![]() "Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietam servitutem" |
FEDCON:
Death of the American Republic
Presented By F.A.C.T.S.
One story is that many of the common people who opposed federalism openly, were able to take refuge on the vast holdings of land owned by Thomas Jefferson in order to avoid persecution by the federalists. In Jefferson the people always had a true and lasting friend, and this gesture of protecting those who came to him for help, could have cost Jefferson much more than just the money he was losing to help feed and protect those who came to him for shelter and protection. But Jefferson was a friend of real American patriotism and he could not turn his back on these patriots who had lost everything they owned in defense of their dreams. There are some good historic facts and other indicators available, to point to the probable conclusion that this was a story that most likely occurred. The actions and concerns of Jefferson made the outcome clear and positive for many poor people; they would survive.
Fortunately for the common people Thomas Jefferson was elected President in 1800, and he quickly did something about the many people imprisoned under the Alien and Sedition Acts. Early in his term as President, Jefferson pardoned all of those who had spoken out against the Federal government and were jailed as a result of their actions. Further restraints were imposed on the unconstitutional and overly harsh Alien and Sedition Acts by Jefferson, and for the two terms that Jefferson was President, the masses of people in America were able to live a little more freely, but by 1810 all of that would change for the last time.
An afterthought to the Sedition Acts for the masses of people in America to consider; in 1964 the Supreme Court "informally" ruled that the Sedition Acts were unconstitutional, but the High Court stopped short of overturning the acts altogether. This leaves open the speculation that the government could reincarnate them, and in the recent past there have been numerous sedition type acts passed by the Federal government. It is troublesome to think that any of those laws could be reapplied to oppress the people and their free speech, but it is a very real possibility considering the direction that the United States is presently taking. Sedition type laws are a serious threat to the common people and no matter how they are viewed, those types of laws are a direct violation of the basic human rights that are embodied in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
With the defeat of the federalists in 1800, at the hands of the anti-federalists, it became clear to the federalists that they needed a better approach to deal with the masses of common people and government. As a result of the election and clearly open hostility to their form of government, the federalists moved their machinery into the background and started using a silent and secretive campaign of underground tactics to achieve the results that they wanted. The federalist defeat at the hands of Jefferson in 1800 had signaled that the federalists were vulnerable, and the powers of federalism knew that if they were to maintain their power and control, then they could no longer afford to expose themselves openly. The federalists had learned that open exposure could very well be the one thing that could defeat the power and control of federalism.
So the federalists slipped into their dark and evil shadow of disguise and deception, and then quickly moved to consolidate their strength.
First it would be necessary for the federalists to maintain some control over the selection of the President and secondly it would be necessary for Congress to be under the full control of federalism. The Federal courts were not a problem as the federalists already had full control over that branch of the government.
Reducing the amount of representation in government that the common people could have became one main goal of the federalists, but the plan to take control of the representation would have to be flexible enough so as not to alert the masses of common people as to what was going on. The plan would also have to be long term so that federalism could survive over a long time span, and this goal could be accomplished by establishing a two party political system that the federalists would quietly control from the background. Make it appear to the common people as if there were real differences in the two parties, yet fuse the central control of both parties secretly to the control of the select few. With the Federal courts in their control and with the representation of the masses of the people under the control of federalism, it would not be very hard for the federalists to keep and maintain the control over the people and the government that they needed.
History has correctly proven that the federalists were more than just a little correct in the orientation and strategy of their planning.
President Jefferson was never able to stop the damage that federalism had inflicted on the government, as the Courts and Congress remained under federal control and within that climate there was not much Jefferson could do to contain the growth of federalism in America. Jefferson's saddest reality in life, was that he had to view an America that had failed to achieve the full independence, freedoms, and liberties that the common people had fought and died so hard to bring about and preserve.
For Jefferson's believing in a true and real "republic" and in "We the People," he died on July 4, 1826, on the verge of financial bankruptcy, but his faith in America and the common people never wavered. Thomas Jefferson remains to this day as the true father of America because of his strong beliefs in basic human rights, and the title does not justly belong to the likes of federalists like George Washington, who in actuality sold out the grand American "republican" experiment and the common people to the powers and forces of federalism.
