LinkExchange Member | Free Home Pages at GeoCities |
Among the cardiovascular drugs, the usually long-term antihypertensives are particularly important in their effects on sleep, generally a decrease in the duration of REM sleep, but it is unclear how significant these effects are for patients. REM sleep is decreased by blockers of beta-adrenoreceptors like pindolol, stimulants of alpha adrenoreceptors like clonidine and guanfacine, serotonin stimulators like Ritanserin and ketanserin, and methyldopa (Aldomet). Only reserpine increases REM sleep. Both of the alpha-1-adrenoreceptor stimulators, Indoramin and prazosin, cause sedation, and propranolol impairs vigilance or attention.
Beta-blockers like propranolol in particular increase wakefulness by causing insomnia and nightmares, and by suppressing REM sleep. However, the frequency of these effects may be low, especially with types of beta-blockers that do not readily penetrate to the brain, like atenolol.
There is so far a lack of research directly addressing the sleep effects of the commonly used calcium antagonist antihypertensives and the ACE inhibitors.
Moving to the anticancer chemotherapy drugs, the patient faces numerous unpleasant side-effects which include daytime sleepiness and fatigue. Moreover, the other side-effects of these drugs--gastrointestinal distress, depression, muscle and joint pain--may disrupt sleep, as may the primary pain of the cancer itself.
Asthma patients commonly complain of sleep problems which may result from a variety of factors, including allergens (i.e., mites) in the bedding, horizontal posture, low blood oxygen, high blood carbon dioxide, low blood cortisol levels, drugs administered and drugs withdrawn. Most drugs used in treating asthma are known to alter sleep. They have varied effects, and are often used in combination, making their net effect particularly difficult to predict or understand.
Sleep studies objectively confirm the disturbed sleep of asthmatics. They are often woken with coughing, wheezing, and breathlessness. Similar problems apply to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD or emphysema). The result is excessive daytime sleepiness in about half of these patients. Besides direct drug effects on their sleep, asthmatics suffer many other factors affecting sleep, such as gastroesophageal reflux, which can be aggravated by the antiasthmatic drug theophylline.
Theophylline also has a central nervous system stimulatory effect that can disturb sleep, particularly in patients new to this drug. On the other hand, at least one antiasthmatic drug, salmeterol, a beta-adrenergic stimulator, has been shown to improve quality of sleep.
Lastly, turning from asthma to Parkinson's Disease, we find sleep disturbances to be one of these patients' most common complaints, present in 74-96% and considered almost as debilitating as their impaired movement. Parkinsonism is associated with almost every kind of sleep disorder. In addition, long term treatment with the mainstay levodopa (usually prescribed as Sinemet) can also disturb sleep.
Other antiparkinson medications include direct stimulators of dopamine receptors such as bromocriptine or pergolide (Permax), dopamine releasing agents like amantidine (Symmetrel), drugs that block receptors for acetylcholine like trihexyphenidyl (Artane) and benztropine (Cogentin), and drugs that inhibit the breakdown of dopamine like seligiline (Eldepryl). Where the effects on sleep of even the best-studied antiparkinson drug, levodopa, remain controversial, those of the other drugs are even more obscure, though there is suggestive evidence to exempt amantidine from the generally invidious effect of the antiparkinson drugs on sleep.
I hope that the summary above has not left those sleep-disordered patients with hypertension, asthma, cancer or parkinsonism in a state of helpless confusion. Sometimes it seems as if anything you can take to help one problem will cause a myriad of other problems.
This review has some of the character of the PDR in its listing of potential side effects without creating a clinical context of their frequency, severity, and offsetting benefits of their therapeutic effects. Generally I discourage patients from dwelling on the PDR descriptions of potential adverse effects of drugs. They are written less to inform the doctor and patient than to protect the drug company against suits based on the allegation that they failed to warn. Therefore, their safest path is to list everything that is ever reported by anyone taking their drug, however rare or tenuous the connection to the drug itself.
One way to think about it is that almost any drug can cause almost any side-effect you could name in some unfortunate individual, but that most patients never have the vast majority of such reported side-effects. On the other hand, if you do have a symptom you suspect to be a side-effect, it is useful supportive evidence (though still not proof) of a connection if the particular side-effect is listed with the drug. It is still more relelvant if it is described as "common." But the most relevant piece of data comes from you the patient: did the symptom start shortly after the drug, or when the drug was increased in dosage, and has it seemed to lessen with dosage decrease? This is, to my mind, the most important evidence that a drug is causing a given side-effect for a given person.
Meanwhile, don't let yourself be paralyzed by anxiety that anything you take will make matters worse. Most often, the opposite is true, that for instance the drug that relieves asthmatic symptoms helps the patient sleep better and therefore feel more alert.