STATEMENT ON THE NATIONAL
EXPERIENCE ON ‘POPULATION, GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT’, BY THE REPUBLIC OF
SOUTH AFRICA
PRESENTED TO THE THIRTY THIRD SESSION OF
THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT
NEW YORK, 28 MARCH 2000
Chairperson, distinguished delegates
Yesterday we presented three pertinent
issues that, for our country, defines the thematic relations between
population, gender and development. These are the issues of globalization,
HIV / AIDS and reproductive health and sexual rights. We explained, at the
conceptual level, how we envisaged the operationalisation of the
relationship between these issues in programmatic focus areas.
What we will do today is to share with you
some data and the historical causes and consequences of South Africa’s
particular population experience in relation to gender and development.
First, the state of demographic transition
in South Africa. Fertility trends, as expressed in the Total Fertility
Rate (TFR - the total number of children born per woman in her
reproductive years), in South Africa have declined from between 6 and 7 in
1950 - 1970, to 4 - 5 in the 1980s, and our current TFR is 2,9. The
current TFR comprises of an urban rate of 2,3, compared with a non-urban
rate of 3,9. For women with no education, it is 4,5 - reducing gradually
to 1,9 for women with post school education. The population group with the
highest TFR is non-urban African women. All population groups in urban
areas have a TFR of less than 2,5.
Mortality rates, including infant, under
five and maternal mortality, have consistently declined over past decades.
The current Infant Mortality Rate is 45 / 1000, under five mortality is 59
/ 1000, and the Maternal Mortality Rate is 150 / 100 000. These are the
consequence of improved primary health care and water reticulation
services (amongst others), particularly since 1994. Alarmingly, we are
currently observing a stagnation in maternal mortality decline, and in
certain areas even increases in under five mortality. This is because of
HIV / AIDS.
The rapid movement of urban South Africans
through demographic transition is probably attributable to the very
aggressive family planning programme and population policy of the former
apartheid government in South Africa, which had as singular objective the
reduction of the fertility of black women in the country. That government
was driven by an obsession to demographically control the lives and
livelihoods of black South Africans, as a strategy to supplement its
social, economic and political repression and exploitation of the majority
of the country’s population.
Therefore, the so-called population
strategies of that government undermined women’s reproductive rights, as
part of a total dis-empowerment strategy.
It has however left us with a demographic
profile more typically associated with women enjoying an improved
educational, economic and social status. Sadly, women did not and still do
not enjoy such statuses, in spite of our very progressive and liberal
constitutional and legislative dispensations governing gender and
development.
Do the means justify the end, one would be
tempted to ask. This brings me to the second issue - HIV / AIDS in the
South African society. As we speak, about 150 000 AIDS deaths have already
occurred in South Africa. Almost 12 % of our population is HIV positive.
This does not sound alarming to the lay ear. Projected against our total
population of about 42 million, and over the next decade, conservative
estimates are that by 2009, 6 094 529 South Africans will have died of
AIDS. Most of those dead will have been women, particularly of the 25 - 49
age groups. Male deaths will also be concentrated in those age groups. It
is these projections that led me to refer yesterday to increased
dependency rates and social and economic devastation.
Life expectancy projections - ours has
declined by 6 ½ years over the past decade - do not reflect the fact that
we will be faced by generations of AIDS orphans, and a growing elderly
population with little or no support and care.
I wish to add to yesterday’s call by our
delegation to regard HIV / AIDS as a global concern beyond mere
humanitarian considerations. Particularly our trading partners in the
north may well consider the possible demise of a market and a source of
products that is so integrated with theirs that liberalised trade has
become a political priority for them.
Finally, I will touch on the response of
the South African government, in partnership with the NGO sector and other
role players, to these population realities. Health and welfare programmes
are assuming a community involvement and partnership approach, to create
caring local communities. We are increasingly introducing sexuality
education in our schools, and will probably have to extend that to
pre-adolescent age groups as well.
Our population programme was developed in
the post-ICPD era, and is recognised as a very good example of the policy
translation of the ICPD Programme of Action. That programme has now been
focussed almost exclusively on the demographic impact of HIV / AIDS, on
three levels:
- Preparing the society, economically and
socially, for the impact of the pandemic, and promoting planning in
accordance with the projected impacts;
- Assessing, and pursuing, intervention
programmes aimed at the most vulnerable groups to new infections, and
the groups amongst whom new infections can be curbed, i.e. adolescent
youth;
- Intensified population advocacy and
Information Education Communication projects, with the HIV / AIDS
theme, targeting decision makers in all spheres.
These initiatives are to be complemented by
a much more empowering reproductive health approach, that promotes
reproductive choice for women, especially in marginal, poor, rural areas.
And male responsibility coupled thereto.
Chairperson, I will conclude by indicating
why we are lumping these issues together. I referred to the suggestion of
improved gender equality if one relies solely on reading fertility
indicators. The grip that HIV / AIDS secured over our society is however
the result of (amongst others) the systematic and institutionalised
dis-empowerment of women over a period of centuries - exacerbated by two
decades of infringement on, if not denial of, reproductive choices.
We are therefore not tempted to see the
demographic changes of the past three decades as gains, but as a prelude
to the current demographic devastation by HIV / AIDS.
Distinguished colleagues, South Africa
therefore encourages all nations to seek, over the next days and years of
Commission activities, to even further emphasise and programmise gender
activities that empower women sexually, and entrench male responsibility.
Thank you. |