![]() |
|
|
Mediterranean
Conference XXII. 11-16 Temmuz, 2000 tarihinde New York'ta mukim,
Dowling College ve Istanbul Universite'since Istanbul'da düzenlendi.
"The
Profile of Women in Turkey"
1. Introduction
2. Main Indicators on Women
Marriage, Divorce and
Reproductive Activities
The traditional values and customs do not only influence the choice of the spouse, but also affect other dimensions of the marriage including the payment of dowry for the bride and the marriage arrangement among the relatives. For example, purchasing dowry was practiced in the marriage of a large number of women (28.6 per cent in Turkey total in the mid-1990s; 21.9 per cent urban women and 41.0 per cent rural women).2 Secondly, many of them were married to their relatives (22.6 per cent in Turkey total; 20.4 per cent urban women and 26.5 per cent rural women), as it had been customary in the past. Also, not only the customary but also the religious norms are honored in the marriage. An imam's symbolic religious blessing of the civil marriage was found to be important for the majority (89.0 percent) of the married women in 1993.3 Nevertheless, the traditional pattern of marriage has been changing as a response to the changes including the greater female participation in labor force, increased number of females in the institutions of higher education, and their increased access to universal information. For example, the tradition of marrying at the age of puberty faded away. The marriage age rose to 22 for the females and 25.9 for the males in 1994. Moreover, many more women began to go court for divorce.4 Amongst the reasons for women getting divorce, the most frequently given ones are exposures to domestic violence, extra-marital relations of the husband, the use of alcohol by the husband, and the intervention of the mother-in-law in the family affairs.5 The division of labor in the home is very traditional in the sense that male participation in the housework including cooking, cleaning and childcare is almost nil (not more than two per cent), regardless of women’s work outside the home. However, the male share in making of the budget is larger. In 1993, a survey on the married women in the age group of 15-49 years old showed that for 54.1 per cent of the families, the husband had a full power over making the budget. This figure was 50.4 percent for the families where both man and woman worked; and 55.0 per cent for the families the wife was a housewife.6 The traditionally rewarded role as a mother is important for many women. In 1989 the total number of ever-married female population (in the age group of 15-49 years old) was 14, 010, 461 and the total number of children ever-born alive were 55, 756,138. This means that the average number of children per woman was 3.98 in 1989.7 However, it varied with a number of factors: the level of formal education obtained by the women that is also found to be an important factor in shaping female attitudes towards their bodies; the level of labor force participation; regional customary practices and values, and residence in urban or rural area. Consider that 5,531,779 illiterate women had 30,870, 492 children in 1989 (which meant 5.58 children per woman). In contrast, 8,478, 682 literate women had 24,885,646 children (which meant 2.94 children per woman with university degree had 1.47 children (239,729 college educated women with 353,891 children).8 While, the average number of children per woman was 3.98 in Turkey total; it was 3.01 for the urban woman and 4.60 for the rural woman. Parallel to this, a female agricultural worker had 4.83 children, but a working woman employed in modern formal sector had 2.23 children in 1989. Regional differences are significant in the number of living children per woman too. A woman in the western Turkey had 3.31 children (3.01 in the urban and 3.95 in the rural areas); a woman from the central Anatolia had 4.04 children (3.69 in the urban and 4.44 in the rural); however, a woman from the Eastern provinces had 5.25 children (4.87 in the urban and 5.43 in the rural).9 In some provinces (e.g., Diyarbak?r, Sanl?urfa, Bitlis, Sirnak, Mus) in this region the number of children per woman ranged from five to seven.10 The infant mortality rate was still high according to the statistical indicators of 1993. It was 52.6 %o in Turkey total with 44 %o in the urban milieu and 65.4 %o in the rural areas.11 There have been improvements in the health care services provided to the mother and the child, but these are far from meeting the needs. This is why the infant mortality rate is still high in Turkey. More than half (62.3 per cent) of the pregnant women received health care at least once during their pregnancy (46.8 per cent women from a medical doctor and 15.5 per cent of them from a nurse) in 1993. The number of women receiving health care from a medical doctor was higher in the urban areas (57.7 per cent) than that in the rural areas (30.6 per cent).12 The number of women receiving medical care before and after the pregnancy and the proportion of delivery in a hospital has increased through time. Nevertheless, this varies with the level of formal education obtained by women, showing that education affect the way women treat their bodies. For example, only 30.4 per cent of the illiterate women, but 96.6 per cent of the university graduate women delivered their baby in a hospital in 1989. While 46.3 percent of the illiterate women delivered their child at home without any assistance, this figure was 3.8 per cent for the middle school graduates; and none of the high school and university graduate woman delivered a child at home without any assistance.13 Recognising the problem of limited access to health care in the pre and post-pregnancy period, the Ministry of Health started a program titled, "Saving the Mothers" with an aim of extending the health care services to a larger number of women, particularly those in the disadvantaged social strata. The use of contraceptive has increased throughout time as the contraceptive devices have become more available, and as women have obtained higher level of education and an increased level of access to universal information. In 1993, more than half (62.6 per cent) of the married women in the age group of 15-49 years old reported utilisation of contraceptive methods including the traditional (28.1 per cent) and modern ones (34.5 per cent), but 37.4 per cent did not use any type of method (33.8 per cent urban women and 43.9 per cent rural women). The use of contraceptive was higher for the urban women (66.2 per cent) than that for the rural women (56.1 per cent). The more preferred contraceptive methods were the modern ones including pills, IUD, condom and others (34.5 per cent in Turkey total; 38.9 per cent in the urban and 26.8 per cent in the rural areas).14 The use of the traditional methods including withdrawal and calendar methods was almost equally utilised by both the urban women (27.3 per cent) and the rural women (29.3 per cent) in 1993.15 Education
The enrolment ratio also varies with gender, not much at the primary level. However, at the secondary level the gender difference in the enrolment rate becomes more discernible, yet it has narrowed through time. In 1991-1992-education term, the enrolment rate at the primary level was 85.38 per cent for girls and 91.1 for boys. At the secondary level, in 1991-1992 education term, in the middle school the enrolment rate was 47.74 per cent for girls and 71.26 per cent for boys. In the high school it was 31.06 for girls and 47.29 per cent for boys.21 In 1994-1995 education term in the middle school the rate was 54.5 per cent for the girls and 76 per cent for the boys; in the high school it was 39.5 per cent for the girls and 59 percent for the boys.22 The lower level of female enrolment in the secondary education is related to three interrelated factors: discrimination against the girl child when the family provides educational opportunities to the children, poverty and child labor.23 The economically disadvantaged families24 and those with more than four children25 always give priority to the education of the male child. Families more often utilize the girl child’s labor outside the home as well as in the economic activities conducted in the house. In addition to them, the gild child assumes housework.26 At the tertiary level of education there was a significant increase in the female enrolment rate. However, in 1990-1991 academic term, it was still 8.9 percent for the females, but 16.5 percent for the males; the same figures rose to 13.8 percent for the females and to 21.3 percent for the males in the 1994-1995 academic term.27 The discrepancy between the
