GENESIS: Part 3
THE FIRST ELEVEN CHAPTERS OF GENESIS ARE NOT THE ONLY CHAPTERS OF THE HEBREW BIBLE QUESTIONED BY MODERN HISTORICAL SCIENCES.
IN FACT EVERY MAJOR EVENT OF THE BIBLE RECORD IS CURRENTLY SEEN AS HISTORICALLY SUSPECT MAINLY BECAUSE OF A MISMATCH WITH HISTORY.
THE BIBLE AS HISTORY
KEY BIBLICAL EVENTS
CREATION C. 5793 - 3761 BC
FLOOD C.3537 - 2105 BC
BABEL C.3300 - 1765 BC
ABRAM BORN C.2305 - 1813 BC
ABRAM IN EGYPT C.2230 - 1738 BC
JACOB IN EGYPT C.2015 - 1525 BC
EXODUS C.1585 - 1310 BC
The dates given above represent two extremes of fundamentalist opinion - one being Christian and based on the Septuagint Greek version (also called the LXX) of the Hebrew Bible, the other being Jewish and based on the Masoretic text and a date of 421 BCE for the fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonians [normally dated to 587 BCE.]
How does the Bible compare against the historical record as understood by modern archaeology? Not very well. You might think that can't be true since so many books and commentaries about the Bible claim it be supported by archaeology, but in actual fact there is no accepted evidence for any of the Bible characters prior to the kings after Solomon. Solomon's empire doesn't exist, David and Saul are silent figures in history, and everyone prior has left no historical record. For archaeology there is NO TRACE of Bible history prior to the late 10th Century.
How can this be so? A little understood fact is that most of the ancient world is dated off the historical records of the Egyptians and records of their dealings with other cultures. Egypt is the backbone of Ancient world chronology, its thirty-plus Dynasties the clock of ancient time. Since this chronology so grossly fails to support the Bible many have concluded that the chronology is in error.
Egyptian Chronology
Egyptian chronology is based on the 30 Dynasties recorded by Egyptian priest Manetho in the 3rd Century. Manetho's original work doesn't survive, but later writers quoted it extensively and it has been largely confirmed by ancient inscriptions found in Egypt itself - though sometimes with glaring omissions when Pharaohs fell from favour.
Manetho's Egypt ended when Cleopatra suicided in 30 BCE leaving Egypt with a Caesar in place of a Pharaoh. But Cleopatra's Dynasty had begun with Alexander the Great's expulsion of the Persians, and the accession of his successors to Egypt's throne. Prior to these Ptolemies Egypt had been ruled by native Pharaohs who claimed their country had been unified centuries before under one king, Menes.
Following Menes the kings of Egypt ruled relatively peacefully for the first six Dynasties, building large brick tombs. This is known as the Old Kingdom [c.2920 - 2150.] Dynasty III produced the first Pyramid under Pharaoh Djoser, while the famed Pyramids of Gizah were built by Dynasty IV. However after the long reign of Pepi/Phiops Egypt became unstable and fell into chaos, the First Intermediate Period, during which time short-lived Dynasties VII-X reigned. [c.2150-2070]
Dynasty XI reunified Egypt under Mentuhotep, and was followed by the powerful XII Dynasty, which strongly centralised power in the Pharaoh's hands. This period is known as the Middle Kingdom.[c.2070 - 1630] However once again the power of the kings was called into question and the XIII Dynasty was noted by many short reigned kings. According to Manetho Egypt was ultimately struck by some disaster that let it be invaded by "king shepherds", the Hyksos. This led to the Second Intermediate Period under Dynasties XIV - XVII. [c.1630-1550]
Dynasty XVIII began with a great victory for native rule by Ahmose, who expelled the Hyksos from Egypt, chasing them into Palestine. His strong rule began the New Kingdom [c.1550-1070] and his Dynasty was noted by military excursions in neighbouring lands.
However under Amenhotep IV, who became Akhenaten, a religious crisis arose as Pharaoh abandoned the old gods for one, invisible god, only seen in his sign, the Sun, or Aten. During this time Egypt lost its "empire" and the XVIII Dynasty crumbled. However strong military leadership by the XIX Dynasty, notably Ramesses II, returned Egypt's "empire". But Ramesses II long life led to him out-living many of his off-spring, leaving something of a power vacuum at his death. Weak kings followed, and gave way to the XX Dynasty, most of whom were "Ramesses", and whom ultimately handed over a much weakened Egypt to the XXI Dynasty. Thus began the Third Intermediate Period under the XXI - XXIV Dynasties. [c.1070 - c.664.]
