|
|
MODERN
MEDICINE |
|
We have a team of professionals with rich experience in various specialised fields for treating various ailments.
All consultations are fully supervised by experienced, qualified specialists.
Method: Everybody has a natural healing ability. If one
happens to cut oneself somewhere, the cut will heal on
its own, even without ointments or medicines. We stimulate
the natural healing processes of the body (using one of
many different techniques; viz. Modern Medicine, Homoeopathy,
Ayurveda, Naturopathy, Hypnotherapy, different types of
healing like Reiki, Pranic healing, Cosmic healing, Guided
Imagery/Visualization etc.) to bring about a natural remission
(& disappearance) of disease.
On request you can also: Learn Meditation, control Stress,
improve Memory & Concentration, find a most satisfying
job without much effort, learn speed reading, learn remote
viewing/see places far away (sitting wherever you are
- with eyes closed), learn Telepathy (mind reading/sending
messages), stop smoking, lose/gain weight, improve confidence,
regress to a past life (especially to solve problems that
you have in this life related to a past life), find lost
objects, get answers for the unsolvable, get whatever
through guided visualization (a car, a house, money etc.),
E.S.P. (Clairvoyance, Sixth sense, Intuition etc.) and
so on. We have a team of specialists with rich experience
in various specialised fields for curing various ailments. |
|
|
|
Stress
control & Memory Clinic
Relaxation through Meditation
or Hypnosis. Memory improvement with good recall. |
S.T.D. CLINIC
To enhance
sexual performance.
To CURE all sexually transmitted diseases. |
Arthritis
& Pains Clinic
To cure Ankle & Knee joint swelling and pains.
Bone-cracks/fractures without any operation
or Surgery. |
ECLECTIC CLINIC
To CURE all chronic
and incurable diseases using one of many different
techniques; (viz. Modern Medicine, Homoeopathy,
Ayurveda, Naturopathy, Hypnotherapy, different
types of healing like Reiki, Pranic healing, Cosmic
healing, Guided Imagery/Visualization etc.) |
Asthma
& Allergy Clinic To
CURE all types of asthma and allergies-
Safely and permanently. |
IMPOTENCY & STERILITY CLINIC
For a complete
health check up, to clear up deficiencies and
to make one potent and fertile |
Blood
Pressure Clinic
To cure all types of hypertension
and Hypotension safely. |
KIDNEY & LIVER Clinic
To cure or prevent Kidney Stones,
Gall Stones, inflammation or dysfunction of kidney
& liver without expensive operations, dialysis,
transplant etc. |
The
only CANCER Cure Clinic
To treat, cure or prevent
all types of cancer without any surgical operation
- economically. |
PILES & FISTULA CLINIC
All types of painful or bleeding
piles. Fistulas treated and cured without any
surgical operations - safely. |
The
only DIABETES Cure Clinic
To cure all types of Diabetes without
injections, permanently and to avoid Gangrene,
Amputation etc. |
PSYCHIATRY CLINIC
To treat and cure all mental and
psychiatric problems in adults or children. To
prevent tension, control stress, for memory loss
etc. |
ENT & EYE CLINIC
For all ENT & EYE problems,
to cure otitis(ear discharge), deafness due to
trauma, long sight, short sight, squint, Colour
and night blindness, cataract (without operation),
or prevent the use of spectacles. |
QUIT |
ALCOHOL, SMOKING
BAD HABITS ETC. |
To avoid DIVORCE, Suicide, etc. |
HEART & LUNG Clinic
To cure all heart problems and
to avoid and treat heart attacks, hole in the
heart, artery problems, enlarged heart etc. without
any surgical operations – economically. |
SKIN, V.D. & Beauty Clinic
To cure Herpes, Pimples, Psoriasis
etc. and all skin, V.D. and hair problems.
To get healthy, fair, clear and radiant skin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOMEOPATHY |
|
Everybody has a natural
healing ability within them. Conventional medicine
(Allopathy) treats only the symptoms and gives only temporary
relief by suppressing the symptoms. Disgusted with this
form of treatment, a German Medical Doctor, Dr. Samuel
Christian Friedrich Hahnemann, stopped Allopathic medication
and after some research, started a new medical system,
which he named Homoeopathy (most people now spell it Homeopathy).
Homeopathy stimulates the natural healing processes of
the body with the help of very minute quantities (i.e.
in sub-atomic particles) of a remedy to bring about a
natural remission of disease. It is not concerned with
a physiological response. Note:
Homeopathy does not produce any side effects what so ever!
Homeopathic treatment is best taken from a Qualified
Homeopathic Doctor because people who medicate themselves
on their own or take treatment from a person who isn't
Qualified, can go into a state of 'Drug Proving', i.e.
they start showing the symptoms that drug produces when
taken in milligram doses (remember Homeopathic remedies
are not herbal, but sub-atomic, electromagnetic remedies),
worse they may become immune to treatment by other Qualified
Doctors (including Allopaths/Conventional Doctors).For those having the time, the following can be
read (or an e-mail can be sent right away):-
Homeopathy uses dilute sub-atomic particles which stimulate
the natural healing processes of the body (to bring about
a spontaneous remission of disease/s). Homeopathic remedies
are electro-magnetic (dynamic) - their preparations involve
shock succussion, whereby the atomic structure is disturbed.
