comments by Patrick C. Ryan
(4/5/2000)
Every early tradition of which I have knowledge unequivocally asserts that nothing but the primeval, formless ocean preceded the formation of the universe.
"When heaven above was not (yet even) mentioned,
(nor) firm-set earth below called by name;
(when) but primeval Apsû, their begetter,
and the matrix, Ti'âmat
— she who gave birth to them all —
were mingling their waters in one."
EXCURSUSUnfortunately, the most complete account of the Sumerian creation myth is the above- referenced Akkadian epic.
Though Jacobsen equates Uraš with Ki, the earth, I rather believe this name captures a Sumerian designation for the circular motion (analogous to that of the Northern Circumpolar Regions before the appearance of stars) in the primeval ocean that was the active component of the first entity. We can, I think, even discover the corresponding Sumerian name of the passive component: Nam-mu, "a goddess who was considered, in some traditions, to have given birth to An (heaven) and Ki (earth)" (Black and Green 1992, p. 134). Nam-mu is written with the archaic sign for "open", HAL (‘a six-pointed star'), or the archaic sign for "star", AN (‘an eight-pointed star'), inside the archaic sign for a circular enclosure (KIL), which, I interpret as "emptiness, space" ("that which contains the stars"). The name, Nam-mu, I analyze as nam, a prefix forming abstracts + mu(-10) (SAL — the archaic sign for which is a downward pointing triangle with a short vertical line almost bisecting it up from the apex, the mons Veneris, with the aperture of the vulvae indicated), which means "woman, be broad, vulva(e), spread out wide, width" = "*space"; thus Uraš and Nammu are respectively the primeval motion and the primeval empty space.
Nammu is named in the An-list of alternate names for deities: (D)Ama-libir-tu-an-ki, which means "ancient mother who bore heaven and earth". (Jacobsen 1976, p. 95) |
the sons of the earth (snakes) and (even) vermin had not (yet) been created
in that place;
(myself and) them who were there was what I raised from Nu(n),
from inertness
(even though) I could not find a place wherein I could stand. (author's
translation)"
jn xpr pt, jn xpr t3,
jn qm3m s3.w-t3 Ddf.t
m b(w).t pwy
Tz.n.j jm(jw).sn m Nw(nw)
m jnnw
jn qm.n.j b(w).t ‘H'.n.j jmy
face of the deep."
EXCURSUSThe word translated as "deep" is Hebrew tehôm, which is feminine; and, in the plural absolute as t'homôth (Gesenius 1951, p. 1062), in the meanings "deep, sea, abyss" — at origin, probably a proper name since it is never used with the article. We have seen that the Akkadian creation epic, Enûma elish, names two deities as creators: "... primeval Apsû, their begetter, and the matrix, Ti'âmat . . . " Akkadian Apsû is a borrowing from Sumerian ab-zu, which designates fresh water (Black/Green 1992, p. 27). Akkadian Ti'âmat is, I believe, also a borrowing from Sumerian: ti, "life" + ama, "mother" + an Akkadian -t, which creates a feminine noun. That Ti'âmat also represented water is shown by the phrase "were mingling their waters in one", which indicates that both represented water; and by the existence of the Assyrian tiâmtu/tâmtu, "sea", which, is rather transparently derived from Ti'âmat. Though Akkadian Ti'âmat should ideally correspond to Hebrew *t'm(t), interchanges of ‘ (/?/) and h are familiar in Northwest Semitic (Moscati 1969, p. 42) so Hebrew thm(t) would not be an unusual correspondence for Akkadian Ti'âmat. So, in view of the semantic and phonetic correspondences, it is highly likely that Hebrew tehôm is a distant echo of Akkadian Ti'âmat (and ultimately, Sumerian *ti-ama), a designation for the passive female component of the celestial ocean. Thus, the Hebrew account corresponds to the general pattern with the small exception that the name of the male component has been suppressed in the creation story itself, however — according to Graves and Patai, even Akkadian Apsû has found its way into the Old Testament as aphsayim, "waters" (Graves/Patai 1983, pp. 32-33). |
Chaos, but found nothing substantial for her feet to rest upon,
and therefore divided the sea from the sky,
dancing lonely upon its waves".