levels of formal education obtained by the females and males is mainly
the result of poverty and discrimination against the girl child because
of "harmful" traditional practices and favoring the education of the boys,
who would take care of the family in their old ages, when the family allocates
its limited resources. The recent statistical data show one million children
in the age group of 12-14 years are out of school, and 785.000 of them
are females.28
The mechanization of agriculture in Turkey since the 1950s has prompted a massive rural-to-urban migration. In the 1960s and 1970s, the relatively high growth in industry was able to absorb this growing urban labor force and it provided employment for an increasing number of urban women. The number of women in the urban labor force grew by 1.1 per cent per year, reaching 12.8 per cent of the non-agricultural labor force by 1980.30 However, in the 1980s, industrial growth slowed, and the continuing migration from rural to urban areas produced an increase in the urban labor market that the formal sector could not absorb. Migration to the cities -- from the troubled East and Southeast regions and from the Black Sea region where the shortage of land compels people to migrate -- has an impact on the female labor force participation. The majority of the migrating women are not prepared for the formal labor market in terms of language, formal education and skill training. As the economy became increasingly unable to offer urban employment in regular salaried jobs, especially to those who lacked needed skills; women began to turn to micro enterprises as a possible means to earn a living. The majority of these women have found their places in the urban informal economy. Declining rural employment for women and under-reporting of the urban informal sector has resulted in an apparent drop in women's labor force participation from 72.0 per cent in 1955 to less than 42.8 per cent in 1990.31 The same figure was much lower in the late 1990s, as given below. Participation in formal labor force decreased in the early 1990s for men and women. For example, male labor force decreased from 76.5 per cent in 1988 to 71.2 per cent in 1994; and female labor force participation declined from 43.9 per cent in 1988 to 31.9 per cent in 1994,32 and the same figure for 1998 was 27.9 percent.33 Therefore, rural-urban migration and urbanization had negative consequences for the educationally and professionally disadvantaged from the lower social classes. However, women at the highest echelons of society have made great progress. For example, the percentages of doctors and lawyers who are women in Turkey are 15% and 18.7%, respectively. The profile of the female labor force shows that many women have been exploited. According to the Household Labor Force Survey (1996 April), 21,376, 000 people were employed: 14,827,000 males and 6,550,000 females.34 Out of a total number of 6,550,000 employed females, 70 percent (4,585, 000) of them were unpaid family workers; 18.93 percent (1,240, 000) were regular employees; 3.3 percent (221,000) were casual employees; 0.7 percent (46,000) were employers; and 7.0 percent (458, 000) were self-employed whose proportion was 8.835 per cent in 1998. The overwhelming majority of the unpaid family workers were employed in the agriculture and animal husbandry occupational category (4,433,000 female agricultural and animal husbandry workers out of a total number of 4,585,000 female unpaid family workers).36 Despite the decline in women's participation in formal economy, the export led growth paradigm has enhanced the small and medium scale enterprise (SME) development and brought positive consequences for women, favoring women's entrepreneurship in Turkey. Female entrepreneurship (in terms of business activities as both employers and self-employed persons) increased significantly from 5.9 per cent of the economically active female population in 1990 to 11.1 per cent in 1994.37 But it registered a slight decline to 7.0 percent in 1996 and it was 8.8 percent in 1998 (as given above), due to slow down of economy.38 Their number is more likely to grow faster if they are given support in the form of credit allocation of tax reduction and education. The Prime Ministry Directorate General on the Status and Problems of Women has started a number project to provide technical education and assistance with an aim of encouraging the self-employed and the employer females. Credit policies have provided incentives to women entrepreneurs. Furthermore, training programs for increasing women's financial literacy levels have been systematized in the frame work of the National Program for the Enhancement of Women's Integration in Development that was launched in 1993 by the Directorate General on the Status and Problems of Women. It was financed jointly by the Government of Turkey and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) to address the disparity between women's contribution to productivity and their share of developmental benefits Educationally and professionally qualified from the upper echelons are largely represented in the public (where women occupy 27.5 percent of middle to upper level public management cadres)39 and private sector, and women in small and medium size enterprises have been benefiting from the credits and advancing. The major problem of female labor force participation is in the informal economy. The growth of the informal sector was the result of the economic policies that were geared towards debt reduction. This directly or indirectly supported the informal sector. These policies rested on increasing the competitiveness of the export industries through shifting the production mechanism to labor intensive operations of small to medium scale sub contracting arrangements. The increased shift of production to the labor intensive informal sector has had the following consequences: (1) women have begun to enter the labor force at increasingly younger ages and some even at childhood; (2) women have been employed at substandard labor conditions with no social security: (3) due to low wages and difficult labor conditions in general, and due to pressures of household production (under the increasingly prevalent household production subcontract arrangements), women's recreational and sleep times have been reduced drastically. Statistics on women in the informal sector are not directly complied or reported by any statistical source in Turkey. There is under-reporting of female informal sector activities, either because male heads of household provides the responses or because women themselves do not regard their home-based income generating activities as work. For example, my survey study on the socio-economic characteristics of Balat-Fener in Fatih district of Istanbul showed that the latter is the case. During the fieldwork 40 in September-October 1997, many women were observed doing various types of handicraft to sell. However, when one asked them whether they work or not their answer, was, "no". Changes in