Steroids law
Let's say that Drug A comes in 1 mg tablets and Drug B comes in 100 mg tablets. steroids law Steroids law. Each tablet therefore gives the same effect. In the case of the simplest type of drug such as these two drugs, the effect is identical whether one uses 10 tabs of A, 10 tabs of B, or 5 tabs of each. The same number of receptors are occupied regardless and the effect is the same. steroids law Steroid withdrawal. Therefore, stacking these drugs makes about as much sense as stacking two brands of aspirin or two brands of coffee. It is okay if one happens to have both available, but there is no reason to go out and buy the second brand in the hopes that stacking it will give more of a caffeine buzz, or more pain relief. The mixing might make sense if there were a pharmacokinetic difference: perhaps one of the brands of aspirin is time-released and you want both an instant hit for immediate pain relief as well as sustained action. steroids law Buy anabolic steroids online. (The sustained action though could be obtained with only the regular brand, simply by taking small amounts frequently. )Application to AASNow the obvious question here is, Is the same type of drug response true with AAS, or aremore complex things going on? Let's say that, used alone, the same effect is obtained from 1 "Deca-unit" of Deca (let's say that a Deca-unit is 400 mg) or from 1 "Dianabol-unit" of Dianabol (let's say that this is 280 mg/week in divided doses every day). If these drugs were as simple in action as Drugs A and B, then the math says that the same result will be obtained regardless of whether one uses one "Deca-unit" of Deca per week, one "Dianabol-unit" of Dianabol per week, or half a unit of each respectively in a stack. This however is not what happens. Using half a Deca-unit and half a Dianabol-unit per week (say 200 mg/week Deca and 20 mg/day Dianabol) gives better gains than using one unit of either alone. This effect is called synergy and results when there is more than one mechanism of action. The above math remains correct for any given receptor but this is saying that there are more things going on in the body than simply binding to one receptor. Aside from this and other practical but well-confirmed observations, there is scientific evidence that this is indeed the case. Scientific Evidence for Multiple Modes of ActionThe first thing to consider is whether or not a single mode of action is sufficient to explain all results, as with the simplest case described for Drugs A and B, or whether data is in conflict with such a model. The equation given earlier allows one, given a measured Kd value, to calculate what percentage of receptors is occupied for a given concentration of drug. The Kd value for testosterone and the androgen receptor (AR) actually is not known with great precision for humans, but is approximately . 44 nmol/L. 1 Free testosterone levels in normal men average approximately . 07 nmol/L. 2,3,4Contrary to previous statements made by me (although those statements had been made in the scientific literature) this indicates that normal testosterone levels are not sufficient to saturate the AR. The equation given shows that with these values for free testosterone (Tf) and for Kd, one would expect only 14% of ARs to be occupied at any time. Increasing Tf by ten times would improve this to 61% occupancy, which still is not saturated. Increasing twenty times would yield further improvement to 76%. Perhaps this correlates well with the observation that gains improve markedly relative to low dose as one increases amount of testosterone used to 1 gram per week, but going to 2 grams per week offers only a modest further increase. These results surprise me and are definitely contrary to accepted wisdom. I can only speculate at the moment that those who were trying to determine whether or not receptors are saturated made the mistake of performing the calculation with total testosterone levels instead of Tf. Doing so would lead to that conclusion but is an incorrect method. I had been going to argue as I had previously that the dose response curve, which extends at least to the 1 gram per week level,5 indicates that there must be more than one mechanism of action, since response increases even past the point of saturation.
Steroids law
Anabolics || Quality-vet-steroids || Quality-vet-steroids || Quality-vet-steroids