Home
Index

Contents

On this page...

Why be ashamed of Australia?
Australians do not care about greenhouse
Statements from celebrities
Statement by Sir William Deane
Statement by 43 former leaders
Reasons for pride in Australia?
Some Australians are exemplary
Change Australia
Useful links
Neither of the big political parties will do much about greenhouse/climate change, vote smart.
 

Ashamed to be Australian?
Change Australia!

Fight for a more moral Australian government

Created 2004/11/04, modified 2009/09/25
Feedback welcome; email daveclarkecb@yahoo.com

I am ashamed to be Australian. I feel I must apologise when I communicate with people of other nations (except the USA, whose people have even more cause for shame than Australians).

 
Dying gums
Dying gums at Crystal Brook, where I live.

This may be due to a natural long dry period, or it may be climate change. How much must we loose before our Government decides that greenhouse is a serious problem?
Perhaps the worst single act any national leader can make is to involve his/her country in an unjust and unnecessary war. Prime Minister Howard involved Australia in the Iraq war. Far worse, the Australian people voted him in as our national leader again after he had done this. There was no more justification for the invasion of Iraq than there was for Nazi Germany's invasion of Czechoslovakia and Poland – the acts that started World War II.

Are the majority of the people of my country immoral, stupid, or just ignorant?

Both of the major Australian political parties seem to me to be morally empty, their interaction with the Australian people revolves around how they can win more votes and get into, or hold onto government. I doubt that the word 'ethics' would mean anything to any of their senior members. They seem to be serving only themselves, the wealthy of this country, the big corporations, and the USA.

Why is the Howard Government involving Australia in the 'American Way' in international relations: bombing and terrorising to try to achieve short-sighted national aims?

Worst of all, Australia and Australians are producing far more greenhouse gasses than people in the rest of the world – even more than USians. This is not just a crime of our government, most individual Australians are similarly culpable.

Hope for improvement

On 24th November 2007 the Australian people resoundingly voted the anti-environment and war-mongering Howard Government out of office and replaced it with the Labor Rudd Government. Rudd and the Labor Party promise a much more responsible stand on greenhouse/climate change, and they are somewhat less inclined to blindly follow the US administration – although still highly value the US aliance.

There is good reason to believe that the new government will not be so bad as the old. Will it be possible to once again be proud of being Australian? That remains to be seen.
Home
Top
Index





Why should one be ashamed of being Australian?

 

International relations the US way

Compare to International relations the humane way, below
Fallujah (Iraq) burning during the seige of November 2004
Fallujah burning
For more see Failings of Australian Governments.

A very informative article on the Iraq War of 2003 is given in Wikipedia.

Bombing and terrorising other nations is the American way, it never was the Australian way – until the John Howard government.
Home
Top
Index





Australians do not care about greenhouse

On 2006/03/18 I took a folding chair down to the main road (Clare to Blyth) in front of my place for an hour and ten minutes to get a record of the traffic going past. I should say that it was a Saturday and the day of a state election – this would have had some effect on the mix of traffic. I have tabled a summary of the traffic below.

Type/Number of occupants12 3>3Total
Small car30 003
Medium car105 0015
Large car4623 2172
Large 4WD125 0017
Large car with caravan0 200 2
Large 4WD with caravan0 100 1
Totals71 3621 110

Notes on the table

The numbers following 'Small car' indicate that there were three cars with one occupant, zero cars with two occupants, etc., etc.
My estimates of car sizes go something like this: small, <1 tonne; medium, 1-1¼ t; large 1½ t; large 4WD, 2 t.
I did not record large commercial vehicles.
Some of the large 'cars' were utilities (pick up trucks) that had at least a partial load.
There were no pedestrians, bicycles, or motorbikes.
There were no busses (there are four busses a week available to pick up passenges going past my property).
4WD = four-wheel-drive = SUV

All the cars I saw, other than the utilities, could have taken at least four people, some could have taken eight. Apart from one or two of the utes, not one of the total 110 had a full load of passengers; 65% of the cars I saw contained only the driver. Not counting the towing vehicles, about 160 tonnes of vehicles went past carrying about 147 people; if the average weight of an occupant was 70kg that is 160 tonnes of vehicles carrying 10 tonnes of people (a payload ratio of only 0.0625).