the economic policies have had implication for female labor force participation. Since from the second half of the 1970s, Turkey has gone through changes in its economic policies in the course of reforms. In the late 1970s it abandoned its import substitution industrialization policies in favor of export led growth policies to overcome the debt crisis and the accompanying budget deficit and high inflation rates. In 1980, the first Structural Adjustment Policies (SAPs)41 were implemented. Its consequent deregulation of the money market, followed by deregulation in the labor, goods and services markets and wage limitations impacted, albeit indirectly, women's equal participation in the economic and social spheres. Women's labor concentration in the free trade zone multinational corporate operations - as in the SAP experiences of South Asia and South America - did not take place in Turkey. Instead, women's labor has become increasingly concentrated in the informal economy and the female participation in formal economy has progressively declined in the 1990s. The falls in income and consequently living standards, compel women to take on marginal jobs to supplement the falling earnings. Falling income levels also compel women to spend more time on household production activities - spending more time in the market to buy cheaper goods. Several studies indicate a negative correlation between income level and time spent on household production. Income losses due to sustained high inflation have the impact of increasing poor women's household labor. While not specifically treated in any empirical study, it is also argued that women's nutritional intake levels are declining as women prioritize the nutritional intake of other family members (especially of their children) and give up on their own nutritional needs to compensate for the low purchasing power. Although the share of the agricultural sector in the national economy continues to shrink42, this sector is still the largest employer of women. Women in this sector often work as unpaid family workers. Nevertheless, agricultural work has empowered women by increasing their participation in decision-making processes at the village context. However, increasing levels of urbanization (internal migration) and increased urban unemployment of women have led to marginalization of women and their isolation from decision-making mechanism in the city. Female-Head Households
Women and children, and particularly the girl child are clearly most affected by the income distribution disparities. As a result, the girl child is discriminated when the family has to make a choice for the education of the children (as mentioned above) and her labor is exploited. Many children in the female head households need to work to contribute to the budget. The study on the working children (6-14 years old) showed that 55.1 per cent of them came from the households headed by the females in 1994.44 The girl child's contribution to the household is more vital than that of the boy child. A great majority (75.0 per cent) of the working female children gave their total income to the family, while only 57.2 per cent of the male children made such a sacrifice for the family in 1994.45 3. Political Participation
Therefore the Tanzimat Decree (1839) -- a kind of constitution which contained provisions that brought equality before the law and paved the way for constitutionalism, secular education, and scientific advancement -- had significant implications for the improvements in the status of women. The idea of educating women and ameliorating their position was discussed by the Young Ottomans, who were able circulate their ideas through increased number of publications at the end of the 19th century. As the publication grew, a number of women journals raised the political consciousness of the Ottoman women. For example, Terakki Muhaderat, published in 1868 was the first women's newspaper that gave information on the feminist movements in the West; Women's World, published between 1913 and 1921, had a clear feminist structure, and it suggested reforms to solve the women's problems; Hanumlara Mahsus Gazete ("Journal for Women"), published between 1859 and 1908 played an important role in the history of the women's movement in Turkey since it was the first to have a predominantly female staff, including printers, reporters and editors. The magazine called on women to act in solidarity in order to gain political rights. Women did not only publish their ideas advocating the provision of liberties to women, they also took action in order to be represented in the public domain. Before the War of Independence in which women played a significant role, women made a contribution to the Young Turk Revolution of 190846, which restored constitutional government during the Ottoman period. After Independence (1922)47, a group of educated women took a radical step and formed a political party (Kad?nlar Halk F?rkas?) in June 1923 with an aim of demanding political rights and contesting for elections. Later, it was dissolved and transformed itself into an association, the Union of Turkish Women (Türk Kad?nlar Birli?i). It has been one of the influential women organizations since then.48 Ataturk's reforms, which aimed at elevating the Turkish people to the level of contemporary civilization, identified as that of the West, brought about political and economic rights to women.49 Turkey largely eliminated the practices of sexual segregation and the obstacles of political participation and discrimination with the abolition of the Caliphate in 1924; with the adoption of secularism reinforced by the constitutional law; by replacing the Shariah law with a new civil code, adapted from the Swiss Code, in 1926. The new civil code made amelioration in the position of women in the family. Then, in 1934 women were granted political rights that gave them an opportunity to be represented in the public domain as equal partners. Women's right advanced as result of the secularization with the Ataturk's reforms that separated the state and religion by abolishing the Sultanate and the Caliphate in 1924 and the other Islamic institutions (e.g., the madrases, Shariah Courts, religious orders); by changing of script from Arabic to Latin; and more significantly by declaring the Turkish Republic as a "secular state" by a constitutional amendment in 1937. Despite the constitutional separation of the state and religion, the state has regulated the religious affairs through the Directorate of Religious Affairs that was established in 1924. The secularization reforms did not only alter the conduct of public affairs, but they also restructured the social life and life styles. For example, sexual segregation was discouraged; female head covering was banned in the public offices and in the institutions of education. Soon after obtaining the political rights, women were represented in the parliament. The proportion of women members of the parliament was 4.6 percent in 1935. Female parliamentary representation decreased to 2.0 percent in 1946 when Turkey transited to a multi-party system. Then in 1960 it dropped to 0.6 percent. In 1991 it was 1.8 percent.50 The 1995 general elections resulted in the election of 13 women out of 550 members of parliament. During the period of 1994-1999 the female participation in the parliament was 2.6 per cent, their participation in the local governments was around one percent51. The 1999 general and local elections held on the same day (April 18) led to the increase in the female representation both in the parliament and in the local governments. Their number in the parliament rose to 23 and their representation in the local governments increased too. In Turkey female participation in the political parties and interest groups are not low.52 The level of female participation in grass-roots