| RECYCLED EARTH
Man's history is short, in the lives of earth. By my math, according to the bible's generations, from creation to Joseph giving land to Jacob (Israel) in Egypt, was 2,238 years. Rameses was the pharaoh who Joseph worked for. So therefore if you believe the bible, this gives a almost exact time table, for the reign of man. Rameses are known by science, to be twelve kings of Egypt. Beginning with Rameses the first in 1314 B.C. This may not be proved for certain, that this is the Rameses who gave up the land. But it is certain this is the first possibility, which does establish a maximum. By adding the two together, we get the oldest possible age of man at 3552 B.C.. TIME TABLE >________|______________|_________ BC|AD___|____ _____present_ 3552bc 1896bc 500ad 2006 Creation Noah's of Man Ark How does this compare to the history of man over the world ? In Egyptian recorded history 1st dynasty began 2920 B.C even pre-dynasty estimates are no older than 3200 B.C.. In Greek history the fall of Troy was in 1250 B.C. Although there is a lack of recorded history much beyond this, it is believed the Greeks began around 2000 B.C. The Roman empire only began around 700 B.C. In Spain, Phoenicians established colonies in 1100 B.C. India, or what is known today as Pakistan fell to Aryan invaders in 1500 B.C. But was believed to have started in 2500 B.C. The oldest is believed to be Chinese, 5000 B.C. according to science, however the first documented Chinese civilization was the Shang dynasty in 1523 B.C. Also in all other examples as above, recorded history followed closely after history began. In only hundreds of years not thousands. There is no reason to believe, the Chinese would not follow this same pattern. The Chinese people have shown their advanced capabilities in the past. Being the first with silks, gunpowder, and many others. It is illogical to think they would not develop documentation skills, as all other humans somewhere along the same time tables, within hundreds of years of their beginning. Even if they were slower to developed in this one area, their civilization should have began around 2500 B.C.. Science wants you to believe, you came from monkeys, so they will continue to flood your thought process with question after question without answers. To make it overwhelming to reach a logical conclusion as to what the truth is. If you are one , lost in all these lies and opinions of those who are even more confused than you. I offer you this advise. Take all the facts you have been told by science, temporarily put them on a shelf in the back of your mind. Think of this process as a road trip we want to get from point A to point B, so we don't need to know anything other than, that information at this time. It would serve only to confuse our direction, after we get to point B, then we will look further down the road. The first place to start, would have to be the beginning of man. Man to me is intelligent, similar to the man down the way, or your neighbor, or people in the past that show similarities to you. Man the only way you know him. Anything before this type creature, what ever it was, it was not man. So we will begin this way and not be clouded with anything other than man. When did man begin ? I believe man began in or about 3552 B.C. this is consistent with recorded history, from civilizations from all over the world. Which is consistent with biblical accounts as well. The oldest recorded history other than from biblical accounts, is the Egyptian which began around 2920 B.C. which would follow mans beginnings a few hundred years. This seems to be the pattern all over the world. Man branching outward from the area of creation, from biblical explanation matching origins and historical development of records. Not only in dates, but also in general ideas. All of these civilizations believed there was some kind of war between vain gods, whose end result was the destruction of the land surface of the earth. Where only the righteous was saved to replenish the earth. They all believed, there is a struggle between good and evil. They all believed doing right will be rewarded in the after life. So therefore to get from point A to point B we will for the sake of argument, concede the bible to be fact, its accounts of creation and time table of events to be accurate. Therefore anything after or around 3552 B.C. to have happen as stated. Some cultures vary in these truths, to or around their existing beliefs today. So sometime shortly before or around 1896 B.C. earth was covered by water to return control of earth back to man.( Noah's Ark ) Sometime shortly before or around 3552 B.C. earth was covered by water and darkness due to some kind of catastrophe. ( prior to the Creation of Man ). Millions of years ago, earth was a Jurassic world, you may not know why for sure, but you must admit evidence of dead remains left in the earth, in the form of fossils and skeleton remains. But this evidence in no way contradicts the genesis of creation, in my opinion. It does however give proof that the earth has been recycled more than once. At least a Jurassic period, a creation or replenishing period and a flood and replenish period. The one thing consistent in all of these periods, is that sea life continued throughout. This is one thing that has added to scientific confusion, because science refusal to except biblical explanation. This is why the lifeline in the sea dates back so old. This is why pre-historic fish have been discovered alive in modern day. This also is why there is truth in geology, for the earth is old. It was old when man got here, but replenished for man. As I have said, earth has lived at least three times, for at least three different kinds of worlds. I believe it has lived more