The rationale of Homeopathy is that life is fundamentally
a bio-electric phenomenon, with various groups of cells
vibrating in sync with each other; disease is essentially
a bio-electric disturbance (viruses/bacteria can attack
an individual only if there is such a disturbance) - Homeopathic
remedies act on the same plane as disease, bringing about
a bio-electric stability (health). One may ask why such
minute doses of medication are used - Homeopathy is not
concerned with a physiological response, but in mainly
stimulating the natural healing processes of the body
to bring about a remission of disease. I have been practising
Homeopathy for the past 10 years & have cured all
sorts of 'Incurable' diseases/conditions.
Homeopathy has cured a whole lot of conditions completely
and permanently like –
- Cancer
- Fibroids (where ever they may be)
- Brain Tumours
- Warts
- Kidney Stones
- White Patches (Leucoderma)
- Ovarian Cysts
- Poly-Cystic Ovarian Disease
- Endometriosis
- Infertility
- Thyroid Problems
- Rhinitis
- Sinusitis
- Ear Problems
- Tonsillitis
- Bronchitis
- Heart Problems
- Kidney Failure
- Liver Cirrhosis
- Prostate Problems
- Sexual Dysfunctions etc.
More over, if one interviews the Patients' of a Homoeopathic
Doctor, one would get to know how effective it is (everybody
is satisfied - obviously the ones not satisfied wouldn't be coming).
What about animals? I have cured (of things like tumours,
kidney failures, ear infections, skin diseases, prolapsed
uterus, inadequate milk production after the birth of
a calf/pup/kitten etc.) a whole lot of animals - if it
was "faith" producing the cure (as some people allege), how can animals
get cured? Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales (U.K.)
has a whole farm dedicated to the Homeopathic treatment
of animals, where no 'G.M. (Genetically Modified)' foods
are allowed. Experiments have been conducted & it
is seen that even when alcohol (or water for that matter)
- the base used for potentising (a method of vigorously
shaking the base while diluting it) Homeopathic dilutions
- dilutes the medicinal substance so much as to leave
almost nothing of it in the base, the base (alcohol/water)
retains an impression/memory of the original substance
it was diluting. In another experiment, it was seen that
these dilutions can degranulate Human basophils (which
means they do have an effect), the results of which were
published as a scientific paper, in the most well-known
Scientific magazine 'Nature'(1988, Vol.333, June 30th)
, with the title, 'Human basophil degranulation triggered
by very dilute antiserum against IgE' (both by Prof.Jacques
Benveniste et al).
The Lancet, earlier, has published 2 articles to show
that Homeopathy works (the articles were titled, 'Is homoeopathy
a placebo response? Controlled trial of homoeopathic potency,
with pollen in hayfever as model', 1986, II:881-886 &
'Is evidence for homoeopathy reproducible', 1994, 344:1601-1606).
There are lots of other articles that prove the efficacy
of Homoeopathy:-
Evidence profile for the efficacy of
homeopathy – A new paradigm for medical sciences:
"The Body Information Theory":-
• First question addressed: The activity of
very highly diluted preparations. Homeopathic practitioners
will argue that the use of preparations that are diluted
beyond Avogadro’s number (i.e. potencies greater
than C10) happens in only 25% of the prescribed homeopathic
medications. Nevertheless, for some people this question
is the most important obstacle to the acceptance of homeopathy.
The experimental model that is cheapest, most reproducible
and also the most easily researched is probably the "acetylcholine-induced
contraction of the rat ileum". It is a well recognized
scientific model (Chang FY, Lee SD, et al. Rat gastrointestinal
motor responses mediated via activation of neurokinin
receptors. J.Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 14: 39-45). This
model has been devised for the verification of very high
dilutions of Belladonna by A. Cristea, a Romanian researcher;
results have already been published (Bastide M (ed). Signals
and Images. Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997: 161-170).
Professor Wolfgang Süß, Institute of Pharmacy
at the University of Leipzig, has used this model to test
the transfer of the activity of a homeopathic remedy (in
this case Atropinum sulphuricum D60) from the original
liquid form to the homeopathic tablet. As usual, several
controls were performed. Alpha-lactose monohydrate tablets
impregnated with the highly diluted Atropinum had systematically
efficacy, on the contrary with anhydrous alpha-lactose
tablets no effect can be ascertained. Thus, the quality
of homeopathic tablets can be tested before daily use
in pharmacy (constant reproducibility). This very simple
model therefore has the potential to remove doubts about
the activity of very highly diluted homeopathic remedies
(Schmidt F, Süß WG, Nieber K. In-vitro Testung
von homöopathischen Verdünnungen. Biol. Med./Heft
1/February 2004;32-37). B/ It has taken much more time
for another model to be accepted by the scientific community.
