|
Score |
Explanation |
| Overall
Aesthetics (This refers to the WebQuest page itself, not the
external resources linked to it). |
Overall
Visual Appeal
(0-4 pts.) |
3 |
The font of this WebQuest is large enough
to read, but not too large to be distracting. The background is a dark
color, so it's very visible on a white background and isn't distracting.
I think it's a little plain though and that they could have used more color
than just a border. There's only one picture on the whole WebQuest. The
rubric is very colorful and looks the nicest out of every other page of
the WebQuest. |
Navigation
& Flow
(0-4 pts.) |
3 |
All of the student components are listed
top to bottom on one page. Students just need to scroll down the page.
Targets are at the top of the page and can take the students to a particular
area. The sections aren't blocked off. Everything just runs together. I
would recommend either having separate pages with links on every page so
they don't have to keep scrolling up and down all of the time or having
the links at each section of the WebQuest. |
Mechanical
Aspects
(0-2 pts.) |
1 |
All of the targets work except for three.
They say plug ins are not available for some reason. |
| Introduction |
| Motivational
effectiveness of Introduction (0-2 pts.) |
1 |
It doesn't seem to be very motivational to me.
It concentrates too much on marriage. These are young teenage kids. Most
of them are not thinking about marriage at this age. They have enough problems
to deal with. I would recommend talking more about dating, dating violence,
and what constitutes a healthy relationship. |
Cognitive
effectiveness of the Introduction
(0-2 pts.) |
2 |
I think that it's very clear. The students
should know exactly what they have to do. The process is written step by
step. It was written in part 1 and part 2 to make it easier and more understandable. |
| Task
(The
task is the end result of student efforts... not the steps involved in
getting there). |
Connection
of Task to Standards
(0-4 pts.) |
4 |
The task clearly fits with the standards listed
on the teacher page. |
Cognitive
Level
of the Task
(0-6 pts.) |
4 |
The directions are easy to follow, but I feel
that some students may find this very difficult, while others may get done
quickly. It doesn't really relate to something that happens in their lives
right now. Plus, some students may not be very computer literate. Some
may not have a computer at home to be. It's also very time consuming. It's
a lot of work. |
| Process
(The
process is the step-by-step description of how students will accomplish
the task). |
Clarity
of Process
(0-4 pts.) |
3
|
The process is clear, though items in the evaluation do not
appear to be in the process.
|
Scaffolding
of Process
(0-6 pts.) |
5
|
The activities are clearly related to completing the task.
It's very organized.
|
Richness
of Process
(0-2 pts.) |
1
|
The students need a more intensive role. Something that is
really going to motivate them. Also, there are no roles assigned for each
member of the group. The task could be expanded by having one group member
assigned a specific role. Each group member completes their role and then
all group members could come together and work on relating each area they
were assigned to the final project.
|
| Resources
(Note:
you should evaluate all resources linked to the page, even if they are
in sections other than the Resources block. Also note that books, video
and other offline resources can and should be used where appropriate.) |
Relevance
& Quantity of Resources
(0-4 pts.) |
4 |
All of the resources are excellent references
for the students to complete this project. They all fit right in with the
task. There is a good number of resources for the students in order
to complete the task also. |
Quality
of
Resources
(0-4 pts.) |
4 |
All of the resources are excellent references
and fit right in with the task. They will definitley help the students
in order to complete the project. |
| Evaluation |
Clarity
of Evaluation Criteria
(0-6 pts.) |
6 |
The rubric is excellent. It's very organized
and colorful. It fits right in with the process. It's very organized and
let's the students know exactly what they need to have for their grade.
It basically goes right along with the process so the students just need
to follow this in order to get a good grade on the project. |
Total
Score
(0-50
pts.) |
41 |
This WebQuest is good, but it needs some more
work. It's a good idea, but it needs to relate to what is going on in the
student's lives now, not later in life. They date at the high school level,
but most of them aren't even thinking about marriage at this point in their
lives. It should concentrate more on dating, dating violence, and healthy
relationships. |