AND ALTERNATIVES |
|||
|
Debates
on Globalization
So far all this page has is one email and my reply. "ideology & globalisation... I have never read such a load of envy ridden depressing boring mindless crap since my state funded teachers made me read there union propaganda under threat of getting my arse caned if I didn't. Communism has already been tried maybe you missed that particular bulls up last time, what you espouse is a recipe for totalitarian corruption created by moronic and patently corruptible control freaks like yourself. Most of the poorer countries of the world are in that state mainly because of a lack of capitalism and too much state control and a complete disregard for individual rights and responsibilities they are oppressed by exactly the same sort of mindless tribalism that I hear in your article. I would welcome your reply if you see fit." Reply: I can see you have a bright future ahead of you. Have you applied for a job at the CATO or Fraisier institutes? Your editorial writing skills are of Wall Street Journal quality - the factlessness, the accusations of communism in the second sentence (although these days you'll want to say "terrorist" and use the first sentence), and, of course, the penny-throwing insult of "envy ridden." "ideology & globalisation...what you espouse" Your mind-reading skills especially single you out for stardom. I don't espouse anything on the ideology page, I espouse on the Alternatives page. This means you realized that I'm against Enron controlling our water, and then concluded what I'm for. I think there was an article in the Economist about this - either being with Enron or being one of Stalin's agents. You'll really want to see my alternatives page. The first thing I propose is a few hundred billion dollars in government cuts. "tribalism" Hm, now you're a flag-burner? Your rhetoric is awfully early-2001, you're supposed to be calling me a terrorist, not a patriot or communist. Oh, and you forgot to use the word "inevitable" and some quasi-ironic Marx quote. (Can't help you there, I've never read Marx. Any neoconservative has though, for some reason.). I'll welcome your reply, but please use the word "inevitable" this time. |
||
|
FAIR USE NOTICE: You can copy this info as long as you do not charge money for it. In legal: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: US CODE COLLECTION If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
|||