The first publications appeared in 1991 but it is only
in 2004, after an international cooperation, that the
results have finally been accepted in a high-standard
peer-reviewed journal, Inflammation Research. This model
is different from the Benveniste model; he used the same
control but not the same activator. Professors Marcel
Roberfroid and Jean Cumps of the Institute of Pharmacy
at the University of Louvain, who respectively coordinated
the European multi-centre (4 centres) trial and performed
the statistical analysis, explained the protocols and
discussed the results. The work demonstrates a significant
inhibition of human basophil degranulation, as measured
by alcian blue staining, by high dilutions of histamine
(10-30 - 10-38 M). This multi-centre research has subsequently
been confirmed in three laboratories by applying flow
cytometry analysis and in one laboratory by measuring
histamine release. Even if, at present, the molecular
theory cannot explain these findings, the facts remain
indisputable as recognized by the editor of Inflammation
Research. (Belon P, Cumps J, Ennis M, Mannaioni PF, Roberfroid
M, Sainte- Laudy J, Wiegant FAC. Histamine dilutions modulate
basophil activation. Inflamm. Res. 2004; 53: 181-188.)
C/ Research on high dilutions has existed since the 1950s,
but the number and quality of publications has increased
in the last decade.
Reviews and meta-analyses have even been performed but
often ignored or even denied (see COST B4 supplement report
EUR 19110 ISBN 92-828-7434-6). This research is not encouraged
and even deemed inadvisable by academic authorities. Professor
Jean Cambar, Dean of the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University
of Bordeaux, described the most important models that
have been published previously in international journals,
confirming the effects of very highly diluted homeopathic
preparations. The efficacy of very high homeopathic dilutions
of human or animal natural molecules (also called endogen
molecules) has been published several times in prestigious
journals. Examples include the following: Int J Immunotherapy
1987; 3: 191-200 (Thymulin in mice. Bastide M); Int J
Immunopharm 1990; 6: 211-214 (alpha/beta interferon, Carriere
V); J Vet Human Toxicol 1995; 37(3): 259-260 (Thyroxine,
Endler PC); Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 1996; 9: 43-51
(Bursin, Youbicier-Simo BL). During this meeting Dimitris
Zienkiewicz, immunologist at the University of Edinburgh,
presented preliminary findings assessing, by immunosorbent
assay and flow cytometry, the alteration in activation
and function of dendritic cells that comes about as a
result of their treatment with homeopathic dilutions of
a bacterium. Dendritic cells play an instrumental role
in both activation and regulation of the immune system.
Systematic changes in the profile of cytokines IL-10,
IL-11 and IL-12 cannot be explained by the molecular theory.
Efficacy of very high homeopathic dilutions using pharmacological
models has also been published in peer-reviewed journals.
Examples include the following: Thrombosis. Res. 1994;
76: 225-229 (Acetylsalicylic acid in a vessel model. Doutremepuich
C); Haemostasis 1990; 20: 99-105 (Acetylsalicylic acid
in healthy volunteers. Doutremepuich C); Thrombosis. Res.
1987; 48: 501-504 (Acetylsalicylic acid in healthy volunteers,
Doutremepuich C). The longest-used model, published frequently
all over the world, is the toxicological model (Arsenic,
Phosphorus, Mercury, Cadmium, Cisplatina, Glutamate, Cuprum
sulphate, etc). It can be applied to vegetable, animal,
cell culture material or even clinical studies. This model
is still used and indeed is the theme for a collaboration
between the Universities of Bern and Bologna, testing
homeopathic arsenic trioxide treatments by plant-based
bioassays. The working variables are the germinated seeds
or the stem length on the seventh day. At least 6 recent
experiments by this team are published (Dr Lucietta Betti.
DISTA-Department of Agro environmental Science and Technology,
University of Bologna.). Experiments are well conducted,
in controlled conditions, with a sufficient number of
plants, animals or cells, and with a fair statistical
treatment.
The facts are indisputable, statistically significant
and reproducible, even if they cannot be explained using
the molecular paradigm.
• Second question addressed: The content of very highly
diluted homeopathic preparations. Professor Jean Cambar
introduced the theme by asking what are the contributions
of the different spectroscopies (Raman, Ultraviolet, X-ray
or Magnetic Nuclear Resonance) in revealing the structure
of water and solvents in high dilutions? What is the real
relevance of Avogadro’s number in evaluating the precise
pattern of molecules? Can a dilution work without any
molecule? One of the most innovative perspectives in this
last decade was the demonstration that high dilutions
have as much activity and effectiveness in an organized
structured solvent without any solute molecule as they
do when molecules are present (even only some molecules).
