All
the
best
in chess.
(TM) |
(Navigation bar
directly below.)
*******
|
© A.J. Goldsby,
2009.
(All rights reserved.)
****************
Click HERE
to see the page
for my downloads.
****************
Click HERE
to see any chess
items that I have
that are ...
FOR SALE!
****************
****************
Buy a book
from Amazon.com
(And help me out as well!)
| |
(Click HERE
to return to my Home Page.)
This page is a continuation of my "Best
Tournaments" Page.
(Click HERE to go
there now.)
Click
HERE to see MY list
of:
"The Ten Greatest Chess Tournaments Ever Held."
(All
the comments below refer to the extensive list on the first
"Best
Tourneys" Page.)
I have
numbered what I believe to be fifty of the greatest
tournaments of all time! (Both the "Super 21" Linares
Tournaments could also have been on this list.) These tournaments are NOT in
order, but simply chosen chronologically by the date that they occurred! As
Larry Evans points out, Jeff Sonas's list had many important
omissions. I have attempted to fill a few of these missing tournaments in.
{A.J.G.} )
Additionally,
many of chess history's MOST IMPORTANT tournaments are
in BOLD
print. (But not all of them)
***
I
would very much appreciate if someone would copy all of the above events,
convert Their cross-tables into a standard document
form.
(Preferably MS-Word.)
I
would then make this available as a download on my web-site.
Anybody out there up to this task?
Here
are the ten strongest super tournaments of all time:
(according to Jeff Sonas)
-
Linares
1993. (Super-21, won by Kasparov)
-
Linares
1994. (Super-21, won by Karpov)
-
Vienna
1882. (!) (Super-20, won by Steinitz & Winawer)
-
Nuremberg
1896. (!) (Super-20, won by Lasker)
-
AVRO
1938. (Super-20, won by Fine & Keres)
-
Linares
1992. (Super-20, won by Kasparov)
-
London
1883. (!) (Super-19, won by Zukertort)
-
Hastings
1895. (Super-19, won by Pillsbury)
-
Nottingham
1936. (Super-19, won by Capablanca & Botvinnik)
-
Dos
Hermanas 1996. (Super-19, won by Kramnik & Topalov)
(The
exclams in parenthesis are used to denote relative surprise. These are tournaments most modern-day players have never even heard of! They
are very strong,
many of the older events have been {virtually} forgotten by chess history.)
I
personally feel that many of these more modern tournaments are over-rated.
St.
Petersburg, 1914 is one of the strongest tournaments of all time, according to
many chess historians. I also personally feel that Bled, 1961 has to be one
of the
greatest ... (and surely one of the strongest) tournaments of all
time.
Larry
Evans gave the following answer:
(To the question that was posed by Sonas on the
first page of "Great Chess Tourneys.")
"This tremendous piece of work is bound to stir controversy! Based on Elo's
research, Jeff was able to construct a yearly Top - 10 list dating back to 1860.
He ranked these by adding 4 points each if the number-one or number-two ranked
player competed, plus 3 points for # 3 or # 4, plus 2 for # 5 or # 6, plus 1 for
#7, # 8, # 9, # 10. The maximum number of possible points is 22."
(This seems to me, a little arbitrary. {A.J.G.})
"London
1851, is missing, (it was a knock-out, not a round-robin). Stellar events like
Vienna 1922 and New York 1927 also vanish because just four of the top ten took
part. An argument obviously could be made that the 1948 World Championship
belongs on this list, (#1. Botvinnik, # 2. Smyslov, #3. Keres, # 5. Reshevsky)
-- but it was omitted because Euwe at # 11 fell behind Boleslavsky, Bronstein,
Fine, Kotov, Najdorf, and Flohr.
For
another perspective see "The Enthralling World of Super-Tournaments,"
(New In Chess, 1998/#7); by R.M. Gonzalez. He singles out Karpov's sensational
performance of 2977 in a field of 14 stars at Linares 1994, as one of the
strongest
tournaments of all time. (Super-21.)"
My
(LM A.J. Goldsby I) list of:
is as follows:
(I give these by date, {which was played first}; NOT by their
rank!!)
-
Hastings,
[Engand] 1895 - Easily one of the greatest tournaments ever held.
