UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
The Comics Journal Message Board
Comics Medium The history of the term "graphic novel" . . . (Page 1)
|
This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3 | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: The history of the term "graphic novel" . . . |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 20, 2003 12:02 PM
Does anyone here know what work, if any, has been done to trace the history of the term "graphic novel"? The earliest appearance of the term "graphic novel" in print that I've seen is on the inside front dustcover of Bloodstar (1976) by Richard Corben and Robert E. Howard: quote: Although I seriously doubt the people at Morningstar Press (the original publishers of BLOODSTAR) coined the term "graphic novel," I'm interested to know who did. But let me be clear: what I'm looking for here is not oral history but nominations for the earliest printed reference to "graphic novels." IP: Logged |
Andrei Molotiu Member |
posted November 20, 2003 01:36 PM
Martin Vaughn-James' "The Cage" (1975) is subtitled "a visual novel." Not quite the same thing, but close. IP: Logged |
Andrei Molotiu Member |
posted November 20, 2003 01:37 PM
Oh damn, I forgot to make a snotty remark. IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 20, 2003 02:07 PM
Yes, "visual novel" is close, but I say, no cigar. Here's the main reason why I'm curious. In a recent article entitled "The Graphic Novel Diamond Jubilee" (Friday, Nov. 14, 2003), columnist Andrew D. Arnold tells the following story: quote: Now, if Eisner really coined the term "graphic novel" in reference to a book that was published in 1978, what was the term doing on the dust jacket of Bloodstar, published two years earlier, in 1976. And anyway, Arnold's claim is that A Contract with God gets the nod as the first graphic novel, so labelled, which is clearly not the case. It interesting to note that Eisner was, at the time, actually a self-professed fan and follower of Corben's work,* which means it is not out of the realm of possibility that he picked up the term from reading the Morningstar Bloodstar hardcover! Given the actual publication history, this makes more sense to me than Eisner's story, but maybe there's an explanation of how the term jumped from Eisner's meeting with a trade-book editor in New York to the cover of Bloodstar. Anyone? ----- * See the introduction to The Odd Comic World of Richard Corben (Warren, 1977), wherein the author, Will Eisner, states: "I have watched Corben's work for some time now, awed by his enormous imaginatin, composition, capacity for story telling, draftsmanship and technical virtuosity." IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 20, 2003 02:38 PM
Hey, if I'm not mistaken, this topic has just inspired a entirely separate and self-contained parody topic. I feel so proud! IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 21, 2003 12:05 PM
According to the Web Page Graphic novels in the Merril Collection, "[t]he term 'graphic novel' was probably invented by Milt Gross (1895-1953)." "Probably"? Why "probably"? More anecdotal oral history, I guess. No evidence required. In "The Publication and Formats of Comics, Graphic Novels, and Tankobon," an article published in Image [&] Narrative, Chris Couch repeats the same old story: "The term 'graphic novel' was coined by Will Eisner with the publication of A Contract with God in 1978." And Neil Adams "is, simply put, one of the greatest draftsmen this country has ever produced." And NBM was "First to publish fully painted graphic novels with the sell-out launch of 'The Mercenary' by Spaniard Vicente Segrelles (1985)." And so on. IP: Logged |
R. Fiore Member |
posted November 21, 2003 01:58 PM
quote: Probably because it was the earliest citation they could find, but this didn't rule out the possibility that there might be an earlier one they didn't find. The citation and its date are the evidence. IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 21, 2003 02:11 PM
quote: Exactly so. Now all we need is the Milt Gross citation and its date, and Milt Gross will get the tentative nod as the originator of the term "graphic novel." But until then . . . IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 22, 2003 10:28 AM
quote: So I guess we're all gonna stop repeating the story that Eisner coined the term "graphic novel" now, right? (See, for instance, the article I cited earlier by Chris Couch, as well as the following glossary entry in The Comic Book by Paul Sassienie: quote: ) ANYway, what about Arnold's argument that A Contract with God "crystallized" or "defined" the term "graphic novel"? Before I'm misinterpreted, let me say right now that, yes, A Contract with God was an important and influential book, and did in fact do a great deal to "crystallize" or "define" the term "graphic novel." It's interesting to note, however, that like A Contract with God, Bloodstar was published outside the comic book system (by a company based in Kansas City), it was explictly promoted on the dustjacket as a "graphic novel," and it "deliberately" aspired to "literary status" ("BLOODSTAR is a new, revolutionary