Mike Graham
Dorina Graham
Photography:
TLRs:
Yashicamat
Rolleiflex T
Mamiya C330
Rolleicord IV
127 Film
Yashica 44
Rangefinders
Yashica Electro 35
Olympus 35 ECR
Rollei 35S
Nikon
Nikkormat FT3
Nikon F3
Nikon EM
Exposure meters
Lenses
The 50 millimeter
The Lab
Repairs?
Dinosaurs
FAQs
Aviation:
There I was...
Melli Beese Project
Guest Book
| |
My TLRs: Yashicamat
Mamiya C330 Rolleiflex-T
Rolleicord IV Yashica
44

Why 120 Film?
Here's a sweeping statement for you: most medium format lenses
will be technically less "sharp" than their 35mm equivalents. In terms
of lines-per-millimeter, a good 35mm lens will beat a good medium format lens.
But since medium format is so much bigger than 35mm, the resulting prints or
slides will appear much better. The bigger the magnification, the lower the apparent
quality, and a medium format negative enlarged to an 8x10 inch print will look
about the same as a 35mm negative taken to 3.5 x 5 inches. 
Which is not the same as saying 35mm is a poor tool - it's not!
But if you need big posters, use a big camera. You wouldn't shoot a crocodile
with a .22, would you?
In ballistic terms, If the 35mm frame on the left was a .22
rifle bullet, the two and a quarter frame next to it would be about the same as
a 20mm cannon shell - enough to blast a hole through about eight crocodiles in a
row and embed itself in the engine block of the truck parked behind them.
Get the idea? Although, to be fair, I've never seen a row of
eight crocodiles with a truck behind them, have you? And I understand the
practice of shooting crocodiles and other large quadrupeds is frowned on...

Do I
need a TLR?
It's a
trade off. You'd be swapping the flexibility of 35mm, with its vast array of
lenses, motor drives and accessories, for a simpler camera with the
ability to make gigantic enlargements of a quality that's just unobtainable with
35mm. A TLR can't handle the variety of situations, particularly action
photos, that your 35mm outfit can. But if you like taking your time and
carefully composing images in your mind before you shoot them; if you don't mind
the challenge of working with a single focal length and seeking out unusual
perspectives and viewpoints, I suspect you'll thoroughly enjoy yourself.
If you're already pleased with your 35mm photos, just wait till you see your
first TLR results!
Learn
to pick your battles carefully. If you leave your Nikon and 500mm mirror lens in
the Land-Rover in favour of walking up to that leopard for a full-frame close up
with your Rolleiflex, bear in mind that he can probably run quite a bit faster
than you. Don't come whining to me - you've been warned!