politics is high, but they are under-represented in leadership positions, particularly in the Islamist and ultra-nationalist parties. Female participation in high level bureaucratic positions53, corporatist institutions, and in the judiciary has been increasing, albeit slowly in recent times. While women's participation in formal politics is low, they have been active in the various political movements. They have played a significant, if unquantified, part in less conventional political activities: ad hoc actions, community actions, industrial action, revolutionary, nationalist and even “terrorist” politics from the mid-1960s. However, they have often been excluded from the decision making process. What are the factors that count for the lower level of female political participation in Turkey? The statistical data on the marriage and reproduction trends, the level of female education and the patterns of female employment shows that the following factors are advanced: (I) the socio-economic disparity between men and women54, that is the gap between the level of formal education received by the males and the females, the lower level of female participation in formal economy and in the modern sectors and the income discrepancy between the men and women; (ii) the male dominated feudal family structure (particularly in the eastern and south-eastern provinces); (ii) traditional values reinforcing the male dominance that have been internalized through primary and secondary socialization; and (iv) the customs and practices that limit women's control over their sexual and reproductive rights. There are civil initiatives to increase the women participation in politics and in the parliament. However, they have not been able to develop effective lobbying strategies due to the lack of experience and expertise. Yet they have created a public debate on the under-representation of women in the parliament. 4. Violence Against Women and Responses
Until the end of 1980s when the women's movement became more assertive and independent of the state, the women NGOs were not very vocal in opposing the forced virginity exams. Thereafter, women magazines have started making critical remarks on such exams, and the NGOs have begun campaigns to stop this practice. Honor killing, which has no basis in law, is murdering a female on the ground that she had an inappropriate sexual relationship and, therefore damaged the family honor. It is not a seldom practice, particularly in the Southeast and East. The chief public prosecutor of ?anl?urfa (a province in the Southeast), Hüseyin Fidan, said, "Every two or three months, a case like this which ends in death comes to me".56 The rationale lies in the fact that the members of the family link family honor to the maintenance of female chastity. Therefore, an actual illegitimate sexual relationship or any conduct of behavior creating a doubt about such a happening could spoil the family honor. Honor killing is more frequently practiced in the East and Southeast where the family structure is feudal and where the rate of female literacy and women’s participation in modern economic activities are much lower than that in other regions. There is another reason explaining why honor killing is more common in these regions: a young girl is often a commodity for the parents, because her bride price (ba?l?k paras?) can go up to five to ten billion TL ($ 20,300 to $ 40,600 in 1998) or its equivalent in goods. When there is a doubt over a young girl's chastity, she has no economic value to the family anymore. Then the family feels bitter over the economic lost and, at the same time, they are put under the community pressure demanding them to terminate the life of the "stained" daughter. In a feudal traditional environment where mechanical solidarity codes social relations, the community encourages severe punishment of any action that is considered to be the violation of the collective moral. Given this background, the family asks one of the male children or teenager cousins, who is below 18 years old, to kill the stained female, who allegedly violated the established mores. The penalty for killing an immediate blood relative on purpose is life sentence under the law. However, the Criminal Code reduces the penalty for murder, if it is committed on witnessing an adulterous act or on suspicion of an illicit liaison on the ground that it has been caused by "heavy provocation" (Turkish Criminal Code, Article 59). The sentence is reduced to an eighth of its severity. It can be further reduced when the age of the convict is below 18 years old. Moreover, in the cases of honor killings, the judges in the region take the traditional values and practices and the community pressure into consideration when they make the judgement. They consider the regional custom ("töre") a mitigating factor and reduce the sentence. For example, in the case of Sevda Gök's (16 years old) honor killing, the murderer, her 14-years old cousin, was given only two years by the Court in ?anl?urfa on April 5, 1996. Sexual violence in the form of rape is widespread in Turkey. In 1990, 20,257 males were taken to court and accused of heinous crimes including rape. Their number was 18,705 in 1994.57 They were the reported cases. However, many women do not report when they are raped because they are ashamed of it, they are afraid of community pressure, and they often think that it is their fault. Women NGOs have been actively campaigning to stop violence against women in all its forms and they have demanded the government to take more effective measures and specific action to combat these violations of women's human rights. They have also tried to raise the level of consciousness amongst the women and to educate them so that they could understand the legal mechanism to protect themselves against violence. The institutes for Women Studies, which function at several universities, provide intellectual support for the activities of the women NGOs that campaign to stop all types of violence against women. Domestic Violence
Responses to Domestic
Violence: Women NGOs and Governments
The press and the public consciousness became more sensitive to the issue of domestic violence as result of the nation-wide discussions on the issue by women NGOs and by the Women's Problems Research Center at Istanbul University, founded in 1990. Women NGOs took one more step to protect women against violence with the foundation of the Purple Roof Women Shelter (Mor Çat?) in 1990 in Istanbul. The foundation served women by offering legal and psychological help as well as lodging. Then Women Solidarity Foundation in Ankara was founded in 1991 to combat domestic violence and all types of violence against women, and in 1995 they opened a shelter.62 In 1998 there were 11 shelters and six guidance centers63 in the big cities. Various feminist groups and NGOs have also made use of every occasion like the Women's Day celebrations to raise the issue of violence against women. Moreover, the women NGOs and the academicians in the field of Women Studies lobbied for a bill to protect women against domestic violence. Finally, the bill bringing protective orders against domestic violence was passed in the Turkish Parliament despite the opposition of the now defunct Islamist Welfare Party on January 17, 1998.64 With the adoption of the Law for the protection of the Family, the issue domestic violence was addressed for the first time in Turkey. The law grants third partied the right to file complaints of domestic violence and makes it possible for judges to place restraining orders against the family member who has used violence in the home, thereby ensuring that the perpetrator is kept away from the victims.65 5. Gender Studies in Turkey
6. Conclusion
Factors that hinder gender
equality and low level of female participation in politics are categorized
as follows.