If the people I recorded cared about how much greenhouse carbon dioxide they were releasing into the atmosphere why did 72 drive large cars and only three drive small cars? (Few of these people could claim to not know about the greenhouse/climate change problem. It had been well publicised for years. They would also have to know that vehicle emissions increase with vehicle size.) (See Eat half the cake.) Why were there no pedestrians or cyclists? (Clare is 5km away from where I did this survey; I frequently ride a bike, and sometimes walk, into town.)

This is another reason that I am ashamed to be Australian. On the other hand, I have no reason to believe that Australians are more selfish than are non Australians. Probably most people would behave in the same way if placed in the same situation. Perhaps I should say that I am ashamed to be a member of the human race?

Can John Howard (and George W. Bush) be blamed for their irresponsible stands on greenhouse when the common people are unwilling to modify their behaviours?

Of course this is not the only evidence that Australians give a very low priority to the environment. A low percentage of Australians vote for political parties that are strong on environment, and the major parties have found that they will get more votes by promising tax cuts or pay rises rather than by promising to do more for the environment.


Home
Top
Index





Statements from celebrities

In late November 2004 I started a campaign asking celebrities for short statements on how they felt about the Australian Government's stance on greenhouse and its unquestioning support for the belligerent policies of the US Bush Government.
The Australian government has taken the wrong side on climate change and the wrong side in George Bush's "war on terror". As far as both social and environmental justice are concerned, it has become part of the problem.
Received from George Monbiot, 2004/12/02
George Monbiot is a UK journalist and author who writes on many issues of international concern.
On the day that the invasion of Iraq began I said on air, on the ABC, that I was ashamed to be an Australian. Nothing that has happened since has made me feel any better about being a citizen of a nation that acts as a satrapy of the US. Australia now follows the US slavishly on all matters, from war to the environment. Australia joins the US in refusing to outlaw torture. It joins the US in supporting the Israeli 'security' fence. It goes wherever the US orders it to go. And now, with the infamous free trade agreement, the nation signs away its last vestige of independence and autonomy. I am deeply ashamed.
Terry Lane, received 2004/12/18.
Terry is a journalist and well known in Australia for his weekly radio session, 'In the National Interest'.
A concern about ourselves must start with a caring about children and young people and ensuring that we do not damage for the future the land and the seas that are so much part of our Australian identity.
Dr. John Yu, Australian of the Year, 1996; received 2005/02/21

So few responses was disappointing. The response from one person, who was a researcher attached to a university, indicated a fear that making a statement might prejudice the chances of further research grants from the government. Another person rang me and expressed equally grave concern to mine, but I did not hear from this person again.

It seems to me that there is a fear of speaking out against the government because of possible consequences.
Home
Top
Index





A statement by Sir William Deane, former Governor General

From an article by Duncan Macfarlane in The Australian, 2003/05/30

In a wide-ranging address at the University of Queensland, Sir William said the nation would "surely lose its way" if future leaders ran the country as badly as the present (Howard) Government.

He said untruth was evident in the children overboard affair when the federal Government falsely claimed in the lead-up to the November 2001 election that asylum-seekers had thrown their children into the water from their boats.

He spoke of "the denial of the fundamental responsibility of a democratic government to seek to safeguard the human rights of all its citizens, including the unpopular and the alleged wrongdoer in the case of two Australians indefinitely caged without legal charge or process at Guantanamo Bay jail."

Alluding to the federal Government's refusal to ratify the Kyoto Protocol on global warming, Sir William said young Australians must "make good our failure as a nation to do enough to help safeguard the world environment for future generations".

He said the Government must do more to reduce income inequality. "There is the challenge to face up to the completely unacceptable yet growing gap between the haves and the have-nots in this the land of the so-called fair go for all," Sir William said. "The plight of the disadvanataged, even in affluent Australia, is an overwhelming problem which no one of us who has a voice to speak, or the means to help, can in conscience ignore."






