Dat's what I been sayin' Rocko - Aristotle's theory of motion says we can't keep tracing effects back to causes indefinitely.

I gotcha. We need a first cause - the Unmoved Mover. That's God.

Aw - that's bull. Hume showed all this cause n' effect stuff ain't real. An' Kant says that we don't get to apply all this stuff out in the great unknown nohow. Finally, there ARE infinite series in math. Why not an infinite series of causes? I still say God don't exist.

Awright, Bigshot. What about what Descartes and Spinoza say - since we can imagine a perfect being exists, therefore he must.

That don't prove jack.

Well if yer so sure he don't exist, where'd you get that idea into yer mind?

What are ya - blind? I just said that! I ain't buyin' it!

Okay, what about this - don't you ever look at the Periodic Table or a really neat truck and realize a Universe of perfectly interlocking parts - mechanical symmetry and biological complexity? I mean, dat's God.

Listen, Butt-Nut. I'm still going' with Hume here. Even if there was a Cosmic Architect, the world ain't so perfect that we necessarily got a God.

I'm thinkin' Rocko's right. Chance and probability show the Universe may be an accident after all.

You said it. So I blow away your argument on Cosmological, Ontological, and Teleological grounds. Me and Buford here wanna know if you got another reason for the existence of God.

Well. . .

No, not really.

You know what that means. . .

DRINK!!