Political Factors:
Socio-Economic Obstacles:
Ideological and Psycho-social
Hindrances:
The solution lies in the empowerment of women by means of (i) increasing the female political participation and their share in the formal decision making process; (ii) enhancing the level of female participation in economic activities; and (iii) raising female consciousness through education and re-socialization programs. Moreover, creating and sustaining the social institutions that could provide shelter and legal aid to battered women is significant in the reduction of violence against women. The state and NGOs need to co-operate to increase their number. The state has taken steps to improve the status of women and protect them against all types of discrimination and violence. Since from the foundation of the Republic, government policies have been in favor of promoting gender equality. Particularly from the mid-1980s onwards, partly as a response to increased female voice in the public and lobbying for amelioration in the status of women, the state has taken significant steps to improve women's human rights and insure gender equality. Turkey signed CEDAW (Convention to Eliminate all types of Discrimination Against Women) in 1985 and it lifted in July 1999 reservations66 against the Convention. The reservations were made on the grounds that it contradicted the provision of the Turkish Civil Code that governs marriage and family relations. There have been several legal arrangements in the Civic Code, Penalty Law and Income Tax Law with an aim of eliminating discrimination against women in the frame of CEDAW (see APPENDIX). Moreover, state has created
new institutions67
to provide institutional support to the empowerment of women and brought
new legal arrangement to eliminate all types of discrimination against
women. An individual woman should be aware of the state’s initiatives to
enhance the status of women and she needs to learn her legal rights and
how she would utilize the legal measures to protect herself against abuse
and violence. This requires education, economic independence and democratic
political environment where an individual woman would be able sustain and
defend herself.
APPENDIX CEDAW Committee Reports 68
The Committee acknowledged factors and difficulties hindering full implementation of the Convention, including the reservations to articles 15 and 16, and difficulties arising from globalization, modernization and deeply rooted traditionalism which interplay strongly in the context of the status of women in Turkey. The Committee noted that Turkey is a secular country with a predominantly Muslim population under pressure from various political groups, and recognized the serious impact these pressures have on the condition of women, and the extent to which they serve to perpetuate the existing inequality between women and men and hamper the de jure and de facto implementation of the Convention. The principal subjects of concern identified by the Committee were: the reservations to articles 15 and 16 of the Convention; the prolonged discussions and the resistance to the reform of the Civil Code; the fact that the General Directorate on the Status and Problems of women has no corresponding bodies at regional and local levels; the lack of an integrated and systematic approach by the national machinery and the relevant ministries to all areas covered by the Convention, in particular with regard to women in rural areas, vulnerable groups such as ethnic minorities, young women and women in prisons; and, the fact that various articles of the Penal Code, including those related to the abduction of single and married women and to adultery contradict paragraph (f), article 2 (laws constituting discrimination against women). The Committee also expressed concern over: the fact that greater penalties are imposed for the rape of a woman who is a virgin; the practice of forced gynecological examinations of women in the investigation of allegations of sexual assault, including of women prisoners while in custody; the provisions of the Penal Code that allow less rigorous sanctions or penalties for "honor killings"; the lack of special temporary measures to redress the situation of Kurdish women, who suffer double discrimination; the pervasive violence, in all its forms, perpetrated against women and girls and the inadequacy of legal and educational measures to combat this violence; the failure to take into consideration the Committee’s general recommendation No.19 on violence against women and the UN Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women; the law which categorizes violence as a "crime against public decency and public order", noting that it contradicts the spirit of the Convention and contravenes the dignity of the person; the ineffectiveness of juridical and educational measures to address violence within the family; the failure to take sufficient appropriate measures to prevent and combat the acceptance of male dominance and violence against women in rural as well as in urban areas, to beat women and to require silent obedience from them; and, the lack of concrete measures to prevent the high number of suicides among women victims of violence. Concern was also expressed over: the fact that spousal consent is required for abortion; the existence of brothels regulated by law and the lack of information and statistical data about the phenomenon; the fact that Turkish political parties, trade unions and other public institutions are not sufficiently sensitive to the importance of the implementation of article 7 (participation in public life); the need for representation in decision-making bodies, including Parliament and the government, where the number of women is still very low; and, provisions in the Turkish Citizenship Law, stipulating that a Turkish woman who decides to assume the nationality of her foreign husband will lose her Turkish nationality. Additional areas of concern included: the high level of illiteracy among women and girls, especially in the rural areas, the drop-out rates of girls in schools owing to family practices, early marriages and the prioritization of boys in school enrolment and other gender discriminatory practices in education; the clustering of women in higher education in areas regarded as "suitable for women"; the very low minimum age for employment, which contravenes relevant ILO Conventions; the high level of unemployment of migrant urban female workers, the lack of measures to integrate them in the labor markets and the persistent occupational segregation in lower paid jobs, impeding their upward mobility and further reinforcing discrimination against women in the labor market; the lack of legal literacy programs to raise the awareness of rural women regarding their rights; and the high number of women in rural areas who work in family enterprises, meaning that their work is not recognized in the formal economy, they do not receive social security benefits and their access to health services is limited. The Committee recommended that the government:
Major Achievements in Promoting Gender Equality within the Frame of CEDAW: a. One of the most significant steps taken in Turkey towards the empowerment of women since the Beijing Conference has been the implementation of 8-Year Compulsory Basic Education Law of 1997. In Turkey one of the main shortcomings of women’s education has always been the relatively low level of secondary school enrolment for the girl-child. This has been attributed to economic and cultural factors that deter the girl-child from continuing school after compulsory basic education. Thus, it is aimed that the enrolment levels of the girl-child will rise with the increase of compulsory basic education from 5 to 8 years. It is also expected that the new law will ensure that the critically aged girl-child will remain in the education system for longer period of time and thereby enhance her awareness of her individuality. In addition, it is planned that the girl child – who is following only 5 years of compulsory basic education could be swayed into different vocational education fields (as well as into religious education) by conservative parents and communities – will now have enhanced opportunities and freedom in her choice of secondary, tertiary and vocational education. 8-year compulsory basic education is also expected to rise the marriage and child birth ages by keeping the girl child in the educational system for a longer period of time. Notes 1. The State Statistical Institute (SIS), Social Structure and Women Statistics Office. 1996. 1990'l? Y?llarda Türkiye'de Kad?n ("Women in Turkey in the 1990s"). Ankara: (SIS). p. 6. 2. Ibid. p.6. 3. Ibid. p.6. 4. The divorce statistics shows that in the total divorce cases the percent of women applying for divorce rose from 56.2 per cent in 1990 to 59.9 in 1994. Ibid. p.7. Table 1.4. 5. Ibid. p. 8. 6. Ibid. p. 16, Table 3.1. 7. SIS. 1992. Women in Statistics 1927-1990. Ankara: SIS publications. p.44, Table 13. 8. Ibid. p. 44. Table 13. 9. SIS. 1994. Temel Kad?n Göstergeleri 1978-1993 ("Main Women Indicators 1978-1993"). Ankara: SIS Publications. p. 15, Table 9. 10. See T.C. Sa?l?k Bakanl??? (Ministry of Health). 1995. Dünya'da ve Türkiye'de Saðl?k, Kalk?nma ve Çevre Aç?s?ndan Nüfus Sorunu ("The Question of Population in the World and in Turkey from the Perspective of Health, Development and Environment"). Ankara: T.C. Sa?l?k Bakanl??? Publications. p. 45. 11. The State Statistical Institute (SIS), Social Structure and Women Statistics Office. 1996. 1990'l? Y?llarda Türkiye'de Kad?n (Women in Turkey in the 1990s). Ankara: (SIS). P.9 and p.12, Table 2.2. 12. Ibid. p. 10 and p.13, Table 2.3. 13. SIS. 1994. Temel Kad?n Göstergeleri 1978-1993 ("Main Women Indicators 1978-1993"). Ankara: SIS Publications. p. 22, Table 12. For more information on the level of access to medical care during the pregnancy and the proportion of women delivering in a hospital, also see, The State Statistical Institute (SIS), Social Structure and Women Statistics Office. 1996. 1990'l? Y?llarda Türkiye'de Kad?n (Women in Turkey in the 1990s). Ankara: (SIS). P.10 and p.13 Table 2.3. 14. The State Statistical Institute (SIS), Social Structure and Women Statistics Office. 1996. 1990'l? Y?llarda Türkiye'de Kad?n ("Women in Turkey in the 1990s"). Ankara: (SIS). p. 13, Table 2.4. 15. Ibid. p.13, Table 2.4 and Graphic 2.3. Also see, SIS. 1994. Temel Kad?n Göstergeleri 1978-1993 ("Main Women Indicators 1978-1993"). Ankara: SIS Publications. p. 11. 16. SIS. 1994. Temel Kad?n Göstergeleri 1978-1993 ("Main Women Indicators 1978-1993"). Ankara: SIS Publications. p. XXII, and p. 25, Table 13. 17. For example, in 1990, only 5.2 percent of the women in the age group of 15-19 were illiterate, but the same figure for the women above 60 years old was 45.1 percent. See T.C. Ba?bakanl?k Kad?n?n Statusü ve Sorunlar? Genel Müdürlü?ü. 1998. Cumhuriyet’in 75. Y?l?nda Türkiye’de Kad?n?n Durumu (“the Situation of Women in Turkey in the 75th Anniversary of the Turkish Republic”). Ankara: TAKAV Matbas?. P. 6. 18. For the difference in the male and female illiteracy rate by age group, see Ibid. p.27, Graphic 29. 19. For the characteristics of the women migrated from rural to urban areas, see The State Statistical Institute (SIS), Social Structure and Women Statistics Office. 1996. 1990'l? Y?llarda Türkiye'de Kad?n ("Women in Turkey in the 1990s"). Ankara: (SIS). pp. 52-55. 20. Ibid. p. 56. 21. Ibid. p.26, Graphics 27-28. 22. The State Statistical Institute (SIS), Social Structure and Women Statistics Office. 1996. 1990'l? Y?llarda Türkiye'de Kad?n ("Women in Turkey in the 1990s"). Ankara: (SIS). p. 31, Table 6.2. 23. Turkey has over 1.5 million working children. According to the State Statistics Institute, in 1994, one million of the 12 million children between six and 14 worked full-time, while another 500,000 were part-time or full-time unpaid domestic workers. A total of 77 percent of working children are employed in farming, 11 percent in industry, seven percent in services and five percent in trade, while most of the children work in small or medium businesses with less than 10 employees. Most child exploitation is practiced in country's key export oriented sectors like agriculture, textiles, metal, earth works and leather. However Turkish law formally bans child employment. See www.globalmarch.org/child_labour-today/clns-may.1.html. 24. For example, in the case of the lower income families (families earning less than 3,000,000 TL per month. in 1994 ) the 23.8 percent of the female children, but 14.8 percent of the male children did not go school. See T.C. Ba?bakanl?k Kad?n?n Statusü ve Sorunlar? Genel Müdürlü?