A discussion in some detail of certain parts of

To Ride A Silver Broomstick

by Silver RavenWolf
©1993 by Silver RavenWolf. Published by Llewellyn Worldwide.
ISBN 0-87542-791-X. 300 pages

Note:
While some of the quotations are moderately extensive, I feel it is necessary for them to be so in order to properly address them, lest I be accused of not representing the author's opinions fully and fairly.
I believe that these quotations are still within the purview of the "fair use" provisions of copyright law.
I further assert that my rebuttals, discussion and analysis are protected under the First Amendment in that they are legitimate differences of opinion and are not defamatory in any way. Should the author or his publisher wish to discuss this with me, they are welcome to do so.



Let me say from the start that while many of the comments below express [sometimes very strong] disagreement with the author, that I do not oppose her right to practice as she wishes or believe as she wishes. However, when she presents her beliefs, ideas, and opinions for publication, she must expect responses.
There are some places where I do specifically express agreement with the author. This happens when I feel she has made a particularly telling point, especially if it's one I feel is too often "got wrong," or ignored. There are also entire sections where I do not comment because the material is reasonable and not problematic for an inexperienced reader
Should you find yourself tiring of this analysis [and isn't it interesting that the word "analysis" includes the word "anal?"], do take a moment to skip to the bottom and read my final comment on this book.
You may notice in my comments the use of words such as "zir" and "zie." These are gender-neutral pronouns, allowing me to avoid the awkwardnesses of "his/her" and "s/he". If you find this jarring, I apologize.

Fair Warning

Henceforth, comments that I receive about this or any other book I discuss will be considered as intended for publication on this site. Saying in your email that you do not wish it to be published will not be sufficient: the only way to guarantee that comment on my remarks here will not be published is to not send them to me.




p.21 ["Magickal Jargon"]
element: Usually counted as four: Earth, Air, Water and Fire. However, many Witches add Spirit or Akasha to this category, as well. Each element has a direction within a magick circle or working: East = Air; South = Fire; West = Water; North = Earth; Center = Spirit or Akasha.
I'm not fond of this "fifth element" notion. The classical elements are derived from the Greek, which had four, not five. I believe it's basic to our faith that Spirit is not an element in the sense of these four, for it pervades all. That's what we mean when we speak of immanent divinity.
I'm also a little bemused at the order in which the author chose to list the elements. Going around the Circle, even if you start at the North [my Tradition generally starts in the East, but different Traditions have different traditions, so to speak], you'd have Earth, Air, Fire and Water.
p.21 ["Magickal Jargon"]
Enchantment: A magickal object that must be kept absolutely secret and hidden from all human eyes and affects a hidden aura. Enchantments must be charmed first. Gems and magickal writings are good items to use for Enchantments.
I think by "enchantment" she means "talisman." An enchantment is a magickal working, not a physical object. It's this kind of casual error that bothers me about a lot of the writings you see in the Pagan community nowadays. Ms. Ravenwolf is far from the worst offender in this, of course, but we should be striving for the very highest quality in our presentations, not what we can get onto the shelves fastest.
p21 ["Magickal Jargon"]
Guardians: Ceremonial magicians use the Guardians of the Watchtowers or Guardians of the Four Quarters. Some Witches use them too. There are those that see these Guardians as ugly little biddies, such as lizards, dragons, etc. But I have always envisioned them as the angels Michael, Ariel, Raphael, and Gabriel.
Oh, great Gods, where do I start?
First of all, this doesn't tell a newcomer anything about who/what the Guardians are. It's singularly unhelpful in this regard. Why even bother to put in the entry if you're not going to put in a useful entry?

Second, apparently Ms. Ravenwolf has a personal aversion to things reptilian ["ugly little biddies, such as lizards..."]. That's fine and dandy for her, but I question whether she should be coloring her presentation with those personal issues. Further, to refer to lizards and dragons as "biddies" seems highly inappropriate in and of itself. According to Dictionary.com, a "biddy" is:

bid·dy1
n. pl. bid·dies
A hen; a fowl.
[Origin unknown.]
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Used here without permission under "fair use" provisions of copyright law.


bid·dy2
n. Slang pl. bid·dies
A woman, especially a garrulous old one.
[Nickname for Bridget.]
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Used here without permission under "fair use" provisions of copyright law.


biddy
\Bid"dy\, n. [Etymology uncertain.] A name used in calling a hen or chicken. --Shak.
Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc. Used here without permission under "fair use" provisions of copyright law.


biddy
\Bid"dy\, n. [A familiar form of Bridget.] An Irish serving woman or girl. [Colloq.]
Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc. Used here without permission under "fair use" provisions of copyright law.


biddy
n 1: adult female chicken [syn: hen] 2: young bird esp. of domestic fowl [syn: chick]
Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University Used here without permission under "fair use" provisions of copyright law.


I don't see how "biddies" can be considered a viable, reasonable or respectful appellation for the Guardians, regardless of Ms. Ravenwolf's personal feelings about lizards and dragons. Quite the contrary, in fact.

