Mainstream media didn't report it, of course, but the Bush family owns Kuwaiti oil wells. And, if sources are correct, including those who were in the CIA, Bush (while president) ordered the CIA to burn oil wells that Hussein was blamed for by the media.

Anyway, the reason I mention this is I now wonder just how crooked the government of this nation is. What if every cover-up, if every crooked deal, if every cent of graft, was exposed? What if every con perpetrated by the federal government against the people of this nation and their liberty was exposed?

President John F. Kennedy once threatened Congress with telling the American people the truth.

The result? Ten days later he was assassinated.

Martin Luther King was getting a huge following even though he was black at a time when this nation was still under extreme overt prejudice between white and black. As his following grew, as his words and philosophy made greater sense to greater numbers of people, he became an increasingly serious threat to the power of the two major parties.

The result? He was assassinated.

Bobby Kennedy worked against the graft of unions and the like. He also had a huge following as he believed strongly that individuals could overcome injustice and oppression. He worked for social justice and human rights (work that continues to this day through the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial).

The result? Not only was he assassinated but an intense cover-up of his assassination was conducted by the Los Angeles Police Department. The facts were easy to cover-up since his murder did not fall under federal jurisdiction as candidates aren't covered under federal jurisdiction.

There are hundreds, perhaps thousands or hundreds of thousands of people for more studied than I am in government since I just became seriously interested in the latter part of 1995. Then, interest became intensified nearly to obsession as to the operations of government, including cover-ups, government cons against the American people, anti-Constitutional legislation, and the like, in the last two to three years after coming upon case after case of government exceeding it limitations.

Even though I am a relatively novice, there are a few things I am quite certain of beginning with the fact that this Republic is designed for the people to be in control with government subservient to them.

However, it seems as if the federal government is in control now with the people subservient to it. In example, examine the tax codes. As you well know or should know, income tax is in direct opposition to the Constitution and the government designed the system with the intent to defraud.

Then, the government conmen essentially removed the right of due process by law which allows the IRS to circumvent the 5th Amendment, and protects the IRS rather than the citizen.

As if that is bad enough, you may look until Hades freezes over and you will NOT find any legislation that legally establishes the Internal Revenue Service as a government agency. The closest it gets is a renaming of a trust bureau in Puerto Rico, the Internal Revenue Bureau, a bureau that also was not established as an agency by Congress and was in Puerto Rico only.

Special Note: For more information concerning the lack of jurisdiction of the IRS over the American public, go to: "BATF/IRS --Criminal Fraud" by William Cooper, CAJI News Service (Exclusive)

Law enforcement agencies violate people's rights and numerous amendments daily in all parts of the country. And, even if innocents are killed, there is usually not any action taken against the agencies or the individuals perpetrating actions against innocents.

Actually, I have read many cases but yet have found one in which the enforcement people were convicted of murder or manslaughter even though openly admitting their first response is to shoot to kill so as to 'protect' themselves. Kind of a "shoot first, ask questions later" attitude.

Isn’t it rather strange that armed marauders breaking into innocent people’s homes would consider an old man sleeping on his sofa as “life-threatening”? This happened to Mario Paz, a 65 year old who had withdrawn his life savings because of fear of losing them due to the Y2K scare. Too bad he didn’t know it would result in his murder.

And, too bad his murderers weren’t hung up by their thumbs to die a slow death with their feet on a fire-ant hill in central Texas.

We have the constitutional right to go where we wish as long as we do not interfere with the rights of others, such as violating their property and their rights as property owners. We can freely go from state to state without interference. Of course, this is based on the Constitution of the united States of America being obeyed. Legally speaking, any interference, such as be blocked or stopped without cause is a form of kidnapping.

So, who the devil gave the right to law enforcement people to stop citizens, ask for identification, search their vehicles, throw them to the ground and treat them worse than animals are permitted to be treated?

Who in Heanven's name gave them the right to confiscate innocent citizen's property, throw them in jail, deny them due process of law and, if that is not enough, keep the bounty and divide it amongst the participating cops, prosecuting attorneys, and judges who “handle” the cases?

Who allows these crooks in disguised as law enforcement officers, prosecuting attorneys of criminals, and judges who effectively represent the judicial system of this nation to get away with the atrocities committed by these clods who are far worse criminals than most of those in prison since they do it under the guise of such things as the war against drugs, stopping crime, and the like?

Somehow, judicial, law enforcement, and officers of the courts are protected in every case above and all those which exist. Is this for purposes of crime prevention or the war against drugs, and, if so, on what premise?

What legal right does any person wearing or carrying a badge have to break into your property, whether it be your home, your vehicle, or your person? The truth is - Absolutely NONE!!

