Comments from the lighter side :-)

Some criticisms

“After reading about 20 pages of RT I developed a headache. Because there are so many subjects you have tried to touch it looked like utter confusion. So if reading it managed to confuse my mind then I can think of what your mind could be who wrote it. The pages create an impression of a person running impatiently from one subject area to another, trying hurriedly, just to have a tiny peek at it or just skip the surface of it in order to grab the first impression so he can try to give a profound opinion or a summary of that vast subject which took ages to develop.

As I told you before, you should not get offended and it is not my intention. But It looks to me as work of a "Baka Panditha" for an example how can you form an opinion, talk about or give an introduction to a subject matter if you have not studied it yet ? How it is possible to talk about Buddhist theory of Karma or Christian Bible or Muslim Koran without studying those. How it is possible to write any thing in regard to Hinduism without an idea about what Krishna told Arjuna during the battle at "Kuru Kshtra".

I think your idea of putting down RT is interesting. All of us have such a philosophy but very few put it down in words. The problems with creating no focus however is anyone interested will give up reading before getting to topic of interest.

Comments from the Lighter Side J

“You are wasting your time”

“Trying to be smart… eh?”

“Don’t you have any better thing to do?”

“You think you are smart, but you are mistaken”

“Don’t talk about things that you don’t have any predisposition to handle”

“This is total rubbish”

“This looks like intellectual masturbation”

I AM ON THE LOOKOUT FOR REVIEWERS! Drop me an e-mail (prasad112470@yahoo.com) if you like to become one.