Third, I consider the use of Christian angelic imagery more than a little inappropriate in a Wiccan context. I won't go into this at great length, since it seems to me to be pretty self-evident, but let me point out that in Christian imagery angels are considered to have been the first beings created by YHWH. Why are we involving ourselves with them and their creator? Are not our own Gods and Goddesses good enough?
p.23 ["Magickal Jargon"]
Pagan/Neopagan: Follower of a nature-based religion. The term Neopagan means "new Pagan" and is not a popular term. It seems to be a direct result of New Age lingo.
"Neopagan" may not be popular with Ms. Ravenwolf, but it's pretty widely used in the Pagan community. I believe it was coined by Oberon G'Zell, and the distinctions between neo-Pagan, paleo-Pagan, meso-Pagan and others are well-discussed here by Isaac Bonewits. I'm not sure what Ms. Ravenwolf means by "a direct result of New Age lingo." The tone of this phrase seems to indicate a certain disdain for the "New Age" [often richly deserved, in my opinion], but I think many would consider Ms. Ravenwolf herself to be pretty "New Age."
p. 23 ["Magickal Jargon"]
pentacle: A circle surrounding a five-pointed, upright star (known as a pentagram). Worn as a symbol of a Witch's belief and used in magickal workings and ceremonies. Each point on the star has a specific meaning; Earth, Air, Fire, Water and Spirit. Pentacles are never worn inverted in the Craft. Many Witches consider this blasphemy of their faith. However, an inverted pentagram is used in some second degree initiations, not to indicate evil, but to fulfill a function of growth.
The assigning a fifth item, spirit, to a point on the pentagram isn't as egregious as calling it a "fifth element," but I don't really see that it's necessary. Not everything needs to correspond with everything else. If you're looking for something to correspond to the five points of the star, why not the Triple Goddess [Maiden, Mother, Crone] and the Dual God [Oak King and Holly King]? That seems to me to be much less of a stretch...
I also question her definition of "pentacle." The pentagram is the symbol [five-pointed star within a circle], and can be a piece of jewelry, painted onto something, woven into a piece of fabric etc., but a pentacle is a specific tool used on the altar. The etymological origin is the word "panticle," an archaic term for "plate."
I'm also struck by the apparent contradiction where she says that the pentagram is never worn inverted [i.e. with a single point downward], yet in the next sentence she admits that it's used in some Second Degree initiations without being considered any kind of blasphemy. The fact of the matter is that an inverted pentagram is far more common in the UK, and does not carry the heavy Satanic symbolism that it often does in the US.
p.25 ["Magickal Jargon"]
vision question: Using astral projection, bi-location, or dreamtime to accomplish a specific goal. Also called pathworking
Nope. Flat-out, no. Vision Questing is a Native American ceremony where one goes out into the wilderness, alone, away from one's community, to fast and seek a vision from the spirits. I strongly object to what I've heard referred to as "spiritual strip-mining," where one takes terms and concepts from other cultures without taking the time to learn the details of the underlying principles and culture. While this isn't nearly as bad as some cases, it's still an inappropriate use of the term. Why not simply call it "pathworking" and leave it at that?
And why "jargon?" That word has mildly pejorative overtones. Wouldn't "terminology" have been a better word?
p.31 ["Your Special Days of Celebration"]
By the first Turn of the Wheel, you may find that you have missed some of your special days. I know I did. Don't worry about it. It is difficult to expect a person to totally trash how they have been living for several years and pick up a whole new set of realities, including holidays! The God and the Goddessa renot going to destroy your happy home because you forgot.
They don't dispense lightening (sic) bolts to your front door if you really aren't comfortable with some of the special days, or don't feel up to celebrating others ... Grandma may be down with the flu, and you are staying with her until she is better, or your parents may have flown in from Madagascar and you have to pick them up at the airport. Imagine their surprise if you told them "Gee, sorry folks, I'm a Witch now and I can't possibly pick you up because I will be dancing naked in my backyard under the Full Moon!" That would certainly impress them.
These are excellent points. Sabbats and esbats should be something to which one looks forward, not a chore -- a celebration, y'know?. Furthermore, Wicca is a practical path: if the house is on fire, don't plunge back into the flames to get your Book of Shadows. Don't trust to the Gods to keep you from getting pregnant during a Great Rite. And don't get stressed because you weren't able to be "naked under the Full Moon" at the precise moment of the Winter Solstice.
p.35 ["Your Special Days of Celebration"]
Beltane
...the traditional colors for Mayday are red and white, representing the blood that flows from a woman when her purity is taken.
OK, I just don't know where to start here. Again. For someone involved with a religion that recognizes the divine female, Ms. Ravenwolf sure seems to have bought into the notion that a woman who hasn't had sex is somehow more "pure" than one who has. Or is she referring to a girl who has not reached menarche yet? Either way, this notion of either menstruation or sex being somehow "impure" is abhorrent to me, and I'd think it would be to anyone who respects women and the female divine.
