Welcome | Networking | Long Range Plan | Links | Membership Application

Issue:

A program is needed to reduce the number of children who are victims of sex offenses

Status:

Draft

Discussion:

Sex offenses against children do lasting and devastating harm. They are risk factors that cause or exaserbate a number of mental disorders: e.g., post traumatic stress disorders, depression, and borderline personality disorders. Hence, advocates want to reduce these risk factors.
   Many people who sexually molest children suffer from a personality disorder, which is very difficult to treat. Many offenders have molested numerous children before they are caught. Imprisonment removes the offender from the street, but once they complete their prison and probation time, most become repeat offenders.
   There is no simple solution to this issue. Although this is the subject of extensive research, no easy solutions are in sight. Some offenders can be managed in the community under closely supervised long-term probation, which is a few cases can be helped with medications. Indefinite sentencing meets stiff resistence from advocates for the offenders rights.
   Hence, NAMI advocates have asked the Alaska Mental Health Board and the Department of Corrections to appoint a taskforce of the best professionals available to review the research and recommend a course of action to the legislature.
   In 1998 the Alaska Legislature passed SB 216 "An Act providing for the civil commitment of sexually violent predators." This calls for the indefinite in-patient civil commitment of these offenders. Alaska's law is patterned after one passed in 1990 by the State of washington.
   As part of our review of SB 216, we searched the National Library of Medicine's abstracts of research on sex offenders. Our query found 507 citations. One of these was an article by Brody and Green in the Bulletin of American Academy of Psychiatric Law 1994, entitled "Washington State's unscientific approach to the problem of repeat sex offenders." The authors concluded that the law is unscientific, treatments are inadequate to ensure future safety, and the law selects poor candidates for treatment.
   We sent the Alaska legislature citations for that abstract and for articles in the Spring edition of the National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning (NTAC) newsletter, which carried two negative articles about state laws similar to SB 216:
Message from NTAC's Director and "States Consider Sex Offender Commitment Laws"
    Despite the negative reports on similar legislation in other states, Alaska passed SB 216 with a fiscal note of $1.4-million. At the Alaska Psychiatric Hospital's cost of $200-thousand per year per patient, the legislature is only planning for 7 sex offenders. Alaska has 3500 registered sex offenders. How, many of these would qualify as "violent" and "sexual" predators we don't know, but it would be many times 7. Additionally, many child molestors would not meet the "violent" definition. Hence, at the time they passed the law, the state legislature knew that it would not sigificantly reduce the number of victims of sex offenses.

This is an important issue for both children and adults. Because of the complex issues, we believe a special taskforce is needed to review the issues, the available research, and recommendations by the American Psychiatric Association and the National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning.
   The purpose of this taskforce would be to recommend legislation and other action ot the state legislature and to the Departments of Corrections and Health ans Social services.
   Because of the complexity of these issues, the taskforce should include the best professionals available plus advocates for the victims and the offenders.

&emdash;prepared by Dick Wilson

Strategies: After a period of review of this issue ask all advocacy groups concerned with sex abuse, children or mental disorders to request the state government to form the recommended taskforce.

Planned Action steps:
By November Prepare a sample letter for advocacy groups interested in children to send to the following:
  1. Governor,
  2. HESS Committees of the Senate and House,
  3. The Commissioner of Health and Social Services
  4. The Commissioner of Corrections

Progress:

 

Return to Issues master Page

General

| Welcome | About this web site

Young Family Network

| Introduction | Tips | Plans | Events | Forum | Chat Room | Publications | Membership Form

Long-range Plan

| Introduction | Mission, Goals & Assumptions | Service Principles | Issue Papers

Links

| Resource Links

 Email us webmaster
Date Last Modified: 5/7/01