TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract
Introduction
Literature
Review
Materials
and Methods
Results
Discussion
Essentials
of a Scientific Paper
Urban
Forestry Resources
(http://www.oocities.org/EnchantedForest/Palace/1170/scipprwrt.html)
ABSTRACT
Abstracts and summaries – overviews
of facts, results, conclusions and recommendations of an article.
Various definitions of abstract
and summary – refer and study the target journal.
Abstracts:
-
Function – between the Title and the
article itself.
-
Very important – read more widely than
article.
-
Placed at beginning of article, just
below the Title.
-
“I” never used.
-
Passive voice commonly used (active
voice in the articles).
-
Don’t include footnotes, references
(e.g. Lennon and Ono (1998) concluded that… )
-
Two kinds:
Informative abstract
-
Used in journals – intended for expert
audience – technical language OK.
-
Can substitute report.
-
Often less than 200 words.
-
Contains 3 major elements:
-
Objectives and scope;
-
Methodology; and
-
Findings – results, significance, conclusions,
recommendations.
Descriptive abstract
-
Cannot serve as substitute for report
itself.
-
Need to read report for basic details.
-
Often less than 10 lines (regardless
of number of pages).
Summary (either a conclusion or summary):
-
Placed at end of the journal article.
-
Placed before business and organizational
reports, e.g. proposals, feasibility reports.
-
Cannot substitute for report itself.
-
Often a condensation of the Discussion.
-
Each major point of the Discussion
should be covered.
-
Should be concise.
-
No new material not given in report
should be introduced here.
-
If written for executive audience,
called executive summary.
Executive summary
-
Placed immediately before Introduction.
-
Often replaces Introduction in short
reports.
-
Non-technical language used.
-
Seldom more than one page long, double-spaced.
-
Enables decision-making.
-
Need not summarize all sections of
report, e.g. methodology not important.
-
Results and implications of results
important (in order to make a decision).
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
Tells reader what to expect from
the article. Introduction and literature review usually integrated for
journal; but kept separate in thesis.
In thesis, the literature review
(Chapter II) has many subheadings and it is appropriate to change the name
into formal title.
Introduction must be straightforward
(e.g. Storage facilities have been identified as one of the key factors…
Several investigators have explored… (list of references – must be arrange
chronologically).
It should be “really introducing”
(e.g. Penaga Lilin (Mesua ferrea) and Kelat Paya (Eugenia papillosa)
are indigenous shade tree species that are potentially to be introduced
in Malaysian urban parks).
The purpose of Introduction:
-
Defines subject, scope, and purpose/objective
of the study.
-
Reveals plan of development of article.
-
Provides theoretical or historical
background.
Subject
-
Never begin with general and superfluous
statement (e.g. Malaysia is suitable for the production of Sentang trees…
(so what?!))
-
May need to define or explain terms
– useful for you and the potential reader.
-
If possible, begin with interest-catching
intro – particularly for non-specialist.
Purpose/Objective (the essential
part of the article)
Tells why you are writing about this
subject (the question is… why are you intend to study these subjects?!).
Deals with significance of the subject.
Enables reader to decide whether to
read further (it must be very clear and simplify the objective in general
form). Try to communicate to potential readers about the importance of
our study.
Scope
-
Further qualifies the subject.
-
Defines the limits of the subjects.
-
Often defines the kind of audience
expected to read the article.
Plan of development
-
Announces report’s organization and
article – improves comprehension.
Theoretical or historical background
-
May be necessary for clarity; essential
if non-specialist is expected to read the article.
-
May arouse interest.
Note
: Nowadays, Introduction was kept brief due to (i) increasing
cost of publication (proofreading, editing, etc.), (ii) proliferation of
scientific literature), (iii) availability of review articles, books, etc.,
and (iv) study and follow preference of target journal.
Table of Contents
LITERATURE REVIEW
The literature review in a scientific
paper is commonly part of the introduction. Many of the points given here
also apply to literature used in the discussion.
Serves to:
-
review scientific literature (i.e.
the importance of the study involved).
-
explain choice of materials or methodology
(i.e. alternatives and comparisons).
-
show rationale for investigation (e.g.
why are you doing this and this?)
Most journals insist on minimum
number of citations necessary – avoid giving historical account.
Distinguish between literature for
Introduction and literature for Discussion.
Paraphrase – don’t plagiarize or
steal others’ work!!! (Paraphrase means to say in another way. The way
to do it is to read the paper, close it down, write down the key words,
then construct your own words. When done, compare it with the original
so that it looks matching).
Quotations – use if unavoidable,
keep it to minimum. Do not use too often, so that your paper doesn’t look
terrible).
How much of the literature should
be quoted or paraphrased? (it depends on your project undertaking, so you
should decide which is the best for you).
Use literature accurately by:
-
verifying every citation and checking
primary source.
-
clearly understanding the material.
-
careful paraphrasing.
