Titus, part 4
"Remind
the people to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready
to do whatever is good, to slander no one, to be peaceable and
considerate, and to show true humility toward all men." (Titus 3:1-2, NIV)
Returning to the book of
Titus, recall that Paul in chapter 2 outlines to Titus the guidelines of
instruction for the congregation in the church at
Given the recent attacks
on Christianity in the
The question in all this
is: should a Christian engage in political protest and activism?
Furthermore, was what Judge Moore did right? This is a very sensitive
topic. Americans, at their hearts, are very rights driven people.
We have become spoiled in a sense; we are so used to a life of liberty and the
pursuit of happiness that we become enraged when something stands in the way of
that pursuit. This goes for Christians and non-Christians. This
country was founded on the principle of free exercise of religion, and
Christians in this country have enjoyed the awesome blessing of unfettered
worship and exercise of Christianity for over 200 years. However, for the
last 35-40 years, this country has become increasingly anti-Christian.
The sexual and cultural
revolutions of the 60's and 70's continued a slow erosion of Christian
values in this country to the point where the great majority of the liberal
elite in politics, the media, and academia are openly
anti-Christian. Combine that with the fact that modern Christianity has
watered down the gospel to appeal to a post-modern culture, and it is no wonder
that orthodox Christianity is under attack; not only from without, but from within.
Now I say all this to
point out that what we are seeing now is a gradual movement in conservative
evangelicalism to "take back the culture." To quote from the
movie Network,
modern evangelicalism is saying "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to
take it anymore." I return to the question posed earlier:
should a Christian engage in political protest and activism? The Apostle
Paul speaks to this in our passage.
"Remind the people
to be subject to rulers and authorities." Paul's
instruction to Titus is to remind the people (i.e., the congregation in
In case you think this
is a Pauline bias, the Apostle Peter says the same thing: "Submit yourselves
for the Lord's sake to every authority instituted among men" (1 Peter
"To be obedient, to
be ready to do whatever is good, to slander no one, to be peaceable and
considerate." Paul now goes on to describe the manner in which
this submission to the rulers and authorities is to take. This list is
fairly self-explanatory. Christians are to be obedient, ready to do
whatever is good, to slander no one and to be peaceable and considerate.
In other words, as I stated earlier, we are to be model citizens.
Considering this list of behavior traits, I find it hard to justify political
activism. There is nothing in this list that allows Christians to
be public nuisances demanding their rights.
"And to show true
humility toward all men." Moving from the Christian's attitude
toward the governing authorities, Paul addresses the Christian's attitude
toward people outside the congregation. We are to be humble toward all
people ("men"). Again, if the command is to be humble, does
that give us an opening to be loudly demanding our rights? No. By
definition, the humble person is not concerned with their rights. In
Romans 12, Paul gives the following instruction: "If it is possible,
as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone" (Romans
In summary, the
Christian is to be in submission to all governing authorities in a manner that
is obedient, eager to do what is good, peaceable and considerate. We are
also to be humble toward everybody. Notice the command to submit to
authority. It is unqualified. It does not matter how benevolent or how
malevolent the government is, the Christian is to be in submission to it as
long as the government does not call on the Christian to act contrary to
Scripture.
So, to answer the
question we started off with: A Christian should refrain from political
protest and activism. This does not mean we completely disengage from the
political arena. It is perfectly acceptable to act in full accordance to
the rights allowed all citizens. For example, we can (and should)
vote. We can (and should) voice our views on social/political subjects
when the time is appropriate in a manner that is in accord with Scripture
(e.g., humble, peaceable and considerate). We can write our elected
officials, etc. The folly comes in when Christians attempt to "take
back the culture." The Apostle John says, "the whole world is
under the control of the evil one" (1 John
Men like Judge Moore,
Dr. Dobson and Dr. Kennedy, while good-intentioned and well-meaning are wrong
and misguided in what they are doing. Judge Moore was patently wrong to
defy a direct order from a superior no matter how much I agree with his point
of view. Furthermore, Dr's. Dobson and Kennedy have spent a considerable
amount of time, money and energy in organizing rallies and protests.
Time, money and energy that could be better spent proclaiming the saving gospel
of our Lord Jesus Christ. Christians will never "take back the
culture" through political and social channels. The only way to
regain the culture is by capturing people one heart, one mind at a time through
the transforming power of the gospel.