Solutions:
We use the Tukey - Kramer Procedure for unequal sample sizes.
There will be 3 possible pair wise combinations:
C(C-1) / 2 or 3(3 - 1) / 2
LEVEL OF MANAGERS |
SAMPLE
SIZE |
MEAN |
HIGH
LEVEL |
5 |
7.6 |
MID
LEVEL |
7 |
8.86 |
LOW
LEVEL |
6 |
5.83 |
Tukey - Kramer Formula:

For High and Mid Level Comparison:
3.67 x sqrt of [1.26/2 (1/5 + 1/7)]
critical difference of 1.71
The actual difference between high and mid level managers is 7.6
- 8.86 = 1.26. 1.26 is less than the
critical difference of 1.71 therefore
there is no significant difference between the means of high and
mid level
managers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For High and Low Level Comparison:
3.67 x sqrt of [1.26/2 (1/5 + 1/6)]
critical difference of
1.76
The actual difference between high and
low level managers is 7.6 - 5.83 = 1.77.
1.77 is greater than the
critical difference of 1.76 therefore
there is a significant difference between the means of high and
low level managers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Mid and Low Level Comparison:
3.67 x sqrt of [1.26/2 (1/7 + 1/6)]
critical difference of 1.62
The actual difference between mid and low
level managers is 8.86 - 5.83 = 3.03.
3.03 is greater than the
critical difference of 1.62 therefore
there is a significant difference between the means of mid and low
level managers.
Summary Table:
PAIRINGS |
CRITICAL
DIFFERENCE |
ACTUAL |
INTERPRETATION |
HIGH
AND MID |
1.71 |
1.26 |
not
significant |
HIGH
AND LOW |
1.76 |
1.77 |
significant |
MID
AND LOW |
1.62 |
3.03 |
significant |
There is a significant difference in evaluations
between high and low managers and mid and low managers only.
Back to: Finals Main Page
|