"Gravity is the 4th Dimension because physical matter itself is 4-Dimensional. As Einstein proved and the institution of academic physics(presently insists it) acknowledged sixty-five years and five months ago (as of 10/'76 when this discourse was publicly delivered, at San Francisco CityCollege).
"This means literally, that we are able to make a seemingly absurd prediction with complete confidence that it is not absurd - or even a prediction - at all, but rather an inevitability. That inevitability being that the fundamental material constituents of all apparently solid Universal Matter, i.e., neutrons, protons & electrons and all other so-called 'sub-atomic particles', are not 3-Dimensionally static solids at all, but rather 4-Dimensionally accelerating fields.
"Consider the physical definition of an expanding field. The singular
definition for all expanding field systems is: 'A measurable and definable
area or system of or within space, which is inherently and constantly growing
larger (or smaller).
"Such definable field areas of space may have any number of
dis-similarities. But all manifestations of expanding field energy have in
common one inevitable characteristic.
Consider the comparative relationship of two otherwise totally un-related
fields. Specifically, we will compare the qualities of an ex-panding field of
sound with that of an expanding field of electro-magnetism - which is light.
(Refer p. 49, Illustrations 5 and 6)
"In the example of a field of sound we will consider a simple mechanical
alarm clock which is ringing, but not otherwise moving relative to an
observer. The innermost circle represents the outside diameter of the alarm
clock itself; of course the concentricity’s emanating from center - the
ringing alarm clock - represent the systematic structure of sound waves
projecting omnidirectionally from it. In the case of sound, the field is
expanding from the alarm clock @ slightly less than 1,100 ft. per-second.
Note, that the soundField system which is circumscribed by and contained
within the area encompassed by the outermost (largest; oldest) sound wave is
completely symmetrical; that is to say, it has the same uniform structure in
any direction from the center-source and throughout all of its parts.
"Now, we will consider the above diagram of a ringing alarm clock as a
source of light rather than sound. Whereas, light does not require a
con-ducting medium to support its motion through space from its source, and
sound does, and, whereas light moves at 186,000 miles-per-second as compared
to the l,lOO foot seconds of sound. Nevertheless, what these two comparatively
consid-ered fields do have in common becomes graphically evident when either
or both of them are in motion relative to an observer.
"That commonalty is a very well known phenomenon, originally discovered in
the mid-1800's by the Austrian physicist, Christian J. Doppler. This
pheno-menon is acknowledged to be invariably characteristic of all expanding
fields. It is called 'Doppler effect', or sometimes 'Doppler shift/
contraction'. The definition of which is: 'The contraction of any field system
in the direction of its motion at a rate increasingly proportional to the
velocity of its (center) source'.
"When we consider the field Source to be a ringing alarm clock, we will
observe in that case the indicated left-to-right motion of the alarm clock -
or the right-to-left motion of the observer - to be approximately one-half the
speed of sound.
When we consider the moving source of the field to be a light-field source
rather than a sound-field source, we then consider the left-to-right moving
source or the right-to-left moving observer to be moving at approximately
4/5ths the speed of light.
Under these circumstances, the field is no longer symmetrical. The
structure is not uniform in all directions from the source and throughout all
of its parts. It is instead contracted in the direction of its motion; the
contraction ratio corroborate to relative speed; forming a non-symmetrical
field System; reasonably approximated in the referenced illustration.
"Let it be emphasized here that Doppler contraction is not and has never
been applied to, or recognized as, applicable to Matter.
"I have said that Einstein proved that matter is 4-Dimensional. Yet, I
have also said that Doppler effect has never been applied to matter. This can
only mean that Doppler effect is not applicable to matter; for the inevitable
reason that matter is not an accelerating 4-Dimensional field after all. Or,
that Doppler field contraction is actu-ally applicable-to and exhibited-by
matter, but that this application - like the 4th Dimension itself - has yet to
be recognized. Another 4-DIMENSIONAL ULTIMATUM; if you will, and, even for
that matter, if you will not. (There is nothing to negotiate:)
Turn. Or Burn. (Pivot Or Divot) Continued:
"Either, matter is found to exhibit Doppler shift and is therefore
re-confirmed to be 4-Dimensional. Or, matter does not exhibit any evidence of
Doppler shift, and, therefore, cannot possibly be a 4-Dimensionally expanding;
accelerating field.
"Presently, to briefly introduce for review one of the several unexpectedly
discovered prevailing conditions of reality; derived yet once again directly
from Einstein's combined Theories of Relativity.
Its original technical derivations are the mathematical equations of the
Dutch physicist, Hendrik Antoon Lorentz. Einstein's functional incorporation
of the Lorentz equations within Relativity Theory, are, for this reason now
totally acknowledged-among and familiar-to the physical science community at
large. Specifically these equations are termed, ''the Lorentz/Lorentzian
Electromagnetic Equations'. Suc-cessfully and covariantly employed by Einstein
to describe the behavior of sub-atomic ‘particles’, combined with Maxwell’s
electro-magnetic equations.
Although H. A. Lorentz originally intended their application exclusively
to moving sources (‘particles’/’charges’) of electromag-netism or light,
Einstein very interestingly found another and quite unexpected application for
them. Specifically, Einstein discovered that Lorentzian Electromagnetic Field
Transformations are descrip-tively applicable to matter (in motion) itself.
(A recurring echo in the acoustically unimprovable halls of science?)
((What?))
The term, 'Lorentz Transformations' may sound somewhat form-idable. What
is mathematically and faithfully described here is still however,
non-mathematically, already familiar to all of you.
To quote non-mathematically, exactly what Lorentz Transform-ations
describe, by way of what Einstein categorically proved: 'Matter : contracts in
the direction of its motion at a rate increasingly proportional to its
velocity'.
That is to say, matter, be it rocket or rhinoceros, and all of its
contents, contracts in the direction of its motion at a Lorentzian measured
rate increasingly proportional to its velocity. A brief but excellent
non-mathematical elaboration of this fact can be found on page 190 of THE
EVOLUTION OF PHYSICS, by Albert Einstein and Leopold Infeld. More elaborate
documentation of this fact is available in any advanced physics text on
Relativity. This is Fact #3.
"I call this Einsteinian phenomenon of the Lorentzian contraction of Matter,
'MassField Doppler Effect'. It not only re-confirms that Matter is a
4-dimensionally expanding field, it also proves once again that gravity is
the 4th Dimension.
One may quite reasonably ask why Einstein's successful and renowned
applications of Lorentzian electromagnetic Field Trans-formations to Matter:
have never been recognized as MassField Doppler Effect.
That is an extremely relevant question, and it has an equally fascinating
and yet familiar 'answer' - that being that anyone and everyone can 'see' and
therefore 'knows' that Matter, that is to say, physical reality at large 'is
not' expanding.
* ‘If matter was made up of a disturbed areas, it would by now have spread
outward indefinitely, which obviously it is not’: * who said it, establishing
the present day status quo of subjectively rejecting objective proof(s); under
what circumstances, will be revealed in documentary format, shortly.