Assyria eclipsed Egypt in power, invaded in 671 BCE and destroyed the sacred city of Thebes in c.664 BCE, but soon after fell away as Babylon rose in power. Babylon in turn was defeated by the Persians, who invaded and ruled briefly in Egypt. By the time Alexander arrrived in Egypt in c.332 he was hailed as the god's son and given the throne.
Redating Egypt
In the 1940s and 50s Immanuel Velikovsky led those who sought to redate Egypt. His scheme of redating grossly violated various lines of evidence by redating some Egyptian Dynasties to massive degrees, and to do so he claimed that several were merely copies of later Dynasties - the XIX was the XXVI, the XX was the XXX. Such a solution is too drastic for the facts.
Since then other redating schemes have been developed. Donovan Courville tried to fit all of Egyptian history into the very small Biblical time-frame of 2150 - 1445 between the Tower of Babel and the Exodus. To do so he theorised that the I - VI and XII - XIII Dynasties ran in parallel to each other. No compelling evidence exists for such a parallelism.
Lisa Liel is an Orthodox Jew who tries to fit the history of Egypt into the Jewish traditions preserved in the Talmud and elsewhere. Apparently several traditions indentify the Pharaoh of the Oppression as one Malul who ruled from age 6 to 100 and was followed by the brief reign of the Pharaoh who perished in the Red Sea pursuing the Israelites. Pharaoh Pepi II is the ONLY Pharaoh who fits this precise description, and he dates just prior to the collapse of Eyptian authority known as the First Intermediate Period. Liel dates this event to c. 1476 BCE [1310 BCE using the Orthodox date of 421 BCE for the Babylonian Exile.]
She indentifies the influx of new material culture in Palestine, known as Middle Bronze Age I, as the invading Israelites. Liel then fits the Entire Middle Kingdom and the Hyksos period between 1476 - 1055 BCE. And the Dynasties prior to Pepi II all post date the Babel event dated to c. 1930 BCE, Abram's 48th year. Quite a sqeeze of history, but the early Egyptian reigns are ambiguous in their exact lengths.
An alternative is the work by Gerald Aardsma who joins Liel in indentifying the Pharaoh as Pepi II, but instead redates the Exodus by 1000 years, suggesting that the Hebrew symbol for one thousand was lost from the text which gives the period between Solomon and Moses (I Kings 6:1.) However he retains the orthodox relative dating of Solomon which, as we have seen, is problematic. There is simply NO evidence for Solomon's riches in the Iron Age where he is usually placed.
Key to Courville and Velikovsky's schemes is the synchronism between the end of the XIII Dynasty and the Exodus of the Hebrews. Liel joins them in synchronising the attack of Saul on the Amalekites with Ahmoses' expulsion of the Hyksos, the Queen of Sheba with Queen Hatshepsut, and the invading Pharaoh Shishak with Thutmoses III. Aardsma joins with Courville and Liel in identifying the MB I people in Palestine as the Israelites
All these schemes are considered extremely radical and have little independent confirmation - though what they do have is intriguing.
In recent years the less extreme reconstruction of Egyptian history by David Rohl has received a lot of attention. Rohl is, unlike the others, an archaeologist and Eygptologist - hence is personally acquainted with the physical evidence and techniques of archaeologists. David retains the End of the 13th Dynasty link of Courville and Velikovsky, but very little else of their respective schemes. His ideas grew out of extensive discussions in the 1970s and 80s between archaeologists and historians who supported the idea of a revision, but not necessarily the scheme set out by Velikovsky.
According to Rohl's reconstruction the identification of Shishak is based on various lines of evidence - genealogies, inscriptions and linguistic data, rather than the dubious similarity of names between "Shishak" and "Shoshenk". Based on seeing the data in a new light, Rohl finds Ramesses II fits the bill as "Shishak" - though the specific time that Ramesses invaded Jerusalem is under discussion.