ü. 1998. p. 11, Table 6. 25. For example, in 1994 the education disparity between the female and male children increased with the number of the children in the family. In the families with five and more than five children, 24.6 percent of the girls, but 15.6 percent of the boys did not go to school. T.C. Ba?bakanl?k Kad?n?n Statusü ve Sorunlar? Genel Müdürlü?ü. 1998. p. 11. Table 7. 26. For example, the proportion of the female children used in the housework doubled that of the male children in 1994. T.C. Ba?bakanl?k Kad?n?n Statusü ve Sorunlar? Genel Müdürlü?ü. 1998. p. 37. 27. Ibid. p. 31, Table 6.2. 28. According to the UNICEF report, 31.9 percent of the female children in the age group of 7-13 do not attend school in 1997-8. The rate is higher in the provinces where the level of human and economic development level is low. For example the proportion of the girl child out of school in Diyarbak?r is 61.4 percent; in Erzurum 59.4 percent, in ?anl?urfa 46.3 percent. In Ankara it is 17.6 percent and in ?stanbul 21.6 percent, in ?zmir it is 19.5 percent. See UNICEF. 2000. Türkiye'de Bölgelerin Geli?imi 2000. Taslak Nisan. Tablo 23.A ve Tablo24.A. 29. In the last two decades, unemployment levels in general, and women's unemployment in particular have risen significantly. Women's unemployment, on the other hands, is continuously higher than that of men's. Official statistics place urban women's unemployment rate at 19 percent. Recent studies, however, reveal that urban women's unemployment rate for the four major cities (Istanbul, Ankara, Adana, Izmir) runs in the environs of 35 percent. The unemployment rates are highest among young women of secondary school level education. 30. ?emsa Özar. 1994. "Some Observations on the Position of Women in the Labour Market in the Development Process of Turkey", Bo?aziçi Journal Review of Social and Administrative Studies. Vol. 8, Nos. 2, 1994. pp. 23-6. 31. Prime Ministry Directorate General on the Status and Problems of Women. 1996. Supporting Women-Owned Business in Turkey: A Discussion of Needs, Problems, Opportunities, and Strategies. Ankara. p. 5. 32. Prime Ministry Directorate General on the Status and Problems of Women. 1996. Supporting Women-Owned Business in Turkey: A Discussion of Needs, Problems, Opportunities, and Strategies. Ankara. p. 5, Table 1.5. 33. www.die.gov.tr/CIN/women/Response.Beijing.htm. 34. SIS. 1997. Household Labour Force Survey. April 1996. Ankara: SIS Publications. 35. www.die.gov.tr/CIN/women/Response.Beijing.htm. 36. SIS. 1997. Household Labour Force Survey. April 1996. Ankara: SIS Publications, p. 54, Table 3.10. 37. Prime Ministry Directorate General on the Status and Problems of Women. 1996. Supporting Women-Owned Business in Turkey: A Discussion of Needs, Problems, Opportunities, and Strategies. Ankara. p. 14. 38. Gross National Product (GNP) grew by 5.2% in the 1981-1990 period and by 4.4% in the 1991-1998 period, a record among OECD countries. During this transition period, parallel to those positive developments, Turkish economy also faced some problems like high inflation, high public debt and high interest rates stemming from structural inadequacies. The Turkish economy, starting from the latter part of 1997, has already entered a phase where it headed for overall improvement solving its problems. The inflation rate has started to dwindle down from around 90% to 50% and the investment rate has accelerated. However, the subsequent global crises and, the Russian crisis in particular adversely affected the Turkish economy while extraordinary jumps in the oil price occurred in the same period. More importantly, Turkey had to live through with the direct consequences of two consecutive earthquakes that struck the nine most developed provinces. It was mainly for these reasons that the Turkish economy had entered into recession. Now, it has started to recover. In this, the unusually harmonious, resolute and efficient working of our three-party coalition government has been instrumental along with the unprecedently intensive work and pace of the Turkish Grand National Assembly completing legislation on many important issues. 39. The increased demand for skilled labor of the service sector particularly financial sector led men to leave the public sector beginning by 1980s where the wages are traditionally lower than that of private sector. Women have taken up the public sector jobs vacated by men. Women's labor in the public sector is concentrated in traditional jobs such as nursing, teaching. Nevertheless, women occupy 27.5 percent of middle to upper level public management cadres. Thus, although the public sector continues to shrink, it seems to provide some opportunities for women. 40. Nilüfer Narl?. 1997. "A Case Study on the Households in Balat-Fener: The European Commission-UNESCO Sponsored Rehabilitation and Restoration Project", The Final Report. Istanbul: Unpublished Report available in the French Anatolian Institute and Fatih Municipality. 41. As in all such programme, the adjustment policies in Turkey entailed two main elements: stabilisation and structural adjustment. Structural adjustment commenced with monetary policies and money market (de) regulations, and soon shifted emphasis onto regulations pertaining to the public sector, the agricultural sector, and the state enterprises. 42. The results have been dramatic. From 1980 to 1998, the share of agricultural products in exports declined from 57 to 10% while industrial exports rose from 36 to 88%, definitely signalling a shift away from an agrarian to an industrial economy. The total volume of exports which was US$ 2.9 billion in 1980 reached US$ 26.9 billion in 1998. The average increase in exports was 14% annually. 43. The State Statistical Institute (SIS), Social Structure and Women Statistics Office. 