I suspect that she's referring to sexuality rather than menstruation because of the reference to "purity" being "taken." How can I possibly have respect for someone who thinks that sex makes someone impure? How can I consider her a member of my religion, a religion that celebrates joyous experiences of life? "Behold, all acts of love and pleasure are My rituals," says the Charge of the Goddess, but apparently the author seems to have some doubts about this.
Now, if we were talking about an incident of rape, I could see some notions of violation, corruption and defilement, but unless she has a wildly different notion of what Beltaine's about than I do, that doesn't seem to be relevant here. I am, quite frankly, appalled.
p.38 ["Your Special Days of Celebration"]
At dinner on Samhain, our family sets an empty place for those who have departed who were dear to us. Since the passing of another family member last year, we have begun to set a separate table for them as they were crowding out the hungry living tummies at the main table.
This is a lovely custom, and one I'd encourage people to take on.
p.46 ["Defining the All"]
What is important is that you pick a pantheon and stick with it while you are learning the Craft. Do not mix pantheons or interchange deities from different pantheons in the same ritual; you are likely to screw up your magick ... if you do.
I cannot agree too strongly. While it's possible to work with deities from different pantheons at different times, I consider it unwise to try to mix them in a single ritual: it would be like asking a group of soldiers from different countries, with different uniforms, traditions, equipment, insignia, and languages, to get together and carry out a mission together on short notice. Ain't gonna work.
It's my personal feeling that while one may choose to interact with deities from many pantheons, one will eventually find one pantheon that feels like a better "fit" than any other. That doesn't mean one must exclusively work with that pantheon, but that one is likely to get the best connection and the most intense and important experiences from doing so.
p.46 ["Defining the All"]
...we Witches are allowed to clear out negative emotions by crying.
Yep. Nothing wrong with crying. In fact, I'd contend that someone who can't cry is not fully in touch with zir own emotions, and isn't someone I want leading a Circle. The Priest/ess of a Circle should be working hard on full integration of all sides of zirself, the better to serve the God/desses.
p.46 ["Defining the All"]
My logical mind told me to determine what physical things created the shadow (as it was not that of a living cat), until I remembered that magick and spiritual attunement come to one in the most practical ways. What was important is how I felt inside and the energy I absorbed in that moment.
Again, yes! The important thing was not to understand where the shadow came from but to get the message. As with any omen, sign, portent, the message is often more important than the medium.
p.47 ["Defining the All"]
When studying pantheons, keep the following in mind...
When researching deities, try to answer the following questions...
These two series of questions are outstanding. The highest compliment you're likely to see me give something like this is "I'll be using this with my students."
I'll be using these with my students.
p. 51 ["Defining the All']
Lilith: Hebrew; Adam's first wife and said to be turned into a demoness; however, if you have ever read any of Zecharia Sitchin's work, you may change your mind. In my opinion, Lilith was a Star Woman bred with Adam. This would make her a goddess of Higher Intelligence or a representation of the Star People.
Huh? "Star Woman?" "representation of the Star People?" I didn't want to think that she was going down the von Daniken route, but I went and looked up Zecharia Sitchin. Let me quote from a page on the site:
the Anunnaki came to Earth some 450,000 years ago from the planet Nibiru – a member of our own solar system whose great orbit brings it to our part of the heavens once every 3,600 years. They came here in need of gold, with which to protect their dwindling atmosphere. Exhausted and in need of help in mining the gold, their chief scientist Enki suggested that they use their genetic knowledge to create the needed Primitive Workers.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is a classic case of people who can't keep their subcultures straight. If you want to theorize that we've been visited by extraterrestrials in the past [leaving aside the issue of the plain bad science in Mr. Sitchin's site], that's fine, but I cannot see how it is in any way whatsoever relevant to a book on Wicca. This sort of thing reminds me of people who wear their Star Trek uniforms to Pagan festivals, or enormous pentagram pendants to SCA events, even though loudly proclaiming one's adherence to a non-Christian religion was an insane and dangerous thing through much of the SCA's historical period. I used to take my pentagram pendant off when I went to an SCA event, for that very reason...
It's passages like this that make me think this is a book that should be read under the supervision of an experienced teacher, not handed out like a reliable primer. My wife commented that this book sounds like it was written by someone who had heard a lot of rumors about Wicca.
p.52 ["Defining the All"]
Nuit: Egyptian; Sky Mother. Often seen depicted in circular fashion cradling the stars.
Actually, Her name is Nut. "Nuit" is the French word for "night." It's an amusing coincidence and/or a clever Freudian slip, but it's wrong. I thought I might be wrong on this, so I checked Google for reference. I typed in "Nuit" and "Goddess." I found many pages where She's referred to as "Nuit," but after five pages of scanning I had yet to find one where the site ended in ".edu." I suspect that "Nuit" is a common misspelling rather than a legitimate spelling. However, I'm going to check with an Egyptologist friend of mine, so my remarks here may change.
Furthermore, Nut is almost always depicted in a squared-off form, arching over the Earth:

