The Evaluation
You will be evaluated according to the scoring rubric introduced below.
SCORING RUBRIC FOR THE POWER POINT PRESENTATION
50 POINTS
Indicator |
Criteria |
Not adequate |
Adequate |
Good |
Excellent |
Use of Information
Content |
Purpose and subject are clearly defined. |
0 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
Information is well organized. |
0 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
The information is correct, relevant and convincing and is backed up by facts and examples. |
0 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
The presentation raised questions and invited curiosity so that the audience wanted to know more. |
0 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
Closure is catchy. Major ideas are summarized and your personal conclusion is presented. |
0 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
Use of Graphics |
Presentation is visually appealing. |
0 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
Power Point functions / skills enhance the presentation. |
0 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
Text - readability and color choices. |
0 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
Use of Graphics. |
0 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
Use of automatic shapes with text added. |
0 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
SCORING FOR THE ORAL PRESENTATION
ACCOMPANYING THE POWER POINT PRESENTATION
(50 POINTS)
Indicator |
Criteria |
Not adequate |
Adequate |
Good |
Excellent |
Use of Information and Content |
Provided depth in coverage of the topic. |
0 2 |
3 5 |
6 - 9 |
10 |
Presentation was well planned and coherent. |
0 2 |
3 5 |
6 - 9 |
10 |
|
Integration of the Power Point presentation into the Oral presentation. |
0 2 |
3 5 |
6 - 9 |
10 |
|
Quality of the work done |
Quality of teamwork: The members speak loud enough. The members speak clearly and look at the audience. |
0 2 |
3 5 |
6 - 9 |
10 |
Participation of each member: The presentation was equally divided. |
0 - 2 |
3 5 |
6 - 9 |
10 |
|
FINAL SCORE: |
Click on the picture of
Adi Avitan to go back to the Web Quest, or go on to the alternative rubric.
SCORING RUBRIC FOR THE EXHIBITION
(50 points)
Indicator |
Criteria |
Not adequate |
Adequate |
Good |
Excellent |
Use of Information
Content |
Purpose and subject of exhibition are clearly defined. |
0 - 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
The pictures/photos/ drawings are relevant and illustrate the message. |
0 - 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
The information accompanying the pictures (captions) is correct, relevant and convincing. |
0 - 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
The exhibition raised questions and invited curiosity so that the audience wanted to know more. |
0 - 2 |
3 - 5 |
6 -10 |
10 |
|
The display of the pictures is well organized, has logical order. |
0 - 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
The exhibition covers various aspects of the subject (different points of views, safety, advantages of skateboarding) and each aspect is committed to convince the audience. |
0 - 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
Use of Graphics |
Presentation is visually appealing. |
0 - 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
Use of various kinds of visual arts: paintings /posters and photographs / drawings that enhance the message of the exhibition. |
0 - 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
Colors and shades are well used and appealing |
0 - 1 |
2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
SCORING FOR THE ORAL PRESENTATION
ACCOMPANYING THE EXHIBITION
(50 POINTS)
Indicator |
Criteria |
Not adequate |
Adequate |
Good |
Excellent |
Use of Information and Content |
Provided depth in coverage of the topic. |
0 - 2 |
3 - 5 |
6 - 9 |
10 |
Presentation was well planned and coherent. |
0 - 2 |
3 - 5 |
6 - 9 |
10 |
|
Integration of the exhibition into the Oral presentation. |
0 - 2 |
3 - 5 |
6 - 9 |
10 |
|
Quality of the work done |
Quality of teamwork: The audience can hear. The members speak clearly and look at the audience. |
0 - 2 |
3 - 5 |
6 - 9 |
10 |
Participation of each member: The presentation was equally divided. |
0 - 2 |
3 - 5 |
6 - 9 |
10 |
|
FINAL SCORE: |
Click on the picture of
Benny Avraham to go back to the Web Quest.
Introduction / Task / Process / Resources / Conclusion / Overview / Pupils' Page