i'm not crazy, i'm just a little unwell.

the crouching tiger realm: information files  

-- basics -- >history --  life and times -- opinions -- articles -- consolidation -- literature -- humor --

- main site  -- links  --mailing list -- guestbook -- admin

 

 

 

opinions

definition • he's not in the mafia? • explaining the triads • about seeing ghosts • why jinchuu became that way • why Enishi 1 • why Enishi 2 • suffering from enishi-itis • top ten lists

Some analysis of why Jinchuu was orchestrated that way: without hitting the Kenshin-gumi (who are directly related to Kenshin), and without going on a grander or lesser scale than necessary.

(Kamorgana)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/all_about_yukishiro_enishi/message/414

Except for Kaoru, no one actually very close to Kenshin had been directly a target of the attacks.

Megumi is a very close friend of Kenshin, moreover, she is a good doctor, and depriving Kenshin of that advantage would have been a good strategical move (and our DearDevil is definitely into strategy, ne?). She was also a very easy target...

Since the people having what I consider as an irrational hate towards Enishi (not dislike, this is different) are mainly motivated by the fact that he hurt Kenshin and kidnapped Kaoru, I was
wondering whether the fact that the direct innocent victims of Jinchuu (Tae/Uramura keiji) were not main characters was a move of Watsuki to limit the popularity damage made to Enishi?

If he had attacked characters with a bigger fanbase, or very familiar to the readers, like Megumi, Misao, Tsubame, or even Sano, and especially in a "traitorous" way, wouldn't have it been more difficult to like him?

Personally, the attacks against Tae and Uramura Keiji are the ones that I have the most difficulties to forgive, they are completely exterior to the problem between Kenshin and Enishi. I can understand why Enishi used Kaoru to get back at Kenshin, and the resent that he has towards her as his sister's replacement. I think that Enishi is entitled to hate Kenshin (and again, I don't condone his methods, let's be clear). The fights between the Companions and the Kenshingumi/Saitoh were direct confrontations, so they are different than unilateral attacks...to me, at least (^-^).

OTOH, I'm not sure that I would have been so understanding if Megumi or Tsubame (to take one that I don't like, as it has nothing to do with the "favorite or not" problem here (^-^)), who aren't fighters, had been direct targets of Jinchuu...

So I tend to think that Watsuki might have used the very secondary characters to show Enishi's determination and the blindness of his hate, while trying to avoid to make him completely evil, and irredeemable, from the very start.

(Mary Ann)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/all_about_yukishiro_enishi/message/417

It’s true that the fact that Enishi doesn’t go after the other Kenshingumi, helps us understand him, accept his choices and like him. If he had started attacking absolutely everyone, then he would have seem like a total madman and the readers would have had way more difficulties accepting him. In fact, he would have lost his humanity, hence making it hard to find him sympathetic. That is the force of the villains in RK: they are not totally evil, they have a purpose clearly explained and they do not kill, only for the thrill of it.

In Enishi’s case, it’s particularly evident. After the first two brutal attacks Watsuki could have chose to go on with that trend, but he didn’t and that’s a good thing for us, Enishi fans. But did Watsuki make that choice consciously or not? I would be more than tempted to say that it was unconscious.

When you read Watsuki’s free talks in the manga, he always complains about the fact that is villains are not evil enough and he deplores the fact that readers even comes to love them most than some of the Kenshingumi members. Then, during the revenge Arc, he constantly says that he wanted to correct that aspect of his work during Jinchuu and that he wanted to portray pure evil villains, hence Enishi’s little group of friends. Then, according to Watsuki’s sayings, Enishi should be like them. In fact, Watsuki even says that he wanted Enishi to be a "terminator". And he goes farther saying that the companion should have existed and that Enishi should have been all alone against the Kenshingumi. Then, he adds that like this, Enishi would have been a more attractive character.

Can I disagree with Watsuki, for once? Hopefully, Watsuki failed once more to portray a pure evil villain, as he says. Watsuki loves complex characterisation and that’s the great thing about his work. I’m glad he didn’t listen to what his mind told him. (^-^)