Genealogy Report - Frances Louise Hagen



Generation Seven

4th Great Grandparents of Frances Louise Berlin

Christopher Darrow and Elizabeth Packer

112. CHRISTOPHER7 DARROW (George, #224); b. before 1 Dec 1678;

Christopher Darrow was baptized 1 Dec 1678 in First Church, Congregational in New London, New London, CT. No information was found about his young life, supposedly spent in the town of New London, CT or nearby area.

Frances Caulkins in her, "History of New London", wrote the following about this period in which Christopher was born and spent his childhood. This is from Chapter XVII of her book, page 246 and 247.

"It was remarked by the inhabitants of other towns that something bold, uncommon and startling was always going on at New London. This was the effect of its commerce, its enterprise, its trains of comers and goers, its compact, busy streets. It was easy to raise a mob here; easy to get up a feast, a frolick, or a fracas. The activity of men’s minds outstripped their learning and their reflection; and this led them into vagaries. Men who had long been rovers, and unaccustomed to restraint, gathered here, and sought their own interest and pleasure, with too little regard to the laws. The Puritan magistrates of the town were obliged to maintain a continued conflict with the corrupting influences from without. A changeful, seafaring populace can not be expected to have the stability and serenity of a quiet inland town......."

She continues a paragraph later.

…With respect to the era of which we are speaking, it may be observed that the rigor of the law was so great, that all the impurities of the community were made manifest by it. We see what iniquity there was, in its whole length and breadth.
Drunkenness was perhaps more prevalent here than in other towns in the colony, simply on account of the importation of liquors into the port. Selling liquor to the Indians was another offense growing out of position. This, though illegal, was not then regarded as disgraceful; some good men, and even women, were fined for doing it. Another class of offenses heavily amerced, were those which violated religious order; such as swearing, blasphemy, labor, traveling and sailing on the Sabbath, and non-attendance at the customary place of worship. In these particulars, the laws themselves were stringent; they were also rigidly enforced and strictly interpreted. Swearing included expressions which might now be regarded as mere vulgarity; blasphemy and profanity took a wide range, and covered denunciations of the system of worship as established in the colony, or its officiating organs, whether ministers or magistrates.
Cases of defamation, quarrels and sudden assaults were numerous. Violations of modesty and purity before marriage, were but too frequent, and this in the face of a stern magistracy and strict Puritan usage. Robbery and theft, with the single exception of horse-stealing, was very uncommon.

On pages 250 thru 252, Ms Caulkins writes about some of the offenses that were brought before the local court. I have selected some of the more interesting cases.

1. John Lewis and Sarah Chapman presented for sitting together on the Lord's day, under an apple tree, in Goodman Chapman's orchard.
2. James Rogers, Sen.
(Sr.), John, James and Jonathan, his sons, presented for profanation of the Sabbath, which is the first day of the week, and said persons boldly in the presence of this court asserting that they have not, and for the future will not refrain attending to any servile occasions on said day, they are fined 10s, each, and put under a bond of £10 each, or to continue in prison.
3. Complaint being made to this court by John Prentice against William Beebe for keeping company with his daughter Mercy, and endeavoring to gain her affections in order to a marriage without acquainting her parents, which is contrary to law, the said Wm. Beebe is ordered to pay a fine to the County Treasury of £5.
4. Elizabeth Way presented for not living with her husband. The court orders her to go to her husband or to be imprisoned.
5. New London presented for not having a grammar school, fined £10; also for not having an English school for reading and writing, £5.
6. The Court adjourned to first Tuesday in August, on account of the contagious distemper in town.
7. John Chapell, Israel Richards, John Crocker and Thomas Atwell, presented for nightwalking on the Sabbath night, Sept. 17, and committing various misdemeanors, as pulling up bridges and fences, cutting the manes and tails of horses, and setting up logs against people's doors; sentenced to pay 10s, each, and sit two hours in the stocks.
8. Widow Bradley resented for a second offence, in having a child born out of wedlock, the father of both being Christopher Christophers, a married man; sentenced to pay the usual fine of £5. and also to wear on her cap a paper whereon her offence is written, as a warning to others, or else to pay £15. Samuel Starr became her bondsmen for £15.

