In 1997, parity and complacency ruled the BRFL. The league champion was
a very low seed that made very few moves. Revenues were down. As a result,
may of the proposals are made in the spirit of raising competiveness and
active participation.
If there truly was a loss of interest, you really have a league whose average
tenure is 9 seasons and whose new members are in their fourth seasons?
Week 16(finals): Voila!
Advantages
This method still keeps the incentive to make your team as powerful as possible by the end of the
season, but keeps the championship game away from the dreaded week 17.
Disadvantages
Rostisserie style as a playoff decider goes against long held BRFL tradition
of winning head to head.
Proposal 3: 4 divisions
4 divisions of 3 teams each.
Play your division twice (2*2=4 games), play outside the division once (9 games) = 13 total.
- Week 14: Top 8 make the playoffs (4 division winners, next 2 best records, next 2 highest pts)
- Week 15: Semis (reseed)
- Week 16: Finals
Advantages More teams in the playoff hunt results in higher interest.
Division games increases intensity of regular season. High point scorers
rewarded.
DisadvantagesThree team division increases chance of
lends itself to rewarding mediocrity and tiebreaker problems with only
four divison games. Rewarding high scorers as playoff teams adds rostisserie
element bending slightly the BRFL head to head tradition.
Proposal 4: Keep the same format
The same format will be kept with playoffs starting in week 13. The regular
season will be 12 games. 11 vs rest of league with week 12 either
- Repeat of Week 1
- Play the team next to you in standings 1v2, 3v4, etc
- Week 13 - Byes given for 1 - 4. 5 plays 12, 6 v 11, 7 v 10, 8 v 9
- Week 14 - Seed survining teams vs 1-4.
- Week 15 - Semis finals
- Week 16 - Championship
Advantages Everyone makes playoffs, season long interest.
Disadvantages Potential tie-break headaches due to unbalanced schedule.
Shorter Season.
Proposal 12: Same as number 1 with 8 playoff teams
THREE 4-team divisions. Play everyone in the division twice, outside the
division once (total of 14 games in our 12-team league). I like your idea
of 8 playoff teams (playoffs starting week 15 and running through week 17).
For those who don't like the "stars sitting down for the playoffs" in week
17.
As for the playoff entrants, I'd say 1st and 2nd place from each division,
plus the 2 best records after that. For seeding, the division winners get
seeds 1-3 (and they're ordered based on record first, then head-to-head
match-up, then points scored, ..., and coin flip or drawing cards, if
necessary!). The rest are then seeded 4-8, based on record, then
head-to-head, points scored, etc. Even though I've always been on the
wrong end of the "re-seed for the next round so the highest plays the
lowest left, etc.", I like that format, and suggest keeping it. It rewards
the division winners.
Now, for the league revenue/pay-out, reward the eight playoff entrants,
plus a little extra for the division winners, and, of course, reward teams
for progressing through the playoffs.
Advantages More Playoff Teams
Disadvantages Playoffs extend into week 17.
Proposal 1 ___________ 4/2/0
Proposal 2 ___________ 4/2/0
Proposal 3 ___________ 4/2/0
Proposal 4 ___________ 4/2/0
Proposal 12 ___________ 4/2/0
Roster Size Proposals
Vote for one or none of the following three proposals. A non vote keeps
rosters and special reserve what it is today.
Proposal 5: Reduce Permanent Roster to 12, increase special reserve
Player movement was flat in 1997. Possibily due to a dilution of available
talent. 52 more players will be available under this plan.
It maybe the nature of some otherwise active owners to play it closer to
the vest with a squad of 12. As a result, it is being proposed
that we add two season long special reserve slots to allow owners to add
players each week for strategy or development purposes. This is in addition
to the two bye week slots we currently have.
Additionally any special reserve player may be added to the permanent roster
on claim day. The owner special reserving this player has the right of
first refusal on Tuesday only. A permanent roster drop must be made to
accomodate this player. This is the way it was when we first used special
reserve.
The philosophy being we don't want to stifle the strategy of active owners.
Proposal 6: Keep rosters at 14, Add increased special reserve
Same as above but with 14 man rosters. Rationale being the big spenders
will drive revenue, not the stand pat owners forced to make a move.
Proposal 13: 12 Man Roster with one IR slot
Reduce the permanent roster size to 12 to make it harder to do without special
reserves, and have one injured reserve slot ($1 to reserve, $1 to get back
off) that has some form of requirements (like injury status of at least
QUESTIONABLE on a given day of the week, like Thursday AM ... that way, it
can't be so easily used to just hide a player, and, once the status is
better than questionable, the owner(s) MUST either drop that player, for
$1, or spend $1 to reinstate that player and another $1 to drop someone
else).
Proposal 5 __________ Proposal 6___________ Proposal 13 _______ Neither _________
Miscelleanous Proposals
Vote Yes or no on the following:
Proposal 7: Increase dues to 25 dollars.
To make up the shortfall of losing two teams, increase the initial dues
to 25 dollars. Reduce the escrow amount by 5 dollars. Still collect 80
dollars at the draft.
YES_________ NO___________
Proposal 8: Award High Scorer with Money prize
The luck of the schedule sometimes plays a part in the head to head
match-ups. Sometimes a great team might miss out.
Award the highest scorer a monetary prize at the end of the
regular season. Amount will be determined by realignment proposal selected.
YES_________ NO___________
Proposal 9: Bonus Points for Game Winning Kicks
If a kicker's field goal decides a game in the final two minutes of
regulation or overtime, then that kicker will be awarded 2x the value
of that field goal.
YES_________ NO___________
Proposal 10: Player Total Yards Tiebreaker
Submit only if proposal 4 passes
Eliminate ties by totalling all the rushing and receiving yards from the
five RB/WRS in your starting line-up.
YES_________ NO___________
Proposal 11: Eliminate Losers Tournament
The Losers tournament takes away money from playoff participants and holds little
interest for its participants.
YES_________ NO___________
Proposal 14 Lineup Submission Deadline
Starting line-ups must be submitted by Friday at 6PM or be subject to a
two dollar late fee. Line-ups can be submitted by phone or email or two Calvin
or Tom if your opponent cannot be reached.
YES_________ NO___________
Proposal 15 Lower Yardage Bonus
Start awarding Yardage Bonus points at 50 yard rather than 100 yards. This
would be combined rushing and recieveing. Bonus increments stay at 50 yards:
- up to 49 = No Bonus
- 50-99 1 point
- 100-149 2 points
- etc
YES_________ NO___________
This page hosted by
get your own Free Home Page