Terrorism in mexico
Destroy a totalitarian state. terrorism in mexico Terrorist attack prediction. Destroy the new world order. Exterminate an ethnic group. '"The majority of the analysts interviewed say that the motivations behind these new "demons of violence" do not apply to the traditional terrorist organizations like the Irish Republican Army (IRA), the Basque separatist group ETA, or Hezbollah. terrorism in mexico 9-11 terrorist attack photos. Summarizing a thought shared by many, Jenkins says, "The traditional terrorist groups see themselves as liberation armies and not criminals. They don't jump the moral barrier of indiscriminate mass killings, with or without weapons of mass destruction. On the contrary, they have political reasons not to kill indiscriminately because they don't want to lose their support and popular sympathy, or they want to avoid a strong reaction from governments. terrorism in mexico Terrorism in mexico. When we look at past terrorist attacks, we see that terrorists could kill many more people if that was their intention. "Or as Greg Gerardi, a former researcher of the Monterey Institute of International Studies says, "The traditional terrorists fought for a cause and not to make enemies. "But there are those who disagree with this distinction between terrorists, the idea that some would never resort to the use of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons while others would. "The IRA, Hamas, the Jihad could use weapons of mass destruction in specific scenarios if they have a strategic purpose for doing so, like eradicating the enemy," Kyle Olson says. "If, for a nuclear nation, it is rational sometimes to use a nuclear weapon, then why isn't it to a terrorist group when what is at stake is their survival or a very important goal?" Chances of acquiring weapons of mass destructionIf experts in the field are in almost total agreement in foreseeing several scenarios that could lead to the use of weapons of mass destruction, they do not agree about the chances for violent groups actually acquiring the production capacity to create these weapons. They also draw distinctions between the components of the "nbc triad" of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, and agree that nuclear weapons are the most difficult to acquire and deliver, while chemical weapons are the easiest. "In the case of chemical weapons, it is easy to get access to the technology," says Neal Pollard, an analyst with Science Applications International Corporation. "The same does not apply to biological weapons because the distribution is very controlled. "Brian Jenkins agrees: "The technical knowledge to produce chemicals is relatively low, but the same is not true of biological and nuclear. ""The difficulty with these kinds of weapons is storing and delivering them with efficacy.
Terrorism in mexico
Ireland || Conversational-terrorism || Terrorism psychology || Terrorism in southeast asia