She may have stars within Herself or may not, but I've never seen Her depicted as "cradling the stars" or in a circular fashion. Even allowing these depictions [which are, I believe, fairly representative of artistic renditions of Her] as representing curves, that's still a long way from "circular."(to see the source documents for these images, simply click on them)
p.52 ["Defining the All"]
Although the Goddess plays an important part in Witchcraft, the God should not be looked upon as any less important. He is the necessary balance to obtain harmony and has his own power and expertise.
I agree wholeheartedly.
p.61 ["Meditation, Visualization and Dreaming"]
The study of Witchcraft is hard work if you wish to reach any level of proficiency. It is not a faith where you can dress up, go to church on Sunday, listen to the drone of the sermon and go home and forget it for the rest of the week, assured that your soul has been saved for at least the next six days.
It isn't the study where you pick up a single, all-encompassing book and find a passage, believing that by reading the words all your problems will fade away.
It is not an organization that assures you that if you give it money, you will be forgiven for cheating on your spouse or fudging on your income tax return. Even if the person who cashes your check forgives you, I doubt either your spouse or the IRS will be so charitable.
Excellent points [in fact, this whole chapter is pretty good. I'm amazed to find myself saying this, given some of the material I've found elsewhere in this book, but in the interests of integrity and giving credit where credit is due, I have to say it]! Much of what we study is centered around the dreaded "R Word:" Responsibility.
p.86 ["Stocking Your Magickal Cabinet"]
(discussing magickal tools:)
2. No tool or accessory should be used for anything other than the purpose of magick or ritual celebrations
3. Never, ever touch someone else's tools and accessories without their permission. Likewise, never allow anyone else to touch your magickal items unless you are absolutely sure that the person's energy is synergetic with yours. The only exclusion here are the Tarot cards or some other types of divination tool that may require the energy of the querent
Actually, there's a lot of controversy about #2. Some people do like this somewhat Ceremonial-magick attitude toward their tools, but others [a minority, perhaps, but a fervent one] feel that it's better to use a well-made and much-used kitchen knife than an expensive and fancy ritual blade that's not used for anything else. However, the first sentence of section three is something I cannot emphasize too strongly. Whatever your feelings about how tools should be handled, it's the height of bad manners to assume that someone else will agree with you: err on the side of caution. I've seen some astoundingly egregious violations of this by people who should know better.
p.87 ["Stocking Your Magickal Cabinet"]
I tend to agree with the thought process of the Native Americans. They feel that if you spend time making an item for ritual use, concentrating your energy and thought process on the creation of the object, you have already brought half of the magickal intention into form.
Leaving aside the reference to "Native Americans" as though there was/is a monolithic culture among them, the point is very valid.
p.90 ["Stocking Your Magickal Cabinet"]
The Athame/Sword
The athame is used for commanding and manipulating power. This knife is usually doubled-edged (sic) and dull as it does not actually cut anything on the physical plane.
A dull knife is symbolic of dullness, and most of us [I hope] would prefer to keep our intellects sharp. If that's how you want to conduct your life, rituals and magick, that's up to you, but at least understand what's going on here. Sure, you can use a letter-opener as an athame if you're in a public place and likely to get arrested if you bring out an actual blade. You can also drive your car in first gear all the time if you want to.
There's a lovely quote on page 268 of "Lord Darcy," by Randall Garrett (published by Baen Books. Compiled and edited by Eric Flint and Guy Gordon., ©2002 by the Estate of Randall Garrett. ISBN 0-7434-3548-6) that touches on this. Even a non-Wiccan gets the idea...
"...it's only used as a symbolical knife, d'ye see. We never actually cut anything material with it, so it never needs to be sharpened again if a man's careful."
"But if you never cut anything with it," said Lord Bontriomphe, "then why sharpen it at all? Wouldn't it work as well if its edges were as dull as, say, a letter opener?"
Master Sean gave the London investigator a rather pained look. "My lord," he said with infinite patience, "this is a symbol of a sharp knife. I also have a slightly different one with blunt edges; it is a symbol for a dull knife. Your lordship should realize that, for many purposes, the best symbol for a thing is the thing itself."
p.90 ["Stocking Your Magickal Cabinet"]
The wand and the athame are basically interchangeable
Bzzzt! Thank you for playing. What do we have for the losing contestants, Johnny?
If the wand and athame are basically interchangeable, why do we have both? If you look at some of the classic works on the subject such as the Farrar's "Witch's Bible Complete," you'll see that the wand and athame are distinctly different tools, attributed to different elements, and have their own uses. These two tools come to us through Ceremonial Magick, where they have seriously disparate uses, as I believe you'll find if you check such texts as Israel Regardie's "The Golden Dawn" or Aleister Crowley's "777". There's some controversy as to which is the tool of Air and which of Fire, but I have no idea where the notion comes from that they're interchangeable. Sloppy teachers? Lazy students?
p.90 ["Stocking Your Magickal Cabinet"]
The athame stands for intellect, right thinking, and calculation. I do not use mine very often...
...
p.99 ["Cleansing, Consecrating and Charging"]
For example, for Earth you could use sea salt, dirt, rice, corn meal etc.
You could indeed use all of these. Although this may seem a nitpicky point, I personally would prefer to use mined salt for Earth. Sea salt has a distinctly "Water" aspect to it.
p.111-116 [The Fine Art of Magickal Record Keeping"] This chapter is short, but well worth reading and taking to heart. I'm not a great fan of the notion that DOS stands for "Disk Of Shadows," [although the author doesn't actually make that hoary joke] but aside from that I endorse this chapter without complaint.
p.121 ["Designing and Performing Rituals"]
In a coven, each compass point is represented by an individual person, sometimes called an Officer.
This may apply in Ms. Ravenwolf's coven, but it's a pretty huge overgeneralization to say that this will automatically happen in a coven. I'm not even sure where she got the notion: it's certainly not one I've encountered in twelve or so years in the Pagan community.
p.129 ["Designing and Performing Rituals"]
Why Not Use Rituals Written by Somebody Else?
My only advice is that if it doesn't feel right, don't do it.
Excellent advice, particularly for a solitary. If a ritual makes you uncomfortable, you're unlikely to get good results from it anyway.
p.137 ["Webweaving" I'm somewhat at a loss to understand why this isn't entitled "Networking," a perfectly good word that's already part of the general lexicon.]
...don't fall into the trap of thinking that someone is an adept just because they have been involved in the Craft longer than you have. When someone starts spouting to me how many years they have been in the Craft before we've had a decent general conversation, I get suspicious. You can be a Girl Scout for eleven years and still get lost in the woods.
Yes! Do they have eleven years' experience, or one year of experience repeated eleven times? People who get puffed over titles and rank often have little else to recommend them.
This is another chapter that's pretty good, and I highly recommend you read the caveats and cautions.
p. 149 ["Divination vs. Fortune Telling" A chapter which, oddly, does not mention astrology. What a curious omission... Otherwise, not bad, for the most part]
Runes: Divination by the use of stones or ceramic squares inscribed with the magickal alphabet of the Germanic, Scandinavian, or Norse symbols. Runes are excellent for dream analysis, spells, talismans, as well as general divination.
Runes were originally carved on wood, and if you're going Back To The Old Ways, I see no reason not to follow suit on this, too. I'm not sure about "dream analysis," but the runes are a fine and sophisticated tool for both divination and active magick. I strongly recommend Edred Thorsson's "FUTHARK," "Runelore" (both of which are about active runic magick) and "At the Well of Wyrd," his book on divination. Freya Asswyn's "Leaves of Yggdrasil" is also highly recommended. D. Jason Cooper has written an interesting book called "Using the Runes" which discusses using different colors and woods for your runes: I can't speak for the quality of his scholarship, but it's certainly interesting.
Conversely, I strongly recommend you Stay Away From Ralph Blum's Material.
p. 149. ["Divination vs. Fortune Telling"]
Graphology: The study of an individual's script or handwriting. This is extremely useful in webweaving and also adds to any other reading you may be doing.
I'm not sure about including graphology under this category. Although the Skeptic's Dictionary is pretty contemptuous of graphology [they don't have much use for the polygraph or the much-used Myers-Briggs Personality Test, either; make of that what you will], those who practice the study of graphology will likely tell you that it's a science, not a divinatory or oracular tool.
p.167 ["Divination vs. Fortune Telling"]
The Runes One of the best known books on the subject is The Book of Runes by Ralph Blum. Although I began my first experiments iwth the use of this particular text, Blum's use of the Christian religious system really bothered me.
Oddly, this discomfort doesn't seem to have spilled over to angels.
p.167 ["Divination vs. Fortune Telling"]
The interpretations the author gave, though basically sound, did not seem to fit the magickal alphabet. I felt that much was lost.
Given that Blum's runes stem solely from his own insights and interpretations, as opposed to any solid research, that's hardly surprising. His invention of a "blank" rune is based on nothing other than his own ideas, and his rearrangement of the runes from three rows of eight into five rows of five makes it clear that this is Blum's invention, with little to do with the original runes. I confess, when I was first starting I, too, bought his book and rune cookies, but found myself dissatisfied with them almost immediately. I put them away and didn't take up runes again until I found Thorsson's work [see above].
p.235 ["Telepathy, Psychometry and Mind Power"]
...productive energy (referred to as the cone of power)
The cone of power is one form of "productive energy," but hardly the only one.
p.258 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
Many Witches believe that groups of souls become incarnate at the same time in different areas of the world to work together toward a common goal. Hence, you may hear yourself called "my brother" or "my sister" even though there is no blood relation and you may never have even met each other face to face.
There's a lot to be said for this theory, and it would explain why one finds instant sympathy or distaste for a person even before getting to know zir.
p.258 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
What happens between incarnations is a puzzle to many. Do we float around as ghosts? Do we fill the position as "Guardian" of a loved one or a stranger? Do we become Angels? And what are Angels, anyway? Are they beings like us, or very unlike us? Do we go to another planet, or perhaps to another dimension with living, breathing people who are more evolved than ourselves? Or do we go to a place to rest and relax, shoot the shit with those we missed in the last incarnation, and prepare a complete documentary of what we have learned and what we didn't?
This is another of those passages that irks me for several reasons.
"What are Angels?" I dunno: why don't you ask a Christian, a Jew, or a Muslim?? Angels are Biblical in origin, and so not really relevant to non-Biblical religion.
"Do we go to another planet, or perhaps to another dimension with living, breathing people who are more evolved than ourselves?" Oh, grief. First, let's not mix up astronomy with religion, folks. That's for the people who like to read the National Enquirer "articles" about the Hubble taking pictures of Heaven. Similarly, the notion of other dimensions is a scientific one, not really applicable to spiritual matters. How would we get there? Would we float around there as ghosts, or appear with solid bodies? If so, how? Why? And why expect people in other dimensions to be more evolved than we? Might they not be less evolved than we? Are we the least-evolved beings around?
"Shoot the shit?" I'm sorry, but this phrasing seems out-of-place, to say the very least. Surely the author could have found a more professional way of phrasing this? So I'm left wondering: was this the author's phrasing that the publisher didn't edit, or the publisher deciding to muck with the author's phrasing? Either way, someone should be embarrassed...
p.259 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
...there is some type of "holding pen" for truly perverted people (I hope). Though I don't believe in the typical Hell, I certainly hope there is something like it for people like Hitler and a few other bad eggs I can think of.
Why? To me, a statement like this indicates a poor understanding of karmic consequences [and no, I don't like borrowing the word "karma" from another culture, but English didn't have an equivalent term]. There's no need for a Hell for Hitler, Pol Pot, Jeffrey Dahmer et. al.: their actions will be atoned for over many lifetimes of hard work and suffering.
p.259 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
"There are no victims, only volunteers." ... I believe that you can choose your parents, the society in which to return, the type of career you will have, who you must help or what you must do (that feeling of you've got a purpose, but you don't know what and time is running out) and I believe you choose your own time and method of death. You also choose your own physical condition, your body chemistry and your DNA structure -- which is why some of us have the capability to be rocket scientists and others fill the roll (sic) of artist or writer. This does not mean that everything is set in stone when you get back here, but that you have laid out an itinerary and whether or not you follow it once you get here is entirely up to you.
I don't buy it. First, it smacks of predestination: "you choose your own time and method of death" What are the chances that six million people got together in the Summerland and said "Hey, I have an idea! Let's all incarnate as Jews in Germany in the early 1900s so we can die horribly in gas chambers!"? There's a "blame the victim" component to this notion, not to mention one that implies that it's OK to ignore the suffering of others, since they chose this life for themselves.
She also turns right around and contradicts herself at the end, saying you don't need to follow the itinerary you've set for yourself. That's like having someone else plan your vacation trip for you, then not tell you anything except "Start off by turning right."
This idea is popular in some Newage circles, but I suspect you'll find it has less credence among the homeless, the chronically ill, and anyone else who's suffering badly. It's fine for people with comfortable, middle-class lives who can reasonably expect to die in a nice comfortable bed, I think if you ask someone who's about to be "necklaced" in Rwanda you'd get a different answer.
p.259 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
I recently read a statement noting that there are more people alive today than if you added all the people up since time began. Does this throw a kink in the reincarnation theory? If all those people are alive today, they they (sic) all have been reincarnated from an earth life. This is true.
Well, maybe and maybe not. Why not new souls? Why not reincarnations of all those passenger pigeons?
p.259 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
However, I believe that there are many souls here at this time who have not been earthlings before. Society today plays hard with the idea of other inhabited planets and dimensions. Just about everyone these days has seen at least one UFO.
Sure. I've seen scores of UFOs: Flying Objects that I can't identify. That doesn't mean they're extraterrestrials or angels; it just means I can't identify that light/shape in the sky. Now, if she wants to say that "just about everyone these days has seen at least one thing-that-looks-unlike-anything-on-earth-and-could-likely-have-come-from-another-planet," then I think she's quite wrong.
Leaving that aside, are we to assume, under this theory, that these other planets are suffering mysterious drops in the birth rate there?
p.262 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
When you are considering theories, don't forget the one on genetic memory which is responsible for many of our fight-flight instincts and who knows what else, including possible lineage from either apes or star people or both!
Who knows what, indeed! Yes, our fight-or-flight instinct is genetic. What of it? And no, we're not descended from apes; we share a common ancestor with them. Surely this isn't news or controversial to Ms. Ravenwolf...
"Star people?" I don't think there's much evidence of this. Even if there is, is this really relevant to the book?
p.263 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
Azrael is the proper name of the Angel of Death. His status in the "other worlds" is the same as that of the other Angels you hear of so often: Michael, Raphael, Ariel and Gabriel ... He is, perhaps, the loneliest Angel of the lot. If you wish to learn more about Azrael and his world, check the suggested reading list at the end of this chapter
Angels again...
p.264 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
...although Witches are quire comfortable with the color black for fashion dressing, one will see them wearing white at the funeral of any beloved person.
What nonsense! To say that all Witches will wear white to funerals is completely without basis. I've attended several funerals, and never wore white. One certainly could do so, and for certain funerals I would [in the Far East, for example, white is often the color of mourning: if the deceased was from such a culture, I'd honor it by wearing white], but for most funerals in our culture I'd feel it being disrespectful to the feelings of the other mourners and/or an attempt to draw attention to oneself to do so.
p.264 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
As death indicates rebirth into a purer form or light form, white is used to reflect that thought. It is a Witch's way of honoring the dead.
What's this "purer" or "light form" stuff? Perhaps the author has come to terms with death, but her opinion of life doesn't seem very high.
p.265 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
If you plan to be a leader of an organization of Wiccans or Witches, or choose to be a High Priest or Priestess of a coven, you would be expected to be able to perform a handfasting ceremony (marriage), a christening (for the birth of new babes) and funeral rites.
A "christening?" I'd be hard-pressed to see how that's the role of a Wiccan clergyperson. A Wiccaning, perhaps, or a saining (a lovely archaism for "blessing," sometimes in the context of naming a child), but christening has particular connotations that seem to be at odds with the notion of a Wiccan presiding over the ceremony.
p.265 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
It is my belief that handfastings are far more sacred marriages than those conventionally performed by any state or standard religion.
Oh, now there's a way to make us popular among mainstream religions! What ever do you suppose the author was thinking when she wrote this? Sure, a religious ceremony is pretty much by definition more "sacred" than a civil one, but how Ms. Ravenwolf can have the colossal gall [not to mention the shortsightedness] to say that a handfasting is more sacred than a Christian one, for example, is beyond me.
Just for the record, I want to state without reservation that I utterly repudiate this notion.
p.265 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
In this ceremony, you are creating a bind that will exist after this incarnation is over.
I presume she means "creating a binding" or perhaps "creating a bond" here. Actually, handfastings come in various forms, from a one-year commitment to a commitment to be together through all lifetimes. They are not one-size-commits-all.
p.265 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
Why discuss handfastings and christenings in a chapter on death and reincarnation? A marriage denotes the partial (note I say partial) death of self and the incarnation of a new life form -- the union. A christening of a child denotes a celebration of their rebirth to this earth plane, where death has gone before.
I have to say that I don't feel any part of me died when I got married. I've already made my feelings clear on the question of "christenings." Perhaps the chapter should have been entitled "Passages" or something more inclusive.
p.265 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
...a God-Father and a Goddess-Mother (gee, I wonder where they originally got the idea?)
I don't know: why don't you enlighten us? And while you're at it, to what "they" do you refer? If you're trying to imply that Christians got it from Witches, I'm going to have to ask you to document it or let me slap you. If you're pointing out that similar concepts have existed throughout the world and throughout history, then the smug tone of this remark is quite superfluous, isn't it?
p.266 (Frankly, I'm uneasy with so many notions in this section that I'm tempted to simply say "Arg" and leave it at that)["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
Time and Perception The human sees time, and in fact invented it, in order to give life a logical sequence for completing specified tasks as one grows to perform them.
How interesting. So, before there were humans time did not exist? All those billions of years between the Big Bang and the last couple of million years were ... what? Screwdrivers or something?
p.266 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
we move ever closer to the "Federation of Planets"
We do? Where? As far as we know, there's one inhabited planet, and we're on it. We can't even put together an effective federation of this planet...
p.266 ["The Summerland: Death and Reincarnation"]
(the Mona Lisa) is probably smiling at the folly of the human who sticks to linear time
Given how little we know of the woman who posed for this famous painting, I'd be really interested to know where the author got this. Or was she just writing whatever came to the top of her head?
p.271 ["There's No Such Thing as a White Witch"]
What is happening to you may not be the result of a past life boo-boo. One question I hear often when divining for magickal people is, "Is this difficulty a direct result of something I have done in a past life?" Too many people are willing to accept a bad situation by interpreting it as a punishment because of foul deeds done in another life time (sic). For some strange reason, it makes the difficulty easier to rationalize and handle.
This gives us fine justification for rolling over and saying, "Gee, kick me again!" in a volatile situation, turning everything over to an Almighty Purveyor of Justice to squash their hopes and dreams without so much as a cry of indignation. "I must have deserved it" is not always the correct response.
Karma does not exist to be used as the easiest road in times of crisis. It exists to bring things into balance, yes, but the Universe does not revolve around this doctrine as the one and only rule. There are others. Cause and effect are important, but not everything.
You are here to learn many lessons, but you are also around to assist others in accomplishing their goals and lessons as well. Not every situation you encounter is a result of the law of Karma. Not every difficulty you are involved in is a result of Karmic backlash. Likewise, not every person you meet is really someone you have known well or dealt with before.
And now, to my amazement, here's a good paragraph or two. This does seem to fly in the face of the author's previous remarks on 259: I recommend you ignore the stuff on that page and concentrate on this. Ignore the dismal grammar (doesn't anyone use actual proofreaders or editors any more?) and absorb the intended sense of it.
p.272 ["There's No Such Thing as a White Witch"]
Hold your ground and stay calm in verbal confrontations. Do not take a defensive posture; take an offensive one.
Interesting thesis. Does she think that these are the only two options?
p.274 ["There's No Such Thing as a White Witch"]