What are the advantages?
 |
Money. A TLR is the cheapest way to start off in
medium format without spending a fortune! There is plenty of choice out
there - Rollei, Yashica, Mamiya, Minolta's superb Autocord, even Ricoh and
Olympus built TLRs back in the glorious fifties and sixties. The Chinese
Seagull is the cheapest really useable TLR, still produced today and
marketed under various names. The Russian Lubital TLR is also a possible
choice, but a friend of mine in England had one and wasn't very happy with
it. (Built by tractor mechanics, optics by the Coca-Cola bottle people, a
very substandard offering...)
|
 |
Simplicity.
TLRs are light, simple to load, easy to use, and
a lot less weight to lug around than an equivalent medium format SLR.
|
 |
Size. 2 1/4 square (6x6 cm) negatives give you more
than three times the size of 35mm. This means grain-free 8x10 prints on 400
ASA film, and even enormous posters retain excellent sharpness and a full
tonal range. Size does matter.
|
 |
Silence. The
mirror doesn't slam up and down at each
shot, unlike an SLR, keeping the camera quiet and unobtrusive. The total lack of vibration
- all the opening and closing forces within a leaf shutter are expended
radially, unlike a vertical or horizontal focal plane shutter - also means you can hand
hold a shot easily at 1/30th of a second, all but impossible with an MF SLR.
With practice, 1/15th is possible. This could well be the reason why I've
often got consistently better photos with my TLRs than with a much more
expensive - and theoretically sharper-lensed - Hasselblad.
|
 |
Flash. TLRs have a leaf shutter that synchronizes at all shutter
speeds. Outdoor fill-flash is easy.
|
 |
Altitude. You can hold the camera upside
down, over the heads of a
crowd, and still see enough in the viewfinder to compose the photo. Need a
bird's eye view of a boxing match? Easier
than carrying a step ladder around, eh?
|
 |
Speed. It
is MUCH faster to reload a TLR than to load a MF SLR magazine. My record for
a film change with the Rolleiflex is twelve seconds, from last shot fired to
cocked and locked on frame one of the next roll. Try that with a Hasselblad!
|
 | Discretion. As
soon as you hold a regular camera up to your eye, people run for cover: it's
pretty obvious you're about to take a PHOTOGRAPH! Since you
drive a TLR at waist level, people tend either not to notice you as much or
not be as nervous. Certainly kids tend to be less shy around that
harmless-looking box.
|
 |
Control. You can
observe your subject during the exposure - who had
their eyes closed, who looked away... you can even see the flash going off.
An SLR, sharing the same lens for viewing and shooting, flips the mirror up
to block your vision at the critical moment of exposure.
|
 |
Composition. The image in the viewfinder
is the right way up but
reversed left to right. This is actually an aid to careful composition,
forcing you to notice more detail. It's also really easy to check at a
glance if everything is lined up straight.
|
 |
Choices. You have a lot of
freedom about how you
compose your shots. The natural format is a square, but of course you
can crop the negative for vertical or horizontal format. All options are
available to you without your having to rotate the camera - it's a very
flexible format!
|
 |
Angles. A TLR is easy to hold really low, or even at ground level.
This can give you a new and unusual viewpoint, and opens creative avenues
that would only be possible with an SLR if you were actually to lie down prone! One
of my favourite tricks is to kneel and use one knee as a camera rest - rock
solid down to 1/8th of a second!
|
 |
Mechanics. TLRs appeal to photographers who love simplicity and don't
want to be dependant on batteries and high-tech. Other than the meter in a
Yashicamat or the current Rolleiflex, a TLR doesn't need a single volt to
make it work. TLRs are entirely mechanical and generally insensitive to
their environment and temperature changes. There's no need to worry about an
LCD going black on a hot day or fading out on you in sub-zero temperatures -
your TLR will happily click away for you long after modern cameras get
packed away safely.
|
 |
Longevity. TLRs are generally far more reliable than equivalent
medium format SLRs. I've talked to several camera service specialists about
this, and they all seem to agree that a TLR's life expectancy - even in
heavy use by an overstressed professional - can be measured in decades. There's
simply less to go wrong - no mirror mechanism, shock absorbers, bayonet
coupling, aperture stop-down, complex film magazine, focal plane shutter,
auto-exposure system...
all kinds of things that can break just aren't there!
Now I'm not saying they never die. But most TLR problems - and this
is true with all cameras and humans, too - stem from lack of exercise!
Unused for years, the special lubricants inside will harden and begin to
solidify, causing stiff operation and failure. To keep your camera
fighting-fit, fire the shutter at least on a monthly basis - run through
all speeds from fastest to slowest a few times. Use the self timer if it has one, turn the focusing knob back
and forth to squish the grease around, and open and close the aperture a few
times. You won't wear it out - if you don't believe me, ask a repair man!
The life expectancy of a Rolleiflex Compur shutter is in excess of 30.000
firings, and the Copal SV found on most Japanese TLRs should be at least as
good. Think that through for a moment: that's two thousand five
hundred rolls of 12 exposure film before the shutter will need a check
up and overhaul! Join that much 120 roll film together, and you'd have a
little over two kilometers of film. Or a hundred rolls a year for 25
years... then you have an overhaul and service done and run it for
another 25 years.
|
What are the disadvantages?
 |
Shoe leather zoom. Other than the Mamiya C
range, there are no
6x6 TLRs around
with interchangeable lenses. Several companies offered screw-on wide-angle
and telephoto adapters, but most folk agree they're not worth the money.
Image cut-off with vignetting, a drop in effective aperture and generally
poor performance are too high a price for a few millimeters more or
less. Use your feet to walk back and forth...
"But I can't change lenses!" did I hear somebody cry out?
Great! Just think of the money you'll save by not having to buy any!
|
 |
Parallax. Just like your left eye sees a slightly
different view from your right, the top lens has a higher view than the
bottom. It's not much, only about 50mm, and at distances greater than a few feet
it's insignificant. But at closer distances, particularly with the
bellows-equipped Mamiya, it can be a real problem if you forget about it.
|
 |
Physics. Mechanical limitations restrict the maximum speed of a leaf
shutter to 1/500th of a second. Focal plane SLRs usually go to at least
1/1000th, many medium format SLRs can do better. This may not seem to be a
problem until you find yourself with 400 ASA film on a bright sunny day - a
couple of extra speeds would help!
|
 | Guesstimation. Since the viewing lens doesn't stop
down,
you have to estimate depth of field using the scale around the focusing
knob. Other than one special lens built for the Mamiya and an adapter for
the Rolleiflex that's as cheap and easy to obtain as Neil Armstrong's space
suit, this applies to all
TLRs. You'll have to rely on the engraved scale that most TLRs fortunately
have.
|
 | Close-ups. Most
TLRs only allow you to focus down to about one meter. Apart from the
bellows-equipped Mamiya C range, you'll have to use special close-up
attachments to photograph anything smaller than a toaster with your TLR.
|
 | Printing. Getting prints made from 120 film will be a
lot more expensive than with your 35mm camera unless you do your own
processing. One hour labs don't do 120 film; it's a professional format
which means using a professional lab. It's the same with cars - a big car
gives you a more comfortable ride, more space and better performance than a
small car, but costs more to run and service.
|

Page 2 of 4
Last Page (4 of 4)
Copyright
© 2001 by Mike Graham. All rights reserved.
Revised: 10 Oct 2001
| | |