|
Cracker
Barrel Project To
Site or Not to Site: Executive Summary
Cracker Barrel is a corporation that has become a nation wide industry.
It is especially found on the Southern landscape because we love the food
they fix. However, determining the
location of such a restaurant takes a lot of careful planning because of their
stringent siting criteria. The
purpose of this paper is to briefly identify the steps that our team took to
determine a suitable site. My team
consists of Seth Broadfoot and Michael Hughes.
Before we started our project, our team
developed the cartographic model. This
gave us a game plan as to how we needed to break the data down into useful
information.
The first computer query examined was the interstates.
The interstates were necessary because the first requirement for our
project was to have frontage to an interstate.
Based on this criterion, the only logical place for a cracker barrel is
off of I59. I759 is not an
interstate; it is an intrastate road system.
Secondly, we queried out parcels greater than 2.5 acres, and queried out
what areas are zoned commercial. At
this point, we merged these layers together to see which layers are greater than
2.5 acres and zoned commercial. This
narrowed our search by approximately 90%.
Thirdly, we created a buffer of five miles.
This allowed us to intersect the buffer with the population to see if the
population aspect of the criteria was met.
After this determination was made, we intersected the income to determine
if the population per capita was met. After
the production of the new layer, we had to set per capita greater than zero to
throw out any null values that would skew our data.
Finally, we took a look at the traffic count and price.
We received the traffic count from a 1998 Traffic Flow Map.
Price was determined by contacting a certified appraiser, Bill Hopewell,
in the area. He appraised the land
off of I59 to be 100,000 for three acres of property. He also appraised the land off of I759 to be worth 120,000
for the same three acres.
This left us with a very difficult decision to make.
We had three sites that could support a Cracker Barrel (Figure 1, 2 and
3). Then we had to set down and
determine which of those sites would be the best place to put a Cracker Barrel.
We felt that proposed site one (figure 1) would be the best place to put
the restaurant. It met most of our
criteria. The only thing that it
was lacking was that the traffic flow on the interstate was only 24,190.
This project presented a couple of problems.
First, it taught us that there could be more than one correct answer.
This made it very difficult in determining a site.
The second problem was our inexperience with ArcGis.
This problem would not have been nearly as stressful if I understood this
program better. However, I realize
that was one of the reasons for the assignment.
The group that I had was great and very cooperative.
We all spent many hours in the lab working on this project.
Everyone pulled his own weight!
Figure
1
Figure
2
Figure
3
|