And Bumba was alone."
motion and persistence of created being. This force is water (Nummo), and
the Pair are present in all water."
unmanifested water."
water
. The waters desired, ‘How can we be reproduced?' They toiled andperformed fervid devotions
, when they were becoming heated, a golden eggwas produced."
when there was yet no earth, but water covered everything..."
animal, bird, fish, crab, tree, rock, hollow, canyon, meadow, forest. Only
the sky alone is there; the face of the earth is not clear. Only the sea alone is
pooled under all the sky.'"
everywhere there was only water."
no land---no land but the land of the gods. There was only the sea and the
sea was everywhere."
The Universe was in darkness, with water everywhere.
...(Io) then looked to the waters which compassed him about,
and spake a fourth time, saying:
'Ye waters of Tai-kama, be ye separate.
Heaven, be formed.' Then the sky became suspended.
'Bring-forth thou Tupua-horo-nuku.'
And at once the moving earth lay stretched abroad."
We have attestations from many early cultures that associated the bringing of civilization to them by creator-deities connected with the planetary deity associated with water, which was Venus (Osiris in Egypt; Enki in Sumer; Quetzalcoatl in Mexico).
This, of course, is a blurring of the distinction between the primeval, celestial ocean; and earthly waters; and a gradual loss of identity by the former as the planetary deities grew in importance.
Similarly, the ancient sky and earth deities eventually were subsumed by the deities representing planetary Jupiter (originally only weather) and Saturn (old age and decay).
The Milky Way, once a deity of shamanic wisdom reached through spiritual traveling among the worlds (heaven, earth, underworld), was absorbed by planetary Mercury; and the functions of the constellation Draco, which represented conflict, were taken over by Mars.
The two stars which were deities in the very earliest beliefs, the Sun and Moon, retained their duties of social harmony (justice), (camp-)fire; and animal fertility.
Black, Jeremy, and Green, Anthony. 1992. Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia - An Illustrated Dictionary. Austin: University of Texas Press
Budge, E. A. Wallis. 1969 [1904]. The Gods of the Egyptians - or Studies in Egyptian Mythology. 2 vol. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
Eggeling, Julius. 1900. Sacred Books of the East. Vol. 44. Max Müller (editor). Oxford: Clarendon Press
English, E. Schuyler, editor-in-chief. 1948. Holy Bible. Pilgrim Edition. New York: Oxford University Press
Gardiner, Sir Alan. 3rd edition, revised 1973. Egyptian Grammar: being an Introduction to the Study of the Hieroglyphs. London: Oxford University Press
Gesenius, William. (as translated by Edward Robinson). 1951 (1906). A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament — with an Appendix Containing the Biblical Aramaic. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Graves, Robert. 1959. The Greek Myths. 2 vol. New York: George Braziller, Inc.
Graves, Robert, and Patai, Raphael. 1983. Hebrew Myths: The Book of Genesis. New York: Greenwich House (distributed by Crown Publishers, Inc.)
Griaule, Marcel. 1975. Conversations with Ogotommeli. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Holmberg, Uno. 1927. Finno-Ugric, Siberian Mythology, Vol. 4 of The Mythology of All Races. Boston: Marshall Jones
Hongi, Hare. 1907. A Maori Cosmology. in The Journal of the Polynesian Society, 14 (63). Wellington: Polynesian Society
Jacobsen, Thorkild. 1976. The Treasures of Darkness - A History of Mesopotamian Religion. New Haven and London: Yale University Press
Leach, Maria. 1956. The Beginning. New York: Funk and Wagnalls
Moscati, Sabatino, et alii. 1969. An Introduction to the Comparative Grammar of the Semitic Languages: Phonology and Morphology. Wiesbaden: Otto Harassowitz
Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Volume I. Bern and Munich: Francke Verlag
Taube, Karl. 1993. Aztec and Maya Myths. Avon: The Bath Press
Thompson, Stith (editor). 1968. Tales of the North American Indians. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Zaehner, R. C. 1966. Hindu Scriptures. Translation. London: J. M. Dent
the latest revision of this document can be found at
HTTP://WWW.GEOCITIES.COM/Athens/Forum/2803/proto-religion/creation-1.htm
Patrick C. Ryan * 9115 West 34th Street - Little Rock, AR 72204-4441 * (501)227-9947
PROTO-LANGUAGE@msn.com