concept--a graphic novel, which combines all the imagination and visual power of comic strip art with the richness of the traditional novel."). Furthermore, Bloodstar was one long story (not a series of short stories), it was originally published in hardcover (in an edition of 5000 copies), and it was successful enough to be printed in softcover in 1979 by a mainstream publisher, Arial Books. "Crystallized" . . . "defined the term" . . . okay, maybe . . . but notice how Bloodstar--despite its ambition, clear labelling as a "graphic novel," and success in the marketplace--doesn't rate even a mention in the official history of "graphic novels." Why? If I had to venture a guess, I'd say because Corben's book doesn't quite fit the story these people--Arnold, Couch, and others--want to tell about how "graphic novels" were and are serious stories for serious people. The first graphic-novel-to-be identified-as-a-graphic-novel a fantasy by Richard Corben and Robert E. Howard? Well, dammit all anyway, that's just embarassing . . . Regarding the coinage question, Spiegelman's point about Bill Spicer's Graphic Story Magazine is a good one. Maybe Bill Spicer's the man! "Graphic Story" is pretty damn close . . . IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 22, 2003 10:30 AM
Before someone else has a chance to point it out, here's the corrected quotation: quote: IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 22, 2003 12:19 PM
Another (possible) link in the chain of usage: according to this page, something or other (probably an illustration*) by Richard Corben appeared in issue #15 of Spicer's Graphic Story Magazine (Summer 1973)--which (if it's true) would mean that Corben definitely was familiar with the term "graphic story" before the term "graphic novel" was used (for the first time ever in print? for the first time ever on/in a comics album?) on the cover of Bloodstar (1976). ----- quote: ----- I
didn't realize this, but the term "graphic story" seems to have been
pretty popular in the late '60s and early '70s. For instance, in
addition to a partial run of Bill Spicer's Graphic Story Magazine, the Inge Collection of Comic Art reference Journals has the following: quote: So, the term "graphic novel" was derived from "graphic story," which in turn was derived from "graphic art"? IP: Logged |
Domingos Member |
posted November 23, 2003 01:32 AM
What can I add, but say: thanks for a fascinating thread. No one seems to know shit about this subject though. I'm going to quote you from now on. IP: Logged |
Domingos Member |
posted November 23, 2003 01:35 AM
The next question is: who coined "graphic story". He he, it never ends... IP: Logged |
Andrei Molotiu Member |
posted November 23, 2003 02:16 AM
According to Jones & Jacobs, "The Comic Book Heroes," p. 116, "Richard Kyle... invented the terms 'graphic story' and 'graphic novel' for works that deserved better than 'comics'." The time is unspecified, but clearly before 1967, as the next sentence refers to "Bill Spicer, whose subsequent Graphic Story Magazine (1967)..." Then there's Steranko's take: Discussing his "Red Tide" (1976), he says: "The words "Visual Novel" appear on Red Tide's cover; the term "Graphic Novel" appears inside the book. I'm not even suggesting I created it, but it was used in the book and in promotional material before publication." IP: Logged |
Andrei Molotiu Member |
posted November 23, 2003 02:32 AM
And remember that Rodolphe Topffer (add an umlaut there) called his comics "litterature en estampes" or "histoires en estampes," which basically means "graphic stories," and this back in the 1830's. IP: Logged |
Jaz Williams Member |
posted November 23, 2003 10:22 AM
quote: I was wondering who to blame for the self-conscious attitude toward the term "comic book"... I HATE the phrase "graphic novel"! Having spent years working in a large bookstore that gets plenty of comics-buying activity, I've learned how much even the non-comics-enthusiast public has latched onto the term... Some parent will ask on behalf of their five-year-old for any YU GI OH or DRAGON BALL Z books, and I tell them there's plenty of "comic book" versions of such, take them to the section, and the reply is, "Oh, these aren't comic books, they're graphic novels! I've heard these aren't appropriate for younger readers--is that true?" Yow! IP: Logged |
PatrickRosenkranz Member |
posted November 23, 2003 12:08 PM
Don't forget Beyond Time and Again by George Metzger (1976) and Comanche Moon by Jaxon, which was begun in comic book form in 1977 and collected in a paperback edition in in 1979. Only Jaxon says, it's not a novel, it's non fiction. IP: Logged |
Domingos Member |
posted November 23, 2003 12:28 PM
This thread is about the history of the term "graphic novel", not about what's the first graphic novel. IP: Logged |
JackieEstrada Member |
posted November 23, 2003 06:36 PM
Metzger's "Beyond Time and Again" is subtitled "A Graphic Novel" and was published by Richard Kyle, who has often claimed to have coined the term. Jackie Estrada IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 23, 2003 07:26 PM