I used to
have an old book on this tournament, but I have lost it and now I have to be
satisfied with a reprint. I have studied the games many times, and can tell you almost any player could improve after a careful study of these
games.
This was the first real, true international tournament. Practically every
country of [chess] power was represented. Several of the best players
that ever lived participated in this event. Many of these players are
real legends. The former and current World Champion also participated.
Just about ALL of the strongest
players of that period participated. The
result was a surprise victory for the American, Harry N. Pillsbury.
-
London,
[England or Great Britain] 1883 - One of the first great super-tournaments and completely dominated by J.H. Zukertort. Had he not
lost his last three games to the absolute tail-enders of this event, [exhaustion,
he was taking powerful drugs at the end of this event]; this would have been the
greatest, single tournament performance by any player … EVER! (It still may
be, anyway.)
Say Zukertort had won those last three games. And if his opponents would
have had MODERN ratings, (circa 2000-2001) Zukertort's PR would have been in the 3100+ range. It's almost more than the mind can conceive of …
I have had several books on this tournament. It's also some very interesting chess. Great stuff!
-
Nuremburg,
[Germany] 1896 - A great victory for Emanuel Lasker.
Coupled with
his victories at London, 1899; and Paris, 1900; this makes
up probably three
of the greatest tournament victories ever by a World Champion, especially prior
to the end of the 20th century. (This is so odd, because he also won New York,
1924. And he won St. Petersburg, 1914. Because he won so many great tournaments, and placed highly in so many others, many of the 'older' authors would argue
that Emanuel Lasker was in fact the, "Greatest Tournament Player who ever
lived.")
-
San
Sebastian, 1911 - The great Cuban's [Jose R. Capablanca] little ... "Coming-out party."
(A surprise victory for Capa, who
at the time was a virtual unknown. Marshall [and others] had to
speak up for him, [to the tournament committee] before he was even allowed to play!) Easily
one of the strongest and best tournaments ever held. J.R. Capablanca was to win many
tournaments, but this was one of his greatest. (His domination of the tournament at New
York, 1927 was also one of the more impressive performances by a World Champion.) The
Dover book on this event is required reading for any real chess fan.
Did you know that
initially Capa was not going to be allowed to play? And
that he was ONLY permitted to participate in this event after Marshall
vouched for him, assuring the tournament committee that this event would be
severely damaged {weakened} If Capa was not allowed to play. (Marshall has
already several events, most notably Cambridge Springs, 1904, so his words
carried
a lot of weight with the various "power-that-be.") (Added
- May, 2006.)
-
Nottingham,
[England] 1936 - Most chess historians (worth their salt) say this is easily one of the strongest and best tournaments ever held. (Many,
such as J. Gaige & Tim Krabbe {and others} have said this is ... THE strongest tournament of all time.) Capa and Botvinnik tie for first. I highly recommend that you
get the [Dover] book on this tournament and study it. It's great chess and a very
good story. Maybe one of the strongest tourney's of all time!
-
A.V.R.O;
[Holland] 1938 - The great tournament held in the Netherlands to
determine the challenger to World Champion, A. Alekhine. It was a double-round robin, and the players who participated were easily the
best in the world. (At that time.) Keres, Fine, Botvinnik, Alekhine,
Euwe, Reshevsky,
Capablanca, and Flohr. Every player was a legitimate
contender for the crown.
FOUR (4) World Champions participated. Three of
the other players were all very legitimate contenders for the Crown. Keres
and Fine finished tied for first. (Keres was considered the winner on a
rather arbitrary set of tie-breaks.)
It produced some of the best chess games ever played.
After YEARS of research, I ( A.J. Goldsby I )
must conclude
that this was the greatest and strongest tournament ever held. (!!!)
(Dozens of GM's - like Arnold Denker - agree
with this opinion.)
-
Bled,
[Yugoslavia] 1961 - (This tournament is not rated highly by Sonas.)
A gathering of some of the strongest players ever assembled. Tal won,
but just barely ahead of Fischer. Fischer was undefeated and also beat Tal in their individual game. Perhaps one of the most momentous gatherings of all
time. Forget the numbers, practically all the players here are
legends, and all the players in the top half of this tournament will surely all be enshrined ... in the "Chess Hall of Fame."
