As I sit here writing this, Independence Day
celebrations are in full swing around the nation. By nightfall, all
eyes will be turned upward as people wait for the fireworks displays
to begin. When the bright lights fade and the smoky haze clears from
the night sky, we might ask ourselves what's really out there beyond
the limits of our sight? The television and print media are tripping
over themselves to catch the public interest regarding the 50th
anniversary of the Roswell Incident, making it hard not to consider
the issue of extraterrestrial life.
Something happened 50 years ago in New Mexico. Something fell to
earth. First the military confirmed the incident, then they denied
it. Their final word was that it had been a weather balloon. There is
a reason why people suspect the government and military and this
incident is a prime example. Why make a huge deal out of an incident
when nothing really happened? Why cover-up and bury evidence and
information when there is nothing to the circulating stories? If a
weather balloon had fallen to earth in Roswell, why was it necessary
to suppress the flow of information?
I understand the government's reasons for suppressing information
in certain situations and I can allow that there are additional
circumstances of which I am unaware that require just as much
protection. Certainly, it would seem necessary to keep new technology
under wraps, so if the "weather balloon" had actually been a cutting
edge prototype plane, I'd be the first person to cry "no foul". But
when a nation is panicking over the idea of aliens and UFOs, it would
seem prudent to simply come clean and say "top secret prototype" with
the hope that people would support the government's efforts and the
panic and curiosity would subside. This might be hard to get away
with in 1997's climate of curiosity and paranoia, but this was
America in 1947.
One of the problems with the prototype theory is the fact that
multiple witnesses reported seeing alien lifeforms. I have trouble
believing that all of the people would mistake a human pilot of such
a craft for an alien. Even harder to swallow is the current story
being floated that these "aliens" were crash test dummies. Without
knowing any of the witnesses personally, I'd like to give them a bit
more credit rather than assume they were unable to discern a
mannequin-like, crash test dummy from a human or alien victim. I've
seen footage of the witnesses who were interviewed then and now and
they don't seem like crackpots, which lends some validity to their
impressions and statements.
1947 was quite a year for sightings of UFOs. The first flying
saucer was spotted not long after nuclear weapons were tested in
Alamogordo, which is just a hop, skip, and a weather balloon flight
from Roswell. It's not surprising that people might be concerned
about radiation and that their fears about mutations might expand to
encompass aliens. Maybe America's scientists had sent up a huge
signal to outer space with the detonation of their weapons of mass
destruction? Sightings of UFOs escalated and soon their alien pilots
were accused of abducting our citizens for testing purposes. This is
where my ability to believe is really challenged.
The idea of extraterrestrial life is easy to believe. It seems
highly likely when one considers the number of galaxies and planets
in the universe. To believe that our planet is being visited by other
lifeforms is a bit more difficult, but not impossible. It would mean
that their planets are relatively near our own or that their
technology far outstrips our own. Considering the great strides we've
made in the last century alone, this isn't hard to believe. Where my
ability to believe falters is when these "aliens" are purported to be
abducting people and playing chicken with our military and civilian
aircraft. Who are these aliens? Did we somehow become the main drag
for alien weekend cruising? Does our blue planet for some reason
attract the dregs of alien society?
If these visitors are so advanced, I can't understand why they
would be wreaking havoc with our collective psyches. Back in the
early 40's, we may have exploded a beacon for other worlds and, if
they did come to visit, they might have decided to "abduct" some of
our citizens for study. But why would they need to take them more
than once and why would they still be here 50 years later, continuing
their research? How long does it take to catalogue and study the
human body? The idea that aliens find us so incredibly interesting
that they would not only abduct us, but continue the practice for
years, is hard for me to fathom. It's much easier to believe the
studies showing sleep paralysis as a possible alternative to
abduction and, with so many "sightings" and "abductions" filling the
collective conscious, people have no trouble filling in the blanks
when pressed for details.
It's difficult for me to believe that there is no
extraterrestrial life. Anyone who has seen the Hubble Deep Field
images can begin to understand just how small our little corner of
the universe really is. I even go so far as to buy into the stories
of aviators who have seen UFOs during their hours logged in the skies
over our blue planet. It's a bit harder for me to believe every
picture, video, or reported sighting when my own eyes can so often
deceive me. I'm one of those people that needs hard evidence or,
ideally, the chance to make a sighting firsthand. In the absence of
proof, I'll mark the anniversary of the Roswell Incident with a
distinct feeling that something more than a weather balloon and a
crash test dummy dropped in on that New Mexico landscape. With all
the fabrication, hand-waving, and document shredding that the
government is guilty of on a daily basis, this may be the most any of
us ever knows.



This page hosted by
Get your own Free Home
Page