Personal Website of R.Kannan
Students Corner - A Decade of Economic
Reforms in India - A Review

Home Table of Contents Feedback



Visit Title Page
Students Corner



Back to first page of Module: 3

A Decade of Economic Reforms - Review by RBI
[Source: RBI Report on Currency and Finance 2001-2002 dated March 31, 2003]

Module: 3 - Monetary Reforms - Money, Credit And Prices

Reforms under Monetary Policy - Concluding Observations


Reform Effects & Key Developments

The 1990s marked a fundamental shift in the role of the monetary and financial system from a passive channel of resource mobilisation and disbursal guided by the planning process to an active role in resource allocation in accordance with market signals. The reforms were enabled by fundamental shifts in the monetary-fiscal interface. Moreover, in the context of the growing openness of the Indian economy, the absorption of excess foreign exchange supply in the market led to significant compositional shifts in the Reserve Bank balance sheet and the reserve money analytics. This necessitated recourse to open market operations to achieve the monetary policy objectives. Coupled with the ongoing financial deregulation and its possible implications for stability of money demand, the monetary targeting framework evolved into a multiple indicator approach in 1998-99. In addition, a framework for liquidity management in the form of Liquidity Adjustment Facility was put in place in June 2000.

The monetary policy reforms facilitated a significant reduction in pre-emption of resources. A noteworthy development was the lowering of inflation in the economy in the second half of the 1990s attributable,inter alia, to better monetary management. This, in turn, led to a concomitant softer interest rate environment, especially in the government securities market. The LAF was able to maintain stability in money market conditions. Finally, monetary policy was successful in sterilisation of capital flows in consonance with domestic requirements. An empirical assessment of the monetary transmission mechanism suggests that the output and inflation variations are largely on account of non-monetary factors and the contribution of the monetary policy shocks declined further during the 1990s as compared with the 1980s.

A few issues emerge from the analysis. An important factor determining the effectiveness of the monetary transmission process is the degree of ‘pass-through’. In view of the weak sensitivity of the bank lending rates to changes in the Bank Rate, the efficacy of the monetary policy in reinvigorating growth runs up against a constraint. Second, the shrinking net domestic assets of the Reserve Bank in the context of sustained capital flows brings into focus the limits of sterilisation on an ongoing basis.

Finally, a key objective of macroeconomic policy, including monetary policy, must be the avoidance of resurgence of inflationary expectations. In this context, despite a significant improvement in the monetary-fiscal interface during the 1990s, fiscal dominance continues to persist with growing volume of gross market borrowings. The burden of directly financing the fiscal deficit could easily revert back to the Reserve Bank in case of a reversal in the liquidity conditions, especially as banks’ investments in Government securities are already far in excess of their statutory SLR requirements. Therefore, the issue of separation of debt management function from the monetary authority needs to be addressed. The proposed Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Legislation and the need to accord greater operational flexibility to the Reserve Bank, as indicated in the Union Budget, 2000-01 could have far-reaching ramifications on the operational framework of monetary policy in India.


The conduct of monetary policy during the 1990s was geared to supporting the overall economic reforms with a view to creating a competitive environment as a means of improving productivity and efficiency and ensuring macroeconomic stability. While the twin objectives of monetary policy remained the pursuit of price stability and ensuring credit availability for growth, the operating procedure of monetary policy underwent significant changes in response to the challenges of financial liberalisation. This also entailed reforms in the monetary and fiscal interface in order to ease the fiscal constraint. This process was well supported by structural measures, through the dismantling of administered interest rates and the deregulation of credit markets. Given the changes in the monetary landscape, the process of adjustment has been reasonably smooth. The Reserve Bank was successful in achieving the objective of a phased scaling down of statutory pre-emptions. An important macroeconomic development was the sharp decline in the inflation rate during the second half of the 1990s attributable to better monetary management as well as generally favourable supply side factors. An empirical assessment of the monetary policy transmission mechanism suggests that the output and inflation variations, particularly in the second half of the 1990s largely emanated from non-monetary factors and the contribution of the monetary policy shocks has further declined during the 1990s as compared with the 1980s.