Reasons for pride in Australia?

International relations the humane way

Compare to International relations the US way, above
My Thuan Bridge, otherwise known as the Friendship Bridge; over a branch of the Mekong delta in Vietnam. This project was partly funded by Australian aid.
My Thuan Bridge
Photo thanks to "Travel to Vietnam"
I don't want to be entirely negative. There are points about which one can take pride in being Australian...
Home
Top
Index





Change Australia

What can you do to help change Australia for the better; so that you will not have to be ashamed of your country?

What can you do?

Refer to main text for more details

  • Write letters to newspapers;
  • Write to, or telephone, or visit your federal parliamentary representative;
  • Join a political party and do your little bit to change it for the better;
  • Only vote for people you respect;
  • Stand for parliament yourself;
  • Write an Internet page about your local member of parliament;
One of the more unorthodox acts that I have resorted to was to post a book on personal ethics to my local MP. It was probably ignored, but who knows?
It's worth working on our politicians. The independents and those in the minor parties have consciences. I fear that those in the big parties have mostly got their conciences under control, but they might have a heart in there somewhere, there's always hope, remember Darth Varda! See the example letter below.

I believe a big part of the problem is that Australians (and Americans) don't, or can't, put themselves in the position of the people who we are oppressing. If we can make Australians see the situation from, for example, an Iraqi's point of view, that is a step toward fixing the problem.

Express your opinion, you can write to newspapers. Most people will either understand your feelings and simpathise with you, or will totally miss your point, but there may be a few who will start to think about it because of your letter.

My role-models are the students of one of the Melbourne universities, I think it was Monash. When they first started protesting against the Vietnam war back in the sixties I thought that they were close to being traitors. I gradually came around to their opinion. Someone has to be first, even if others think that person is a nut at the beginning.

Whatever you do, don't vote for one political candidate because you think that he/she is not quite so bad as the main party alternative. And party loyalty is a big part of the reason that we, and the USA, have the terrible governments that we are lumbered with. Look into all the candidates. Learn what the parties stand for. Perhaps join a political party, you can work to improve them from the inside. Find a candidate who you can respect. If all else fails, nominate as a candidate yourself (I have done so), or even start your own party.

Perhaps organising a few friends to put together some placards and demonstrate in front of your local MP's office might be more your style? The main thing is to do something! Apathy is as much the enemy as are bad politicians.

An example letter that you might like to modify and send to your local member if he/she is Liberal or National Party

This is a slightly edited copy of a letter that I sent to my local MP and about 10 local newspapers on 2004/11/18. You can probably improve on it or think of other ways to prick someone's conscience. Be polite and not insulting; this can be difficult when you feel disgusted.

The Editor, Dear Sir/Madam;

Open letter to [politician's name], Federal Parliamentary member for [name of electorate].

The prestigious journal, The Lancet, has published a study concluding that 100 000 Iraqi civilians have died from the hostilities since the beginning of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. I don't know how many politicians in the UK and USA voted for the war, but for the sake of an estimate I will suppose that there were 200 in the UK and 300 in the USA. There must have been about 85 Liberal members of the Australian House of Representatives, including you, who went along with the invasion. We can therefore lay the responsibility for the 100 000 dead Iraqi civilians on about 585 politicians. Your share, then, is 100 000/585=171 innocent dead people.

Do you feel that you are responsible for the deaths of these 171 Iraqi civilians? If not, can you please explain why you should not be considered responsible?

The Weapons of Mass Destruction that were the main justification for the war have not been found.

The war was illegal according to the UN. Ie. Iraq posed no immediate threat to Australia, the USA, or the UK; and the UN Security Council did not approve of the invasion.

There was never any credible evidence that Iraq was connected with terrorist groups.

Any unbiased observer would have to conclude that the war has increased hatred and mistrust for the Coalition, and therefore it would have increased the threat of terrorism against Australia and Australians.

The USA has sold off Billions of dollars worth of Iraqi assets to pay for 'reconstruction'; a reconstruction that would not have been needed but for the invasion.

