Main
About
Reviews
Articles
Links
Contact
Old Site
The Sting
(George Roy Hill, 1973)

Classification: Good
Originally Published: Movie Poop Shoot, 11/3/04
Even against the tough competition from THE EXORCIST, THE STING won the Best Picture Oscar for 1973. So often we talk about the Academy getting things wrong. This time they got it right.

I saw THE STING for the first time as a young teenager, when it aired on PBS during a pledge drive. Even despite the endless commercial interruptions suggesting I pledge my allowance money in exchange for Scott Joplin albums and piles of tote bags, I was mesmerized by this movie; only about twenty years old at the time, but, with its Depression setting, felt like a relic from a forgotten age.

Essentially, THE STING is a sequel. Four years earlier, stars Paul Newman and Robert Redford and director George Roy Hill had teamed for the first time in BUTCH CASSIDY AND THE SUNDANCE KID, an undeniably great end-of-the-western comedy. Though THE STING was well-liked and a huge box office hit, it is far more fashionable today to prefer BUTCH CASSIDY, since its quipping heroes and dark ending bear have far more in common with cool contemporary cinema than the romantic and unapologetic ally upbeat STING.

Redford plays Johnny Hooker, a low-rent grifter whose partner is killed when they accidentally steal from rackets boss Doyle Lonnegan (an intensely menacing Robert Shaw). Seeking revenge, he finds Newman's Henry Gondorff, and convinces him to help play Lonnegan for "The Big Con."

Redford's good but Newman is better, or at least gets all the best moments (His first line: "Glad to meet you kid, you're a real horse's ass"). Setting the con in motion requires Gondorff infiltrate Lonnegan's card game and out-cheat him. He spikes his breath with gin (because marks can't tell if you cut it) and plows into the high-class, high-stakes game with "Sorry I'm late. I was taking a crap." The poker scene in THE STING, stylistically simple as it is, is one of my favorites, because Newman’s mischievous grin never fails to make me smile.

THE STING was only the second film I ever reviewed in this column nearly five years ago. The writing was terrible (some may say it still is) by even my infantile prose couldn't smother my enthusiasm for the film, an enthusiasm that remains just as strong five years later. Back then, there was something unquantifiable about the film, a charm that I couldn't put my finger on. "There's something magical about this movie," I wrote, straining to understand exactly what about this middlebrow concoction involving Depression-era grifters charmed me so completely. Five years later I'm still struggling with it.

Here's one additional reason to love THE STING. A key indicator of any movie's quality is its ability to suck you into the narrative on repeat viewings, even after you already know the outcome. In this department, THE STING is almost unparalleled. No matter how many times I see it (and I'm at about a dozen full viewings at this point), there are moments that still affect me: Luther announcing his retirement to Hooker; the final hand in the poker game on the train; the final moments of “The Wire” con. That the entire film is structured around the careful manipulation of suspense and surprise makes this feat even more astonishing -- by all rights, this film shouldn't work at all on second viewing. Instead, it works better because instead of viewing the con from Lonnegan's perspective, we see it from Gondorff and Hooker's. And it's always more fun to be the con artist than to be the conned.