![]() Personal Website of R.Kannan |
Home | Table of Contents | Feedback |
The Issue of Capital Account Convertibility The Asian financial crisis led to a rethinking of the various issues relating to the CAC. Earlier, CAC was the mantra on everyone's lips and even international agencies like the IMF were nudging - not too gently - countries like India towards liberalising the capital account. While on the subject of capital account convertibility, I recall the observations of our Governor, Dr.Bimal Jalan and I quote, "...It must be understood that merely by lifting all capital controls, the markets of a developing country do not get as deeply integrated as a developed country's markets. As such, each country would need to decide on its own path of capital account liberalization with regard to the timing and sequencing". The critical role played by a well capitalised, well managed and well-regulated financial system which has all along been stressed by the Indian authorities has come into sharper focus. Further, the dangers from a highly leveraged corporate structure without proper norms for corporate governance are better appreciated. Needless to say, the fiscal position has to be taken into account. As far as developing markets in general are concerned, there would be six tenets that would need to be kept in mind by the authorities while deciding on the pace of capital account liberalisation.
Some facts about capital account liberalisation. In the absence of a well chalked out sequencing, the liberalisation of capital account has often been followed by crisis in many countries. It is often a mistake to over emphasise the permissive factor of capital account liberalisation while under estimating the importance of weakness in fiscal policy as well as the compatibilities between the desirable monetary and exchange rate policies and the actual ones followed in practice. At the same time, it also stands to reason that the cost of maintaining controls and the inefficiencies and distortions that result should be carefully evaluated. Nevertheless, given the fact that effect of a crisis is often of a long term nature as far as real sector of the economy is concerned, economists are increasingly recognising the merit of a gradual, well thought out, prioritised opening up of capital account. What lessons do we need to draw from the episodes of crises in other countries?
This brings me to the issue of India's march towards CAC, which has hastened in recent times and our efforts at liberalising various procedures. There is an erroneous impression in certain quarters which are meant to be otherwise well informed. It is stultifying to claim that the Indian approach to CAC is one of encouraging inflows while discouraging outflows. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Capital inflows were always encouraged and repatriability assured. In fact, the thrust of the policy in recent years has been to minimise or totally abolish administrative hurdles. The added emphasis in the last few years has been a gradual and measured opening up of outflows by residents e.g.:
To the NRIs we have sent a strong and unequivocal signal and thereby to the world at large about our commitment to convertibility
For exporters, suffice it to say, that it is a continuous process of rationalisation of procedures, with a view to minimising transaction costs, and to ensure easier and cheaper availability of credit.
The freedom of FIIs in the Indian financial market has been substantially increased and they are allowed to trade in exchange traded derivatives. Alongside, liberalisation has also been effected in the foreign exchange market. For instance, the freedom to rebook cancelled contracts has been restored, so also booking of contracts based on past performance. Swap and open position limits available to banks have been enhanced to enable banks to offer finer rates to the customers. RBI is also actively considering introducing rupee based currency options. A Committee constituted to look into various related aspects is expected to submit its recommendations to the Reserve Bank very soon. I also understand that the Forex association has aptly arranged a panel discussion on this subject tomorrow. I hope that my colleagues who will be participating in the discussions will carry back several useful suggestions on the subject. The issue of capital account convertibility also leads me to the current spate of debates and opinions in respect of the level and cost of reserves. Should countries hold larger reserves or less reserves? Countries need to set their reserves holding on the basis of capital as well as current account variables. Apart from the computable charge on the reserves arising out of commitments relating to capital account transactions both long and short term, as well as trade requirement, the impact of external and internal shocks have to be kept in view in formulating policy on reserves. As the capital account becomes more open and international capital flows more readily, the demand for reserves will increase. Merely comparing global interest rates with domestic interest rate as a proxy for cost of reserves may not be appropriate. It is not the arithmetical difference in interest rate on substitutable assets but the various other unquantifiable benefits that the economy derives on account of strong reserves which needs due recognition in such discussions. Two aspects relating to liberalisation need reiteration even at the cost perhaps of repetition. First and more important for the fruits of liberalisation to reach the common man the role of officials at the bank branches is crucial. Our experience based on the feedback from media reports and the public in this regard is unfortunately not too encouraging. There is just no purpose in talking about CAC from high podiums if action at the grass roots level is still embedded in FERA mindsets. Let me emphasise on one important irritant that a common man is concerned about. He is becoming increasingly intolerant and sensitive to too much documentation particularly for small value transactions. Our efforts in this direction are yet to bear satisfactory results. My message to you, perhaps the most important one, is, to put in special efforts to ensure hassle free service to customers. Second, a more technical one. Recent market developments have underscored the importance of improved risk management practices in the financial sector. To amplify this let me recapitulate the exchange rate movements in recent times. Moving away from pronounced one way movement; the market has started exhibiting fair degree of two-way movements and finer prices. Unlike the earlier periods when market spreads narrowed down faster even at times of volatility the observed pattern of merchant supply and demand viz. falling supplies with a weakening rupee in anticipation of further weakness and shooting up demand due to worry of further weakness and vice versa continue. The more volatile the currency gets, it is the end-users, rather than the intermediaries, who get hurt in the process. It is therefore disconcerting that the two-way movements have not resulted in activating risk management strategies among the end users. Instead, two-way movements have been looked at as opportunities for staying away from the market by opposing segments. Corporates are looking at the treasury as a profit centre. There is a great deal of work to be done by the banks in widening the awareness of risk management among business entities who are yet to look at the market as a place for disposal/acquiring currency rather than a place for profit maximisation. It is necessary that the business entities do not look at exchange rate movements as an exclusive source for profit enhancement of the business. Corporates must appreciate the risks involved. RBI has cautioned banks extending foreign currency loans about the need for assessing the market risk in their clientele books arising out of unhedged currency risks. There is a convincing need for banks and corporates to look at the business balance sheets and identify the sources of market risk, implicit and explicit, and mange it meaningfully in tune with the business objectives of corporates. Another aspect that needs to be given serious thought is the invoicing of trade. The market seems to be very much focussed on the USD -Re rate and the opportunity available in other currencies appears to have been completely over looked. The invoicing pattern of trade reveals that USD continues to be the major currency of invoice. RBI communicates with the market in the language of USD-Re. The stability of Rupee against USD does not mean that Re is equally stable against all the other currencies. Though it is not the intention to discuss invoicing strategy here it is necessary that the end users look at the global currency movements and effectively use the relaxation permitted to evolve appropriate risk management strategies. The increasing integration of the economy with the global markets may bring about change in the currency composition of trade. Recognising this possibility in the long run Government of India recently permitted RBI to use Euro as another currency for intervention. In the context of the market one of the other issues is transparency in rate quotations. Electronic trading platforms are taking over the role of brokers and gradually the volumes through these platforms are increasing in the global markets. With an outright offer and bid price and volume available price discovery has become superior. India cannot be away from the developments and I am sure this development would gain further ground in the times ahead. The recent development in the context of capital markets transactions, relaxing several regulations are an indicator of the emerging trend. The country is committed to a gradual and well calibrated move to capital account convertibility. Convertibility is not a one-time affair; it is a process of evolution and the process is an on-going one. As we move towards an increased level of convertibility, it must be emphasised that the responsibility of the end users and the intermediaries becomes significant. The freedom would bring in two way capital flows and the impact of these flows must be absorbed in an efficient manner. It is necessary that the market develop adequate risk transfer mechanisms, which would provide shock absorption capability in the event of adverse movements. We have to move together to develop risk management products beyond the current age-old product viz. the forwards. | |
|