-
right choice of verbs (don’t overuse
the same verbs. Try another verbs instead of using the same verb frequently.
For example, "Jagger (1998) adds/grants/implies/mentioned/noted/found,
etc. that urban forests plays a significant role in modifying the ecological...
")
Make sure that all facts are
properly cited.
Check that all citation is listed
in the references and vice-versa.
Check that all references are listed
alphabetically.
Within text, cite literature within/immediately
after the first sentence.
Style problems with unusual publications.
Cite “serious” publications (e.g.
journals and annals. Magazines are not considered as “serious” publications).
The criteria in citing are (i) something that subjected to peer review,
which is considered as “serious”, (ii) proceedings are not “serious” since
not properly done, and (iii) if we don’t follow/cite “serious” publications,
we are helping in propagating lie if we cite proceedings or any
other non-serious publications continuously.
Minimize citation of unpublished
data, papers in press, abstracts, theses, personal communications.
Tense for literature review (past
tense or present tense or future tense):
-
Past tense - If referring to
actual work done in the past (e.g. Roger and Moore (1965) investigated
that the effect of tempering on the rate of moisture removal… )
-
Present tense - If referring
to knowledge produced as a results of research (e.g. The storage potential
of onion cultivars varies with their physical and physiological characteristics
(Pacino and Ford 1957; Lennon and Ono 1967)).
A literature review is usually
a mixture of past and present tense.
How to cite a literature?
-
make simple and straightforward reviews.
-
direct and easy, which make life much
simpler.
-
exception?! No, otherwise the readers
are not really interested in your paper.
Cite recent and current (still
applicable) publications :
-
recent may not be current. Recent may
be one or two years ago.
-
For example, "The susceptibility of
Lecanium
sp. to many insecticides is little known (Stone and Dion, 1956)". Let’s
say that this paper is cited in a 1995 article, so it is no longer appropriate!
Table of Contents
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Most readers skip this section
of the paper. Yet it is important in that it allows fellow scientists to:
-
judge the reliability of your data
-
know the conditions under which results
are applicable
-
use your methodology.
It is the easiest and shortest
part, plus consistency in producing the results.
The Introduction is not very likely
to be reviewed by researcher who are in related field, but he will look
on your Materials and Methods to interpret your results!
Section encompasses several or all
of the following:
-
overview of investigative designs (e.g.
Latin Square, Randomized Complete Block Design, etc.)
-
materials
-
procedures
-
methods for observation and interpretation.
Describe in chronological order
if possible.
Enough details must be given so
that results are reproducible and can be properly evaluated.
Refer (without providing details)
to previously published method if:
-
method widely familiar
-
literature easily accessible to reader.
Advanced or unusual statistical
procedures require literature citation.
Use subheadings if they will improve
clarity; repeat subheadings in Results.
Usually described using passive
voice, but watch out for dangling modifiers (e.g. "The farmers getting
fertilized" or "I collected the data from 10 plots"!).
Occasional use of active voice and
first person acceptable and even encouraged.
Tables can replace lengthy descriptions
(e.g. to summarize)
Avoid/minimize use of trade names
(I don’t know why… but I think it might spark the brand/product war if
we mention the trade names!).
Get colleague to check (the reason
is that you are so familiar with the Materials and Methods, and yet sometimes
you will forget to mention something. For example, you have forgot to mentioned
the experimental design!)
Some points about scientific methodology:
-
ensure sample size large enough (refer
back your statistical books!)
-
beware of extrapolation (the results
obtained only applied to the environment of the experiment. Don’t try to
compare your results with somebody else).
-
test your hypothesis, don’t prove it
(don’t you dare to say… “definitely, it will last longer” or something
else!)
Table of Contents
RESULTS
Simply, this is where you present
your data.
Results and Discussion? Keep separate
(including in the thesis writing) unless:
-
required by journal
-
more “natural” to combine
-
extended discussion not possible
Don’t give results that are
not accounted for in Materials and Methods (casual observation don’t belong
to Results, such as raw data).
Don’t include materials here, more
suitable for Materials and Methods or Discussion (always ask yourself,
does this part belongs to Materials and Methods, Results, or Discussion?)
Begin with overview of what you
have found out.
Present summarized data in tables
or graphs (don’t present raw data, and decide what is the best, either
you will use graphs or tables. Summarized data means after we analyzed
it using statistical analyses).
In text, point out key data to:
-
emphasize their significance (don’t
put everything that is unnecessary. Highlight the important points)
-
help reader comprehend tables, graphs,
and figures.
Don’t present all or many of
the data shown in tables and graphs.
Don’t try to interpret text, tables,
graphs, and figures. Interpretation must be left to the Discussion.
Make proper use of statistics:
-
Statistics not used to lend scientific
air (what does it mean?! It means that statistics leads you to objective
conclusion!).
-
Provide a measure of central tendency
and a measure of variability.