It is interesting to read about and compare the community living of those days and with ours at the present time. Obviously the church was much more involved in the community life than today and it appears that a number of people rebelled against it.
There was infidelity just as there probably has been since time began when little one celled creatures were swimming around in their communities. The actions of the court and the community indicated the status of women during that period. In most cases they were considered as property and the aid of the community was given to them only in extraordinary circumstances.
Caulkins writes that robbery and such crimes were not normally committed with the exception of horse stealing. During this period horses were one of the biggest commodities. People raised horses for trade purposes not only within their colony but for trade to other countries and other colonies. Since they did not have fences in which to keep their stock of horses they branded them and allowed them to run free in the woods. There were people that would catch the horses, alter the brand, and drive them overland or ship the horses by sea to other countries or communities. There the horses would be sold or traded for other goods. This was referred to as "horse-coursing". Courts were set up in all communities to try those persons suspected or accused of this practice. The punishment for such acts were both fines and whippings. In 1700, Caulkins writes; "an adjourned court was held at New London purposely for the trial of horse-coursers. The penalty for a first offense was a fine of £10 and to be whipped ten lashes; for a second, £20 and twenty lashes; for a third, £30 and thirty lashes, and so on.

This sounds a little like the "car-jacking" that we have today. Maybe they should have had a three strikes and your out deal as we have in some parts of our judicial system. It was an interesting period but I am not sure that I would have wanted to have been a part of it.

Henry A. Baker in his "History of Montville" - states that "Christopher settled at Waterford, probably on the farm occupied by his father, called the 'Old Darrow Farm.'"

113. ELIZABETH7 PACKER (John, #226); b. 25 Mar 1679 at New London, New London, CT, although some researchers give her place of birth as  Waterford, New London, CT. She was baptized 13 Mar 1681 in the Congregational denomination in New London, New London, CT. She is the daughter of John Packer 2nd and Lydia Latham Lockwood.

There are two sources that confirm the marriage of Christopher and Elizabeth. One is noted in Henry A. Baker's, "History of Montville" where on page 102 he shows the children of Sgt. George Darrow and Mary Charlett Sharswood. He states:  "2. Christopher, bap. 1 Dec, 1678; m. Elizabeth Packer.

Prentice Alexander, a genealogist in Connecticut, copied some Connecticut Vital Records from the Barbour Collection and it shows that Volume 1, page 26 states: "Darrow, Christopher, m. Elizabeth Packer, June 27, 1701."

The Life of Christopher Darrow and Elizabeth Packer.

Two years after being married Christopher and Elizabeth were given a grant of land that had initially been granted to the colony by the King of England. The following is written in the "History of New London, by Frances Calkins."

Quote - "By act of Assembley, May 13th, 1703, an addition was made to the bounds of New London, of a tract between the north bounds of the town and the southern bounds of Norwich, extending from the northeast boundary line of Lyme to Trading Cove, and by the cove to the Great River. 
This included the Indian lands or Mohegan reservation, which had long been claimed by the town, but not legally included in their bounds.
"Patent of New London sanctioned by the Governor and Company, 14. Oct. 1704.
'To all persons to whom these presents shall come, -- The Governor and Company of her Majesty"s Colony of Connecticut in General Court assembled send greeting:--Whereas we the said Gov r and Company by vertue of Letters Patent to us granted by his Royal Majesty Charles the Second of England &c., king, bearing date the 23d day of April, in the 14th year of his reign, A. D. 1663, have formerly by certain acts and grants passed in Gen. Assembly given and granted to" " unquote.

After the above unquote there are 77 names listed. One of those names is "Christopher Darrow."

Note by Dean Hagen -- (Some researchers interpret this to mean that the land was given in 1663 and that the Christopher Darrow mentioned must have been from an earlier generation. I do not agree with that theory, I maintain that the first paragraph of the quote shows that this act was dealing with an additional tract of land next to the original New London. This act was a procedure of annexation much as we do today. The original patent was giving by the king in 1663, but, this annexation did not take place until 1704. Notice the 4th paragraph of the quote and the sentence "The Governor and Company  of her Majesty's Colony of Connecticut". Charles II was king of England in 1663 -- Anne was queen of England from 1702-1714. Christopher Darrow was married in 1702 and I believe living on a part of this area at this time.)

"History of Reedsburg and the upper Baraboo valley" by Merton Krug states the following about Christopher Darrow on page 479 --

"Christopher, (eldest son of George Darrow), was ever a man of influence in the then thriving port of New London, and when the city received its Charter from King James I, of England, Christopher Darrow's name was one of the few mentioned thereon.

