SECTION III — SLIDES AND RESEARCH ON BACON AND
AMERICA
by Linda S. Schrigner
58a
In this 17th Century treatise Spinoza expressed
Rosicrucian doctrines of universal laws and principles, involving metaphysics
and mysticism, in a way that would have called down the Church authorities
for heresy and/or unorthodoxy, even in the new Age of Enlightenment in
which he lived. However, the book by its full name, Ethica
ordine geometrica demonstrata,
was not published until a year after his death in 1677. Spinoza
also wrote other landmark papers, including Tractatus
Theologico-Politicus, which also
would have been a powerful influence upon 17th and 18th Century thinking
behind plans for Bacon's
New Atlantis. It was an explanation
against the continuing civil and religious interference in individual free
thought, inquiry and written or spoken expression. (Please
see Spinoza article in the Bibliography)
In so many words, Spinoza's ...Ethics explained why natural laws, being immutable, inevitably supersede the arbitrary morality of societal laws, because all things must be free to pursue the expression of their true nature. Through theological and esoteric studies, many scientists and spiritual leaders in colonial and revolutionary America had grasped an understanding of the immutability of all natural/physical laws that are universal, function unerring regardless of erroneous human opinion and belief. However, those who would likely be available to teach such deeper ethics at the University of Virginia without truly understanding the underlying universal principles involved, could not be relied upon in that which would have been taught under a general catalogue heading of "Metaphysics". So it is possibly for this reason that Jefferson approved the course of ethics and eliminated the suggestion of metaphysics from the university catalogue. We know that, as were other founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson was a Mason, but was he also a Rosicrucian? |
![]() Spinoza was one of the giants who, because of his consistency with Rosicrucian teachings, the very manner and content of his writings, and certain events in his life, is considered by Rosicrucian leaders today to have been a Rosicrucian. |