Science has two rules: (a) everything you know is wrong (q.v. Firesign Theatre and (2) facts adjust themselves to fit theories and philosophies, not the other way around. Which is why Derrida is having such a heyday right now. Anyway, the second most important socially contextualized scientist EVER is of course Mr. Charles Darwin, who invented out of his own mind a small archipelago inhabited by weird birds and lizards, and likewise created a hermaphroditic barnacle (do you really think a puritanical Creator would have made such disgusting things? Maybe s/he was just lazy). I don't even want to know why Darwin would discover (that is, visualize and thus create in our consensual reality) such loathsome creatures. Nevertheless, that is what he found, and we are stuck with it, until someone more inventive comes along. Why couldn't someone imagine silk trees that giver rise to fruit that look like Salma Hayek once in a while? Is that too much to ask?
Again, El Físico Nuclear convinced Jefferson that the Great Chain of Being was a metaphysical atemporal construct which actually existed, in a vain attempt to teach Jefferson the concept and structure of DNA (had he understood this idea, perhaps he would have prevented his hypocrisy from coming to light). It was this belief in the Great Chain of Being which led, indirectly, to the Lewis and Clark expedition.
The theory of the Great Chain cannot be held in the mind at the same time as the idea of extinction of a species--indeed, these concepts cannot even co-exist in the same sentence (whoops). This incompatibility is due to the fact that the Great Chain theory holds that every species is a link in the chain, and that the Creator would not allow any part of this continuum to be lost. Given this premise, it was a logical conclusion that the remains of mammoths found in Virginia had living relatives on the plains of America, somewhere. Lewis and Clark were sent to investigate the lands to the west, and Jefferson hoped that these behemoths would be found there.
Dr. Science is indeed a true son of El Físico Nuclear. Not in the sense that he carries The Physicist's genfo--at least, not more than any of us do--but in that he explains science in a way that makes sense to everyone. The fact that he, like Stanton Friedman, has only a Master's degree, and is therefore not a real doctor, is perhaps the reason that he can explain such ideas as the Aurora Borealis, quarks, and Spam in ways that we can all understand. Furthermore, he also occasSionaly features information on turning your home into a laboratory. So go ahead--Ask Dr. Science!
Strange Magazine is slicker and more trendy, but just as insightful!


Member of the Science
Humor Webring
[
Previous
5 Sites
|
Previous
|
Next
|
Next
5 Sites
]
[ Random
Site
|
List
Sites
]