Green Liberty

Where Green Goals and Libertarian Principles intersect.

What are the Green Goals?

What are the Libertarian Principles?

How Do They Intersect?

Green Goal #5: Decentralization

Green Goal #5: Decentralization: Centralization of wealth and power contributes to social and economic injustice, environmental destruction, and militarization. Therefore, we support a restructuring of social, political and economic institutions away from a system that is controlled by and mostly benefits the powerful few, to a democratic, less bureaucratic system. Decision-making should, as much as possible, remain at the individual and local level, while assuring that civil rights are protected for all citizens.
By Lance M. Brown, founder of GreenLiberty.org, Future Solutions, StopCarnivore.org, CampusLP.org, and lpLists.org, and co-founder of PeoplesForum.com and Rent-a-Court; Candidate for President - Year 2008.

The Problem

It is widely agreed that America has become a "corpocracy"- run by and for the people with lots of money. Washington, D.C. is seen as a strange, elitist place where backroom deals and campaign contributions (not to mention $20,000 a plate dinners and nights at the Lincoln Bedroom) determine public policy.

Our government has lost its way. It was designed to protect the rights of the people, and instead it primarily protects politicians and big business. Any positive effect that Government's work has on its people seems almost coincidental.

How do we return power to the people? How do we make sure that all Government is local, as the saying goes?

What needs to happen

There are two things that need to happen to ensure the health of our democracy:

  1. Government must return decision-making power to individuals, towns and states- in that order of priority. Citizens must be allowed to have the most control possible over their own actions- and they must be expected and required to assume the responsibilities that come with that control.

We are in danger of being helped into helplessness by the Federal Government. They have assumed control over so many facets of American life that most decisions in this country aren't made by people, but instead by committees, commissions, senates, assemblies, and so on.

One size does not fit all

When Government sets a "nationwide standard," a county-wide regulation, or any other new sweeping rule, it stifles our ability to craft creative solutions as people, as neighborhoods, and as communities. Aside from clear situations of physical harm, or harm to property, there are few, if any, rules which can be fairly applied to all 280+ million Americans. The same can generally be said about state regulations. One size does not fit all when it comes to regulation.

When Government "takes action" on a social or cultural problem, we as citizens and communities inevitably suffer, because we lose the option to develop the solution which fits us best. Many of us become passive about the problem, because we think that it is "being taken care of" by Government- although, in our hearts, we know that probably isn't true. Other people end up "battling with the opposition" for control of the legislative process- so that they can be the one to make the rules for everyone else.

Local and self-government is best

All government really is local- everything we do takes place between individuals, in towns and cities. Individuals, towns and cities must have the control and responsibility they need to run their lives the way they think is best.

  1. Government must get out of the role of power-broker, where legislation serves to support one agenda, industry, or special interest group. Government needs to have one role— that of ensuring the physical safety which its citizens need to live as free individuals. 

Politics and Government have become a money-based battle for power. Lobbyists, Special Interest Groups, Lawyers, Big Business, and the Media run the show. Most people agree that the distance between what those groups represent and what "we, the people" represent is far, and growing farther. 

The Election 2000 mess in Florida made it astonishingly clear that our Government doesn't even have the means to find out what the will of the people is, never mind the ability to carry it out.

Using aspirin to cure cancer

There are many suggestions on how to reform government to ensure that it serves the needs of all people equally— making Election Day a holiday and making it easier to register to vote, to limiting corporate contributions to candidates and other types of "campaign finance reform." Any of these ideas could help— but they will be like taking aspirin to cure cancer. Unless we cure the cancer itself, it will eventually kill our democracy.

No fair taking sides

The only way to take government out of the hands of the power-brokers, and give it back to the people, is to take away its role as "arbiter of force." We must not allow government to be a tool that groups can use against each other. State and Federal governments should refrain from "taking sides" on issues that don't involve physical harm, or harm to property.

Social and cultural changes are best pursued through voluntary means- and individuals, businesses, and communities must make the efforts necessary to settle their differences, support their fellow citizens, and come to peaceful arrangements on voluntary terms. We must take back the right of self-governance and the responsibility of community management.

Settle it on our own

In tandem with this, we must demand that government step out of the role of deciding our fate, mapping our economy, and solving our problems. By "choosing sides" and redistributing our money on our behalf, government is taking away our ability to best develop the life that we desire, as individuals and communities. We can settle our differences on our own, and at a local level- but only if Government steps out of the way.

If Government were removed from the role of redistributing our country's resources, and focused only on ensuring our physical safety and protecting our civil liberties, there would be no more platform for political corruption. There is no "anti-safety" lobby- and if the government's only job was to protect our safety and freedom, there would be nothing for corporations, special interest groups, and lobbyists to buy.

The battle for control is inefficient and immoral

Instead of masking our social and cultural problems behind the veil of "politics and government," we need to take back control. Not only is it inefficient and divisive to battle for control of the legislative process, it is morally wrong to use government force to solve problems that can be solved otherwise. 

Government is Force

We should recognize that Government is Force- and if we can use it on our behalf, then others can use it against us. We have to end this cycle, by reducing government to a role where it protects and penalizes all citizens equally, and only for crimes of force, theft, and fraud. 

Special Interest Groups, and others who want social change should make their case directly to the people and communities, and those people and communities should take on the rights and responsibilities needed to resolve social and cultural differences and economic problems through peaceful and voluntary means.

It's time to stop just saying "Citizens should be more involved with their local communities."

We need to start doing it. 

 

Copyright 2000, Future Solutions. All rights reserved.

  Green and Libertarian resources