Home | Instructional Objectives | Cognitive Domain | Affective Domain | Psychomotor Domain |
Introduction | Definitions | General & Specific | Adapting IOs | IO Parts |
1.
Performance:
What the learner is expected to be able to DO.
2.
Condition: Important conditions under which the performance
is expected to occur.
3. Criterion:
The quality or level of performance that will be considered acceptable.
Visible (overt) Performance:
* Develops a critical understanding
of the importance of effective argumentative writing.
* Given a table of information
about Medical utilizations of Genetic engineering, be able to write a
well-organized argumentative essay of around 700 words. The essay must describe
and define the adopted side using not less than four supporting examples.
What’s
the performance stated in the objective?
You
can see someone drawing but you cannot see him appreciating
or understanding art.
See
if you can tell the difference between performances (doing words) and
abstractions (being words).
stating
writing
valuing drawing
appreciating
internalizing
smiling listing
Covert
(invisible) performance:
How
can we call these performances when nobody can see them? Although some
performances are not visible to the naked eye such as solving, discriminating,
and identifying. We as teachers have to use such instructionally indispensable
abstract performances in our objectives, what shall we do? Add an indictor
behavior to reveal how the covert performance can be directly detected.
An
indicator behavior is one that will tell us directly whether a covert
performance is happening to our satisfaction. It’s simple, direct, and easily
manageable.
Be
able to discriminate uncountable nouns.
Be
able to discriminate (sort) uncountable nouns.
Task:
Place
a check mark beside those expressions that describe performances that you can
see or hear directly (overt). Then for those expressions describing covert
performances, write the simplest, most direct indictor behavior you can think of
that would tell whether the covert performance existed.
(in
the annual awards in Whyners Club). Imagine that you are the master of the
ceremony and you call me up from the audience and bet me a carload of broccoli
that I can’t lift 500-pound barbells sitting on the stage. I agree to the bet
and then quickly get two burly types from the audience to help me, and we lift
the barbells with ease.
“Where’s
my broccoli?” I ask. “Wait a minute” you reply. “You were supposed to
lift those barbells by yourself.” “Oh? You didn’t say that there were any conditions
attached to this performance,” I reply.. “Why didn’t you say so?” “You
should have known that I meant for you to do it by yourself.”
“Sorry. My crystal ball hasn’t come back from the cleaners. You’ll just
have to keep your broccoli,” I say, snickering all the way back to my seat.
“Be
able to hammer a nail …” is different from one that says, “given a brick,
be able to hammer a nail …” Miscommunications can be avoided by adding
relevant conditions to your objective. How? Simply by describing the conditions
that have a significant impact on the performance.
Your
description of the performance’s conditions should be detailed enough to
describe each one of them as to allow the performance to happen.
Examples:
To
increase the communication power of your objective: Add a criterion of
acceptable performance. This will tell students how well they will have to
perform to be considered competent. Using criteria in your objectives, you will
gain some advantage:
Instructor:
You Flunk!
Student:
But I ran the
hundred-yard dash, like you said.
Instructor:
True. But you were too slow
Student:
But you didn’t
say how fast we had to run.
Instructor:
Would I ask you to run if I didn’t
want you to run fast? You should have known
that speed was important.
Conditions:
Dry, level track.
Performance:
Run the hundred-yard dash.
Criterion:
Within fourteen seconds.
Examples:
Given eight pictures and some supporting phrases and vocabulary, be able to write a 500 word paragraph about the discovery of tea within 15 minutes. |
Speed |
With
the help of a dictionary, be able to look up the meaning of a new
vocabulary item within one minute of accuracy. |
Accuracy |
In
an interview, and without references or notes, be able to respond
correctly to questions relating to English Language Teaching.
|
Quality |
Examples about the IO characteristics:
Given six pictures about the discovery of tea, they will be able to order them chronologically in less than 3 minutes.
When giving a table of information about the Aztecs, they will be able to write an organized paragraph of eight sentences about them within 10 minutes.
Given three wrongly punctuated sentences, they will be able to edit them for capital letters, full stops, commas, and apostrophes with more than 90% accuracy.
They will be able to pronounce the five given new vocabulary items with no mistakes.
Adapted from:
Mager
F. Robert, 1997, Preparing Instructional Objectives, A critical tool in the
development of effective instruction, USA