Finally, Iraq seems as far from being a peaceful democratic nation now as it was before the invasion. (As the latest example, Medecins sans Frontieres (MSF) has just announced that it is pulling out of Iraq because their people are now at too much risk.)

Do you believe that the war was morally justified?

Yours faithfully...



Don't forget to give your name and address, newspapers cannot print letters if they don't have the name and address of the sender. You can ask that they do not print your name and address, but that might make it less likely that they will print your letter.

The Lancet article which refers to the 100 000 deaths among Iraqi civilians mentioned above can be read on The Lancet Internet site. You will have to register to read it, but this is a simple matter.





Produce an Internet page about your local politician

You could write an Internet page on which you could record the letters that you have sent to your local Federal Member of Parliament and his/her answers.

It doesn't need to cost you anything. You could improve on my example. Contact me at the email address at the top of this page if you would like me to help.

Home
Top
Index





Some Australians are exemplary

Some Australians do care deeply about greenhouse and climate change. I suspect that they are usually unwilling to talk about what they do to reduce their greenhouse impact because they don't want to be seen as bragging.

An example I came across recently (Jan. 2007) was Lorraine Saunders of Crystal Brook who said only a little in her speach accepting the Crystal Brook Citizen of the Year Award. You can learn a bit more by 'reading between the lines' of her speach.

I knew that Lorraine prefers to walk or ride a bicycle rather than drive whenever she can. I didn't know, nor did she mention in her speach, that she and her husband, Geoff, have 30 solar photovoltaic panels on their roof and have solar water heating. They are committed to minimising their environmental footprint.

I thought that there were only two people who had any solar photovoltaic panels in my small town, but now I wonder how many others I do not know about. How many people buy 'green electricity' in Crystal Brook? I would love to know.

If only many more Australians were half as responsible as the Saunders. If only the Australian government was as responsible.

Home
Top
Index





Statement by 43 former leaders

STATEMENT FOR THE MEDIA BY A CONCERNED GROUP OF FORMER SERVICE CHIEFS AND AUSTRALIAN DIPLOMATS

TIME FOR HONEST, CONSIDERED AND BALANCED FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICIES

August 8th, 2004
We believe that a reelected Howard Government or an elected Latham Government must give priority to truth in Government.

This is fundamental to effective parliamentary democracy. Australians must be able to believe they are being told the truth by our leaders, especially in situations as grave as committing our forces to war.

We are concerned that Australia was committed to join the invasion of Iraq on the basis of false assumptions and the deception of the Australian people.

Saddam's dictatorial administration has ended, but removing him was not the reason given to the Australian people for going to war. The Prime Minister said in March 2003 that our policy was "the disarmament of Iraq, not the removal of Saddam Hussein". He added a few days before the invasion that if Saddam got rid of his weapons of mass destruction he could remain in power.

It is a matter for regret that the action to combat terrorism after 11 September 2001, launched in Afghanistan, and widely supported, was diverted to the widely opposed invasion of Iraq. The outcome has been destructive, especially for Iraq. The international system has been subjected to enormous stress that still continues.

It is of concern to us that the international prestige of the United States and its Presidency has fallen precipitously over the last two years. Because of our Government's unquestioning support for the Bush Administration's policy, Australia has also been adversely affected. Terrorist activity, instead of being contained, has increased. Australia has not become safer by invading and occupying Iraq and now has a higher profile as a terrorist target.

We do not wish to see Australia's alliance with the United States endangered. We understand that it can never be an alliance of complete equals because of the disparity in power, but to suggest that an ally is not free to choose if or when it will go to war is to misread the ANZUS Treaty. Within that context, Australian governments should seek to ensure that it is a genuine partnership and not just a rubber stamp for policies decided in Washington. Australian leaders must produce more carefully balanced policies and present them in more sophisticated ways. These should apply to our alliance with the United States, our engagement with the neighbouring nations of Asia and the South West Pacific, and our role in multilateral diplomacy, especially at the United Nations.

Above all, it is wrong and dangerous for our elected representatives to mislead the Australian people. If we cannot trust the word of our Government, Australia cannot expect it to be trusted by others. Without that trust, the democratic structure of our society will be undermined and with it our standing and influence in the world.