Armed with a new agenda the federalists quickly set about the task of solidifying their control over the government and the common people. Doing their correct federalist duty, Congress on December 9, 1803 proposed the 12th Amendment to the Constitution and sent it to the States to be ratified and within one year the amendment was ratified and proclaimed part of the Constitution. This was the first amendment in a long string of amendments and laws that the federalists would use to maintain control over the Presidency, the Congress, the States, and the people.
The 12th Amendment was sold to the people under the premise that the amendment would correctly clarify the constitutional question over the election of the President. Similar excuses would be used to clarify the Constitution over the years to come. The correct definition for clarify as used by federalism, using anti-federalist definitions, is to call it the misconstruction of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
If one finds a good strategy, then stay with it appears to have been a well adopted tactic that is followed by the federalists. The only problem with a repeat strategy, is that this type of strategy has weak flaws when used over and over, and eventually the strategy exposes your flaws and unprotected flank to an eventual attack by those paying close attention to your moves. Soon, what was yours becomes theirs, but who said federalists had any brains.
With the Presidency under semi-control for years to come, by virtue of a string of amendments and laws, the federalists set about with the problem of representation in Congress. One early method to control representation included the use of inaccurate Census records, but this had serious public risks if the people were ever to wise up. A more refined way would be to "apportion" the representation as the Federal government saw fit and they could sell this to the common people as an accurate way to guarantee equal representation. The passage and Ratification of the 14th Amendment by force of arms in 1868 formalized the apportionment of representation, but informally apportionment had been going on since 1789 when an amendment for reapportionment had failed to be ratified by the States. The reapportionment legislation was finally made a part of the Constitution by tacking the necessary clauses onto the 14th Amendment. In 1929 Congress passed the Reapportionment Act and set the "permanent" number of House members in Congress at 435 members and this resulted in there being one representative for every 495,000 people in 1977. The threat of the masses of common people having any fair and equal representation in government had been fully extinguished by the powers of federalism.
While 435 representatives may look good at first to the uninformed person, it is really a false deception of what the actual number of representatives should be if the actual and truthful intent of the Constitution were actually being followed. In 1792 there was approximately one representative for every 30,000 people in America as decreed by the original meaning of the Constitution. The dissimilarity of House members continued to shrink as a result of federalism and by 1868, with the passage of the 14th Amendment, the margin widened. The margin between the people and their number of Representatives continued to widen even more in 1929 when the permanent number of Representatives was set at 435. In 1977 there was one representative in the House for every 495,000 people in America, and in 1998 that difference grew to approximately one Representative for every 700,000 people in America, and the disparity between the people and their representatives continues to widen at an ever-increasing rate.
It took until approximately 1929 for the federalist conspiracy to achieve much of their plan for the total domination of government in America. A large part of the federalist success in America is owed to the large number of people that have immigrated to America that were ignorant to the facts of what America and the Constitution were really all about. Most of the immigrants only saw a better way to live via the monetary system of America and not the actual benefits that the Constitution could give to them and their children. After all, they were slaves in the countries they came from, and the federalists in America only viewed the immigrants as a slave labor force that could be easily manipulated to benefit American federalism.
It has also made no difference to the federalists, that in order for them to maintain control that countless lives were lost over the years fighting wars to improve their position. It has not mattered to the federalists that the Constitution was trashed and countless lives wrecked due to federalist tampering. All that has mattered to the federalists is their continued way of life and the control of the people and the government, because control of the government and the labor force only means more money and greater benefits for the select few.
Equal and fair representation by the common people in the House of Representatives could have prevented many of the past and current problems in America and the rest of the world, but federalist profits and gains have always come above all else. This is still very much the same case in 1998.
Based on an approximate population of 250 million people in America and on the original basis of equal and fair representation of one representative for every 30,000 people, there should be approximately 6,250 Representatives in Congress in 1998. This is far different than the 435 Representatives that currently are in the House of Representatives, and this lack of equal and fair representation in government by the common people clearly establishes that there is no "republic" in America, and it also shows just how much federalism has taken away from the common people of the United States by stripping away basic human rights found in the original Constitution.