Rohl then uses an eclipse record from ancient Ugarit to redate Akhenaten to c. 1022 - 1006 BCE, which puts Ramesses II at c. 940 BCE. During Akhenaten's reign a series of official letters from Palestinian officials is known - the Amarna letters - and within these Rohl finds almost direct naming of the Biblical characters of King Saul, David, Joab, Jesse and various rulers and generals. All other redating schemes involve more doubtful indentifications of names in the Amarna letters.
Rohl's redating extends into other regions of Egyptian history via various astronomical synchronisms, something the other schemes lack. To down date Akhenaten and Ramesses II and their various Dynasties down by ~ 350 years several later Dynasties have to be made parallel and reduced in length. Certain lines of evidence suggest that the XXI and XXII are extensively parallel, while some controversial inscriptions suggest the XX is parallelised to the XIX (Ramesses' own) and shorter than currently believed.
Here's a link to David Rohl's Official Web-Site:
An alternative redating scheme, slightly less radical than David's model, has also received attention and support. Peter James and colleagues have reduced the Egyptian chronology in a manner very similar to David Rohl's scheme, shortening and paralleling the XXI and XXII, except they kept the XIXth and XXth Dynasties as successive. As a result they suggest Shishak was Ramesses III, which reduces Egyptian history by approximately 250 years.
In 1991 James and fellow researchers published their work in 'Centuries of Darkness' which marshalls an impressive array of counter-evidence to the standard history. Since then no major flaw has been found in their argument, and the defenders of 'orthodoxy' have even stooped to fraud to try to discredit the revised chronology.
James and colleagues have a 'Centuries of Darkness' web-site which covers this 'history' of conflict...
Key to Rohl and Jame's schemes is the suspected parallelism between the XXIst and XXIInd Dynasties, and down-dating the time-span of the XXIInd and XXIIIrd Dynasties. In this respect they virtually agree with minor differences. David Rohl believes that the Amarna letters prove that King Saul and David were contemporaries with Akhenaten of Egypt, while James argues for a more moderate reduction in dates for Akhenaten. Oddly enough the Ugarit eclipse synchronism that Rohl uses is not unique, an earlier eclipse in 1084 BCE could also match the data and would then support James' reconstruction.
In the end only more work unearthing physical evidence from the periods in question will enable a decision to be made between the two schemes. But together they pose a challenge to all who write the Hebrew Bible off as 'just myths'.
David Rohl also seeks to rescue the very early Bible tales. In his latest book, 'Legend' he attempts to give historical basis to the Eden tales, Cain, the Flood and the Tower of Babel. However the results are not confirmation of every detail. The Flood did not drown the 'whole earth' but did drown the whole of Mesopotamia in c. 3100 BCE, while the 'Tower of Babel' was actually in Eridu [which was once called the same Akkadian name as Babel, hence the confusion] and involved a religious dispute and the subsequent migration to Egypt of the people who became the Pharaohs of the 'Black Land'. His identifications are suggestive NOT definite, and he hopes to stimulate further research and openess about the Bible's oldest tales.
In the end it is surely some historical core that is behind the early tales of the Bible. Stories are not retained for millennia if they have no meaning or basis in fact, as archaeologists continually discover in many parts of the world. For example, Aborigines of Australia's north remember when the land-bridge between Papua New Guinea and Australia was flooded in c. 6,000 BCE.
But many Flood stories from around the World do not prove a Flood. Such stories are very localised, picking out prominent features of the landscape as sites of significant events. Creation stories are similar, and often there are two versions of the Creation, one which describes the gods as making the first people and one describing their initial migration from some other place. Being led by gods can become being created by them, as the tales evolve.
In the Bible itself this process can be seen, with Yahweh using the language of CREATION to describe his LIBERATION of the children of Israel. Yahweh 'creates' a new nation from one man, Jacob/Israel, and that nation is referred to as 'Israel' as if one person. So perhaps the 'Adam' story evolved out of a similar tale of migration and election by the 'god' of Adam's people. I cover this further in Part 2.
Part 2 Discusses a Literal reading of the first eleven chapters of Genesis...
Another issue is just how the Bible's stories were composed and their reliability as history. Both Christians and Jews have ancient traditions about who wrote what, but the Bible itself paints a different picture of its origins. What's the real story?
Part 3 discusses how the Bible was written and later misunderstood.
This page hosted by
Get your own Free Home Page