( # 1. - M. Tal; {14.5} #
2.) - R. Fischer; {13.5}
# 3-5) - T. Petrosian, P.
Keres, and S. Gligoric;
# 6-7.) - E. Geller & P.
Trifunovich; # 8.) B. Parma;
# 9-10.) A. Bisguiser & Matanovich;
and 11-13.) Darga, J. Donner,
M. Najdorf; # 14.) F.
Olafsson,
# 15-16.) L. Portisch &
B. Ivkov; # 17.) L.
Pachman,
and three more rabbits. (Bertok, Germek, and Udovcich) )
( All the players in bold print belong in the Chess "Hall of
Fame," in my opinion. ALL the players named above would easily be GM's today, especially by
modern standards. {The players in blue were either GM's, or Super GM's. They
all either had, or would later have, outstanding playing careers. There are many
"Super GM's" in this group. Many were repeated contenders for the World
Championships. There are great players, writers, and even a World Junior Champion (Ivkov) - and
a player who would also win
the World Junior ... later that year (Parma) - in this group.} A very
elite gathering of some of history's greatest players.
)
-
Linares,
[Spain] 1993 - One of Gary Kasparov's greatest victories.
In a long
line of superb victories. I don't know if there is a book on this event, but
if there
is not, there should be one! Practically every player who had a claim to be
in
the World's "Top Ten" was here, yet Garry steam-rolled everybody. One of the
greatest chess tournaments in the pantheon of chess.
-
Linares,
[Esp.] 1994 - Anatoly Karpov's greatest triumph. He wins one of the strongest gatherings of players ever assembled and performs at a near 3000 PR clip. Even Capablanca in his heyday may not have played as well as Karpov did in this tournament. GM Arnold Denker, writing in FLChess, said,
"Karpov out-did Capablanca." (Knowing what a big fan of Capa GM Denker is, I
know
this was a hard admission for him to make.) Incredible chess.
(Get the old copies of the magazine, "Inside Chess," and play over some of these games.) Karpov's most amazing tournament.
-
CORUS/Wijk
aan Zee, [Netherlands] 2001 - Yet another victory for Garry Kasparov.
Coming as it did, AFTER his defeat at the hands of Kramnik, he very clearly
demonstrates that he is still a force to be reckoned with. This tournament,
with practically all the best players attending, is easily as good
as (or
better than!) many of the older and more classical tournaments. (Also, some
of the games played are fantastic struggles.) This Category 19-24 event is
easily one of the strongest tournaments ever played.
(There
may have been a few events that are very strong and could qualify for this
list. But they were
played AFTER I created this particular list, and I am not going to
update it on a daily basis.)
Note that this list only takes into account tournaments held up until 2001!
(One day - when I have the
time - I shall come back and list notable tournaments since that date. May,
2006.)
Well,
folks that is my list. Having devoted my entire life to the study of chess, I
think it is a list that should be taken very seriously. I tried very hard to be fair.
I passed over St. Petersburg, 1914. (A personal favorite of mine.) I also skipped Cambridge
Springs, 1904. (Another personal favorite.) After lengthy
consideration, I decided it was not strong enough to be included on this list. I also passed
over New York, 1924. (Yet another personal favorite!!) This is because the
tournaments on my list are all a little stronger. (At least!!)
I
am also a little upset that a Bobby Fischer victory is not represented here.
(Also Morphy is not included either.)
But Fischer's PERFECT score in the U.S. Championship of 1963/64 is a mark that
even Kasparov and Kramnik can only dream about. (Also his record of 21
consecutive victories against GM's may never be broken.) His
domination of the Interzonal Tournament of The Palma de Majorca, 1970
(Fischer won by 3.5 points); also stands as one of the most incredible
performances in a tournament of that type. So Fischer may not have a
tournament win in the Top Ten. I guess I can live with that. I guess he has
more than enough triumphs and victories and records for one man.
***
I
skipped MANY modern tournaments, and a few of the older ones. I have very valid
reasons for just about all of these omissions. For instance, I skipped The Chess
World Championship [Quadrangular] Tournament, The Hague/Moscow 1948. The
reason?
