This is the 34th time I'll speak to you from the Oval Office and
the last. We've been together 8 years now, and soon it'll be time
for me to go. But before I do, I wanted to share some thoughts,
some of which I've been saving for a long time.
It's been the honor of my life to be your President. So many
of you have written the past few weeks to say thanks, but I could
say as much to you. Nancy and I are grateful for the opportunity
you gave us to serve.
One of the things about the Presidency is that you're always
somewhat apart. You spent a lot of time going by too fast in a
car someone else is driving, and seeing the people through tinted
glass--the parents holding up a child, and the wave you saw too
late and couldn't return. And so many times I wanted to stop and
reach out from behind the glass, and connect. Well, maybe I can
do a little of that tonight.
People ask how I feel about leaving. And the fact is, `parting
is such sweet sorrow.' The sweet part is California and the ranch
and freedom. The sorrow--the goodbyes, of course, and leaving
this beautiful place.
You know, down the hall and up the stairs from this office is
the part of the White House where the President and his family
live. There are a few favorite windows I have up there that I
like to stand and look out of early in the morning. The view is
over the grounds here to the Washington Monument, and then the
Mall and the Jefferson Memorial. But on mornings when the humidity
is low, you can see past the Jefferson to the river, the Potomac,
and the Virginia shore. Someone said that's the view Lincoln had
when he saw the smoke rising from the Battle of Bull Run. I see
more prosaic things: the grass on the banks, the morning traffic
as people make their way to work, now and then a sailboat on the
river.
I've been thinking a bit at that window. I've been reflecting
on what the past 8 years have meant and mean. And the image that
comes to mind like a refrain is a nautical one--a small story
about a big ship, and a refugee, and a sailor. It was back in
the early eighties, at the height of the boat people. And the
sailor was hard at work on the carrier Midway, which was patrolling
the South China Sea. The sailor, like most American servicemen,
was young, smart, and fiercely observant. The crew spied on the
horizon a leaky little boat. And crammed inside were refugees
from Indochina hoping to get to America. The Midway sent a small
launch to bring them to the ship and safety. As the refugees made
their way through the choppy seas, one spied the sailor on deck,
and stood up, and called out to him. He yelled, `Hello, American
sailor. Hello, freedom man.'
A small moment with a big meaning, a moment the sailor, who wrote
it in a letter, couldn't get out of his mind. And, when I saw
it, neither could I. Because that's what it was to be an American
in the 1980's. We stood, again, for freedom. I know we always
have, but in the past few years the world again--and in a way,
we ourselves--rediscovered it.
It's been quite a journey this decade, and we held together through
some stormy seas. And at the end, together, we are reaching our
destination.
The fact is, from Grenada to the Washington and Moscow summits,
from the recession of '81 to '82, to the expansion that began
in late '82 and continues to this day, we've made a difference.
The way I see it, there were two great triumphs, two things that
I'm proudest of. One is the economic recovery, in which the people
of America created--and filled--19 million new jobs. The other
is the recovery of our morale. America is respected again in the
world and looked to for leadership.
Something that happened to me a few years ago reflects some of
this. It was back in 1981, and I was attending my first big economic
summit, which was held that year in Canada. The meeting place
rotates among the member countries. The opening meeting was a
formal dinner of the heads of goverment of the seven industrialized
nations. Now, I sat there like the new kid in school and listened,
and it was all Francois this and Helmut that. They dropped titles
and spoke to one another on a first-name basis. Well, at one point
I sort of leaned in and said, 'My name's Ron.' Well, in that same
year, we began the actions we felt would ignite an economic comeback--cut
taxes and regulation, started to cut spending. And soon the recovery
began.
Two years later, another economic summit with pretty much the
same cast. At the big opening meeting we all got together, and
all of a sudden, just for a moment, I saw that everyone was just
sitting there looking at me. And then one of them broke the silence.
'Tell us about the American miracle,' he said.
Well, back in 1980, when I was running for President, it was
all so different. Some pundits said our programs would result
in catastrophe. Our views on foreign affairs would cause war.
Our plans for the economy would cause inflation to soar and bring
about economic collapse. I even remember one highly respected
economist saying, back in 1982, that `The engines of economic
growth have shut down here, and they're likely to stay that way
for years to come.' Well, he and the other opinion leaders were
wrong. The fact is what they call `radical' was really `right.'
What they called `dangerous' was just `desperately needed.'
And in all of that time I won a nickname, `The Great Communicator.'
But I never though it was my style or the words I used that made
a difference: it was the content. I wasn't a great communicator,
but I communicated great things, and they didn't spring full bloom
from my brow, they came from the heart of a great nation--from
our experience, our wisdom, and our belief in the principles that
have guided us for two centuries. They called it the Reagan revolution.