Thanks, Domingos, for the positive comments, and thanks, Andrei, Patrick, and Jackie for the additional information. Might be a good idea at this point to provide a quick summary of where we're at: First Graphic Novel (so labelled):
Originator of the term "graphic novel":
Originator of the term "graphic story":
Originator of the term "litterature en estampes" or "histoires en estampes"
Hope I haven't forgotten anything. I'll probably see the mistakes right after I post the message. Don't it always seem to go . . . quote: Yeah, lots of people feel your pain. Alan Moore has argued that "graphic novel" is nothing more than a marketing term, and it's difficult to disagree. (If I remember correctly, Moore prefers "graphic story.") Trouble is, as you say, lots of people are using "graphic novel," and making claims about who coined the term "graphic novel," and who published the first book labelled "a graphic novel," etc., etc. quote: I certainly don't want to discourage people from participating in this little hunt--in fact, the more people who participate, the better chance we have of pinning a few of these things down--but Domingos is right, this thread is not about the definition of "graphic novel" or about what might be the "first" graphic novel. It's about tracing the career of the term "graphic novel." More later. IP: Logged |
Andrei Molotiu Member |
posted November 23, 2003 08:29 PM
To be more specific: Topffer wrote in his "Essai de physiognomonie [sic]" of 1845 (my translation): "One can write stories with chapters, lines, and words: that is literature, proper. One can write stories with successions of scenes represented graphically (successions de scenes representees graphiquement): that is literature in prints (litterature en estampes). One can also do neither one nor the other, which is sometimes the best thing." Writing in 1837 about his book "M. Jabot," Topffer discusses how it is a mixture of words and images working together, then says: "The whole ensemble forms a kind of novel (roman), that much more original since it doesn't anymore ressemble a novel than anything else." (Both citations from 1996 Slatkine edition of Topffer's complete graphic works, first page of introduction, which is otherwise unpaginated). In the intro, Francois Caradec also claims that Topffer called them "histoires en estampes," but does not give a specific quote. BTW, I should point out that it was David Kunzle who, at the 2003 ICAF, claimed that "histoire en estampes" can basically be translated as "graphic novel." That's what I was thinking of in my previous post, but I just remembered the Kunzle reference today. In any case, already in the 1830's, Topffer was calling his works "novels," said they were "represented graphically," and called them "stories in prints." IP: Logged |
Andrei Molotiu Member |
posted November 23, 2003 08:35 PM
Oh, also, I found an 1867 biography of Topffer which calls his graphic works "albums" (in French), maybe the first use of that term as applied to comics... IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 24, 2003 07:51 AM
More good info, Andrei! But one bit you posted raises a couple of questions for me. You wrote: quote: Now, if the translation of "histoire en estampes" (Google translation: "history in prints" ) as "graphic novel" has only recently been suggested (in 2003!), then the English term couldn't have derived from the French term, could it? To begin to make the case, wouldn't one have to find at least one example of an English translation of "histoire en estampes" as "graphic novel" that predates the appearance of "graphic novel" as an independent term in English? (So far as I can tell, the earliest verified citations we have for "graphic novel" are from 1976.) Just wondering . . . IP: Logged |
JackieEstrada Member |
posted November 24, 2003 09:36 AM
If I recall correctly, it was in Bill Spicer's "Graphic Story Magazine" that Richard Kyle wrote about graphic novels. So that reference to Bill Spicer is actually to Kyle. Jackie Estrada IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 24, 2003 10:48 AM
quote: That's a great lead, Jackie. Now it's Google to the rescue. In his column "Master of the Obvious" (Wednesday August 13, 2003, Issue #100), Steven Grant writes: quote:[/quote] If Richard Kyle is indeed the "INTERVIEWER," then he's clearly got the best claim yet to the "Who coined the term 'graphic novel'?" no-prize. And good on ya, Steven "I do my homework" Grant! Maybe we'll all have to quote you from now on! IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 24, 2003 11:26 AM
And it looks like Milt Gross is out of the running. According to a Reference Librarian with the Merril Collection of SF, the Web page on which the claim that Milt Gross probably coined the term "graphic novel" appeared was written by a former staff member and seems to have been misquoted from the source material. The reference to Milt Gross came from The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, edited by John Clute and Peter Nicholls (New York : St. Martin's Press, 1995, c1993), in the article on GRAPHIC NOVELS, pp. 515-516. Here's the relevant paragraph: quote: Of course, we now know that even if the person who wrote the Web page on the Merril Collection site had been faithful to this source material and credited Will Eisner, he or she would have been wrong. IP: Logged |