Professor Louis Rey, Doctor of Sciences, Lausanne, a specialist
in low temperature thermoluminescence, has published on
this topic in the international journals Nature (1988;
391: 418) and C.R.Physique (2000; 1: 107-110). He presented
the latest results of the experiments he carried out together
with Dr. Philippe Belon on the thermoluminescence of ultra-high
dilutions of lithium chloride and sodium chloride. Ultra-high
dilutions of lithium chloride and sodium chloride (10-30
g cm-3) were irradiated by X- and gamma-rays at 77K, then
progressively re-warmed to room temperature. During that
phase, their thermoluminescence was studied and it was
found that, despite their dilution beyond the Avogadro
number, the emitted light was specific of the original
salts dissolved initially. Much to the authors’ surprise,
the experimental results showed, without ambiguity, the
specificity of the contained information. The findings
proved to be reproducible in the course of many different
identical experiments. As a working hypothesis, the researchers
propose that this phenomenon results from a marked structural
change in the hydrogen bond network initiated at the onset
by the presence of the dissolved ions and maintained in
the course of the dilution process, and probably due to
the successive vigorous mechanical stirrings. (Physica
2003; A323: 67-74). Professor Guadalupe Ruiz-Vega, Universidad
Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, Mexico,
presented her most recent publications in the field of
thermodynamics. She was able to demonstrate the biological
effect of two ultra-low dose compounds. (Publication in
process.) The use of modern techniques in the hands of
specialists is the best way to show sceptics that the
experimental facts are well grounded and confirmed by
reproducible experiments. Even in ultra-molecular homeopathic
dilutions, specific information of the prime dissolved
substance still remains in the preparation and can be
detected experimentally.
• Third question addressed: The theoretical
framework in which the effects of homeopathic diluted
preparations can be explained. Two members of G.I.R.I.
(Groupe International de Recherche sur l’Infinitésimal;
see www.giriweb.com), Professor Madeleine Bastide (University
of Montpellier) and Agnès Lagache (Professor of Philosophy,
Paris) have been working on this topic for 16 years. A
new paradigm for medical science is needed to explain
these facts and to allow more precise research models
in the future. A working group of 7 members applied this
new paradigm to the analysis of experimental results.
"When the observed fact does not correspond to a famous
theory, the fact has to be accepted and the theory rejected";
"A theory must be modified to be adapted to nature and
not nature to adapt itself to the theory". Claude Bernard
(Introduction à la Médecine Expérimentale). Prof. Bastide
explained that homeopathy and research models are based
on the observation of "symptoms". Asymptomatic pathologies
exist that provoke "biological scars" as a proof of the
self-treated organism without showing the illness symptoms
(Charles Nicolle, Nobel Prize 1929, Life and Death of
Illness). Symptoms and biological modifications are not
the same and concern different levels in the body. The
symptom may be an ex-pression of the body when it cannot
find any answer whatever the situation (infection, stress,
strong emotion…). Example: Rubella in a normal subject:
no apparent sickness. Rubella in immuno-deficient subject:
symptoms, apparent sickness. For the allopathic research
approach, the symptoms are pathognomonic, specific to
the illness; they are used to diagnose the pathology.
When the diagnosis of the pathology is performed, the
treatment is chosen accordingly; classical therapy may
be also targeted against symptoms. For the homeopathic
research approach, considered symptoms are idiosyncratic;
specific to the patient. They are the personal ex-pression
of the sickness by the patient. They are used to choose
the specific remedy according to the similarity of the
symptoms observed by "proving" in a healthy subject. The
living body is in a lasting and irreversible learning
process; it communicates at every level with its environment.
It is able to receive and treat semantic and corporeal
information; it is not an inert object. The paradigm of
corporeal signifiers (Bastide M., Lagache A. Revue Intern.
Systémique 1995; 9: 237-249 and Altern Ther Health Med.
1997; 3: 35-9). Three principles define homeopathy, based
on clinical and experimental analysis: the similia and
whole person principles, and the use of very high dilutions.
The effects of high dilutions cannot be explained by a
simple molecule-receptor interaction (mechanistic paradigm),
the "well established theory" of modern science. Prof.
Bastide & Lagache propose an epistemological approach
to homeopathy based on body information processes received
and interpreted by the living organism; this follows the
rules of information exchange. Exchange of objects between
a giver and a receiver is very simple: one loses, the
other gains, and the sum is constant. On the other hand,
information is not an object but the trace of an object
- mediation between object and receiver is required for
a signal to be transmitted. For example, take the story
of Robinson Crusoe: Crusoe sees Friday’s footprint in
the sand but not the foot itself. For him, this footprint
means ‘there is another man on this island’. Friday’s
foot is the originator (matrix) of the information; the
footprint is information but is not an object; the sand
is the carrier of the information (the mediator). When
the carrier disappears, the information disappears too.
The information is understood only by the receiver and
the understanding of the information depends on its context
- he knows that he is alone on the island. Prof. Bastide
& Lagache therefore suggest that in homeopathy, the originator
of the information is the starting material of the remedy;
succussed dilutions of the starting material in a solvent
are mediators. High dilutions contain only information
from that material and no molecules remain. This mediation
results from the succussed solvent being in a specific
state, implying perhaps electro-magnetic processes. The
receiver (the whole living body) receives and processes
the information in the remedy according to its state,
whether healthy ("proving") or sick (therapy). The bases
of this paradigm are verified by the systematic experimental
results obtained as described in the first parts of the
conference. This new paradigm is needed to explain the
experimental facts and to understand the failure of research
models that do not fit it.