The voice of the people are totally under represented in all the legislative bodies of government that exist in America today, but for the federalists to stay in control that is exactly what the federalists require. With the federalists probably only capable of holding onto the 435 seats they have in the House of Representatives it is easy to understand why they do not want anymore representatives - the federalists would lose control of America and the world. Worse yet to the Federal government, would be the rule by all of the people, primarily the common class and the largest fear among federalists may be the more even distribution of wealth among the masses of people.
Fears of a "republic" haunt and stalk the federalist psyches and as many people know, fear is the great initiator of mistakes that leads to exposure and vulnerability. The establishment of a government with equal and fair representation within government only starts spelling out a R-E-P-U-B-L-I-C to the federalists, but for the common people a true "republic" spells out freedom from the tyranny of the select few. Maybe its about time that federalism started enjoying a little fear.
By enforcing the original intent of the Constitution and by guaranteeing to the common people their basic human right to fair and equal representation within government, the people of the United States would be well on the way to righting the wrongs committed against them by the Federal government. America and the world could start moving into the next millennium with some real meaning and purpose, and as a people united, Americans could start leading the world into the balance & harmony that brings about true world peace.
Representation without the benefit of being equally and fairly included in that representation is tyranny at its worst and involuntary servitude at best, and is totally counterproductive to the creation of world peace. It is a crime against the basic human rights of the people and a crime against the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the United States.
In order to establish fair and equal representation of the common people within government, the first step will have to involve an election and campaign process that will allow for all the candidates to seek and obtain office on an equal and fair basis. There cannot be any unfair advantage whatsoever, especially in the solicitations of votes through an unfair advantage by virtue of having more money. No unfair advantages caused by monetary differences should be allowed and only in this manner will the process of fair and equal representation for the common people be sustained. This will guarantee that the fair and equal voice of all the people will be heard and felt in government.
Congress has always had the power to affect such legislation as necessary to carry out this principal of fair play, but they have failed to act in such a manner because it has not been to their benefit or that of the federalists. Rather, the Congress has been obligated to act in an arbitrary manner to protect federalism and ignore the basic human rights of the common people.
For the common people to have any voice within government, Congress is going to have to legislate laws that will guarantee elections that are free and open to all the people. The common people must have access to positions of power within government for America to work.
When any individual outside or within government resists the will of federalism that individual will be made to conform to what the federalists want. Federalists control those that resist by manipulation, intimidation, slander, blackmail, and anything else that will solve the problem of bringing them under control, and people like John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. serve as excellent modern day examples of the type of power and actions that federalists are willing to exert in order to maintain their control. Eventually the attempts to control are successful and most of the time it is only greed that is necessary to accomplish that control, but every so often more serious measures are taken to insure the domination of federalism.
Over the last chapter we have seen how the power of federalism was applied over an extended period of time to seize and maintain control of the common people and the government since America was founded. The historical facts have shown how the federalists immediately established the Federal government and how those events violated the basic human rights of the common people of America. Facts have been presented that prove the Constitution was misconstructed for the federalists own benefit at the expense of the American people, and continuing problems in America and the world prove how negative the Federal form of government is to the welfare of world peace. Continuing events in America and the world show how federalism has brought about much of the social problems that exist in the world today, but one of the saddest facts shown is that the people of America continue to show no real concern about the path of oblivion that federalism is plunging the world headlong into.
The American people have shown utter disregard and concern for their plight and as to date have not chosen to correct the problems and sufferings around them. The people in America want all that America provides, but they need to understand that want of things has come with a very dear price, it has cost and continues to cost them their basic human rights.
It appears that the people of America would rather be slaves to the federalists than be masters of their own lives and self worth. The people of America need to learn the value of the words spoken by William Pitt.
"Any government is free to the people under it where the laws rule and the people are a party to the laws."
For more information about F.A.C.T.S. and any of the
material at this web site, please drop us an Email: