82
	4	                  RECROSS-EXAMINATION
	5	BY MR. CORGAN:
	6	Q	Mr. Gluba, would you agree with me that if we wanted
	7	to know what the officers had done or what effect they
	B	could of had on the crime scene itself, that this video we
	9	saw really doesn’t tell us a whole lot in that regard?
	10	A	I think it tells me a great deal.
	11	Q	Well, it doesn’t show us where they’ve been, does it?
	12	A	It shows a great deal of movement at the crime scene;
	13	it shows persons moving round through a couple of those
	14	rooms.
	15	Q	Doesn’t show where they’ve been?
	16	A	It shows where they are at the time that the image is
	17	taken.
	18	Q	So it doesn’t show where they’ve been, correct?
	19	A	Correct.
	20	Q	Doesn’t show if they’ve walked on items or where they
	21	walked?
	22	A	Well, in part it very well may. We know that there
	23	were some footwear impressions on that dining room floor
	24	and we do see officers moving about in there.
	25	Q	But that video doesn’t show us those officers walking
DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT

83

	1	on those items necessarily?
	2	A	They’re in the area.
	3	Q	My point is, sir, wouldn’t you agree with me that in
	4	forming a vast number of conclusions you relied on part of
	5	the information and not all the information?
	6			MR. CARLSON:	Object, improper recross,
	7	Your Honor.
	8			THE COURT:	Sustained.
	9			MR. CORGAN:	That’s all.
	10			MR. CARLSON:	That’s all we have.
	11			THE COURT:	Thank you, sir. Step down.
	12	Let’s take a recess, ladies and gentlemen, and don’t
	13	discuss the case.

LH 2000