• The final question addressed: The clinical effects
of homeopathic preparations. An experimental design is
only relevant if it takes into account the observed phenomenon
within its specific framework and if the subject addressed
can be isolated of all external influences. Considering
human medicine, the psychological factors are responsible
for nonspecific effects and the medication effects are
called specific effects. Whatever the research model,
taking into account the homeopathic approach, the idiosyncratic
symptoms (specific to the patient) must be considered
excluding pathognomonic symptoms. A/ Professor Leoni Bonamin,
Paulista University (São Paulo) and president of G.I.R.I.,
reviewed studies in veterinary homeopathy. Such studies
are relevant for homeopathy because it is easier to isolate
the effects of the treatment: the placebo effect is almost
nil and there are fewer ethical considerations. Moreover,
studies in well-defined herds and features can include
a very homogeneous sample from a large number of animals.
Nevertheless, the rules for well-designed studies must
still consider the particularities of homeopathic research
as regards the Similia principle (considering idiosyncratic
symptoms). Veterinary studies are very important for organic
farming regulation. In Europe, only homeopathic treatments
are authorized for biological farming. The use of homeopathy
is aimed at avoiding chemical residues in the food chain.
More institutional support is certainly needed. In recent
studies, the use of homeopathic complexes has been tested
with very good results using parallel placebo groups,
blinded design, homogeneity of samples with sufficient
animals, and a protocol that is easy to manage in the
farming context. Filliat C. Particularité de l´utilisation
de l´homéopathie en production avicole. Annals of the
"Entretiens Internationaux de Monaco 2002", 5-6 October
2002. http://www.giriweb.com. The use of homeopathic complex
reduced the incidence of haematomas in turkeys during
transportation by about 30%. Riaucourt A. L´Exemple de
la Filière Porcine. Annals of the "Entretiens Internationaux
de Monaco 2002", 5-6 October, 2002. http://www.giriweb.com.
The use of a complex (with endogenous and exogenous substances)
to improve oestrus manifestation in female pigs induced
a reduction of the repetitions of inseminations and semen
loss. Veterinary studies are also useful for questioning
homeopathic study design. Using the model of psychogenic
dermatosis in dogs and cats (Torro, et al. In press),
six months of treatment with the simillimum shows 70%
success. One year after finishing the treatment there
was no recurrence. The entire study duration is six years.
The very long efficacy of the homeopathic treatment is
a reason for questioning cross-over design. Because veterinary
pathogenetic studies are very rare, veterinarians often
need to do extrapolations from human pathogenesis and
their Materia medica is based on classical studies performed
in humans. Research protocols in experimental animals.
For example, the effects of nosode (isopathic homeopathic
remedy) versus allopathy and similar homeopathic remedy
using as model the experimental urinary infection of rats
(Gonçalves et al. O uso da homeopatia no tratamento da
infecção urinária em ratas. Anais do VIII SINAPIH; 20-22
May, 2004: p.25-26. http//climed.epm.br/sinapih/index).
This study compares nosode from individual or collective
samples. It is a blinded study; the presence of E. coli
in gall bladder of rats is evaluated after 12-16 days
of treatment: Untreated control, 100% of bacteria colonies
(no spontaneous healing), second control is the vehicle
(alcohol 5%) 94%, comparison group treated with Antibiotic
(levokinolone) 33%*, treated group with nosode from a
pool of urines (30D) 73%*, treated group with a self-nosode
(30D) 39%*, and treated with a similar homeopathic remedy
Phosphorus 30CH (the incorporation of rats in this group
happens observing their individual behavior) 22%* (* Fisher
test, p=0.05). With such studies it is possible to evaluate
some homeopathic parameters such as the criteria for the
choice of the best homeopathic dilution. The general rule
is to use high potencies for chronic / mental disturbances
and low potencies for acute / organic disturbances. The
antidepressive effect of Hypericum perforatum in rats
was better in 200CH than in 30CH: tested by the Porsolt
forced swimming method (Goulart et al. Avaliação dos efeitos
de Hypericum perforatum (Hp) dinamizado homeopaticamente
em comportamento de ratos. Anais do VIII SINAPIH, 20-22
May 2004: p.14. http//climed.epm.br/sinapih/index); this
was a blinded, well designed study.
Experimental animal studies have limited application to
veterinary or to human homeopathy. Veterinary studies
minimize placebo effects and confirm the efficacy of homeopathic
treatments. Experiments in laboratory animals help improving
research design in homeopathy. B/ Last, but not least,
the human studies were considered. B.1) A second G.I.R.I.
working group was dedicated to clinical research, and
particularly considered the issues of individuality and
complexity. Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) gives first
priority to "Therapeutic Effects Testing" (TET), starting
from the work of basic scientists in laboratories up to
clinical researchers doing Randomized Clinical Trials
(RCTs), and finally reviews or meta-analyses of several
RCTs. The achieved level of TET determines the level of
EBM for a medicinal product. "Clinical Use Testing" (CUT),
starting with case reports, epidemiological outcomes and
cost-benefit studies, is only interesting for public health
authorities and patients but it is never sufficient to
reach EBM. No real bridge exists between these two approaches.