"Now, to present an abbreviated but entirely accurate description of yet
another proven and still unrecognized fact which furthermore categorically
confirms that Matter is 4-Dimensionally expanding. The allotted time does not
permit elaboration of all the details of the involved experiments, but more
importantly, the source of this information will be provided, and especially
the world-endorsed scientific response to its proven and acknowledged results.
"The most popular sources include a renowned book on physics written by the
late and eminent physicist, J.W.N. Sullivan. It is very appropriately
entitled, THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE.
"On pages 100 and 101 of the hard cover edition of that title, the author
is describing an experiment and discovery (entailing the controlled
*bombardment of singular-atomic-thickness gold plates/ filaments; *with
subatomic particles); originally fulfilled by physicist, G.P. Thompson
(Incidentally, G.P.Thompson is not to be confused with J. J. Thompson who was
the discoverer of the electron some decades earlier).
"What G.P.Thompson did in 1937, when technology finally per-mitted him to
be the first to plunge into the sub atomic/ microcosmic realm of so-called
'particles (‘electrons, protons, neutrons’; et al - ‘sub-atomic particles’)',
was to overtly and experimentally discover and mathematically and repeatedly
re-confirm that the ultimate physical constituents of matter - that is,
neutrons, protons, and elec-trons - are not reducible to the anticipated
microcosmic, 3-dimen-sional particles having specifically defined
boundary-’surfaces’; dis-continuous from surrounding space. Instead,
G.P.Thompson, dis-covered that neutrons, protons and electrons are microcosmic
charges of undulating electric field energy (‘disturbed areas’), having no
definite boundary surfaces whatsoever separating them from their surrounding
space.
" Because of the outcome of G.P.Thompson's original experiment and many
other related experiments since then, physical science today formally
recognizes, acknowledges, and categorically states, that two or more physical
entities: be they individual neutrons, pro-tons or electrons, or billiard
balls in collision, or automobiles moving in opposite directions at 90 miles
per hour and colliding head-on: never actually touch or contact one another.
The subjective term ‘touch', and even the objective term 'contact'
directly imply and require one surface meeting another surface. Of course,
for all subjective purposes in the human experience, the terms 'touch' and
'contact' are perfectly acceptable. We observe that apparently solid
3-Dimensional substance has apparently discontinuous surfaces, therefore we
intelligently - but in this case incorrectly - assume that all solid material
substance including that of our own bodies, is ultimately constituted-of and
reducible-to solid 3-D particles; also having discretely defined
surface-boundaries, discontinuous from surrounding space.
"G.P. Thompson's original discovery that there are only charges of
electricity; which ‘somehow influence each other at-a-distance-across space’,
evoked the following commentary from Lord Bertrand Russell:
'No two particles of matter ever come into *contact. When they get too
close, they move off'. - p.126 THE ABC OF RELATIVITY. (Refer p. 49,
Illustration 7. Mutually opposing field’s of two charges/ particles; in
oppositional collision)
All of this is to review and clarify the context in which it is an
observed and acknowledged physical fact that *no two or more phy-sical
entities ever actually touch or contact each other.
"On the other hand, this conclusion is reached by way of the unanimously
agreed upon and yet quite incorrect assumption that the field produced by
atomic and sub-atomic structures - which Thompson refers to as 'disturbed
areas' - is not a physical con-stituent of those structures.
Although it is proven that any two or more material systems never actually
contact each other, it is invariably observed and agreed that they do have, to
say the least, an 'influence' on one another. Which influence must, because
they do not touch or contact, be attributed to conflicting field forces.
"On this premise and for this reason, any answer to any question or
consideration of whether or not two or more bodies touch, is entirely
dependent upon the popular as well as literal interpretation of what is
actually meant or circumspectly intended - in what qualified context - by and
in the practiced; applied terms: 'Matter' and/or 'physicality'. Discontinuity
is as a concept, displacing continuity; where the latter manifests in patently
mea-sured reality. A political coup in theoretical physics. Nobel Prize
material in the department of hasty discoveries. A series of historically
obscure quick fixes (little denials), culminating into what only now surfaces
as a major cover-up. A Time Of The Signs.
Ostensibly, contemporary physics refuses to acknowledge or term an
ener-getic field entity, ‘Matter’ (instead, grotesquely calling it ‘an
unstable; dis-turbed area’), even though that field entity disallows the
simultaneous occu-pation of its space by any other field entity. That is to
say summarily, these two qualities observed of field entities are quite
literally the formal definition of matter. That definition being: 'That which
possesses inertia and occupationally demands 3-Dimensions of Space'. That is
Fact #4.
"There is still more to this.
Sullivan comments furthermore
on pages 103 & 104 of THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE:
‘These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space
indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed
area is the electron. Because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and
if the matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it
would have spread indefinitely' .
(Holy Smokes! The church is on fire?)
Thompson (as described by Sullivan, Ibid.), repeatedly checks the
experiment and its mathematical confirmation; repeatedly gets the same
results, and then dismisses the entire finding. Perished the disturbing
thought. (Presto?) Before it spread indefinitely (Poof?). Along with
everything else that couldn’t possibly be expanding. Even though he just
proved otherwise (((Voila?))). Saved the physical universe from four
dimen-sional expansion. Been keeping General Relativity’s most famous
dimension, flash frozen in three dimensions ever since. Einstein’s 4-D
universe is not an option in today’s academia. Ostracized - banned;
anathematized - from the classroom. The on again off again, hit and miss
dimension.
Why? Because it can’t - ‘mustn’t ‘- be where it is: Everywhere .
(Simple Simon? Out Damned spot?)
"The entire (perpetually trashed) finding is none other than Albert
Einstein's allegedly 'immeasurable' and 'incomprehensible' 4-Dimen-sional
Space-Time Continuum. The physically expanding universe... What is happening
here and ever since, is, G.P. Thompson, with J.W.N. Sullivan and the entire
scientific community (ever since) looking over his shoulder, is opting to
subjectively over-rule and contradict the objectively proven and demonstrated,
prevailing conditional reality, on the now very familiar and equally
over-em-ployed and foregone premise that ‘it appears’ blatantly ‘obvious’ that
Physical Reality-At-Large 'is not' (4-Dimensionally) expanding.
That is to say, Thompson did not simply fail to recognize and acknowledge
the direct implications of his discovery. He and J.W.N. Sullivan refused, and
all physicists since then complicitly continue to refuse to recognize and
acknowledge its meaning and its abundantly measurable, observable, even
prosaically *audible manifestations.
(The very *sound of 4-D gravity is revealed before this dissertation
closes.)
This is hardly exemplary of scientific method.
And, Sullivan, is not through, yet.
