14-MAY-1996 14:53:03.22 Daiajo Tibdixious
V2 is V1 with the limitations on low axiom tool use and creation loosened. [Thank's to Jamison Graff.
Changing axiom levels isn't the same as changing the technology of a tool. To lower an axiom level, people would have to stop believing in something which is verifiably true (until there's a shift, anyway), which would be pretty tough and requires the same penergy expenditure as raising the level--that part is already symmetric.
As far as tool production is concerned, though, going down is a matter of making something obsolete, while going up is a matter of making something impossible--it's inherently asymmetric, unless you're interested in redefining the role of the axioms. ]
This treatise takes as a premise that axioms are primarily a description of a reality, rather than something that defines the reality.
Given this (which was chosen to simplify the axiom argument considerably), we need further rules to
In the following, "axiom" means the 'average' or 'normal' axiom of the realm/world/cosm. "local axiom" means a (sub)realm with the same reality but slightly different axiom(s) from the axiom.
Since ords define the axiom, rather than vice versa, they can't create a contradiction with their own reality stuff and thinking. It is the availability of different thinking, and close-to-the-top-of-the-axiom tools and materials that allows contradictory stuff to be created without causing a contradiction, as the axiom simply moves (in that local area) to the new value.
I propose
This force will simply be a difficulty disbelieving the other axiom development (for those just outside), and as forgetfulness (the researchers/engeneers have trouble remembering the theory, they have to refer to notes continually), clumsiness, and wrong thinking (unconsciously building in average axiom stuff).