Evidence Based Homeopathy (EBH) starts and ends with the
individualized patient. It can be represented as the arch
of homeopathy: at one side there is the examination of
the patient, and at the other side the therapeutic instrument.
In order to understand the patient, we must consider his
totality in time and space to be able to understand his
basic vulnerability, latent or manifest. This totality
must be qualitatively modalized with chronological assessment
to get the Minimal Syndrome of Maximal Value. The therapeutic
instrument can be self-healing (no syndrome, no medication),
or management of life-style or nutrition in order to avoid
obstacles to cure. A homeopathic remedy can be considered
after study of its physico-chemical characteristics, its
toxicology, its usual therapeutic use: this is the first
step, the hypothesis.
The second step is the probability by a first "proving"
(blinded protocol) on healthy volunteers; third is the
confirmation by further "provings"; fourth is the corroboration
by physio-pathological study; and last is the clinical
verification in daily practice. For the remedies we must
have the same qualitative assessment as for the patients.
But the keystone of the whole homeopathic process, without
which the arch will crumble, is the Law of Similars. Research
in homeopathy must be concentrated on qualitative "proving"
on healthy volunteers and clinical verification in daily
practice. Therefore after many years of studies, our first
priority must be systematic clinical files collection
(CLIFICOL project). The Bayesian statistic, a statistical
approach (likelihood ratio), can help establishing a scientific
base for our symptoms’ repertories. This approach was
presented by Dr Lex Rutten from The Netherlands. Can one
get over the gap that exists between EBM and EBH? B.2)
Dr Harald Walach, University of Freiburg, presented an
overview of the already published papers. Homeopathy is
certainly popular (used by 90% of the population of Glasgow,
U.K., 70% of the population in Germany, 50% of the population
in France, 50% of the population in India etc.) and is
historically successful, both individually (by Fieldmarshall
Radetzky, Paganini, etc.) and generally (in cholera and
other epidemics all over Europe). Homeopathy remained
effective in the face of adversaries and is growing despite
(or because of?) modern medical technology. Looking only
at the latest publications and using validated Quality
of Life questionnaires (between 2000 and 2004), 6915 patients
presented clinically significant improvement (approximately
70% of cases; more in children). Homeopathy reduced costs
and allowed a better improvement in work-days lost compared
with conventional practice. For specific diagnoses such
as bronchial asthma (89% improvement; even better after
2 years), cancer patients in palliative care (improvement
of quality of life, fatigue and anxiety but not pain),
hyperactive children (after 3 months, 75% improvement
versus 65% for conventional treatment), URTI (67.3% improvement
with homeopathy, 56% with conventional treatment; side
effects 7.8% homeopathy versus 22% conventional), homeopathy
is at least as effective as conventional therapies, but
costs are lower and the safety of homeopathy is greater.
On the other hand, an "efficacy paradox" can be acknowledged.
Using the hierarchy of evidence, for conventional medicine
the RCT is of the highest value - the best rigour and
internal validity - but it has a low applicability score,
a low external validity and its conclusions are generalized
with great difficulty. On the contrary the applicability
of case series is great, showing a high external validity
and its conclusions generalized easily. RCT implicitly
tests the placebo hypothesis; the question is only: "Is
the homeopathic therapy different from placebo?" It presupposes
a local-causal model of homeopathy, that the physical
presence and "information" of a remedy is decisive (without
considering the "receiver" health status), and that a
"true" effect would be detectable through replication.
It is apparent that discrepancies exist regarding homeopathy
in daily practice and the RCT approach. Nevertheless RCTs
have been performed and meta-analyses of these studies
have concluded that there is clear evidence of efficacy
in favour of homeopathic treatments that cannot be attributed
only to a placebo effect (Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez
G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, Jonas WB. Lancet 1997;
350: 834-43 and Dean M.E. Hans Walz Preisschrift, Essen:KVC
Verlag, 2004.) For some specific diagnoses, the same level
of evidence has been reached: rheumatoid arthritis (6
studies); childhood diarrhoea (3 studies); postoperative
ileus (8 studies); hayfever, asthma (4 studies). For migraine,
results of RCTs are disappointing. In children, using
comparison groups, significant results are obtained for
recurrent infections, postoperative agitation, adenoids,
otitis media, and stomatitis in patients with cancer (complication
of the conventional treatment). There are promising pilots
studies on low back pain, premenstrual syndrome and chronic
fatigue. The problems with RCTs are:
• they are difficult to replicate (true also for conventional
treatment: only 48% of all SSRI studies are significant);
• they are invasive and expensive, inducing lack of interest
due to a lack of funding;
• blinded RCTs answer only the placebo question;
• they make unwarranted presuppositions. Conclusions:
Clear indications exist about clinical effectiveness of
homeopathy; homeopathy is effective in uncontrolled practice
or versus comparison groups; enough indications exist
that "placebo" is an insufficient explanation for the
effects of homeopathy. Homeopathy can be similar or better
in effectiveness than conventional treatment and, where
it has been studied, it is cheaper in the long run. Many
interesting questions not even asked should be prioritized,
such as the potential of homeopathy to avoid invasive
procedures in children and, in primary care settings,
the long-term effect of homeopathy in preventing chronic
complications. B.3) Future projects were discussed. .