Continued Profound (3-dimensional hand wringing)
Disconcertion(s):
"I won't blame any of you who may not believe this next quote. I definitely
don't believe it myself, and it's on pages 103 & 104 of THE LIMITATIONS OF
SCIENCE. AuthorScientist J.W.N.Sullivan, summarily endorses and punctuates
Thompson's dismissal of the experimental results (2+2 must equal 5) How
obvious is it? :
How Obvious It Is:
"As long as we are considering an individual electron, we could be mislead
into thinking that its waves are physical realities. Each electron in fact
demands a 3-Dimensional Space to itself. This makes it obvious that these
waves are merely a mathematical phantom; consequently it is pro-foundly
disconcerting to find that experiment confirms their existence. The apparent
congruity between calculation and experiment must be in some sense illusory.
It is extremely difficult to avoid the conclusion that the experi-ments and
their results have yet to receive their proper interpretation". - Pages 103 &
104 of THE LIMITATIONS OF SCI-ENCE, by J.W.N. Sullivan (again): 'These
disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space indicate
the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed area is
the electron. because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and if the
matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have
spread indefinitely'. And so it has: and continues. That is fact #5.
Extremely Difficult To Avoid Disturbances
In The Recent, Profoundly Disconcerting History Of Science,
Which Have Yet To Receive Their Proper Interpretation
How misled we can be into thinking that waves are physical realities.
Whereas, physical reality at large is ‘ostensibly; obviously’ not expanding.
Making it spotlessly clear that all experimental proofs of the expansion of
the physical universe at large - what is unanimously encountered and uniformly
denied here - are merely mathematical phantoms. The profound disconcertion
being that there’s something going on here that isn’t being recognized, and
we’re afraid someone is going to run into it with its so far unoffered and actively denied proper interpretation, and non-mathematically make it conceptually accessible to everyone,>, before we do. (Boo?). "We could be misled into thinking..." How Indefinitely Spreadable It Is George Gamow, in one mighty peculiar sentence, shows us what’s wrong with Einstein’s Cosmological contribution. ‘Einstein’s Cosmological Constant is unstable, and might *start expanding or contracting at the slightest provoca-tion’. - George Gamow, GRAVITY. (Yes?) ((Well?)) (((Say ‘When’?))) Refer: As You (Squarely) Like It. By William Shakespeare? Dear George Provocateur Gamow: Do let us know when and where it *stops. "The contemporary 4-Dimensional dilemma unmistakably resem-bles the pre-heliocentric era (before Copernicus - 1473 - 1543), where everyone and anyone could 'see' and therefore 'knew' that the entire cosmological universe - the entire heavenly celestial vault - revolved around the earth, east to west; every 24 hours (rather than the earth revolving on its own axis, west to east; creating the illusion that the universe is revolving around it). ‘It is all right to consider, but not to believe (‘they say’): none of what you hear second hand, and half of what you see first hand’. - A Persian parable, paraphrased (Author unknown). The only distinction in this presently subjected case, being of course, that everyone and anyone can 'see' and therefore 'knows' that universal matter - certainly including people and all of their however too often-regrettable paraphernalia and importune trappings - are/is not ('...obviously not'.) expanding (4-Dimen-sional) field(s). Patient: ‘What have I got, Doc?’ Dr. : ‘Have you ever had this before? Patient: ‘Why, yes, I have’. / Dr.: ‘Well. You’ve got it again’. Such a disturbing dynamic would indeed have a dramatically end-less, prohibitively incredible tendency to expansively spread. The very thought is perishable. On Galvanically wired, Pavlovian bell ringing, frog’s leg & knee-kicking contact (‘Ostensibly, *everything is not +expanding’. The 4 dimensionally proven experimental results with its subjectively unprecedented - yet all along - conclusory *object: is discarded the moment +it is 3 dimensionally +subjected. A kind of liberally practiced scientifically compromised, socially acceptable agreement to compromise; to actively misrepresent the power and social role, and certainly the limitations of physical science. Instead, become a politically correctionalized, word-warfare inspired malefactor - an anonymous, nameless, faceless institution of scientific-moral arbitration. As though reality in the human experience can do without morality. Always the first compromised value, in the construction and maintenance of cor-ruption. Meanwhile, back in and digressing to mere, yet to be properly interpreted, fancifully escapist 4-dimensionally ‘illusory, phantom-preoccu-pied, extremely disconcerting reality which has yet to receive proper interpretation..’). "Electrons, protons and neutrons invariably generate and project electromagnetic fields. In Newton's era and long afterwards, the phenomenon of electromagnetism generated by alleged 3-D 'particles' was totally unknown. Matter, be it what Newton called 'particle', or systems of particles such as a planet or star, is simply represented here by and within this solid circle suspended in the center of an otherwise blank page (orbited by question marks suspended in statically suspended,- non-expanding - structureless space). This was before the advent of Field Physics established by Maxwell. (Refer p. 49, Illustration 8) "The existence, structure and dynamics of the electromagnetic field was firstly and most successfully recognized and described in relation to ‘Space and Time’ by the differential equations of the Scot, James Clerk Maxwell, in 1873. The matter (‘particle’, electron, neutron, proton, ‘mass-point’) at the center, generates the apparent and familiar ‘spider web pattern’ of radiating electromagnetic field energy projecting omnidirectionally from its center source (matter generates electricity and gravity proportionate to it’s - the measured source’s - given mass value; size, density). Refer p. 49, Illustration number * 9. (*Note: 5-D electricity moving at right angles out of 4-D matter; 6-D magnetism moving at right angles to the 5th D of electricity. This identification of previously unrecognized dimensions 5 and 6, is clearly and non-mathematically explained and proven on pages 28 and 29, herein.) Prior to this time, Michael Faraday had already recognized the existence of some force originating in material bodies and projecting out of them across Space - but he had also considered this ' force' to be static; that is to say, 'non-expanding' (pre Field Physics). "Moreover, Faraday had no idea of the structure and/or shape/ pattern of the electromagnetic field. Maxwell, on the other hand, proved that electromagnetic fields possess a characteristic and pre-dictable shape and intensity ('field density') in (Classical) Space & Time, and are projected continuously and omni-directionally outward from their alleged 3-D 'particle' sources at a finite velocity; that being 186,282m.p.s. Along Came The Untangled Weave, Warp & Woof Creating an interestingly similar pattern; as that structural transverse projection, so characteristically like a spider-spun web (A natural expression of the inverse square law; projected omni-direc-tionally from its source; more dispersed with distance). With the spider at the center representing the field-generating ‘particle’ (charge of electricity having no distinct boundaries, growing increasingly dense as you approach its center; having no surface, separating it from rather diffusing into> ‘surrounding space’) at the source of Maxwell’s omnidirectionally projecting electromagnetic field. "Incidentally, it was presumed in the Newtonian Classical Mech-anical era, that gravity (‘F’ - ‘the unidentified Force’ in the since adopted universal Newtonian formula for gravity: F=GMM over R2: Force = Gravity x Mass x