Reactions of september 11 2001 terrorist attacks
But inspired by Sept 11, psychiatrists have devoted thousands of words to the topic at their annual meeting in Philadelphia. reactions of september 11 2001 terrorist attacks Terrorist-attacks-on-the-us. They've explored what evil is, what kind of people do evil things, and what can be done to prevent evil. Defining evil, especially in a legal way, is not as easy as you might think. There's so much variation in what constitutes depraved or vile or heinous behavior that it's not far from the famous definition of pornography. reactions of september 11 2001 terrorist attacks Terrorism pictures. "I know it when I see it," said forensic psychiatrist Michael Welner, chairman of the Forensic Panel, psychiatrists who consult in legal cases. This is an important problem because legal punishment -- especially capital punishment -- can hinge on whether jurors think a crime was particularly vicious. So Welner, a New York psychiatrist who led a forum at this week's meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, has decided to "wade in the cesspool of this topic" and try to figure out if people of different ages, sexes, religions and races can agree on what constitutes depravity. reactions of september 11 2001 terrorist attacks Reactions of september 11 2001 terrorist attacks. He's developing a "depravity scale" based on an online survey about criminals' intent, actions and attitudes. Participants decide whether an act is especially, somewhat, or not depraved. Eventually, the Depravity Scale will be pruned to a smaller number of items about which there is widespread agreement. Some examples:Intent to emotionally traumatize the victim, through humiliation,maximizing terror, or creating an indelible emotional memory (such as causing a child to witness a violent crime). Prolonging the duration of a victim's suffering. Targeting a victim because he or she was helpless. At a forum chaired by Welner, Michael H Stone, a Columbia University psychiatrist who studies sadistic parents, recited a litany of "true crime" cases. There was the father who poured boiling water over his 9-year-old son's penis and then set off a cherry bomb under his puppy, the mother who locked her daughter in the closet overnight before church, and the uncle who made his niece choose the stick with which he would beat her. "There is always a case more revolting and depraved than the one you and I think of as the worst," he said. Psychiatrist Joseph Merlino of the New York University School of Medicine argued for a lower threshold for defining evil, as behavior that deprives people of their humanity. He talked about evil in the workplace -- actions that involved violations of trust by ordinary people, such as embezzlement by a well-liked, religious executive. The traditional approach to evil is that it "resides in certain kinds of people who are different from us," said Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist at Stanford University who is president of the American Psychological Association. Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and, now, Osama bin Laden top the list of evil people. Most people think there is an impermeable line separating good from evil that they themselves would not cross. But Zimbardo has spent his career studying what makes average people do bad things and he said he has learned that barrier is "much more permeable than we would like to believe. "A famous example was the famous 1954 study by Stanley Milgram, in which he told people they were giving others electric shocks to help the victims learn. Sixty-five percent administered shocks they believed were dangerous.
Reactions of september 11 2001 terrorist attacks
Airplane || People killed on terrorist attacks || National commission on terrorist attacks || Domestic terrorism