Andrei Molotiu Member |
posted November 24, 2003 11:38 AM
quote: I didn't say Kunzle in 2003 was the first to make that connection, just that that was the instance I personally remembered. Since some of Topffer's pieces were translated into English in the 19th c., it would be interesting to see what those were referred to as. Nevertheless, there probably isn't any continuity from Topffer to Richard Kyle and 1976. I guess there's a difference between "first instance," period (not that Topffer is that, but he does approach it), "first instance in English," and "first instance in English as part of a continuing tradition that leads in a straight line to the present-day usage of the term." IP: Logged |
Andrei Molotiu Member |
posted November 24, 2003 11:55 PM
from Andrew Arnold's current column at Time.com--a letter from R.C. Harvey responding to Arnold's previous column, on the supposed "25th anniversary of the graphic novel": quote: IP: Logged |
Andrei Molotiu Member |
posted November 25, 2003 12:00 AM
Oh, I see that Benjamin had already linked to this column, but for some reason missed R.C.'s mention that the term "was originally coined in November 1964 by Richard Kyle in a newsletter circulated to all members of the Amateur Press Association." IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted November 25, 2003 05:42 AM
No, I didn't miss it. I quoted exactly what was there. Arnold obviously received RC's letter and edited that section of the page. Here's the original post: quote: And here's the new version, with RC replacing the "few readers, none of whom wished to be identified": quote: I'm delighted to have a person of RC's stature weigh in on the issue of who coined the term "graphic novel." Richard Kyle, November 1964, Amateur Press Association newsletter. I see that RC also mentions "The first time a 'long form comic book' was identified as a 'graphic novel' was the 1976 publication of 'Beyond Time and Again,' by George Metzger, where the term 'graphic novel' appears on the title page and on the dust jacket flaps." I assume good ol' RC knows about the other two contenders for that title . . . yeah, I'm sure he doess . . . IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted December 31, 2003 06:32 AM
Since Andrei is still interested in this topic, I would just like to add that a buddy of mine contacted R.C. Harvey by email, and it turns out that although he was aware that Steranko's "Red Tide" was published in 1976, he was *not* aware that "Bloodstar" was published the same year. Although R.C. disqualifies "Red Tide" because he does not consider it a graphic novel (even though it is referred to as such in a text pice in the book itself), "Bloodstar" is still in contention, along with Metzger's "Beyond Time and Again," for the first *graphic novel* to be identified as a "graphic novel." Now if one of R.C.'s friends or relations would loan him a copy of the first edition of "Bloodstar" for research purposes . . . IP: Logged |
Jesse Hamm Member |
posted December 31, 2003 10:08 AM
Though this thread is about nomenclature per se, I can't resist making a point about the origins of the graphic novel as a form. I keep seeing Lynd Ward cited as the first graphic novelist (e.g., "Gods' Man" in 1929), yet Wilhelm Busch's "Die Fromme Helene," a fictional biography in comic form, came out in the late 19th Century and weighs in at well over 100 pages. Is there any better contender for first place? IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted December 31, 2003 07:59 PM
Is this it, Jesse? IP: Logged |
Benjamin D. Brucke Member |
posted December 31, 2003 08:11 PM
Jesse, you ask if there is any better contender for first place. Well . . . Andrei has already mentioned the work of Rodolph Töpffer. In fact, according to the Lambiek Comiclopedia, "Töpffer's picture-stories have been an influence on many of the early 'comic' artists, such as Christophe, Wilhelm Busch and Cham" (bold added). In May 1999, Bob of "Bob's Comics Reviews" provided a short overview of Töpffer's production, and includes this very interesting quotation from the man himself: quote: Check it out! IP: Logged |
Jesse Hamm Member |
posted January 01, 2004 01:21 AM
Benjamin, That is indeed Die fromme Helene -- thanks for the link! Unfortunately, the pictures at that site are reproduced so small that their resolution is mediocre, and they appear to be secondary to the text. (In print, they are much larger, dominating the pages.) I was aware of Topffer, but I figured he only did short booklets, not novels. However, the Topffer page you linked says he did a book of 92 pages, which I suppose could be considered a novel. Since
my previous post, Andrei has posted a link (on the other "graphic
novel" thread) to a 160 panel comic from the 1700s that seems to
qualify as a graphic novel. Perhaps that was the first, then? IP: Logged |
This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3 All times are PT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.42
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.