Motion; squared) acted across Space instantaneously. Out of said ‘particles’ and/or combinant systems of particles. It is since then proven and acknowledged that whatever gravity is (it is politically prohibited from being electricity, or elec-tromagnetism): also moves at the same omni-directional velocity from Matter as does electromagnetic or light energy. "Newton unarguably mastered the description of gravitational effects, while he did not pretend to know, and was careful about specifying that he did not know the causal identity - or even the directional vector - of F (Force=Universal Gravitation). No one else besides this record seems to have allowed for the offered gravitational alternative (that gravity might actually be a repelling force. That Newton’s famous findings allow for that un-known, unpursued possibility; from the preface to the PRINCIPIA); since Newton made a noteworthy point of offering it. "No one on campus is allowed to sharpen a pencil on this dull note. It might wake the big eared - light blinded - Physics teacher. (Mr. Spock has not left the Berkeley or Lawrence Livermore building or black hole engulfed holodeck? Obviously the earth is not moving rotationally on it’s own axis; generating the illusion imparted on all of it’s inhabitants that the universal celestial vault is rotating around the earth; rather than conversely. The archaic, pre Copernican era resides with us ever since, as a place to start realizing that sometimes we misunderstand things as being the other way around, from the way things really are. Newton allows for it. Einstein requires it. But Carl Sagen and his friends don’t allow for or require it. On the contrary, they reject it altogether. Keeping their podiatry appointments under the famously golden arches. Entrenched in the Sandwitch EYEland wars. Bah Humbug - and strawberry jammie business - burgers. Having One’s Tea While Explosively Spilling It Also, continued: ‘Obviously the universe is not made up of a bunch of disturbed areas. Because, if it was, by now it would have spread indefinitely’. (The professional kiss of death) - J.W.N (Cuckoo’s Nest). Sullivan and G.P. Thompson (Rocket Scientists?) Note: the obvious is not put into words here. The obvious being that the physical - as well as spatial - universe is found to be *expanding. Whereas, that inevitably *descriptive word - expanding - is displaced with ‘spread indefinitely’ - as though this play on persuasively weird words were 15 year old Brooke Sheilds for CALVIN KLEIN, or the less expensive dairy substitute - something besides the real thing (not endorsed by COCA COLA, or ‘the polls’). Note also, J.W.N. Sullivan’s (LIM-ITATIONS OF SCIENCE) and George Gamow’s reference to expanding charges of electricity (‘particles’): they are not called that. Instead, they are cunningly referred to as ‘unstable’, and ‘disturbed areas’ (On medical hold?) You Rang ? Dear Mr. Sullivan, Thompson, Gamow (and associates). In spite of your profound misunderstandings contingent to the second law of thermodynamics - what you call applications of entropy, and a universal explosion you perceive and promulgate as ‘beginning creation’. Nonetheless, with all these counter-scientific and sacrilegious handicaps: you are still uniformly spread out more and more indefinitely, and: in the security of all your professional and social company, you are getting (ever) warmer. Spreading - and only humanly being - further and further out, and ever more disturbed. Becoming exactly as three dimensionally small, as the universe becomes four dimensionally larger around you. Squared..(Refer: Black holes. Where Mr. Flatlander & Co. do bus-iness and residence without the 4th dimension. Refer: Go: Maggot Brain) P.S. The allegory ‘indefinite spread’ is really extremely well defined (refer, Sir Isaac Newton’s droning gravitational alternative drivel, and Albert Einstein’s monotonously four dimensional, accelerating babble, and so on and so forth, Proving a steady state universe; blah blah). Having to do, for ex-ample, with anytime you or anyone else drops - or in any way projects, spits or hurls - anything at all at any time, anywhere on or near this planet. A mighty potentially disturbing, profoundly disconcerting, tea leaf reading and spilling thought. A series of very familiar - prophetically self fulfilling and maintaining - false interpretations, orbiting the same alleged. sleep inducing, ‘unresolvable problem’. (Cy Wannarka’s English Ire is stirred here.) Everytime the cursing mathematician at the blackboard drops his chalk, the reputed, immeasurable and incomprehensible answer continues to elude his (‘highly trained’) precipitating powers of observation. Outfinding Dr. Livingston, patrolling vigilantly on the popularly presumptuous river of denial. Out! Damned Spot(s)!, continued: Another Statically Overlooked, Expanding Ultimatum "Thereby and thence, it was Maxwell from whom we learned that the presumed static field, already known to originate-with and project-from Matter, is actually expanding - thereby generating a perfect Natural expression of the geometric LAW OF THE INVERSE SQUARE. Projecting and distributing the same amount of energy, omnidirectionally from matter sources; over an increasingly greater area, at the speed of light. A field unfolding outwardly that way per light wave and/or system of light waves, without end. It is noteworthy also that the Inverse Square Law of Electro-Magnetism, like its velocity (that of light), is likewise, equally applicable to gravity; whatever else gravity may be. It is emphasized here that gravity is not acknowledged or recognized to be electromagnetism. We will return shortly to further consider this vainly grid-locked, conceptually superstitious, Ivy League mesmerizing bogey. "The formula with which Maxwell successfully described and predicted the structure and dynamics of the previously unknown (presumed static) ElectroMagnetic Field are now of course very well renowned as, 'Maxwell's ElectroMagnetic Equations'; describing the much-controversied, newly recognized and acknowledged field forces. "In consideration of what Einstein called a 'TOTAL FIELD THEORY', it is consistently said that Maxwell's ElectroMagnetic Equations are not (POST-FIELD PHYSICS) applicable to the alleged 3-D static 'particles', because Maxwell's Equations describe expanding energy exclusively, and, 'therefore break-down at the non-expanding sur-face of the particle'. The in-place, 4th dimension-excluding, 3-dimensional filibuster. "Yet, since Maxwell, we long ago unexpectedly discovered that the alleged 3-D particle does not have a surface, and in fact is not even a particle at all, but an electrical charge of energy which simply be-comes increasingly more dense towards its center. A charge of elec-tricity fulfilling the formal identity of particular matter. Ostensibly, having been ‘doing this’, all along, as it were. That is Fact #6. "As you can see, we keep finding new ways to make the same mistake. Sternly defining the universe for Mother Nature. Informing her of her ways. Her limitations. What is natural to, and expected of her. Levity Is Neither The 5th Nor 6th Dimension. Whereas, electromagnetism is both. Here’s how it happens all the time: "The non-mathematical identification of the 4th Dimen-sion enables among other things, the unprecedented discov-ery and identification of two previously unrecognized Phy-sical Dimensions Of Reality beyond the 4th dimension of physical ('apparently 3-D') matter. Again, these two 'new' Dimensions are not really 'unknown' or 'inexperienced' at all; merely unrecognized. In compliance with the geometric definition for dimensions, if anything moves at right angles from the 4th Dimension, then what-ever that something is, is also the 5th Dimension. After Maxwell we learned of the existence and especially the structural quality and dynamics of the electromagnetic field (Refer, Illustration 9, p. 49). Specifically, we learned from Maxwell that something does in fact move at right angles out of (4-D) matter, and that 'something' is electricity. Therefore Electricity Is The 5th