1996. 1990'l? Y?llarda Türkiye'de Kad?n ("Women in Turkey in the 1990s"). Ankara: (SIS). p. 48, Tables 9.1-9.2. The recent report shows that in the lowest 20 percent of income bracket, the household income for female headed households is an average US$ 1.484. In the highest 20% of the income earners bracket the same average figures for female and male-headed household is US$ 11.198, and US$ 27.720 respectively. The disparities are most acute in urban areas where household income for female and male-headed households is US$ 4.854 and US$ 10.472 respectively. See www.die.gov.tr/CIN/women/Response.Beijing.htm. 44. Ibid., p. 42-43. 45. Ibid., p. 42-43. 46. For women's participation in the Young Turk Revolution, see Julie Marcus. 1992. A World of Difference. London: Zed Press and Jenkins' observation on their involvement in H.D. Jenkins. (n.d.). Behind Turkish Lattices. London: Glasgow and Collins. Also see Serpil Çak?r. 1994. Osmanl?'da Kad?n Hareketi ("Women's Movement in the time of the Ottomans"). Istanbul. 47. In 1922 the Turks defeated the Greeks at the battle of Sakarya. Turkey signed the Treaty of Lausanne in July 1923. 48. For further details, see Nilüfer Narl?. 1994. "Women in Turkish Society", Economic Dialogue Turkey. No. 40. Istanbul: IMF-World Bank Special Issue. pp. 192-195. 49. Nermin Abadan Unat. 1981. "Social Change and Turkish Women", Women in Turkish Society, Nermin Abadan Unat, and ed., Leiden: E.J. Brill. pp. 5-36. For the implications of political modernisation on women, see Necla Arat (ed.). 1998. Ayd?nlanman?n Kad?nlar? ("Women of the Enlightenment"). Istanbul: Cumhuriyet Kitab Klübü. 50. SIS. 1992. Women in Statistics 1927-1990. Ankara: SIS publications. p.185, Table 68. 51. Following the 1994 local elections, the female representation in the Municipality assemblies was 1.28 percent, but only 0.47 per cent of the mayors were women. See United Nations Conference on Human Settlements Habitat II. 1996. Turkey National Report and Plan of Action. Appendix I, Indicator 47: Elected and nominated councillors. 52. For the lower level of female political participation, see ?irin Tekeli. 1982. Kad?nlar ve Siyasal/Toplumsal Hayat ("Women and Politico/Social Life"). Istanbul: Birikim Yay?nlar?. 53. In the public sector, out the female middle and high level administrators, only 0.62 percent were general manager and 3.7 percent were the unit director. The first governor was appointed in 1991 and in 1992 there were three district governors. T.C. Ba?bakanl?k Kad?n?n Statusü ve Sorunlar? Genel Müdürlü?ü. 1998. p. 47. 54. For the statistical data on the level of female education and employment, see The State Statistical Institute (SIS), Social Structure and Women Statistics Office. 1996. 1990'l? Y?llarda Türkiye'de Kad?n ("Women in Turkey in the 1990s") and SIS. 1992. Women in Statistics 1927-1990. Ankara: SIS publications. For more information on women's access to education, employment opportunities and health care services, also see Nilüfer Narl?. 1998. "Domestic Violence in Turkey: its Socio-Economic and Cultural Base", Paper presented at the Conference titled "Family in the Middle East", organised by the Women's Federation for World Peace (May 13-15, Istanbul: Polat Rönasans Hotel). 55. The Human Rights Watch. 1995. The Human Rights Watch Global Report on Women's Human Rights. "Forced Virginity Exams in Turkey". pp. 418-444. 56. For this quotation, see the article titled "Loss of honour means death in Southeast Anatolia", Turkish Daily News, April 21, 1998. p. A4. 57. The State Statistical Institute (SIS), Social Structure and Women Statistics Office. 1996. 1990'l? Y?llarda Türkiye'de Kad?n ("Women in Turkey in the 1990s"). Ankara: (SIS). p. 25, Table 5.1 58. Ibid., p.25, Table 5.1. 59. This study was referred to in TC Ba?bakanl?k Aile Ara?t?rma Kurumu. 1995. Aile Içi ?iddetin Sebeb ve Sonuçlar?. ("The Reasons and the Results of the Domestic Violence"). Ankara: Another research, Prime Ministry Family Research Institute's study on 2479 women and 1147 men also revealed that 34 percent of the women interviewed were beaten by their husbands according to the declaration of the husbands. Also see Ilker B?çakç?. 1997. "Geli?me Sürecinde Kad?n?n Toplumsal Kimli?i ve Ileti?im Araçlar?nda Kad?n Imaj?". Iktisat Dergisi. No. 336-337. pp.80-85; Tulin Gün?en Içli. 1995. Aile'de Kad?na Kar?? ?iddet ve Kad?n Suçlulu?u ("Domestic Violence Against Women and Women Criminals"). Ankara: The General Directorate of Women's Status and Affairs. 60. T.C. Ba?bakanl?k Kad?n?n Statusü ve Sorunlar? Genel Müdürlü?ü. 1998. p. 56. 61. A survey study in 1993 showed that 11.2 percent of the respondents liked that statement. This figure was found to be higher among the male respondents (13.6 per cent) than that amongst their female counterparts (8.7 per cent). T. C Ba?bakanl?k Aile Ara?t?rma Kurumu. 1995. p. 195. 62. For the activities of the women NGOs to prevent domestic violence, see T.C. Ba?bakanl?k Kad?n?n Statusü ve Sorunlar? Genel Müdürlü?ü. 1998. pp.66-67. 63. General Directorate on the Status and Problem of Women. 1999. Women in Turkey. p.21. 64. See KAZATE Özgür Kad?n?n Sesi ("the Voice of the Liberated Women"), February 1998. No: 3. pp. 1-4. 65. See T.C. Devlet Bakanl???. 1999. 4320 Say?l? Ailenin Korunmas?na Dair Kanun ve Uygulanmas? (“Law Number 4320. Law on the Protection of the Family”). Ankara. Takav Matbas?. 66. Reservations to CEDAW: Paragraphs 2 and 4 of article 15; paragraphs 1 (c) (d) (f) and (g) of article 16; paragraph 1, article 29; paragraph 1 of article 9. 67. For example, in 1987 Committee for Policies for Women established within the State Planning Organisation. In 1989 Women’s Unit established at the premises of the Ministry of Labour. In 1990 Women’s Bureau began to be established at Greater Municipalities. In 1990 April, the General Directorate on Status and Problems of Women established as per Law Number 422. In 1993 Women’s Bureau established within all labour and civil syndicates. See General Directorate on the Status and Problem of Women. 1999. Women in Turkey. Ankara. 68. Refer to www.hri.ca/fortherecord1997/vol6/turkey.htm. Also see www.ysk.gov.tr/yayinlar/insanhalari/insanhak3.htm. |