|
![]() What's up with that Direct-Drives? If you believe most audiophiles or your local Linn-dealer these are products for clubs or radiostations which don't belong into the home of a true audiophile because they "do not sound". Quite the point a good Direct-Driven Turntable has not that much sound of his own usually less than most (not all) belt-driven suspended or high-mass turntables - not necessarily a bad thing in my opinion considering what HiFi ought to be about...How does it work? What are the advantages? How does it sound? What does it cost? How does it look? Some words about plinths Caveats and Drawbacks How does it work?
In the end of the 60's engineers at National/Technics found that to better the reproduction
of analog records you have to minimize the number of moving parts especially the number of
bearings in a player-system.
The first patent of a direct-drive for record-players goes back to 1929, it belonged to
the suisse company Thorens - which is known among audiophiled mostly for its belt-driven players.
So almost 40 years had to pass until - with the inventions of modern discrete regulation-circuits -
it was finally possible to produce a direct-driven record-player of high quality. What are the advantages?
A huge advantage of a direct-drive record-player is the fact, that the whole mechanical system consists
of just one moveable part (the combined motor-shaft/platter-bearing) which turns quite slow and
has a big mass (the platter) attached to it - almost a mechanical ideal for quiet rotation. The resonance of
the combined motor/bearing assembly lies in the range of 0,5 Hz due to its slow speed compared with the
50/60Hz resonance of the motor of a typical belt-driven turntable.
All belt - or idler-driven record-players incorporate a lot of mechanical parts for adapting
the fast speed of the motor to the comparably slow speed of the platter. Each of this parts
implies an own sonic footprint by inducing resonances and suffering from bearing-tolerances in
this more or less complex mechanical system.
Another advantage of good direct-drive decks is speed-stability. How does it sound
Good direct-drive turntables tend to sound very neutral - they deliver what is on the record
not less and not more, no foot-whipping effects like some scottish belt-drive - just pure
information. Musicality is produced of course, but only if it's on the record. As this is true for the "top-of-the-line"-
models covered on this site forget about most cheaper direct-drives of the same era that flooded
the mass-market during the 70s and 80s.
In the DirectDrive-Museum you will find some recommendable models.
A good direct-drive machine delivers rock-steady positions of instruments, precise timing, high dynamics and razor
sharp transients. Classical music has as much authority and weight like with the best high-mass belt-driven
turntables - but without their timing-problems in the lower registers.
The music lover who is ahead of spectacular effects should give a Technics SP-10MkII, an EMT 948
or a Denon DP-6000 a listen - he might well be surprised...
A good Direct-Drive machine is very expensive to build. A SP-10MkII used to cost around 1000,- Dollars in the 70's, today that might be ten times as much. The EMT 948 pictured above carried a price-tag of 6000,- Dollars in the end of the 70's... Those machines were introduced to the stunning public during the heyday of japanese audio. The yen was low, production-costs were no object and lots of well-eduacated engineers were just waiting to put their expertise and creativity into a new "analog statement-product". At the end of the 70's almost every japanese audio-company had one or two of those flagships in their program, mostly for prestige and image-reasons. Obviously these battleships were calculated in a manner that they were subzidized by the huge sales of their little mass-market brothers. Today those machines seem to be THE ticket for a glimpse of analog nirvana. More about today's prices for differnet models in the DirectDrive-Museum. How does it look?Looking at those machines you clearly see the approach of a company to create a real statement-model, one that you will always associate with that company. No player in that days looked like the other, the designers wanted theit babies look unique and prestigous. Rosewood and brushed aluminium were the ingredients and cost was obviously no object. Build-quality was also exceptional, and these days noone dared to present a record-player without a strobe. Some word about plinths and tonearms
If you want these machines sound as they can you need a dense and heavy plinth and a good
decoupled stand. Many of the turntables in that days were developed as a simple chassis which
the user could place into a plinth of his taste. Plinths offered by the companies looked good
- but in most cases they suffered from resonnances and spoiled the sound
of the players. Apparently plinths offered by Denon, JVC and Sony suffered from this.
On the other hand having the possibility to make an own plinth means that you can somewhat tune
the sound of your turntable for your own system and taste. You can also get the looks you like.
Building your own plinth is covered here.
Caveats and drawbacks
Yes, quite a lot. Almost 90% of the direct-drive record-players of the 70s and 80s were cheap
and nasty machines - this is the real reason for the bad image of the Direct-Drive principle among
most audiophiles. These players were composed out of light plinths, lots of plastic and cheap
materials for platter and main-bearing and flooded the mass-market mostly because they were cheap.
You won't see those models on this site. |
HOME | The Hows And Whys | Owning a DD | Museum | Tech-Talk |