Dimension. (Not a video game?) Including all video games. And gamers. (The goal is to take out all resistance to enter the science halls and kill everyone in the building and optionally suicide or surrender and say hello to mom and the neighborhood and Oliver Stone and Brooke Shield’s spread-eagled, virgin 15 year old CALVIN’s on Ted Koppel’s NIGHTLINE. Where the routinely reported ‘plummeting crime rate’ continues to astound experts and defies all laws of gravity and Olympic diving. And now, back to our economically booming regular broadcasting schedule. All of this and much more is inclusive of the proposed, prevailing five dimensional, electrically defined parameters). "Again, in compliance with the geometric definition for Dimensions, if any measurable entity moves at right angles from/to the 5th - whatever else it may be: it is also the 6th dimension. Indeed. Some-thing does (invariably) move at right angles to/perpendicular from 5 dimensional electricity, and that something is magnetism. Therefore, magnetism Is The 6th Dimension. "Of course, in order to recognize and identify The 5th & 6th Dimensions Of Electricity & Magnetism, one must first of all acknow-ledge and recognize The 4th Dimension Of expanding Matter & accel-erating Gravity. From which is projected the 5th and 6th physical dimensions of electromagnetic reality (acting at a distance across space; projecting the law of the inverse square; at the speed of light; ‘just like gravity’ - in fact finding gravity and electromagnetism to be, in every sense of the word, one and the same: a unified field). "We may - presently opportune to - know, gravity on earth is caused by the electromagnetic 4-Dimensional acceleration of Matter. This generates a mechanical pushing or repelling force on or near the surface of major gravitational masses (such as planets); as clarified within Einstein's elevators of The General Principle. But, how does this account for action-at-a-distance across Space; generating atmospheric, oceanic and terrestrial tidal effects for example, and sustaining the orbiting of the planets? *Why don’t their orbits collapse; why don’t they all (stellar objects, galaxies, stars, et al) collapse upon and/or collide with each other, through mutual gravitational attraction? (As Isaac Newton himself asked, and considered to be the major unresolved flaw in his own revolutionary system... *Two and a quarter centuries later, Einstein resolved Newton’s problem with the Cosmological Constant - a repelling force paralleling conven-tionally perceived gravity, but acting in the opposite direction...) "The answer to Newton’s question is not in the 4-dimensional MassField gravity, on or near the surface of accelerantly expanding material systems - but rather the 5 & 6 dimensional ElectroMagnetic field generated by and projecting at right angles from material - 4 dimensional - sources. "That is to say, material bodies on or near the apparent surface of matter are gravitationally influenced to 'fall', or remain (mechan-ically-inertially/direct-contact/surface-to-surface) pinned against the earth's 4-Dimensionally accelerating surface. On the other hand, action-at-a-distance - specifically tidal effects and the orbiting of planets & moons - is gravitationally motivated by the 5th & 6th Dimensions of electricity and magnetism, respectively. "Another way of realizing this is, when you are near and above a large 4-dimensional MassField, you fall. In fact you will fall to earth eventually, even when you are as far as 3,999 miles from it. You orbit for a long time at that distance, but eventually your orbit deteriorates and you fall. This is true of any orbiting body at any distance less than 4,000 miles above the earth. 4,000 miles is also the earth’s radius. Beyond that distance your orbit is permanent; that is to say, you do not fall. "Summarily, in the case of permanent orbit you are repelled away from 4-D MassField Earth and kept in ever enlarging, spiral shaped orbit by the 5th & 6th Dimensions of ElectroMagnetism. The Electro-Magnetic fields of the planets (for example) are reciprocally conflicting with the electromagnetic field of the Sun (emits about one billion tons of radiantly transitory matter every four minutes). Hence, planets cannot fall into the Sun; due to their mutual oppo-sition from (and toward) it - and they cannot escape it either. Arranged exactly in the orders and orbits of Newton’s indomitably calculated, universally gravitating vouchsafe. Unarguably caused by a pulling force or a pushing force. Or both a pulling and pushing force. Mechanically pushing at near distances and electromagnetic-ally pulling and/or pushing at far distances. Due to their reciprocal acceleration against each and other’s electromagnetic and/or radiation fields, extending beyond four di-mensional matter; across space (acting at a distance). Fulfilling the definition for the fifth and sixth dimensions; as electromagnetism acting at a distance; conjunctive with Newtonian-Einsteinian - and other formally proven and recognized - definition(s) of universal gravity. Another look at the structure of a snail or nautilus shell, and the arms of spiral galaxies (what a @ sign may de-scribe): "A consequence of this is the realization of the actual 4-D path of any orbiting body - electron, moon, planet - as compared to what we perceive in 3 presumably static Dimensions of Space. That is to say, because of the unrecognized 4-Dimensional acceleration of Matter, and the extensionally functional 5 & 6 Dimensional space separating it from other matter, the path of any orbiting body is not charac-teristically circular or ellipsoidal as it is 3-Dimensionally observed or understood to be. "Instead, the MassField Concept recognizes that the path in SpaceTime of every orbiting body exists 4-Dimensionally as an accel-erating - ever enlarging - spiral (@)Where the distance of space opening up between the orbiting body and its point of orbit, is no more recognized and accounted for, than the ever ongoing physical enlargement of the orbiting body and its point of orbit (the dominant mass of two considered gravitational masses; each actually orbiting a common center of gravity between the two - or more - centers). Refer p. 49, Illustration 10: 4-D HyperOrbital path. SPECULATIVE NOTE: The loss of 43° of arc per century in the elliptical extreme orbit of Mercury (the shortest of planetary years in the solar system) - and correspondingly more reduced losses for the planets correspondingly further from the Sun - appears resolvable in the (illustrated) 4-D HyperOrbitalPath "This example of planetary field reciprocally and physically con-flicting with solar field, and lunar mass reciprocally and physically conflicting with hosting planetary field is already directly experienc-ed in the proven, acknowledged fact that two or more physical bodies never (surficially) contact each other - also due to conflicting field forces of electrical charges disallowing the simultaneous occu-pation of their space by any other field-charge. (The realm of the very small - the microcosms - is said to host ‘strong forces’ that act at very short distances; that are not considered to be related to large, weak forces of gravity. Which are said to exist only in very large spaces and act at large distances (in the very large - macrocosmic - spaces and times). So it is presently and dominantly considered, in the macrocosmic realm Gravity, is thought not to occur - significantly - in the microcosmic realm - of the very small - at all. Whereas, gravity, like gold, is actually where you find it, and how much of it you find; in the case of locating gravity, moving in one of two possible - direction< s >. toward and/or away < impelling or repelling > from its material source.) "Einstein authored three major works on Relativity. Two are very well renowned academically as well as socio-politically. Einstein's two renowned theories are of course, the Special Theory of 1906 - which is all about light - ElectroMagnetism - and uniform motion (the C of E=MC2), and, the General Theory of 1916, which is all about Matter, Gravity