Well, I'll accept that, but for me it always seemed more like
the great rediscovery, a rediscovery of our values and our common
sense.
Common sense told us that when you put a big tax on something,
the people will produce less of it. So, we cut the people's tax
rates, and the people produced more than ever before. The economy
bloomed like a plant that had been cut back and could now grow
quicker and stronger. Our economic program brought about the longest
peacetime expansion in our history: real family income up, the
poverty rate down, entrepreneurship booming, and an explosion
in research and new technology. We're exporting more than ever
because American industry because more competitive and at the
same time, we summoned the national will to knock down protectionist
walls abroad instead of erecting them at home.
Common sense also told us that to preserve the peace, we'd have
to become strong again after years of weakness and confusion.
So, we rebuilt our defenses, and this New Year we toasted the
new peacefulness around the globe. Not only have the superpowers
actually begun to reduce their stockpiles of nuclear weapons--and
hope for even more progress is bright--but the regional conflicts
that rack the globe are also beginning to cease. The Persian Gulf
is no longer a war zone. The Soviets are leaving Afghanistan.
The Vietnamese are preparing to pull out of Cambodia, and an American-mediated
accord will soon send 50,000 Cuban troops home from Angola.
The lesson of all this was, of course, that because we're a great
nation, our challenges seem complex. It will always be this way.
But as long as we remember our first principles and believe in
ourselves, the future will always be ours. And something else
we learned: Once you begin a great movement, there's no telling
where it will end. We meant to change a nation, and instead, we
changed a world.
Countries across the globe are turning to free markets and free
speech and turning away from the ideologies of the past. For them,
the great rediscovery of the 1980's has been that, lo and behold,
the moral way of government is the practical way of government:
Democracy, the profoundly good, is also the profoundly productive.
When you've got to the point when you can celebrate the anniversaries
of your 39th birthday you can sit back sometimes, review your
life, and see it flowing before you. For me there was a fork in
the river, and it was right in the middle of my life. I never
meant to go into politics. It wasn't my intention when I was young.
But I was raised to believe you had to pay your way for the blessings
bestowed on you. I was happy with my career in the entertainment
world, but I ultimately went into politics because I wanted to
protect something precious.
Ours was the first revolution in the history of mankind that
truly reversed the course of government, and with three little
words: `We the People.' `We the People' tell the government what
to do; it doesn't tell us. `We the People' are the driver; the
government is the car. And we decide where it should go, and by
what route, and how fast. Almost all the world's constitutions
are documents in which governments tell the people what their
privileges are. Our Constitution is a document in which `We the
People' tell the government what it is allowed to do. `We the
People' are free. This belief has been the underlying basis for
everything I've tried to do these past 8 years.
But back in the 1960's, when I began, it seemed to me that we'd
begun reversing the order of things--that through more and more
rules and regulations and confiscatory taxes, the government was
taking more of our money, more of our options, and more of our
freedom. I went into politics in part to put up my hand and say,
`Stop.' I was a citizen politician, and it seemed the right thing
for a citizen to do.
I think we have stopped a lot of what needed stopping. And I
hope we have once again reminded people that man is not free unless
government is limited. There's a clear cause and effect here that
is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: As government
expands, liberty contracts.
Nothing is less free than pure communism--and yet we have, the
past few years, forged a satisfying new closeness with the Soviet
Union. I've been asked if this isn't a gamble, and my answer is
no because we're basing our actions not on words but deeds. The
detente of the 1970's was based not on actions but promises. They'd
promise to treat their own people and the people of the world
better. But the gulag was still the < i>gulag, and the state
was still expansionist, and they still waged proxy wars in Africa,
Asia, and Latin America.
Well, this time, so far, it's different. President Gorbachev
has brought about some internal democratic reforms and begun the
withdrawal from Afghanistan. He has also freed prisoners whose
names I've given him every time we've met.
But life has a way of reminding you of big things through small
incidents. Once, during the heady days of the Moscow summit, Nancy
and I decided to break off from the entourage one afternoon to
visit the shops on Arbat Street--that's a little street just off
Moscow's main shopping area. Even though our visit was a surprise,
every Russian there immediately recognized us and called out our
names and reached for our hands. We were just about swept away
by the warmth. You could almost feel the possibilities in all
that joy. But within seconds, a KGB detail pushed their way toward
us and began pushing and shoving the people in the crowd. It was
an interesting moment. It reminded me that while the man on the
street in the Soviet Union yearns for peace, the government is
Communist. And those who run it are Communists, and that means
we and they view such issues as freedom and human rights very
differently.
