Speutering


*Profit*
*Standards*
*Health*
*Kenneling*
*Breeding*
*Religion*
*Ethics*
*Pets*
*Rescue*
Speutering
*Working*
*Home*

Obviously, any dog that is not a top show winner should not be bred. In fact, such a dog should not remain capable of reproducing his obviously flawed genetics. The same goes for any dog with a disqualification or any dog that produces a disqualification.

Remember folks, a dog can't produce what he doesn't have. If he produces flawed offspring, he has flawed genes. He is like a leper dog and must be ousted from the genepool.

Why the Ultimate Show Breeders invented the term "Speuter".

First, there were two terms for desexing animals, "Castration" for boys and "Spaying" for girls. To refer to the desexing process in general, genderlessly, the term "Neuter" was used.

But men objected to the term "Castration", so "Neuter" became used to refer to desexing boys as well referring to the desexing process in general. So, now we have "Spay" and "Neuter".

Then, the Ultimate Show Breeder stepped in and improved the situation, coining a completely new term "Speuter" to refer to the desexing process in general, genderlessly.

"SPay" + "nEUTER" = "SPEUTER"

Thanks for your support.