Surveys on homeopathic practice have already been published.
Dr Galen Ives (Priority Research, Sheffield) made some
recommendations for future projects. Questionnaire design
should be driven by requirements for data analysis, and
professional advice sought before starting, in particular
thinking carefully about measurement scales (subjective
data not expressed in numbers but crossing a box), and
assuming all respondents lack prior experience in such
recording. The question of timescales is a sensitive one
therefore it would be better to include only new patients.
If the aim is to look at the daily practice, a large demographic
data is needed. The question about why the patients chosen
homeopathy must be addressed. A comparison group is not
a common requirement in such studies. The aims of the
study must be kept clearly in mind. Example:
analysis of effectiveness versus conventional medicine
(CM); cost-effectiveness versus CM. It would be recommended
to use inclusion criteria (such as state of health) and
sub-groups (as example acute cases). The study of patient’s
satisfaction is not the same as looking at treatment efficiency.
Efficiency can best be checked through Quality of Life
studies, in this case at least 2 successive questionnaires
are needed with a greater risk of drop out. . Dr Kivellos
Spiros (Athens) introduced a severity scale that aims
to embody the laws of classical homeopathy in clinical
study protocols. He proposed a classification of "level
of health", starting on level 1 (healthy) down to level
12 (irreversible internal injuries). The homeopathic prognosis
can be estimated using such a scale and group classification
has been elaborated.
Conclusions from this colloquium:
- There is evidence that highly dilute homeopathic
dilutions have biological activity.
- The presence of a "footprint" of the original substance
can be detected in the high diluted homeopathic preparations.
- Explaining the observed phenomenon a new paradigm
for medical sciences exists.
- Veterinary studies confirm the clinical efficacy
of homeopathy.
- Human studies reveal clinically significant improvement
in 70% of patients (more in children); the homeopathic
effects cannot be attributed only to a placebo effect
and for some indications the efficacy of homeopathy
has reached a high level of statistical significance.
- Future studies are needed that investigate the
preventive effects of homeopathy in children and chronic
diseases.
Funding of research into homeopathy must be considered
as vital. Finally, the participants wrote the following
press release: At the invitation of the European Committee
for Homeopathy, which represents 33 homeopathic doctors’
associations in 24 European countries, joining the XVIII
symposium of GIRI, ten internationally renowned university
professors in the field of research met in Brussels for
a 3 day meeting starting on Friday November 12th 2004.
The results of the research discussed by these university
professors are all in accord with one another - namely,
that there is clear evidence for the effectiveness of
homeopathic medications.For more proof/evidence, please visit 'http://www.guna.it/eng/ricerca/indice.htm' & download the 'book (in .pdf format)', "Homeopathy: The scientific proofs of efficacy". |
|
A)
CANCER |
|
Cancer
is defined as any of various malignant neoplasms characterized
by the proliferation of anaplastic cells that tend to
invade surrounding tissue and metastasize to new body
sites.
Cancer cells are characterized by the property
that they multiply and invade whereas normal cells do
not. Malignant transformation starts in a single cell
leading to the establishment of a clone of Malignant cells.
Once the number of cells has reached 1,000,000,000 (approximately
1 gm. in weight), the tumour may become clinically detectable.
By the time a patient dies of widespread malignancy, he
may harbour 1,000,000,000,000 or 10,000,000,000,000 tumour
cells (1 to 10 Kg. in weight).
This is the magnitude of the tumour population that must
be destroyed to cure a patient. The initial dramatic susceptibility
of certain rapidly fatal neoplastic diseases to Chemotherapy
introduced in 1948 provided considerable hope, but soon
it was realized that remissions were almost always temporary
and that the emergence of resistance was the rule than
the exception.
Cancer & Homeopathy: Homeopathy can cure Cancer completely & permanently, unlike the Conventional approach, where, whether you do something (Surgery/Chemo-therapy/Radio-therapy) or not, it will spread (metastasis). e.g. If there is a Cancer of the Uterus and it is removed (Hysterectomy), one can develop Cancer of some other part, say, the Breast/s (but not necessarily the Breast/s). Likewise, if a Man has Stomach Cancer & his stomach is removed (Gastro-jejunostomy), he can develop Cancer of the intestines (but not necessarily the intestines). In fact, The National Cancer Institute (NCI), Maryland, USA, impressed with results that Homeopathy can produce, is now collaborating with Indian Homeopathic Doctors (Homeopathy is practised all over the world, but only India has a proper course and Licensing mechanism) to find a complete & permanent cure for the problem (Cancer). So what is Homeopathy? Click here to know.
