When is he going to admit that he cannot find any evidence of wrong-doing by President Clinton in the so-called Whitewater investigation?

Politicians I correspond with try to convince me he is doing a good job. Thus, I must question exactly what his job is? Is it to get facts concerning Whitewater or is it to keep the case in the minds of the people?

I must conclude it is only to keep the case in the minds of the people, that Starr knows there isn’t any evidence against Mr. Clinton. This, of course, also meets the agenda of the anti-Clintonites, including Starr's good buddies, the Republican leadership.

As they might say, “Yes, Starr, go for it. Subpoena every person who has ever had a discussion with Mr. Clinton. We don’t care that the discussion was only about what to have at a cookout. Spend another few more million of the taxpayers’ dollars - who cares as long as the media has something that could be manipulated as being negative against Mr. Clinton?

Then, to help you and our cause out, media personnel who feel as we do will make sure the actions you are taking will be made public. We can keep introducing thoughts of anti-sentiment against the president for at least a few more months.

Keep bombarding the public with our screwed up, hypocritical thinking and, sooner or later, maybe a few more will get so confused that they no longer realize it is just a plot to undermine the administration.”

Yeh, right, and maybe all the politicians involved will one day tell the truth.