...the breakdown of the patriarchal religions will be complete ... The Savior of the Christians will finally have his bride -- but it won't be the Church, as they would like you to believe. It will be the Goddess, in whatever form she sees fit to take. The Almighty Jealous Father syndrome will bite the dust.
This kind of remark is not only unlikely, it's counterproductive. It's the kind of thing that people of mainstream religions fasten onto when they're looking for reasons to claim that we're dangerous to them. This sort of attitude is no more acceptable coming from a (nominal) Witch than it would be coming from a Christian and directed at us.
p.275 ["There's No Such Thing as a White Witch"]
I don't believe I will see it in my life time (sic), but my children may actually experience the moment when all religions suddenly realize that they are heading in the same direction (which they are). And, on day, they will be One.
Avert! Spiritually, all religions are not heading in the same direction, nor should they be. Sure, toward love and caring, but it's the multiplicity and variety that reflects the world, not some intense sameness. Of course, if you want to sound like a pre-Millennialist ["the day will come when every knee will bend and every voice acknowledge..."], go ahead, but don't expect me to endorse it. Personally, I think we need a multiplicity of religions because there are many different kinds of people, needing many different things. No one religion can serve everyone.
Vive la difference!
p.279 ["Coming Out of the Closet"]
Some New Generation Witches do not move beyond the "flash" of the Craft. These are the people who waltz about town, invariably dressed in black, with tons of magickal jewelry dripping from just about every protruding part of their body (sic). We all go through this stage, but we all don't get stuck there. If your dress and mannerisms are constantly screaming "look at me -- oogie boogie!" you are betting for trouble.
Another pearl! Grammatical issues aside, this is an excellent paragraph, and many Pagans should have it tattooed backwards on their foreheads, so they can see it in the mirror in the morning.
Incidentally, I wouldn't say that we all go through this phase. Some do; perhaps even many, but all? I think not. Not everyone expresses their new-convert enthusiasm by wearing black clothing and forty pounds of silver jewelry. Really.
p.281 ["Coming Out of the Closet"]
Interestingly enough, we all consider ourselves equal. The Witches aren't better than the Catholics; the OTO ladies aren't a cut above the Witches.
This is in odd contrast to the author's remarks on p. 265 and pp. 274-5.
p.283 ["Appendix 1 A Smattering of History"]
Deidre and Andrus Corbin
There's just no excuse for this. Their names are Andras Corban Arthen and Deirdre Pulgram Arthen . The author says "(i)f you hear these names, prick up your ears and listen. If you get a chance to meet any of these people, remember that they have worked long and hard for some of the freedoms you are enjoying today." The advice is good: you should prick up your ears, but apparently actually checking for correct names and spelling isn't that important.
p.284-5 ["A Smattering of History"]
This statement (the Earth Religion Anti-Abuse Resolution )went far beyond human egoism by showing the entire Pagan community that there are enough active Witches and Pagans who are willing to work together to assist their community, and that we are our own worst enemies.
...It is high time we understand that strife among our own causes the most difficulties in our religion.
...I have watched prominent Craft members being trashed by not so prominent ones, which in turn makes everybody prominent. Ahem.
...If you think this is all tripe, your (sic) are correct.
"Tripe" is the mildest word appropriate for this kind of behavior. Ms. Ravenwolf is as on-target about this issue as anyone could be. Abusing our leaders and fellow Pagans doesn't serve anyone. If someone has honestly gained recognition for hard work and achievements, we should be working to emulate them, not knock them down.
Now, before someone complains that I'm doing just that with most of this review, let me point out that my comments aren't aimed at the author per se but at the material. If Ms. Ravenwolf wants to put out a good book, I'll be happy to speak well of it. Sadly, this book does not qualify.
Overall, I regret to say that I cannot recommend this book. It contains sweeping generalizations, errors-of-fact, and comments that can serve only to raise anger against the Pagan community. There are also places where I simply disagree with the author, and hope I've made it clear which are which. I will admit that it's possible that Ms. Ravenwolf's later books are improvements on this one [I can only hope. May the Gods help us if they're worse!], or even that later editions contain corrections of the more egregious errors in this one. There are certainly good parts to this book, but overall they do not outweigh the bad ones, and no amount of nifty illustrations can rescue it.

All comments in the left-hand side of the table above are © 1993 by Silver RavenWolf [with the exception of occasional comments in blue]. Any errors of transcription are the sole responsibility of Robert Berra Jr., who will gladly correct them upon being notified.
All comments in the right-hand side are © 2002 and the sole responsibility of Robert Berra Jr. except where specifically stated otherwise.

HTML coding by RBerra. No GUI editors were used or harmed in the making of this document.






My first piece of fan mail!

OK, the writer is hardly a "fan," but it's in response to my comments above. I'm not going to include the writer's name, since I've been unable to reach her (I believe it's a "she," from the e-ddress). Since nothing in it is personally identifiable, and the email sticks strictly to the subject at hand, I don't feel a lot of qualms about reproducing it here, along with my response. If you are the sender and wish this to be removed, please contact me.


Commentary removed

The writer and I did engage in a brief email exchange, wherein she said she didn't have any interest in debating the subject further, despite the fact that I felt I addressed her points quite adequately and asked her to show any actual errors of fact.
I politely asked her if she wanted me to take down what I had posted--her comments and my responses--and she politely said "Yes." Out of courtesy, I've complied.