It's all but a forgone conclusion that Botvinnik's opponents had to throw their games to him. {At least a few of them, enough to insure that Botvinnik won.} Its also well-known that the Soviets [During the rule of the communists,
anyway.], often played in events, "As a team." This tarnishes many of
these events and puts them under a cloud. (In my opinion.)
***
I
included many of the older tournaments where the strength of the actual games played is in question … and skipped many of the more modern tournaments
for the reason that rating inflation just make them SEEM to be stronger. The trend towards very quick and dull draws in many of these events does not do much
to win over the average chess fan, either. And if you were to carefully study
ALL the games (every single game!) from the tournaments in my list, you would certainly
improve your game, NO MATTER WHAT YOUR RATING IS!!!
USCF
LIFE-Master, A.J. Goldsby I
(June
06, 2001.)
(For
the last 5-7 years, I have been examining the games and studying the players of
this event. This little section is an inspiration that results from all of that
work. I hope you enjoy it and that it will give you a greater appreciation of
the older tournaments. That is my goal, please
let me know if you think I succeeded.)
I
have always felt this tournament was simply one of the strongest events ever
held. This is not an un-informed opinion, many notable chess historians have
expressed the same sentiments. Ever since I was a youngster, I read about this
tournament ... and dreamed about just being able to sit in the audience and
watch these legends of chess play the game.
The
participants were a veritable "Who's Who?" of chess.
(Certainly the best players of that time!) I present them in the order of their
rating.
(The
ratings below are adjusted and based on those from the web
site of Jeff Sonas. See the Dec. 1913 rating list,
or try here.)
-
Emmanuel
Lasker (2796) -
(World Champion) The best player in the world ... at that time. He also had
the highest rating. And he had won MANY of some of the strongest tournaments
ever held up until that point in chess history.
(St. Petersburg, 1895/96; Nuremburg, 1896; London, 1899;
Paris, 1900.
Just to name a few.)
-
Jose
R. Capablanca (2750)
- The Cuban Genius. At that time, he was basically the new kid on the
block. (Before he won San Sebastian, 1911; {His FIRST international
tourney!!}; no one really knew who he was.) But just a few
short years later, he was already firmly in the list of the world's best
players. (#2!!)
-
Akiba
Rubinstein (2690) - The
man who won five straight, consecutive international tournaments. (In one
year!!) At one time, many thought this player to be the next world champion.
(I think Lasker purposely avoided a match with him ... and I cannot really
blame him!) His best recent results were first at Lodz, 1908; and St.
Petersburg, 1909. (Tied with Herr Lasker.)
-
Siegbert
Tarrasch (2662) - The
German Doctor, chess master, and teacher. At one time, he may have been the
strongest player in the world. (Many books say he was one of the world's
best 4-5 players for nearly 25 years.) He had already won many strong
events, two of his best (more recent) results were Vienna, 1898; and Monte
Carlo, 1903. (He won clear first at both events.)
-
Frank
J. Marshall (2637)
- The strongest player from the United States (since Pillsbury's
decline), and the winner of Cambridge Springs, 1904. He was also one of
those players who may not play well in matches, but excelled in tournament
play.
-
Aaron
Nimzowitsch (2620) -
One of the founders of the Hyper-Modern movement, and already one of the ten
best players in the world. (But he would not reach his greatest strength
until maybe the late 1920's.) A dangerous player from Latvia ... he
had already shown his mettle in tournament and match play.
-
Carl
Schlechter (2618) -
The strong player from Vienna, he had the reputation of being nearly
impossible to defeat. (His nickname was, "The drawing Master.") He
had won Munich, 1900; Vienna, 1905; and Vienna, 1908. He also had contested
a (short) World Championship Match in 1910 against Lasker.
-
Alexander
A. Alekhine (2593)
- {Based on some recent results, I would have rated this player a
little higher. But I have not yet gone back and re-calculated all of his
tournaments prior to this date, so I will have to use the rating give by
Sonas.} A future world champion, and the winner of many, many tournaments.
He had already shown himself to be one of the strongest players in all of
Russia at that time, but here he would only finish third.
(Really not a bad
result!)