We have cured hundreds of people
the world over with just the help of this web-site, so
send an e-mail to drjhingade@gmail.com |
|
B)
H.I.V. / A.I.D.S. |
|
AIDS is an acronym
for Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome and is
caused by the Human Immuno Deficiency Virus (HIV). AIDS
is defined as, any sign or symptom of acquired cellular
Immuno deficiency in a person having confirmatory serological
and / or viral evidence of infection with HIV.
When we think of HIV/AIDS, the first thing we imagine
is that it is contracted through unprotected sex only,
but there are a couple of other ways it can be contracted,
i.e. by using an infected syringe/injection needle, by
being given (through a transfusion) infected blood, by
using something that has come in contact with the Body
fluids (blood, semen, vaginal fluids etc) of a HIV +ve
person (including razors & knives), by intimate kissing
and Breast feeding (about 30% of the children born to
HIV+ve mothers are already HIV+ve at birth).
Some of the signs which point to a person being infected
are:
- Recurrent Fever
- Weakness / Tiredness
- Sweating in the Night
- Weight Loss
- Enlarged Lymph Nodes
- Hair-Fall
- Cough
- Continual Diarrhea
- Red / white spots inside the mouth / on the skin
- Pneumonia
- Memory Loss (or Depression)
- Other neurological problems
[but don't assume
some one has AIDS just because they have one of these
symptoms].
The most commonly used diagnostic tests are
—
- The Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA),
which specifically measures the anti-HIV antibodies
in the blood
- The Polymerase chain Reaction (PCR) Quantitative test, which gives
you the Viral load (the CD4+ count to be specific)
- The more expensive (and more accurate) Western Blot
Test.
Can
Homeopathy cure A.I.D.S. ? Read on :-
Homeopathy in HIV
infection:- An abstract from the 'British
Homeopathic Journal', April 1999, vol. 88, no. 2 pp.
49-57
Abstract:-
Objective: This study was aimed to evaluate the
immuno-modulator role of homeopathic remedies in Human
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection.
Methodology: A
randomised double blind clinical trial was conducted to compare the
effect of homeopathic remedies with placebo, on CD4+ve T-lymphocytes
in HIV infected individuals, conforming to Centres for Disease
Control (CDC) stage II & III. 100 HIV+ve individuals between 18
to 50 y (71% males) were included in the study. 50 cases conformed
to CDC stage II-Asymptomatic HIV infection, and 50 cases to CDC
stage III-Persistent Generalised Lymphadenopathy (PGL). Cases were
stratified according to their clinical status and CD4+ve lymphocyte
counts. The randomisation charts were prepared much before the start
of the trial by randomly assigning placebo and verum codes to
registration numbers from 1 to 50. A single individualised
homeopathic remedy was prescribed in each case and was followed up
at intervals of 15 d to one month. A six months study was performed
for each registered case. Assessment of progress was made by
evaluation of CD4+ve lymphocyte counts, which was the
prospectively-defined main outcome measure of the study; the results
were compared with the base line immune status.
Results: In
PGL, a statistically significant difference was observed in CD4+ve
T-lymphocyte counts between pre and post trial levels in verum group
(P<0.01). In the placebo group a similar comparison yielded
non-significant results. (P=0.91). Analysis of change in the pre and
post trial counts of CD4+ve cells between groups was also
statistically significant (P=0.04).
In asymptomatic HIV
infection, differences in absolute CD4+ve lymphocyte counts between
pre and post trial levels were not significant. Analysis of changes
in pre and post trial CD4 levels of placebo and verum groups for
combined strata of asymptomatic and PGL groups was also not
significant.
Conclusion: The study suggests a possible role
of homeopathic treatment in HIV infection in symptomatic phase, as
evidenced by a statistically significant elevation of base line
immune status in persistent generalised lymphadenopathy.
Homeopaths claim A.I.D.S.
curable:- An abstract from an article
that appeared in all major (Indian) Newspapers (source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/36409685.cms) & in the News
magazine 'Homoeopathic Forum':-
PATNA :
The Doctors attending the ongoing 13th All India Homoeopathy
Congress at the S.K. Memorial Hall near Gandhi Maidan here claimed
that AIDS could be cured by Homoeopathic medicines. The chairman of
Post-graduate committee, Central Council of Homoeopathy (CCH)), New
Delhi, Dr.D.P. Rastogi, said that recent experiments at the Regional
Research Institute of Homoeopathy, Mumbai, showed that AIDS is
curable. Three hundred HIV-Positive patients were administered
medicines for three months during the experiment. Thereafter, their
blood samples were sent for tests at different laboratories, which
showed that 15 samples were HIV-negative, said
Rastogi.
Note:The time factor of 3
months was too short; if the trial had continued for some more time, more would have been HIV-negative.
So what is Homeopathy? Click here to know.
We have cured hundreds of people the world over
with just the help of this web-site, so send an e-mail
to dr_ramanand@rediffmail.com
Alternative e-mail: dr2rao@yahoo.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|