and non-uniform motion (acceleration). "In 1919, Einstein authored a third work which is not so well known; primarily because it was only temporarily accepted by the scientific community; then abandoned eight years later. Again, time does not permit me to elaborate the details of Einstein's third and least known work, but I am sure you will find its title very familiar. It is the Unified Field Theory. The conceptual objective of which was to find electromagnetism and gravity one and the same, i.e., unified; two apparently unrelated manifestations of the same force. It would take at least thirty minutes to cursorily begin to do it justice here; in the allotted time we cannot afford to go into that detail. "On the other hand, in a matter of one minute or less we may recapitulate the fact that the primary objective of Einstein's pre-sently abandoned Unified Field Theory was to unify the Special & General Theories into one singular statement, The Unified Field. Specifically the unification of what are otherwise considered academ-ically to be separate and unrelated forces. Forces, which The Unified Field proves as actually having the same causal identity - Electro-Magnetism & Gravity. Repeat: The Unified Field is abandoned; its cardinal objective was to find ElectroMagnetism and Gravity as two apparently unrelated forces which actually have the same causal identity. Presently sum-marizing that gravity is the 4th Dimension because Physical Matter is found to be an expanding ElectroMagnetic Field. And conversely. THE SMOKE ABOVE THE INVISIBLE (‘What?’) WAR ‘Relativity theory furnishes a new way of looking at gravity and describing it, but it still remains a mysterious, little-understood phenomenon. No one knows what connection it has, if any, with electromagnetism. Einstein and others have tried to develop a "unified field theory" that will unite gravity and electromagnetism in one set of mathematical equations. The results have been disappointing. Perhaps some young reader of these words. will someday see how to formulate such a theory.’ p. 108, Relativity For The Million, by Martin Gardner. "Finally, I summarize that gravitational action-at-a-distance is also the 5th & 6th Dimensions, which are also, categorically, an expanding electromagnetic field. That is Fact #7. "We have, among other things in the past 65 minutes, overseen the reinstatement and confirmation of Einstein's presently abandoned Unified Field Theory. (‘This is Dave.’ /’Dave’s not here!’; etc. - Cheech & Chong, continued:) Moreover, the attending or reading audience not sleeping (legally dead, or clinically out to lunch on their own overdone haunches), is witness to the unprecedented identification and hence the qualified recog-nition and discovery of the 5th dimension of electricity, and, the 6th dimension of magnetism: "Furthermore the heart-foundation of Einstein's Unified Field The-ory is a (previously unknown repelling) force which Einstein discov-ered within and extracted from his General Theory Of Relativity. That is the same theory that revealed and introduced us to the 4th Dimen-sion. Einstein called this previously unknown force 'the Cosmological Constant'. When he spoke of it in his Unified Field equations he designated it with the Greek sign 'Lambda', which resembles an inverted capital 'V', like this: A. The non-mathematical definition of Einstein's 'Lambda' or 'Cosmological Constant': 'A previously unrecog-nized Universal Repelling Force, originating in all Matter and project-ing across space at the velocity of light'. Einstein’s cosmological constant force does not eliminate or ignore the concept of gravitational attraction (the concept of a pulling force’), but rather joins it. The repelling force and the impelling force are found coexistentially, side by side. The impelling force of gravity binds the universe together. The cosmologically constant repell-ing force of Lambda is Einstein’s answer to Newton’s previously unanswered question of why a universe full of impelling bodies doesn’t collapse on itself. That is fact #8. 60 Billion McDonald’s Customers Have The Right To Know That Their Strongest Beef Is Four Dimensional (refer, ingredients). Continued: Lambda. The Cosmological Constant. A repelling force acting across space out of material bodies; proportionate in strength and intensity to the mass value of it’s material source (‘particle’/’charge’). At a personal meeting with Lemaitre and Hubble, Einstein was persuaded by the prevailing purveyors of what came to be universally considered - and called - ‘the big bang theory’; to consider the *Cosmological Constant a mistake on his part (*said to be a repelling force acting exactly like and with ‘gravity’; except in the opposite direction. Preventing the collapse of a universe of impelling discovery that the spatial universe is expanding Einstein’s Cosmological Constant Force was dismissed as ‘superfluous’. Einstein was thereafter persuaded to call it ‘the biggest blunder of my life’; as indeed this record takes accented note of agreement). It’s Still The Same Old Story, continued: The record can only very respectfully agree with Dr. Einstein’s theory; as usual; while all others have grown weary. Abandoning the Cosmological Constant to the Lemaitre-Hubble model of an expanding - Big Bang originated- universe was indeed ‘the biggest blunder of Einstein’s life’. We will return to that redoubtably pensive consideration in a moment, but now this: Another Look At Einstein’s 4-Dimensional ‘Geodesics’. "This discussion is rapidly approaching its close. Before it closes, I wish to cite another accordance of the General Theory; which states that a thrown baseball or a fired bullet does not actually describe a curved or parabolic path to the earth when projected horizontally above its surface. Instead they actually move in straight lines which only appear to be curves and parabolas. The reason for this says Einstein, is that, 'What is 4-Dimensionally straight gives the illusion of being curved or parabolic when projected on the 3-recognized Dimensions Of Space'. These quasi 3-D parabolas and curves which are not really para-bolas and curves but instead are 4-D straight lines, are called 'geo-desics'. Einstein's geodesic account of gravity is that, 'Matter causes the 4-D Space-Time continuum to curve in the area surrounding it'. This fact is formally referred to as, 'Einstein's postulate of the 4-D Space-Time metric'. "If we find this Einsteinian description of gravitation vague, it is simply because it is indeed a vague description, yielding small con-ceptual compromise when compared with the familiar 'tug' of Classical Newtonian gravity. One may question, What does Relativity mean when it accounts for gravity by referencing the 4-D Space-Time metric and the curving of the 4-D Space-Time Continuum? And how does this 4-D Space-Time Continuum cause bodies to descend, or geodesically appear to descend? The 'answer' is that physicists do not understand the identity of Einstein's 4th Dimension; since SpaceTime is one of the many effects of the 4th Dimension, it is not understood or recognized what the geodesic gravitational curvature of SpaceTime is either. Here’s what ‘authorities’ say of Einstein’s 4-D geodesic: ‘We cannot visualize such a curved space. Because humanity is not four dimensional’ - The LIFE Science Library’s UNIVERSE, p. 179 Neither will it ever be ‘visualized’, until Matter is recognized to be 4-Dimensionally expanding; as simply illustrated here and affluently verified throughout this mere historical review. ( Refer p. 47: Illustrated 4-D MASS-FIELD STRAIGHT-LINE GEODESIC Euclidean geometry>. The walls have more or less been perpendicular to the floor all this time, and conversely; without ever having been previously recognized as more or less representing 90 degree angles. ) This is fact # 9. The Father Of Experimental Science, Galileo, proved that Aristotle was wrong when the latter surmised that heavier objects that weigh more than light objects, fall faster in descent, when dropped from the same height at the same time, above the earth’s surface. It does ‘seem logical’. It just doesn’t happen to be true. Everyone who is anyone in physics today, falls on hocus pocus, to make this annoying fact go away. Reduce it to a trivial matter of no - ho hum - importance. Whereas, it is a major, unresolved enigma in theoretical physics. It is often falsely held up, either as a non-issue, or as a (falsely) resolved issue. Galileo is said to be the first to make and note proof of that unexpected - ever since, bitterly disappointing - fact of reality. Being the universal rate of descent of all objects in free fall, regardless of their mass values (in the absence of air resistance). 