Monetary management increasingly assumed a market orientation. Switch over to indirect instruments of monetary control was consistent with the objective of rekindling the process of price discovery in the financial markets for the purpose of efficient resource allocation. Besides, the opening up of the economy required the Reserve Bank to counterbalance the domestic and the external sources of monetisation in order to maintain stable monetary conditions. The Reserve Bank gradually put in place a liquidity management framework in which monetary conditions are harnessed to the final objectives through a range of instruments, such as open market (including repo) operations and changes in reserve requirements, reinforced by interest rate signals through the Bank Rate and the repo rates. In the process, the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) has emerged as the principal operating instrument of monetary policy. Besides, the growing macroeconomic complexities required a shift from the earlier monetary targeting framework to a multiple indicator approach in which a host of macroeconomic variables are now monitored for the purpose of monetary policy formulation.

In addition, the Reserve Bank, like many other central banks in emerging market economies, has had to increasingly contend with maintaining financial stability. Besides, the Reserve Bank’s role as manager of public debt also implies that the internal debt management function gets inextricably mixed with the monetary management function. In view of the limited number of instruments, the Reserve Bank has to prioritise its objectives given the circumstances. This constrains the degree of flexibility available to monetary policy in a complex macroeconomic environment.

Fiscal dominance continues to be the critical issue. Capital inflows coupled with weak credit demand enabled the Reserve Bank to trade surpluses of the banking system with the deficits on the Government account and thereby ease the fiscal constraint on monetary policy. In the process, net domestic assets of the Reserve Bank have been shrinking and this could impose limits on the scope for sterilisation in the future. At the same time, in view of the burgeoning fiscal deficit, the situation could change very quickly in case there is a pick-up in industrial activity or if capital flows dry up, especially as banks continue to hold a large portfolio of government securities well beyond the statutory prescriptions. It is in this context that the need is sometimes felt to separate the internal debt and monetary management functions. At the same time, even if the Reserve Bank does not directly subscribe to market borrowings, the fiscal impact on bank liquidity would still constrain monetary policy. There is thus a limit to which a central bank can ease the fiscal constraint through liquidity management operations. The proposals advocated by the proposed FRBM legislation for reducing the role of the Reserve Bank in primary subscriptions and limiting the fiscal deficit, thus, assume particular significance.

The deregulation of interest rates and the evolution of inter-linked financial markets facilitated the gradual emergence of an interest rate channel of monetary policy transmission. There is increasing evidence that the Reserve Bank is now able to effectively influence movements in short-term interest rates in the money markets and by extension, prices in the government securities markets. The pass through to the credit markets is, however, still very weak. The deposit and lending rates of scheduled commercial banks continue to be relatively sticky, largely reflecting structural constraints in the form of a large order of NPAs and the continuation of Government administered interest rates in small saving instruments. This had led to downward rigidity in real interest rates blunting the effectiveness of monetary policy. It may be mentioned here that this rigidity in the small savings rate has been partially addressed as the Union Budget, 2002-03 announced that the interest rate on small savings would be linked to the average annual yield on government securities in the secondary market. Corresponding adjustments in these rates have been announced in the Union Budget, 2003-04. To promote flexibility in interest rates, issues such as asset quality of banks, adoption of floating deposit rates and strengthening of asset-liability and risk management by banks, and rigidities in the interest rates of competing assets need to be addressed.

Unlike in the past when bank balances with the Reserve Bank were largely governed by reserve requirements, the demand for bank reserves in the future, in the context of a declining cash reserve ratio (CRR), are likely to depend on banks’ requirements in respect of settlement balances. Day-to-day monetary management would thus require a closer assessment of market liquidity. It is in this connection that the Reserve Bank has initiated a process of liquidity forecasting. While the gradual institution of a real time gross settlement (RTGS) system would control domino risks of default, this is also likely to exert pressure on liquidity management.

The monetary policy framework has been shifting course throughout the 1990s. The breakdown of a stable relationship between money, output and prices as a result of financial innovations coupled with high inflation rates led to the adoption of an inflation targeting framework in many economies. While the pursuit of price stability could be a sound proposition in itself, there continue to be many constraints in the Indian economy, as in many other emerging market economies, which prevent the switch to an inflation-targeting framework. At the same time, it must be recognised that the current anti-inflationary stance was largely built in the backdrop of the high inflation of the 1980s. Since inflationary pressures have been subdued in the recent past, the coexistence of low inflation and low growth in the past two years poses a fresh challenge to the conduct of monetary policy.


- - - : ( End of Module: 3 ) : - - -

Previous                          Top

[..Page Last Updated on 20.01.2005..]<>[Chkd-Apvd]