-
Ossip
S. Bernstein (2585)
- A Ukrainian Jew, this globe-trotter later settled in France. For
nearly 50 years, this great player was solidly in the 'Top 30' players in
the world. His best more recent result was a tie for first with Rubinstein
at Ostende, 1907. (An interesting side note is that the tournament committee
of San Sebastian, 1911 were going to disallow Capablanca's entry. Bernstein
spoke up and vouched for Capa as being a strong and worthy player. Capa
rewarded him by winning first place, and beating Bernstein in their
individual game ... and this encounter would later go onto win the FIRST
Brilliancy Prize for that event!)
-
David
M. Janowski (2540)
- This Polish-born player later settled in Paris in approximately
1890. He came in second behind Lasker in London, 1899. He won Monte Carlo,
1901. (Clear first, +10, =3, -2.) In the years, 1901 to 1907, he played in
many strong events, usually placing well, (second through fifth) in the
cross-table. He also came in tied for second with Lasker at Cambridge
Springs, 1904. (In 1905, Jeff Sonas says he was the number three player in
the world!!) But his best playing days may have already been behind him. (He
did not make the finals here.)
-
Joeseph
H. Blackburne (2485)
- For many, many years, the best player that Great Britain ever
produced. {His nickname was 'The Black Death!'} (In 1881, Jeff Sonas ranks
him as # 2 in the whole world!!) Winner ... and strong finisher in MANY
International events. (He also won many small matches.) He tied for
first in a strong event in Weisbaden, 1890. In Berlin, 1881, he simply
buried the rest of the field. (3 points ahead of Zukertort, and nearly 10
points ahead of 5th place!!) He also won Belfast, In Manchester in 1890, he
came in second after Tarrasch. (Who dominated this event.) He also won
Belfast, 1892. (Tied for first with Mason.) He was probably invited as the
strongest representative of England ... but unfortunately his best days were
probably in the past. (He did defeat Nimzovich.)
-
Isidor
A. Gunsberg (2450)
- Born in Budapest, he later moved (permanently) to England. (In 1891
he was rated nearly 2650 and ranked number
three in the world!) He won the Hamburg (GER) International Tournament
of 1885 ahead of all the best players in the world. In 1887 he tied for
first place (with Burn) in the London International tournament. He tied a match in 1889 with
Tchigorin - who was then probably at the height of his powers. He subsequently challenged Steinitz for the World Championship (1890-91) and
lost a very close match. He also organized Ostende, 1906 which virtually
launched the careers of both Rubinstein and Bernstein. His better playing
days were also behind him, here he was clearly outmatched ... ...
...
he was unable
to win a single game.
**********
This
was an extremely strong tournament ... these guys were the legends of chess.
Every player here had been a top player in his day and won several international
tournaments. With the exception of R. Spielmann, EVERY PLAYER
OF THE 'TOP TEN' (in the rating list) WAS
PRESENT!!!!!! Using only the ratings of the Top Ten players,
this was a Category 17 or 18 event. (Using a more favorable system, that could
easily be changed to a Category 18-20!!) {Using the actual ratings of all
the players present drops this down to only a Category 12 - 13 event.} A re-computed
average rating of the five players in the finals was nearly 2725.
---> Making this a "Super-20" or "Super 21" (or
better!!) event by Sonas's standards.
**********
Some of the more interesting facts about this event are:
-
-
Lasker scored six wins and two draws in the finals ...
a 3000+
PR (performance rating) by modern
standards!!
-
-
This tournament produced ...
THE FIVE ORIGINAL
GRAND-MASTERS!!!
(Capablanca, Lasker, Tarrasch, Alekhine, and
Marshall.)
-
-
I have studied all of the games of this event. Nearly every contest
...
is both memorable and great.
-
-
In terms of quality and the quantity of contestants, this event
is
easily one of the best and strongest tournaments prior to
1950.
Only Hastings, 1895; and Nottingham,
1936; compare
favorably to this incredibly great and historic
tournament.
Page last up-dated: Tuesday; May 02nd,
2006. Last edit/save on: 06/25/2009
.
*******
Copyright (c) LM A.J. Goldsby I
Copyright (c) A.J. Goldsby, 1996-2008.
Copyright © A.J. Goldsby, 2009. All rights reserved.

|