Christopher Darrow began military service on 25 Apr 1715.  He was a Sgt. in the 2nd Co. of the Connecticut Militia. The military service that they are referring to here was mostly for control of the Indians. 

H. Andrew Brown, a Darrow genealogist in California, contains the following miscellaneous notes about Christopher Darrow.

"The diary of Joshua Hempstead mentions that on Friday 22 Apr 1715 he divided some molasses with Christopher Darrow and that on Tuesday 26 Apr 1715 he exchanged 109 gallons of Rum with Christopher Darrow making the transaction equal."

"Christopher Darrow in 1718 bought 51 acres of land from Richard Rogers in present day Waterford, Connecticut."

Children of Christopher7 Darrow and Elizabeth Packer.

The Death of Christopher Darrow and Elizabeth Packer.

Death of Christopher Darrow

Christopher Darrow died about 1757 at Waterford, New London, CT.  One source states he was buried in the Darrow Cemetery on the " Old Darrow Farm", however, a cemetery list was copied by John W. Blake, July 8, 1936, and it does not include the name of Christopher Darrow.

Christopher Darrow left a will dated 4 Jul 1757 and probated 13 Nov 1759, Christopher made the following bequests:
"son Christopher, Jr. -- nothing, as he had already received his share of the estate.
sons William and George -- 76 pounds, 5 shillings, 1/2 pence each.
Joseph[?] -- 56 pounds, 2 shilling.
children Lemuel, Lydia and Elizabeth (Darrow) Lester -- 46 pounds, 5 shilling. 1/2 pence each.
son Jedediah -- 440 pounds"

This will was not probated until after the death of Elizabeth. (

Merton Krug writes in his "History of Reedsburg" - "Christopher Darrow's will shows that his wife was Elizabeth Marshall. He was a distinguished soldier of his state. He was born Dec 1, 1778, but the date of his death is unknown." 

(Note by Dean Hagen -- The above information indicating that Christopher Darrow's wife was Elizabeth Marshall is an obvious error. It has been confirmed that Christopher Darrow's wife was Elizabeth Packer. Also Krug has the date of birth off by a hundred years, he should have written that he was born before Dec 1, 1678.) 

Death of Elizabeth Packer.

Elizabeth Packer died 9 Feb 1758 at Waterford, New London, CT, at age 78.  There are different dates given by different researchers for the date she died. Some say 3 Feb, 8 Feb, and 17 Feb.) The Darrow Cemetery List has the date of death for Elizabeth Packer occurring on 9 Feb, 1758 She was buried in Darrow's Cemetery on the "Old Darrow Farm", New London, New London, CT. 

On page 347 of History of New London by Frances Caulkins she writes:  "In a corner of a field upon the Great Neck, on what was formerly the Darrow farm, is a group of four gravestones; one of them bears the following inscription:

"In memory of Mrs. Elizabeth Darrow, wife of Mr. Christopher Darrow, who died in February 1758, aged 78 years. She was mother to 8 children, 43 grand-children, 30 great grand-children. Has had 100 '(descendants?)"

On page 103 of History of Montville by Henry Baker he writes: "This stone, with the above inscription, was probably erected several years after her death by some one of her grandchildren, and the number of the children there mentioned may have been taken from the will of her husband, in which only eight children are mentioned, three having died previous to the date of the will. The will was admitted to probate in 1757."

4th Great Grandparents of Frances Louise Berlin

John Bailey and Elizabeth Stallion

Parents of Prudence Bailey

114. JOHN7 BAILEY JR. (John, #228); b. 12 Oct 1688 at Groton, New London, CT;

John Bailey Jr. married Elizabeth Stallion (see #115), daughter of Edward Stallion and Elizabeth Miller, 25 Dec 1713.

In "History of New London" by Caulkins, on page 251 is a court record that states: "Edward Stallion for sailing his vessel from New London to Norwich on the Sabbath, fined 40s."

Children of John7 Bailey Jr. and Elizabeth Stallion (see #115) were as follows:

 

Summary of John Bailey and Elizabeth Stallion.

No information has been found or researched on this family.

 
Return to Table of Contents
Please send e-mail to: toftehagen@yahoo.com
Created with The Master Genealogist for Windows on 10 Sep 1999 at 16:13:43.