Saints and Seasons
http://www.oocities.org/saintsnseasons

The Messiah’s forerunner (2)

by Mike Oettle

IT was the second writer of Isaiah who wrote: “The voice of him that crieth in the wil­der­ness: ‘Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make straight in the desert a highway for our God . . . and all flesh shall see it together: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.’ ”[1]

Judah was in exile at the time, and the “second Isaiah” – or Deu­tero-Isaiah, as he is known – no doubt imagined that these words God had given him referred to some­one calling the people back to the land of Judah in his own time, or a generation or two later.

But it was to be seven centuries before the prophecy was ful­filled by Yochan­an bar Zechariah – or John the Baptist, as we know him better.

The wilderness of Judæa[2] was where he took his stand. Matthew tells us how completely John adapted to the desert environment, wear­ing a garment of camel hair and a leather belt, eating locusts and wild honey. (Yes, locusts, not locust beans – remember, these insects fell into the only class of kosher six-legged animal.)[3] The camel-hair garment was not merely appropriate to the desert: it was the tra­di­tional garb of the prophets. John was leaving no doubt as to his calling.

Crowds came to hear this man, using the words that God had given the second Isaiah: “Pre­pare ye the way of the Lord,” but he also told them: “Turn away from your sins and be baptised.”

It was unheard of in mainstream Judaism for sins to be symbol­ically “washed away” in this fashion, but there were others baptising at the time. Perhaps they re­called Naa­man’s bath in the Jordan that had washed away his leprosy, and they came to hear him and be cleansed.

Non-Jews wanting to be admitted to the synagogue underwent rit­u­al bathing, but there appears to be no link between this practice and John’s. The community of Qum­ran, who left us the Dead Sea scrolls, also underwent ritual baths, but they were re­gard­ed as lunatics by most Jews.

John was pretty outspoken when it came to the Pharisees, Saddu­cees and others who regarded themselves as being favoured by God be­cause they kept the law, and despised “lesser” people whom they called sinners, because in some way or other they did not observe every last detail of the law:

“You brood of vipers!” John said. “Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?”[4]

The “holy” people must have been pretty miffed with a man who called them names like this – unlike their fellow hypocrites, who praised them for their ob­ser­vance.

John attracted quite a following. We know the names of four of his disciples: Simon (later Simon Peter) and his brother Andrew, Philip of Bethsaida, and Nathanael.

And in Acts (19:1-7) we read that Paul en­countered disciples of John at Ephe­sus who had not been aware that an even greater prea­ch­er had come from among those who had undergone John’s baptism. Paul asked them: “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” Their re­ply was: “No, we had not even heard whe­ther there is a Holy Spirit.”

At the same time we know that John certainly did teach (though perhaps not all the time) about the Holy Spirit. He said of Jesus: “He who is coming after me is mighter than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.” [5]

Probably the best-known passages about John are those that de­scribe Jesus’ baptism, when the Lord insisted on being baptised even though He had no sins to wash away, and God confirmed His Son’s an­ointing by speaking from Heaven and sending the Holy Spirit in the form of a dove. [6]

After that the Gospels’ focus shifts to Jesus’ ministry, and John appears in just one further short set of incidents.

John had the tem­er­i­ty to point out the sin of Herod Antipas, Tet­rarch[7] of Gali­lee and Peræa and son of Herod the Great, who had mar­ried his niece Herodias, di­vorced wife of his half-brother Herod Phil­ip. Ac­cor­d­ing to the law a man was per­mit­ted (even encouraged) to marry his bro­ther’s widow, but was specifically for­bid­den marriage to the wife of a living brother.[8]

Mark tells us that Antipas liked listening to John. However he also feared that, with his marriage denounced by John, his Jew­ish sub­jects might rise in revolt along­side the trans-Jordanian Arabs of Peræa. At first he merely imprisoned the prophet – in part, fear­ing that exe­cu­tion might trigger such a revolt – and it was not until Hero­dias encouraged her (and Philip’s) daughter Salome to dance pro­voc­atively before Anti­pas on his birthday that the final act of the drama was played out.

Modern theatricals – and, more recently, Hollywood – have made much of Sa­lo­me’s seductiveness, but it is the brutality of mother and daughter that stands out in their character, demanding John’s head on a platter. [9] Having made a promise before all his birthday guests that he would give what Salome asked, Antipas had the Baptist be­headed and the gory head brought into the palace.

John’s disciples fetched his body away and buried it. Tradition has it that the burial was at Sebaste (previously known as Samaria).

His feast days are 24 June (marking his birth) and 29 August (his beheading).

The name Yochanan has, as I have remarked before, become one of the Chris­t­ian world’s most popular. To distinguish children named aft­er the Baptist it has be­come common, especially in Latin count­ries, to double the name, as in Jean-Bap­t­iste (French), Giovanni Bap­t­ista (Italian), or Juan Battista (Spanish).



[1] Isaiah 40:3,5 (Authorised Version).

[2] In Hebrew this tribal district was called Judah (Yehudah), but the Romans adapted that name to Judæa. The Latin spelling is sometimes simplified in English to Judea.

[3] Leviticus 11:20-23: “All the insects that walk on all fours are de­test­able to you. Yet these you may eat . . . those which have . . . jointed legs with which to jump on the earth . . . you may eat: the lo­cust in its kinds, and the devastating locust in its kinds, and the cricket in its kinds, and the grass­hopper in its kinds.”

[4] Matthew 3:7; Luke 3:7.

[5] Matthew 3:11b.

[6] Matthew 4:13-17; Mark 1:9-11; Luke 3:21-22; John 1:31-34.

[7] A tetrarch was second in rank (in the Roman order of native rulers) below a tributary king. Herod the Great was King of Judæa, and his grandson Agrippa and great-grandson Agrippa II also were kings, but Herod’s son Archelaus was a mere ethnarch. Antipas and Herod’s other des­cen­d­ants who be­came rul­ers were a step low­er again, as tetrarchs.

[8] See Deuteronomy 25:5-10 and Leviticus 18:16.

[9] Matthew 14:3-12; Mark 6:17-29; Luke 3:19,20.


Counter

Back to top of page

Vir Afrikaans, kliek hier

  • This article was prepared for publication in Western Light, monthly magazine of All Saints’ Parish, Kabega Park, Port Elizabeth, but did not appear due to the cancellation of the series. It was, however, included in a bound volume of these articles, which was privately circulated.

  • Back to saints index

    Back to chronological index

    Back to Saints & Seasons index


    Comments, queries: Mike Oettle