The list of those who have agreed to the text follows:

Military

Admiral Alan Beaumont AC, former Chief of Defence Force;
General Peter Gration AC, former Chief of Defence Force;
Admiral Mike Hudson AC, former Chief of the Navy;
Vice Admiral Sir Richard Peek, former Chief of the Navy;
Air Marshal Ray Funnell AC, former Chief of the Airforce;
Air Vice Marshal Brendan O'Loughlin AO former head of Australian Defence Staff, Washington;
Major General Alan Stretton AO, former Director General National Disaster Organisation;

Departmental Heads and Diplomatic Representatives

Paul Barratt, AO, former Secretary Dep. Defence and Deputy Secretary DFAT;
Dr John Burton, former Secretary of Dep. External Affairs and HC to Ceylon;
Dr Stuart Harris AO, former Secretary of Dep. Foreign Affairs and Trade;
John Menadue AO, former Secretary of Prime Ministers Department and former Ambassador to Japan;
Alan Renouf, former Secretary Dept. Foreign Affairs, Ambassador to France, Ambassador to US;
Richard Woolcott, AC, former Secretary of Dept. Foreign Affairs and Trade, Ambassador to the United Nations, Indonesia and The Philippines;
Dennis Argall, former Ambassador to China;
Robin Ashwin, former Ambassador to Egypt, Soviet Union and Germany;
Jeff Benson, former Ambassador to Denmark and Iceland;
Geoff Bentley, former Ambassador to Russia and Consul General HongKong;
John Bowan, former Ambassador to Germany;
Alison Broinowski, former Charge d'Affaires to Jordan;
Richard Broinowski, former Ambassador to Mexico, Korea and Vietnam;
John Brook, former Ambassador to Vietnam and Algiers;
Ross Cottrill, Executive Director Australian Institute of International Affairs;
Peter Curtis, former Ambassador to France, CG New York and High Com. India;
Rawdon Dalrymple, AO, former Ambassador to United States, Japan, Indonesia and Israel;
Malcolm Dan, former Ambassador to Argentina and Chile;
Stephen Fitzgerald AO, former Ambassador to China;
Geoff Forrester, former Deputy Secretary Department Foreign Affairs and Trade;
Robert Furlonger, former Director General ONA and Head of JIO and Ambassador to Indonesia;
Ross Garnaut, AO, former Ambassador to China;
Ian Haig AM, former Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE;
Robert Hamilton, former Ambassador to Mexico, El Salvador and Cuba;
Cavan Hogue, former H.C. to Malaysia, Ambassador to Thailand, and United Nations (Security Council);
Roger Holdich, former Director General of Intelligence and Ambassador to Korea;
Gordon Jockel, former Chairman of the National Intelligence Committee and Ambassador to Thailand and Indonesia;
Tony Kevin, former Ambassador to Cambodia and Poland;
Peter Lloyd, AM, former Ambassador to Iraq;
Alf Parsons, AO former High Commissioner to United Kingdom, High Commissioner to Singapore, Malaysia;
Ted Pocock AM , former High Commissioner to Pakistan, Ambassador to France and Morocco, the Soviet Union, Korea and the EU;
Peter Rogers, former Ambassador to Israel;
Rory Steele, former Ambassador to Iraq;
H. Neil Truscott AM, former Ambassador to Iraq;
Ron Walker, former Special Disarmament Adviser, Ambassador to the UN, Geneva, Ambassador to Austria and Chairman of the Board of Governors IAEA;
Home
Top
Index





Useful links

Which electorate do you live in? Who is your local member of federal parliament?
Parliament of Australia, House of Representatives

What local papers are there?






Index

On this page...
An Internet page about your local politician
Australians do not care about greenhouse
Change Australia
Example letter to Coalition politician
International relations the US way
International relations the humane way
Reasons for pride in Australia?
Some Australians are exemplary
Statement by 43 former leaders
Statement by Sir William Deane
Statements from celebrities
Top
Useful links
Why be ashamed of Australia?
Home
Top
Home
Top