This paper was first written in Fall of 1998; no changes have been made since 2000, and none are planned in the near future. Some of the information within the paper, especially that referring to transgender research, is very old, and has likely been made obsolete by current research.

With those caveats firmly in mind, I hope you enjoy the paper!
ELB

Terms: definitions, causation and statistics

In order to explore this proposition, some terms must first be discussed as they apply to this paper and studies (from recent decades) in sexual orientation. Cross-dressing, or transvestism, (in men) is defined as a fetish in which women's clothing is used for sexual pleasure (Stoller 1968,92). The key to this definition is in the link between cross-dressing and sexuality. Money (228), renames this phenomenon as transvestophilia, and defines it as "a paraphilia of the fetishistic/talismanic type in which sexuoerotic arousal and facilitation or attainment of orgasm are responsive to and contingent on wearing clothing, especially underwear, of the other sex".
Transsexualism is defined as "the conviction in a biologically normal person of being a member of the opposite sex; in adults, this belief is these days accompanied by requests for surgical and endocrinological procedures that change anatomical appearance to that of the opposite sex" (Stoller 1968, 90). Money (203) categorizes transsexualism as a syndrome of gender transposition, called gynemimesis, rather than a paraphilia.
Both transvestism and transsexualism have similar childhood causations. In both cases the father is generally not present during childhood (Rancour-Laferriere 1985, 193; Stoller 1968, 96). This may be expressed by inattention, or may be an actual absence caused by divorce or death of the father. Further investigation into any possible differences between the absent father of the transvestite and the absent father of the transsexual have not been undertaken in any particular depth, however Stoller (1968, 184) states that "from the superficial descriptions...one cannot distinguish the fathers of some transvestites from the fathers of the boy transsexuals".
In both cases the mother provides an influential presence in the son's childhood. In the case of transvestites, the mother has a somewhat destructive need to feminize her son.

These mothers have an unusually strong envy of males which expresses itself in this rather subtle way. There are rare mothers who kill their sons, there are many more who in their hatred of their sons help produce many different neurotic and occasionally psychotic states, and there are some who produce passivity and ineffectualness. The mother of the transvestite shares with these other mothers the need to damage her son, but her technique is different: In order to humiliate him, she makes a little "girl" of him on occasion (Stoller 1968, 183).
This feminization of the son is therefore an intentional act on the part of the mother, which is apparently caused by a resentment of males. The mother of the transsexual, on the other hand, seems not to envy men so much as she identifies with them in some way.
The mother of the transsexual does not apparently intend to feminize her son, but is excessively permissive with her child. The mother and child form an extremely close bond, which is not disturbed by the father due to his absence (either emotional or physical). The extreme intimacy between the mother and son may be characterized by such behaviors as sleeping together during both early and middle childhood. One example is given in the case of an adult transsexual whose mother recalled a childhood "game" she played with her son from age 2 through 8, in which the two curled up together every night in a type of "extrauterine womb" (Stoller 1968, 137).
Additionally, these mothers are exceptionally permissive with their sons, giving them complete freedom to share her privacy. Concerns regarding nudity or bathroom secrecy are non-existent. In addition, the boys are generally not punished for wrongdoings: "the mothers described herein do not even have the capacity to recognize anger they might feel towards their babies" (Stoller 1968, 100). This leads to an inability to ever punish or deny their sons.
Another factor involves the mother's "bisexuality"; rather than referring to sexual behavior, bisexuality in this context refers to "a heavy proportion of sensed and observable thoughts, feelings, and behavior reflecting both masculine and feminine identifications" (Stoller 1968, 112). Consistently, as children the mothers dressed in boys' clothes, associated primarily with boys, and generally behaved as tomboys until puberty. Once the women began to undergo the physical changes of puberty, they each gave up all 'masculine' behaviors and began to dress and act in a more gender-neutral manner. The masculine clothes were replaced by clothes that conveyed the barest of femininity, without excessive makeup or "frills" (Stoller 1968, 95).
Another aspect of transvestite behavior that applies to this paper is the sexual orientation of those who engage in cross-dressing. One study of 504 transvestites found that 89% were exclusively heterosexual, 9% were actively bisexual, and only 1% were exclusively homosexual (Brierley, 34). Although the incidence of transsexualism is itself quite rare, this statistical evidence alone calls into question the belief that Nikolai Gogol was a homosexual transvestite, simply due to the odds against it. On the other hand, all transsexuals insist that they are not homosexuals. They come to consider themselves to be female, despite the facts of their external anatomy (Stoller 1968, 148). Therefore, it is possible that transsexuals would categorize themselves as having a heterosexual orientation in such studies.


Nikolai Gogol - Introduction to Research Paper
Terms and Scientific Background
Biographical Information
Literary Analysis of "The Nose"
Literary Analysis of "Terrible Vengeance"
Psychoanalysis of Female Characters
Conclusion, Sources Cited, and Footnotes
Researched and Written by: Erica Brown
Fall semester, 1998

Course Information:
Russian 166 - Representations of Sexuality in Russian Literature
Instructor: Daniel Rancour-Laferriere
University of California, Davis

This page is © Erica Jean Lindsey Brown, 1998-2006.
http://www.oocities.org/ejb_wd/Gogol2.html

Written permission must be obtained in order to reprint
this material for any purpose.
Contact Erica Brown by email.