We must keep up our guard, but we must also continue to work
together to lessen and eliminate tension and mistrust. My view
is that President Gorbachev is different from previous Soviet
leaders. I think he knows some of the things wrong with his society
and is trying to fix them. We wish him well. And we'll continue
to work to make sure that the Soviet Union that eventually emerges
from this process is a less threatening one. What it all boils
down to is this: I want the new closeness to continue. And it
will, as long as we make it clear that we will continue to act
in a certain way as long as they continue to act in a helpful
manner. If and when they don't, at first pull your punches. If
they persist, pull the plug. It's still trust by verify. It's
still play, but cut the cards. It's still watch closely. And don't
be afraid to see what you see.
I've been asked if I have any regrets. Well, I do.The deficit
is one. I've been talking a great deal about that lately, but
tonight isn't for arguments, and I'm going to hold my tongue.
But an observation: I've had my share of victories in the Congress,
but what few people noticed is that I never won anything you didn't
win for me. They never saw my troops, they never saw Reagan's
regiments, the American people. You won ev ery battle with every
call you made and letter you wrote demanding action. Well, action
is still needed. If we're to finish the job. Reagan's regiments
will have to become the Bush brigades. Soon he'll be the chief,
and he'll need you every bit as much as I did.
Finally, there is a great tradition of warnings in Presidential
farewells, and I've got one that's been on my mind for some time.
But oddly enough it starts with one of the things I'm proudest
of in the past 8 years: the resurgence of national pride that
I called the new patriotism. This national feeling is good, but
it won't count for much, and it won't last unless it's grounded
in thoughtfulness and knowledge.
An informed patriotism is what we want. And are we doing a good
enough job teaching our children what America is and what she
represents in the long history of the world? Those of us who are
over 35 or so years of age grew up in a different America. We
were taught, very directly, what it means to be an American. And
we absorbed, almost in the air, a love of country and an appreciation
of its institutions. If you didn't get these things from your
family you got them from the neighborhood, from the father down
the street who fought in Korea or the family who lost someone
at Anzio. Or you could get a sense of patriotism from school.
And if all else failed you could get a sense of patriotism from
the popular culture. The movies celebrated democratic values and
implicitly reinforced the idea that America was special. TV was
like that, too, through the mid-sixties.
But now, we're about to enter the nineties, and some things have
changed. Younger parents aren't sure that an unambivalent appreciation
of America is the right thing to teach modern children. And as
for those who create the popular culture, well-grounded patriotism
is no longer the style. Our spirit is back, but we haven't reinstitutionalized
it. We've got to do a better job of getting across that America
is freedom--freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of
enterprise. And freedom is special and rare. It's fragile; it
needs production [protection].
So, we've got to teach history based not on what's in fashion
but what's important--why the Pilgrims came here, who Jimmy Doolittle
was, and what those 30 seconds over Tokyo meant. You know, 4 years
ago on the 40th anniversary of D-day, I read a letter from a young
woman writing to her late father, who'd fought on Omaha Beach.
Her name was Lisa Zanatta Henn, and she said, `we will always
remember, we will never forget what the boys of Normandy did.'
Well, let's help her keep her word. If we forget what we did,
we won't know who we are. I'm warning of an eradication of the
American memory that could result, ultimately, in an erosion of
the American spirit. Let's start with some basics: more attention
to American history and a greater emphasis on civic ritual.
And let me offer lesson number one about America: All great change
in America begins at the dinner table. So, tomorrow night in the
kitchen I hope the talking begins. And children, if your parents
haven't been teaching you what it means to be an American, let
'em know and nail 'em on it. That would be a very American thing
to do.
And that's about all I have to say tonight, except for one thing.
The past few days when I've been at that window upstairs, I've
thought a bit of the `shining city upon a hill.' The phrase comes
from John Winthrop, who wrote it to describe the America he imagined.
What he imagined was important because he was an early Pilgrim,
an early freedom man. He journeyed here on what today we'd call
a little wooden boat; and like the other Pilgrims, he was looking
for a home that would be free. I've spoken of the shining city
all my political life, but I don't know if I ever quite communicated
what I saw when I said it. But in my mind it was a tall, proud
city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed,
and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace;
a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity.
And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the
doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here.
That's how I saw it, and see it still.
And how stands the city on this winter night? More prosperous,
more secure, and happier than it was 8 years ago. But more than
that: After 200 years, two centuries, she still stands strong
and true on the granite ridge, and her glow has held steady no
matter what storm. And she's still a beacon, still a magnet for
all who must have freedom, for all the pilgrims from all the lost
places who are hurtling through the darkness, toward home.
We've done our part. And as I walk off into the city streets,
a final word to the men and women of the Reagan revolution, the
men and women across America who for 8 years did the work that
brought America back. My friends: We did it. We weren't just marking
time. We made a difference. We made the city stronger, we made
the city freer, and we left her in good hands. All in all, not
bad, not bad at all.
And so, goodbye, God bless you, and God bless the United States
of America.
|