Welcome To TaxHistory.com
Historical Perspectives on the Federal Income Tax
|
16. DOES WITHHOLDING ON WAGES CONSTITUTE INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE
IN VIOLATION OF THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT?
The Thirteenth Amendment provides that "[n]either slavery nor involuntary
servitude ....shall exist in the United States ...." Although the Supreme
Court has upheld the constitutionality of income tax withholding, in the
context of the corporate income tax, as early as 1916,83 a few taxpayers
have still contended, unsuccessfully, that to require an employer, without
compensation, to withhold income taxes from the wages of employees places
the employer in involuntary servitude in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment.84
The courts have consistently and repeatedly held that a requirement of
governmental service of this character does not constitute involuntary
servitude. A government has the right to require certain actions of its
citizens, including income tax withholding, jury service, and military
service.85
83 Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S.1(1916).
84 See, for example, Lorre, Jr. v. United States, 40 A.F.T.R. 2d 5664
(W.D. Tex. 1977); and United States v. Awerkamp, 34 AF.T.R. 2d 5086 (7th
Cir.1974).
85 See, Arver v. United States, 245 U.S. 366 (1918); Butler v. Perry,
240 U.S. 328 (1916); and Robertson v. Baldwin,165 US. 275 (1897).
For questions about the material on this site or for problems concerning the mechanics of this site contact
Spot
Like the new site? Let us know!