It is certain in my mind she has not told the whole truth, nor will she ever as she is becoming wealthy from her part in the pursuit of the destruction of President Clinton. If she
told the truth, there is no way the Republican Party would have wanted any testimony from her at all. She would never have been ‘forced’ to testify in the first place. We would not even know her name, let alone what she looks like.
No, the reason the tape will be televised, at least for the Republican Party, is it is an attempt by the Republican Party to present her as some sort of innocent little girl who was
manipulated by the big bad man and taken advantage of.
I rather think it was just the opposite - that a very sex-wise woman, young or not, took advantage of a primary weakness in men of responding to sexual advances of younger women, that she did so more or less as a whore hired by Republican leadership.
The rights of the public to view evidence hasn’t anything whatsoever to do with the decision to televise her testimony as our government, Congress included, has hidden tons of evidence and subversive actions from the public in the past and will continue to do so in the future unless intervention is made by the people.
The Republican Party is desperate to win support as we have a presidential election coming up. It knows it has screwed up by bringing all the dirt against President Clinton during his administrations. It knows there is far more negativism towards the party than ever before in history, that it has essentially cut its own political neck. (May we all rejoice if this has, indeed, happened.)
But what is the hidden agenda of, I believe, nine Democrats who voted with the Republican majority? Why would they want her testimoney viewed? How could voting with the majority, the Republican Party, serve their political purposes?
If people such as Wisconsin Democrat Russ Feingold actually believes his own statement,
“The public has the right to view all the evidence that senators are weighing as they make
their decision.”, why did they have closed-door meetings? Why weren’t the meetings
televised or why didn’t the same Democrats insist publicly on the meetings being open to the public?
The certainty is the Democrats in question have a hidden agenda as do all Washington politicians. Very seldom is there any real integrity exhibited by professional, let’s-all-get-rich, Washington politicians, a fact revealed in far greater detail than the Republican Party wanted as the Republican Party vs Clinton saga has unfolded.
So, watch Lewinsky’s testimony if you feel you must but don’t ever believe Lewinsky to be a poor, manipulated, innocent little girl. She knew exactly what she was doing when she seduced Clinton. She went into it with her eyes and, dare I say it, her mouth wide open. Only a fool without much sexual experience of the oral type could ever believe she had not had a great deal of experience giving oral sex.
She was, as one day will come out, a shill of the Republican Party who was willing to prostitute herself for fame and probable fortune.