Friends...or Food? by Anneleise Smillie As an animal welfare group based in Asia the Animals Asia Foundation would like to put forward a few salient points regarding the controversial practice of dog eating to show the other side of the argument and hopefully enable individuals to make informed and compassionate choices. What is fundamental in the practice of dog eating is that the cruelty
is often deliberate and slaughter methods have been designed to intensify
and prolong the suffering in the misguided belief that 'torture equals
taste'. In situations where the torture is not deliberate, the method
of slaughter is still Dr John Wedderburn, a Western medical doctor who has worked for thirty years in Hong Kong and has travelled extensively throughout Asia studying this issue, has the following to say: "I understand and respect the concepts and practices of medicine in the various Eastern cultures and I have conversed at length with practitioners of Traditional Medicine. I have yet to meet a TM doctor who believes that eating dog has any beneficial effect on any aspect of health including virility. The market is entirely from supplier to consumer without the recommendation of doctors. In any case, even if there was some slight beneficial effect from eating dog, the cruelty and suffering could not be justified as there are far more effective substances available in both Western and Eastern medicine." Whilst Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioner Dr. Lo Yan Wo states
the following: Culture and tradition should not be excuses for cruelty. The argument
that a certain practice is historically part of a culture does not make
it acceptable and this argument in itself is incongruous, as in many
of the places where dogs are eaten the practice is less than a few generations
old. In fact in Korea, contrary to popular belief, dog eating is a relatively
recent phenomenon and has never been a part of a long-standing culinary
history. The fabrication of dog and cat meat as "Culture has often been used as an excuse to turn away from suffering
and people in both Asia and the West often use cultural relativism to
soothe their conscience for doing nothing. Surely we want to regard
various practices in our history (such as slavery and cannibalism) as
something to be rid of rather than treat them as 'culture' and demand
respect accordingly? In Asia where people regard friendship and loyalty
as prominent virtues, we should work towards a society where Arguments that a dog is no different to a chicken, a cow or even a
frog, fail to address the core fact that no government in any country
has devised a way of killing dogs humanely for commercial purposes.
As carnivores, they are inherently different in temperament and physiology
to those domestic species more commonly raised intensively en-masse
for food. A Hong Kong Government Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department Veterinary representative has stated that dogs cannot be
humanely raised and slaughtered for food. Whilst it is difficult to
Animals Asia is finding solutions to the problems of dog eating, through
pioneering grass roots programmes which promote animals as ambassadors
and highlight the mutually beneficial relationship between people and
companion animals, whilst working to implement and enforce appropriate
animal welfare legislation. Our innovative animal therapy programme,
Dr. Dog, sees over 300 'dog doctors' spreading love and warmth to people
in need in hospitals, disabled centres, homes for the young and elderly,
orphanages and schools in six countries throughout Asia. For more information about Dr. Dog, Detective Dog and the China Bear
Rescue please visit
our website at www.animalsasia.org Notes to editors,
The article is subject to copyright protection of Friends Of Dogs site, if you wish to use the article in any way please contact the web master at yoonskerr@hotmail.com stating where & how it is to be used. We will be as helpful as we can but we reserve the right to refuse permission if we feel the user will not use this article to save dogs' lives or represents a group we will not support.
|