16 feet per second squared for bodies descending on or near the surface of the earth. (‘God is subtle, but not malicious’. - Einstein). Much (low key, back stage) concern has been given to his unarguable fact of descending bodies in a gravitational field; ever since it was proven. Especially after Newton made a law of gravity that does indeed dictate: the heavier object should indeed descend faster than the lighter - less massive - object. Because, according to Newton’s laws, there should inevitably be a greater mutual attraction between, say, a descending cannonball and the earth, than between a descend-ing bb shot and the earth. The (‘ironic’) mystery is frequently and glibly said to be resolved in the fact of the ‘coincidence’ of inertial and gravitational mass values intersecting at the same qualitatively accelerating coordinates. But an obligatory description of the unanticipated and ‘astonishing’ coincidence is not any explanation of the still That is to say, a cannonball, according to Newton’s Law, should (‘is supposed to’) fall faster than a descending bb shot. The cannonball does not fall faster than descending bb shot or a grain of sand or a Blue whale. Everything falls at the same rate of acceleration, regardless of its mass value (in the absence of air resistance).completely unexplain-ed *coincidence. By definition - like gravity and for exactly the same reason - *not understood (and stonewalled) by the scientific- aca-demic status quo. Representatives of which all too often are found pretending an understanding of that which they do not understand. Furthermore, falsely representing what they (often capriciously and coyly - with all authoritative gravity) laughably and tragicomically misrepresent. Newton was fully aware of the unexplained, hauntingly unresolv-ed problem in point (the definitional intersection of inert and heavy mass values. Describing this ‘coincidence’ too often passes as explan-ation for this coincidence; which falsely currencied description is no explanation at all). According to Aristotelian intuition and Newton’s laws, heavier objects should indeed, fall faster. They don’t. (Einstein’s General Principle is the only explanation for this.) Instead: Everything in free fall on or near earth invariably descends at exactly the same rate (in a vacuum. Sans air resistance). Pursuing The Irresolutely Descending Cul De Sac At the turn of the 19th century, a Russian scientist, Roland Von Eotvos, pursued finding a difference in descent rates of heavier and lighter objects. A difference which is ‘supposed to be there’, and isn’t. Eotvos was inspired to achieve technological measurement of dif-ferences in descent time for variously light and heavy falling objects, down to a billionth of a second (A nanosecond). He could find no dif-ference in rates of descent for variously massed test objects. No difference in descent rates of comparatively lighter and heav-ier objects has ever been measured; to date. The author submits that no difference will ever be found. Due to the more than ‘coincidence’ - but rather the identity - of the fact that apparently descending objects are not really falling at all. The ever-expanding earth, matter of factly rising up to 4 dimensionally overtake and meet - make contact with - apparently falling bodies/objects. The (‘Impossible’) reason all objects (appear to) ‘descend’ at the same rate of acceler-ation. That is fact #10. Proving yet once again, gravity is the 4th dimension. (We hope no one has spilled their Oolong?) Reality Check, continued: "As regards any question of, 'Why didn't Einstein say gravity is the 4th Dimension'? He did. And categorically. Einstein said and proved that gravity is the 4th Dimension much more eloquently and elab-orately; much more absolutely than I or anyone else ever will. We could reference an abundance of Einsteinian non-mathematical quotes at this time, quotes - in other words - finding gravity the 4th Dimension. Instead, at this time and in the name of brevity, we’ll presently reference what is literally the best-known mathematical formula in the world. The direct, non-mathematical translation of which irrevocably proves - as it always has - that gravity is the 4th Dimension. "The formula is E=MC2. The direct non-mathematical translation of which is: 'Energy equals Matter times the speed of light squared'. In grade school as well as jr. high school, I would hear other students ask a question which I have since then learned is also fam-iliar to many others; that question being: 'In the formula 'E=MC2', why is C (light; field energy) squared (Out of M < Mass/Matter/ Particle>; which is perceived as a static, non-expanding, ‘non-field’)? "I may have asked the question myself, but I knew less of math-ematics than I do now - but others did ask that question and that is understandable enough. The teacher’s (ubiquitous) answer, which I have also learned since then is familiar to many others, was not so un-derstandable. That (alleged) 'answer' being: 'It (C squared) actual-ly isn't necessary'. This answer, it will not surprise some of you to know, is quite standardized as a response to the question, 'Why is C squared, in the formula E=MC2?' All are implored not to take my word for this. Simply ask the next physicist or mathematician you happen in to. If you pursue this question, you will get that answer or its equivalent. I had no under-standing of mathematics whatsoever, and yet it still left me and many others wondering, 'If in fact it isn't necessary, then why did Einstein include it in the formula?' One may again reasonably ask, 'What is the speed of light squared from?' Of course the only answer is, 'The speed of light (C - celeritas constant) is squared from (out of) Matter'. Smoke On The Perrier: And, affixed to that familiar explicit statement made by Einstein, is the familiar implicit statement - 'but it isn't necessary'. (GraveyTrain is the 4th dimension? Levity, caprice and quarks are the 5th & 6th, strangely charming, SuperStrung-out, string-along 3 dimensions and vaguely defined, Heisenberg’s Principle quoting, phantom-baiting, black Orwellean Memory hole reports of statically non-expanding disturbed areas, satanistically threatening to turn gravity upside down. In opposition to the COSMOS television gang’s Hollywood promoters and entertainment industry executives, darkly amassing to go off(!); with bouncing balls forbidden to roll downhill? MACHO beating out WIMP by a neck? NASA snapshots of the Big Bang in-residence: available thru the Smithsonian Institute, c/o Mr. Toot - Rocky Mountain High pigeon excrement - Smoot.) "Light energy is acknowledged to be, to say the least, expanding. Specifically, it is very accurately measured, originally in 1887 by Michelson & Morley, to do so at 186,282 miles-per-second. *Light energy is also acknowledged to be qualitatively identical to *Matter energy; *their differences being only their densities - light being much more thinly distributed and tenuous than matter. This is proven in the statement 'E=M' of the formula 'E=MC2, originally published by Einstein in 1906. Light energy or electromagnetism is furthermore acknowledged to invariably originate within and expand-out-of MatterEnergy: mother and father of all ‘spaces and times’. "On the other hand, MatterEnergy is not acknowledged to be expanding. Quite the contrary. Matter is unanimously and at the-oretically disastrous regular intervals since the turn of the 1900’s, obsessively agreed by the outwardly unworried