than that. There is evidence, that does not fit into one of these three worlds. If earth has been reused more than once as I believe, then one must consider a possibility of another time between Jurassic and before the creation of man. For the sake of argument lets say I am correct, and lets look at things that might have been from this period. Keep in mind, this would not have effected the sea life. Life in the sea has developed for millions of years, however many new sea life, was added by GOD during man's creation, to suit man’s needs. The only clash in our dating process of the flood of Noah and recorded history all over the world lies in Egypt, their recorded history is slightly off. And Egypt is also the place where several other questions remain unanswered. Consider this hypothesis, after the catastrophe which ended the Jurassic age, as earth became livable again. New residents moved in, these people were alien in thinking to modern man. From their very beginning their gods were partly human and partly beast. They studied astronomy and based their existence on the same. There are great monuments the world over, whose apparent purpose are to serve as guide markers, for something from above, or to record important dates or passageways. Such as the Giza plateau, I believe the Egyptians found this plateau, and that these pre-existing monuments inspired the Egyptians, to build their beliefs on. There are many different type pyramids in the land of Egypt but none that compare to these. Leading Egyptologist claim the Giza plateau was built during the fourth dynasty, within sixty years of the first attempt to build a pyramid. That ancient Egyptians went from a simple step design in first dynasty to an apex of building wonders that are the monuments at Giza. Where is your logic ? What happened, did they forget everything they had learned ? Would it not be logical to think their building structures would improve over the next twenty six dynasties. These later pyramids look, as though poor attempts to mimic these great structures. They do not show the same building quality or astronomical alignment. It only takes one glance to realize all the others are not even in the same league, as the Giza plateau. The ancient Egyptians believed at night the sun was captured by the underworld. How could people with this little understanding of the way things worked, chart movements of the stars in heaven, to such a degree of accurately, to record time and space for all time ? Or to align these great structures with such accuratecy ? It would seem more logical, to think the ancient Egyptians found these wonders just as they are, thinking these great structures could only have been abandoned by gods. It would be reasonable to consider finding these great wonders on the banks of the life giving Nile river, more than inspiring. They tried to duplicate these wonders many times throughout their history, with little success. Is it any wonder, that the most powerful men of that time, claimed these monuments in their own name ? Nowhere on the planet, is one culture as completely different in their beliefs on how they deal with the dead. Their ancient rituals are completely alien to say the least, than the mainstream of humanity. In other myths there are some figures of human/animal combinations as Neptune (partly fish) or Centaur (partly horse). That are supposed to have lived, during the wars of the gods. But here again these man/beast of Egypt bear no resemblance. In all the other cultures, it was the power of the beast, with the intelligents of man. Always a mans head on a beast body. For beast can be stronger than man, but needed mans intelligence. Their purpose was simple, a lower half like a fish would enable a man such as Neptune more control to rule the sea. A bottom half like a horse, would enable a man to cross the land, much quicker than a mere man, and so on. But this is not the way of thinking in ancient Egypt, they did the reverse, putting animal heads on humans, except for the Sphinx. I do not believe the sphinx represents a man's head on a lion's body but rather a snake/man's head combination on a lion's body. Besides the obvious, of the head gear representing the cobra, or the headband of the snake. The head from the sides, are sloped between the shape of a snake and a man. In other pictures where there is a dog's head on a human body the pictures are not in proper proportions to be taken as wearing a mask of any kind. They therefore represent animals heads on human bodies. Where do these ideas come from ? Could a dog run faster on a human body ? Could a man think better with a dogs intelligents ? Again these ideas have no logical reasoning behind them, but seem to relay another way of thinking, alien to the rest of mankind. The Egyptian hieroglyphics are just as alien, not following language development in the same manor, as the rest of the world. But rather seem to be a cosmic code in simple picture representation. So as to be followed by whatever race of beings, that might find these left clues. However hieroglyphics is impractical for keeping modern precise records, and the reason why no one uses this type communications, in the world as its main language. This form of communication was only intended to relay its simple message to its discoverer. Is it possible, that at the time of the creation of man, when the earth was dark and covered with water, that the Giza plateau laid complete, under the water ? Where the great pyramids and sphinx, waited as planed by their builders, to reveal their secrets ? Waited with other monuments, and huge markings in stone, that can be seen from great heights, from different worldly locations, for the sole purpose of preserving the knowledge, of some lost civilization ? |