I currently have a case going against the government of the city in which I live. There is a "junk law" by which the city assumes the authority to tell people what they may have on their property. The Fourth Amendment is violated by any law enforcement person coming onto my property and seizing any property of mine which I keep on my property.

The city manager tried to justify it by the Tenth Amendment. Obviously, this is based on not understanding that this amendment does not give any level of government the right to write any law in opposition to the Constitutution of the United States of America.

Nor is it understood that the Constitution protects the rights of the individual. Not once in the Constitution is it stated that the inalienable rights of the individual may be circumvented by the majority without ratification and repeal of an existing amendment.

Therefore, unless the city has managed to repeal the Fourth Amendment, it is acting in a criminal fashion against me.

Most Americans are convinced they must have a social security number and participate in social security. Well, that simply isn’t the truth and is, if fact, in opposition to the Constitution of the united States of America. It is beyond the powers of Congress or any other government body to force any person to be involved in any form of citizen benefits.

Congress may not dictate it, nor may the place you work, nor bank, nor any other activity that involves identification. All that is permitted is the establishment of you as a citizen of one of the 50 states and a birth certificate or any other single form of identification will suffice.

Acts by government affecting God-given rights as stated in the Constitution of this Republic are routinely conducted by government. Get this clear - Congress may not enact any legislation repugnant to the Constitution of this nation, nor may any State legislature, nor any County, nor any City, nor any township. The rights of the individual are guaranteed by the Constitution, not the ‘wishes' of the majority.

I now wonder if National Security is really concerned with 'national security', meaning the defense of the 50 states, or just the security of those in power? To date, it seems the big fear of government is that We, the People, will find out the depth of corruption that actually exists.

In truth, as the use of the Internet increases the knowledge of those who use it, I suspect this is a major fear of those in the United States Congress and other government agencies, whether legally established or not.

Thus, we can expect government to start trying to get control of the World Wide Web. It, along with the powers in government in other countries, do not want knowledgeable people. They, instead, want people to remain in ignorance or act as if ignorant of the supreme law of this nation, the Cosstitution.

Most people tend to blame government for all the wrongs that are committed against the people. But, is that really the case? Is government to blame? Let’s examine that.

We live in a Republic which means we elect people to represent us in a centralized, federal government. The federal government has the basic duties to protect the Constitution, promote the well-being of the people, and provide for the common defense of the (now) 50 sovereign states.

The government is subservient to the people of the states, not the other way around. Thus, the responsibility of the people is to remain vigilant over those they elect to represent them, to assure they do as limited by the Constitution in performing duties. It requires the people not only recognizing but responding to wrongs by taking immediate action against those they elect.

Otherwise, the system is corrupted and no longer a Republic. It begins resembling a totalitarian government with the government stating any edict and the people jumping as if the order is valid.

Generally, any edict by the government removes rights of the individual while doing nothing to protect the rights specified in the Constitution. People must not only recognize that liberties are being affected but take action to assure this does not occur, regardless of any rhetoric spouted by people in government. And, for sure, if the government thinks it is a good idea, then it is almost certain that it will negatively affect the well-being of the people and liberty.

You see, the government is determined to have complete control with the people subservient. It is a self-serving entity and we were amply warned by the founders of this nation that any lack in vigilance would result in government gaining complete control over the people.

So, who must shoulder the blame for our country one or two steps away from a complete totalitarian government? It’s us - We, the People - people who are simply too busy, too lazy, too ignorant, or all of the above to get involved and establish once and for all that government is subservient to the people.

And, do you know what else? That is exactly what those who keep getting re-elected regardless of their lack of morals, ethics, the frauds they commit, and of the multiple violations of their oaths of office rely on.

If you want change, you haven’t any option other than learning the facts the government of this nation would rather you didn’t know. And, then, regardless of the effort necessary, begin acting to restore this nation as a complete Republic.

I now do so because I personally do not ever want to pledge allegiance “...to the flag of the United States and to the Government for which it stands...” instead of “...to the flag of the United States of America and the Republic for which it stands ...”.

How about you? Are you up to it or would you rather just complain, then sit back, watch the boob tube, mindlessly vote, and let government remove every liberty free people should have?

(Special note: I have read the two flags are different although I can't find exact proof. I read the flag of the government, the United States Government (an independent corporation, by the way), which is housed only in the District of Columbia and is NOT a geographical part of any state making up the united States of America, has a gold fringe around it.

Since it is foreign to the union, then it makes sense it could not have the same flag. It matters little if the US Government flies the flag of the Union of States as it does many things that are not correct.

The flag representing the states joined in union, The Republic of the United States of America, does not have the fringe.)

Having My Say
Letters And Essays
1999 Articles

Next Article