and unscared col-lective authorities on the subject, to be static and non-expanding. (When in doubt, smugly cite Heisenberg’s Principle Of Indeterminacy. As though Louisiana could be that easily departed?) Digressing To Reality, Geometric & Algebraic Law: "In the formula E=MC2, we have the acknowledged dynamical om-ni-directional expansion of electromagnetic or light energy, squared from presumably static/non-expanding MatterEnergy. "As long as there are those who demand and deny proof of the 4-Dimensional MassField, there will also be those who fail or refuse to recognize the accumulative achievements of historical and contem-porary Academic Physical Science - and, the lessons of Algebra 101. If all the Nobel laureates in the world gather together to agree that any entity acknowledged and agreed to be dynamically expanding, can be algebraically squared from any other entity which is agreed - hysterically insisted upon - to be static and non-expanding (exactly such a gathering exists, and has existed since 1906): what is dramatically established in such an assemblage of authority is that, none among these mortar-boarded multitudes has possession of the mathematical ability required to pass the seventh grade. (Please restrain your undergraduate applause?) "Einstein's 'renowned formula' E=MC2 proves again that Universal Matter is literally, constantly and dramatically expanding. Clipping right along on this planet at 32 feet per second squared. The Causa-tive Source of the 4-Dimensional Space-Time Continuum. Ostensibly and inescapably: a dimension of time, and motion (are synonymous - time being the interval between two or more events (The bespectacled scientific malrepresentatives proclaim with all pro-fessionalism, that their spectacles are unfindable. Unrefractionable. That their sensory optical prescription is immeasurable; even unimaginably out of sight. The fourth dimension: officially proclaimed to be nowhere in the measurable realm of taste, touch, sight or hearing. In or out of italics and/or parentheses. Mr. Science is out to isolate gravity waves. Dr. Livingston is at-tempting to locate someone who presumes enough to find himself, and what he emptily purports to be in search of. The Optometrist has contracted with War-ner Brothers to admonish both lenses on his WANTED: Dead Or Alive, remarka-bly misplaced spectacles: housing the famed ‘n framed rear view mirror with the accumulating police cars in it. Speeding - ever accelerating - from safety.) Disregarding (doing without): the descent of free falling objects, the weight of everything; the orbiting of the planets - and all other orbits with and without punctuation (and the song of an errant hubcap settling down on the asphalt all by it’s rolling and rotating self. Disassociated from the smashed Volkswagen it originated on - stuffed entirely beneath the inferno enveloped 18 wheeler that rests on top of the crushed Volkswagen beneath it. Missing a hubcap subjected to be musically and metalically wobbling down to a final halt on the crowded , rubbernecking freeway. As though it were recently and trium-phantly designed to accommodate the described unique event; ahead of time. As though George Gamow, Carl Sagen, Edwin Hubble and Lemaitre, with the now thickly gathered, conceptually dominant Big Bang gangers. knew and understood it all along < The freeway song of a liberated hubcap > - the lights at the ends of their mole infested , PsyWar choked crazymaking tunnels ). The inescapable sound of gravity. Anything round and rolling - especially metal, glass and/or stone - that’s allowed to slow down, fall over, and settle, audibly oscillating and rotating downwardly toward a quick stop on a hard surface. (Play anything but G-7 at this time?) ((Pink Floyd, making MONEY?)) A tabled or floored coin, dinner plate or serving tray on the run, slowing down to orbitally circle around its destinationally tightening drum roll, finally settling down in the making of a gravitationally resounding, perfectly spiral shaped nest. Shaped like a shrinking spiral while roundly sounding the rhythmically accelerating part. (‘What?’) Where everything in present tense continuously and collectively arrives from the past. (Don’t say you weren’t warned when your 3-D Limited subway train and all of its statically flash-frozen boxcars, gets lost and wrecked.) The sound, shape - and measurable sight - of materially manifest gravity: the reputedly ‘immeasurable’, ‘unimaginable’ 4-D space-time continuum. (‘Huh?) Heat flows downhill; ever smaller. Whereas, events flow uphill; ever larger. Entropic universal heat death is not as a conceptual dogma and/or social obsession, meaningfully derived from the 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics. Any more than the 4-D space-time continuum can be excluded as the explanation for a steady state theory and the long withheld improvement over the hand wringing circle of incumbent, 4th dimension slaying big bang gangers. The greatest - and most coy and smug - pretenders in the history of physical and astronomical science. Sine qua non. (For sure.) ((Secretly blessed, endorsed and enforced by Paul Williams, Chevy Chase, Joan Rivers, Bill Maher, Barbara Walters, Michael Jackson and all of their massive amounts of friends and well wishers, coming together over Uncle Albert’s Unified Field; hailing from Hollywood. Compulsively jumping Mother Superior’s guns. Not carrying any pictures of Chairman Mao. Obediently seeing to it that the kult designated dink doesn’t make it with anyone anyhow. Being obediently strong with their beefy - overwhelmingly high and unbeatable - 3-D burger & coda sales. Ruminating an entirely new, old dimension of missing a given point alto-gether. Being determined to continue doing so - against a rising storm of physical evidence - as long as the four dimensional space-time continuum continues to dispassionately and uncontentionally displace the three dimen-sional hysteria and obsessive, schizophrenic paranoia of the big bang gangers. Certainly including the Hollywood industrialists - NATURAL BORN KILLERS - who sponsor, sustain, maintain and otherwise industrially DEATH-SPEAK and babble-on for them.)) "Now, to close with two brief considerations. About every six months or so the world press and scientific journals at large will re-port on the activities of physicists attempting to discover and isolate gravity waves. And yet, like the 4th Dimension, the only appropriate question is, 'Where are they not?'. Yet still, Contemporary Physics and its mentors continue to brush aside electromagnetism (in the micro and macrocosms) in search of gravity waves. ‘Although relativity theory replaces gravity by a geometrical warping of space-time, it leaves many basic questions unanswered. Does this warping take place instantaneously through space or does it propagate like a wave motion? Almost all physicists agree that the warping moves like a wave and that these waves travel with the speed of light. There is also good reason (sic) to believe that gravity waves consist of tiny indivisible particles of energy called "gravitons." In 1969, Joseph Weber, at the University of Maryland, announced that his equipment, consisting of huge aluminum cylinders, had detected gravity radiation. It seemed to be coming from cataclysmic events at the center of the Milky Way. Since then, dozens of attempts have been made to confirm Weber's claim, some by physicists with detecting equipment more sensitive than Weber's. The results have been negative. The present consensus is that Weber misinterpreted his readings, and that gravity waves have not yet been observed. (Have not yet been proven). As for gravitons, no one has any knowledge of what a graviton is like, although many physicists are trying to invent theories that will predict some of its properties. Presumably it contains a tiny bit of space-time curvature, otherwise large numbers of gravitons would be unable to transmit curvature through space. At the moment the graviton, like the particle physicists' quark,' remains a hypothetical beast that physicists hope someday to capture.’