-
Interpret statistics correctly and
intelligently. Make a revision on your statistical books. (e.g. "The table
shown in Table 1 shows that the capital earning was increased in the last
few years." – why? Discuss it!)
-
Be careful about Type I and Type II
Errors.
Accuracy must be appropriate,
in terms of decimal points (1 or 2 decimal points, and avoid such a ridiculous
precision!).
Present results simply and clearly.
Results often the shortest section
of the report.
Table of Contents
DISCUSSION
This is where you tell what your
results mean. The hardest section to write. You should write a good Discussion.
If properly done, this section is an opportunity to highlight your achievements.
For a good Discussion (adapted from
Robert A. Day,
How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper) you
should:
-
not recapitulate (repeat) your results
-
present principles, relationships,
and generalization shown by your results (e.g. Treatment A is better than
Treatment B due to… or Treatment A has significant different (p < 0.05)
compared to Treatment B).
-
explain or clarify anomalies (peculiarities);
defined unsettled points (e.g. Why is there a different in terms of tree
growth? It might be due to fertilization (treated) and non-fertilization
(control) treatments).
-
define clearly the conditions to which
your conclusions apply.
-
show how your results and interpretations
agree or disagree with previously published works (e.g. This study reveals/shows
that it doesn’t agree with the work done by Carey (1995)). Explain why
and make an elaboration.
-
discuss theoretical implications of
your work, in terms of effects/benefits.
-
suggest possible applications – the
cost effectiveness (e.g. suggest mulching to reduce weeding and transpirational
losses from the soil)
-
stimulate, if possible, further thought
and research on the subject (e.g. relationship between root growth, mycorrhizae,
and mulching, and see what are the effects).
-
state your conclusions and present
your evidence for each conclusion (last paragraph of Discussion).
-
summarize or conclude with a discussion
of the significance of your results (subheadings of Discussion. No need
Conclusion).
Speculation is allowed in a
Discussion “… but it must be reasonable, firmly founded in observation,
and subject to test… “ (F. P. Woodford, Scientific Writing for
Graduate Students).
However, it is not allowed to make
a wild speculation! The solution is to search for literature to support
the discussion.
Table of Contents
ESSENTIALS OF A
SCIENTIFIC PAPER
What do referees look out for?
Title
-
Specific and brief description of contents
Abstract
-
Objectives and scope stated
-
Methodology – brief but adequate
-
Main findings (results, significance,
conclusions, recommendations)
Introduction
-
Nature and extent of the problem
-
Literature review (theoretical or historical
background) - pertinent
-
Scope and purpose/objective – clear,
important for field of study
-
Plan of development or articles (if
necessary)
Materials and Methods
-
Overview of investigative design
-
Materials (include the equipment)
-
Procedures – sufficient details, appropriate
for the study
-
Diagrams or photographs included if
necessary
-
Method of observation or data collection
– appropriate for the study
-
Method of interpretation
Results
-
Tables and figures – clarity, form,
and arrangement satisfactory
-
Tables and figures are essential to
facilitate comprehension
-
Important data highlighted and interpreted
in text, but not repeated
-
Analysis and interpretation are correct
-
Conflicting evidence are attended to
the study itself
Discussion
Should include most or all of the
following:
-
Principles, relationships and generalizations
-
Explanation/clarification of anomalies
-
Definition of conditions under which
conclusions apply
-
Agreement or disagreement with previous
work
-
Theoretical implications
-
Possible applications
-
Further thought or research
-
Summary/conclusion – significance of
work
References
-
Follow house rules closely
-
Complete
-
Accurate
Note : It is important to write
your references in a properly manner, so that the potential readers will
know exactly the sources that you have cited. Most students (even a graduate
student!) always tend to forget to write/cite their references properly.
Sometimes, their theses writing are good, but when it comes to References,
it looks terrible! So, remember to keep your reference materials in a safe
place, thus enabling you to save time, money, and energy in producing it
again and again…
Overall Content and Presentation
A paper could be rejected because:
-
Paper is not substantial
-
Scientific content is poor
-
Facts are not new
-
Ideas are not original
-
Paper is carelessly prepared
-
Text is poorly arranged
-
English is poor
-
Figures are poor
-
Style is inflated or verbose
Table of Contents
Urban
Forestry Resources
[ What
urban forestry is all about? ] [ Urban
forestry in Malaysia ] [ Malaysian
urban landscape ]
[ History
of urban forestry education in UPM ] [ Local
organizations ] [ Research
abstracts ] [ Famous
quotes on trees ]
[ Reading
Materials ] [ Resource
materials guide ] [ Global
urban forestry web sites ] [ On-line
articles ]
[ On-line
journals ] [ Seminar
papers ] [ Scientific paper writing ] [ Tips
on doing research ]
[ Guidelines
for graduate thesis writing ] [ Guidelines
for undergraduate thesis writing ]